(The Catholic Christian Community Bible [first English edition 1997, other translations into Indonesian, Chinese, Cebuano, Chavacano, French, Ilonggo, Korean, Quechuan, Spanish, and Tagalog] “for the Christian Communities of the Third World” uses the following introduction.)
Judges for us is a book of beautiful stories: Deborah, Gideon, Samson and Delilah, Jephthah and his daughter, and towards the end the woman cut into pieces and the priest who sets his own business with the idols of his patron. These narratives that were passed on as popular stories serve as imaged history of an epoch which, although important, is not well known. How were the nomadic Hebrews, who entered Palestine after Moses, able to settle down as simple tillers of the land? And how were they to maintain their identity as a people chosen by God?
The land of Canaan with its fertile plains was most attractive; as was its religion—close to nature where sexual liberty was calmly accepted. Foreign entrants to the country were quickly at home in their new environment. What would become of the intransigent religion of an invisible God? These were dark ages from every point of view, when one might conclude that the fire of Mt. Sinai was truly extinguished.
The liberators
What was to save the future for the tribes of Israel, was first of all, the aggressiveness of several among them (we have in mind the tribe of Ephraim whose feats are related in the book of Joshua); another factor was their being oftentimes at the mercy of plunderers and other nomads from the desert hoping to take their place. They remained faithful to Yahweh, having experienced on many occasions his saving intervention.
In their difficulties, the Israelites, unorganized and divided into rival camps, were to group themselves around the judges of tribes or around emerging born-leaders of the people, sometimes simple peasants but capable of achieving remarkable victories (see chapters 4 and 5).
These men are known in history as the “Shofetim,” a word that means both “chiefs” and “judges.” We must remember that in Hebrew culture and even in the Gospel, the word “to judge” also means “to govern” (Mt 19:28). For that reason those who may have never been members of a tribunal are called “judges.” Perhaps we should understand the word “judges” in another way: these persons were the instruments of God’s justice. The judges were not saints in the meaning we ordinarily give this word. Nevertheless Israel saw in them the saviors that God in his mercy was sending. To slay an enemy chief or kill the Philistines is no longer a religious act for us. If we keep in mind their time and their milieu, these persons had faith and were courageous amidst much cowardice. In awakening the passivity of their companions, they were preparing for a new phase of their history.
The coals under the ashes
The reading of the Book does not give us a very lofty idea of the moral and religious level of the Israelites of that time when the traditional framework of the family and the nomadic tribe was losing its value. Yet a profound renewal was underway. Two words showing this transformation enter the religious vocabulary: heritage and sanctuary.
Heritage: now nomads have their land. He have to see it as a gift from God, cultivate it, and they have to hand it down to their children. Their whole religion is going to be linked to the land that God has given to them and that they will keep as long as they remain faithful.
Sanctuary: the Israelites who never had a Temple in the desert discover the places of worship of the Canaanites. So, they too would get used to gather in places of worship where the Levites, the priests, keep the sacred traditions and the teaching of Moses.
The example of a period when everything is being rediscovered is very interesting to us at a time when the moral and religious structures that our parents experienced are collapsing. We may think that under the layer of the triumphant materialism, many things are developing, and that they are preparing the rebirth of a Christianity that is more aware of itself in an urbane, planetary, post-industrial and post-modern society.
Down below are the introductions in the Mandarin Chinese, Tagalog, Cebuano, and Spanish editions.
Isang aklat ng magagandang kuwento ang Mga Hukom para sa atin: sina Debora, Gideon, Samson, Delila, si Yefte at ang kanyang anak na babae, at huwag nating kalimutan sa huling bahagi ang babaeng pinagputol-putol, ang paring bumawi sa pamamagitan ng mga diyus diyusan ng kanyang tagapagtaguyod. Ang mga salaysay na ito na ipinasa bilang mga popular na kuwento ay nagsisilbing isinalarawang kasaysayan ng isang panahon na bagamat mahalaga ay hindi tanyag. Paano nanirahan bilang mga simpleng magsasaka ang mga lagalag na Hebreong pumasok sa Palestina pagkamatay ni Moises? At paano nila naingatan ang kanilang pag kakakilanlan bilang bayang hinirang ng Diyos? Talagang kaakit-akit ang mayayamang kapatagan ng lupain ng Kanaan; gayundin ang relihiyon nito - malapit sa kalikasan at panatag na tinatanggap ang kalayaang sekswal. Madaling nakibagay ang mga dayuhan sa kanilang bagong kapaligiran sa lupain. Anong nangyayari sa di nakikipagkompromisong relihiyon ng di-nakikitang Diyos? Panahon ito ng kadiliman kahit paano tingnan, na maipapalagay na ang apoy ng Bundok Sinai ay tuluyang namatay.
Ang mga Tagapagpalaya Ang nagliligtas sa kinabukasan ng mga tribu ng Israel, una sa lahat, ay ang pananalakay ng marami sa kanila (nasa isip natin ang tribu ng Efraim na ang mga kabayanihan nito ay isinasalaysay sa aklat ni Josue); ang isa pang dahilan ay ang panganib na malimit nilang hinaharap sa kamay ng mga mandarambong at iba pang mga lagalag mula sa disyerto na gustong umagaw sa kanilang puwesto. Nananatili silang tapat kay Yawe, sa pagdanas nila sa maraming pagkakataon ng kanyang pagliligtas.
Sa kanilang mga kahirapan, ang mga Israelitang di-organisado at nahahati sa magkakaribal na kampo, ay nagkakasama-sama sa pamumuno ng mga hukom ng mga tribu o ng mga lumilitaw na mga pinunong-likas ng bayan, mga simpleng magbubukid kung minsan pero may kakayahang umani ng malalaking tagumpay (tingnan ang mga kabanata 4 at 5).
Tinawag nilang Sofetim ang mga taong ito, salitang nangangahulugan ng pinuno at hukom.
Kaya nakagawian nang tawaging Mga Hukom ang mga pinunong ito na kailanma'y hindi naupo sa hukuman. Pero dapat sigurong intindihin ang salitang "hukom" sa ibang kahulugan: ang mga taong ito ang naging mga instrumento ng katarungan ng Diyos.
Translation: Cebuano
Sa nakapadayag na ang Diyos sa kaugalingon kang Moises sa Sinai, naghulagway ang Mga Maghuhukom og kalibotang dili kaayo masanagon. Ayohon ta nig basa aron madiskobrehan ang natagong himaya nga natisok dinhi. Human sa talagsaong kasinatian sa Exodo, ang Mga Maghuhukom nagtudlo nga ining kalibotana karon, dili masinati ang matuod nga kagawasan gawas kon makigbisog ta aron pag-angkon ini. Pagtulon-an ni sa atong kasinatian. Kay bisag nagdala nato si Cristo sa kalingkawasan, gikinahanglan gihapon ni sa pagtahan sa kaugalingon ug pagsakripisyo alang sa mithi nga atong gipakabililhon. Busa, bisag naangkon na sa atong katigulangan ang nasodnong kalingkawasan, gikinahanglan gihapon nga makigbisog ug andam tang mosakripisyo alang sa katungod nato sa pagpakabuhi.
Sa sinugdan ining basahona, milampos ang mga Israelita sa pag-angkon sa labing biniyaan nga kabungtoran sa Canaan ug maibogon silang naglantaw sa tabunok nga patag nga gipuy-an sa mga pagano. Bisan pa ini, sulod sa kapid-an ka siglo sa pagbinantay sa mga karnero, inanay silang nangahimo nga gagmayng mag-uuma sa nahimutangan nilang pinuy-anan. Nagkahulogan nig lawom nga kausabang katilingbanon; ug sama sa bisag unsang kausaban, mahitabo gyod nga mogula ang krisis sa bag-ong mga bili ug panglantaw.
Ang Mga Maghuhukom naghatag og espesyal nga gibug-aton sa tintasyon sa pagsimba og mga diosdios. Ang mga mag-uumang Kananeo may madahinong tinoohan nga nagsaulog sa mga pwersa sa kinabuhi ug maayong ani. Sa mga pangilin naghiusa sila ug nagbansay sa ritwal sa balaang panghilawas diin nangamuyo sila sa ilang mga dios, sa mga baal, nga panalanginan sila alang sa ulan ug abundang ani. Ining kasaulogana, lisod makadumili ang mga Israelita sa pag-apil sa paganong mga silingan.
Gawas pa, ang mga Israelita biktima sab sa lainlaing matang sa pagdaugdaog nga nakapasamot sa ilang pag-antos.
Ang mga Manluluwas
Ining kahimtanga sa mga Israelita isip katawhang nabahinbahin ug wala magkahugpong, may mitumaw nga mga pangulo sa taliwala nila nga kasagaran taga bukid. Sa pipila ka higayon nasinati nila ang daghang kadaogan (basaha ang mga ulohan 4 ngadto sa 5).
Naila sila nga Sofetim sa ato pa, mga pangulo o maghuhukom. Mahitabo nga may mga pangulo nga wala mangatungdanan sa husgado, apan gitawag og Maghuhukom. Apan kahatagan og laing kahulogan ang “maghuhukom”: mga dalan sila sa hustisya sa Diyos.
Ang mga Maghuhukom dili santos. Apan bisan pa ini, giila sila sa Israel nga mga manluluwas, gasa sa kaluoy ni Yahweh. Tinuod nga dili diyosnong buhat ang pagpatay sa pangulo sa kaaway o sa mga Pilisteo. Apan kon lantawon nato ang ilang palibot, nagpakita silag kaisog ug pagtoo taliwala sa katawhan diin naghari ang katalaw. Gisugdan nila ang laing yugto sa kasaysayan pinaagi sa pagbuntog sa nagpasulabing kahadlok sa ilang kaigsoonan.
Ang bayanihong mga buhat sa mga Maghuhukom malipayong gibalikbalik og handom sulod sa daghang katuigan, hangtod nga nahimong kasugiran. Apan, ang tagsulat nga naghiusa ining mga istoryaha sa usa ka basahon, nakamatngon sa kumon nga mga rason nga nakalangay sa kalingkawasan.
Nakamatikod siya ining han-aya sa mga hitabo:
– Ang mga Israelita mibiya ni Yahweh ug misimbag mga diosdios.
– Busa, gitugyan sila ni Yahweh sa mga kaaway.
– Ang mga Israelita miila sa ilang kasaypanan ug misangpit ni Yahweh.
– Unya, si Yahweh mituboy og manluluwas.
Apan sa naangkon na nila ang kadaogan ug human sa dyotayng kalinaw, malimot na pod sila sa ilang misyon. Ining kalibotana, dili makab-ot ang piho ug hingpit nga kalingkawasan.
Translation: Spanish
Los Jueces son para nosotros un libro de bellas historias: Débora, Gedeón, Sansón y Dalila, Jefté y su hija, sin olvidar al final a la mujer cortada en trozos ni al sacerdote que se aviva con los ídolos de su patrón. Pero estas historias transmitidas como relatos populares no hacen más que poner en imágenes la historia de una época tan importante como desconocida. ¿De qué manera los hebreos nómadas que entraron en Palestina después de Moisés se transformaron en un pueblo de pequeños agricultores? Y ¿cómo guardaron su identidad de pueblo elegido por Dios?
La tierra de Canaán, con sus fértiles praderas, lo tenía todo para seducir; lo mismo ocurría con sus religiones, cercanas a la naturaleza y donde la libertad sexual se expresaba con la mayor tranquilidad. Todos los pueblos que habían entrado allí se habían fundido con ella; ¿qué pasaría con la religión intransigente del Dios que no se ve? Fueron sin duda siglos oscuros desde cualquier punto de vista, en los cuales durante mucho tiempo se pudo pensar que el fuego del Sinaí se había extinguido.
Los libertadores
Lo que va a salvar el porvenir de las tribus de Israel será, por una parte, la agresividad de varias de ellas (pensemos en la tribu de Efraím cuyas campañas son narradas en el libro de Josué), y, por otra, el hecho de que con frecuencia estuvieron a merced de merodeadores y de otros nómadas venidos del desierto. Pero permanecieron fieles a Yavé porque en muchas ocasiones tuvieron la experiencia del Dios que salva.
En medio de sus dificultades, los israelitas, desorganizados y divididos en grupos rivales, se reagrupan alrededor de los “jueces” de tribus, o jefes innatos surgidos del pueblo, a veces campesinos que obtendrán grandes victorias (véanse Jue 4,1 y 5,1).
Esos hombres pasaron a la historia como los “sofetim”, una palabra que designa tanto a jefes como a jueces. Hay que saber que en la cultura hebrea, e incluso en el Evangelio, la palabra “juzgar” quiere decir también gobernar (Mt 19,28). De ahí que se llame jueces a hombres que no han tomado jamás parte en un tribunal.
Las brasas bajo la ceniza
La lectura del libro no nos da una idea muy elevada del nivel moral y religioso del Israel de aquel tiempo en que los marcos tradicionales de la familia y de la tribu nómada perdían su valor. Sin embargo se estaba gestando una renovación profunda. Dos palabras que muestran esa transformación: heredad y santuario, entran en el vocabulario religioso,.
– Heredad: el nómada tiene ahora una tierra. Deberá considerarla como un don de Dios, cultivarla y transmitirla a sus hijos. Toda su religión estará ligada a la tierra que Dios le ha dado y que conservará en la medida en que sea fiel.
– Santuario: los israelitas, que nunca tuvieron un templo en el desierto, descubren los lugares de culto de los cananeos. Se van, pues, a acostumbrar a agruparse también en lugares de culto en donde los levitas, los sacerdotes, guardan las tradiciones sagradas y las enseñanzas de Moisés.
Este ejemplo de un período en que se redescubre todo, está lleno de interés para nosotros en un tiempo en que se derrumban todas las estructuras morales y religiosas en que habían vivido nuestros padres. Podemos pensar que bajo la capa del materialismo triunfante están madurando muchas cosas que preparan el renacimiento de un cristianismo más consciente de sí mismo en una sociedad urbana, planetaria y postindustrial.
EL LIBRO DE LOS JUECES
Como los libros de Josué, de Samuel y de los Reyes, el libro de los Jueces es parte de la historia de espíritu profético redactada por los llamados “deuteronomistas”: ver la Introducción a Josué.
Al autor del libro se deben los dos primeros capítulos en que desarrolla su interpretación de los hechos que sucedieron durante los primeros tiempos de la penetración de los israelitas en Palestina. Luego ordenó una serie de historias en que cada tribu conservaba el recuerdo de sus héroes. Las juntó de tal forma que estos héroes aparecieran como los salvadores de todo Israel, y luego las puso como ejemplos de lo que quería enseñar: el pueblo no puede salvarse y vencer a sus enemigos si no demuestra su fidelidad a Yavé.
Es difícil encontrarle una estructura al libro de los Jueces. Se nota la diferencia entre los llamados pequeños jueces y los grandes jueces. Los primeros son jefes de clan cuya actuación desbordó los límites de su parentela y cuya autoridad fue reconocida por su tribu. Los grandes, en cambio, parecen haber sido personajes carismáticos que protagonizaron proezas militares en la lucha contra los propietarios del país o, al revés, contra los nuevos inmigrantes.
(The Catholic Christian Community Bible [first English edition 1997, other translations into Indonesian, Chinese, Cebuano, Chavacano, French, Ilonggo, Korean, Quechuan, Spanish, and Tagalog] “for the Christian Communities of the Third World” uses the following introduction.)
Around the year 630, Zephaniah’s breaks the silence of the seventy year lull during which they had not heard the word of God. Isaiah concluded his mission around 690, and after that the faithful of Judah went through more than fifty years of persecution in the reign of Manasseh.
Down below are the introductions in the Mandarin Chinese, Tagalog, Cebuano, and Spanish editions.
Mga taong 630, binasag ng tinig ni Sofonias ang katahimikan pagkaraan ng pitumpung taong hindi naririnig ang salita ng Diyos. Mga taong 690 nang matapos ni Isaias ang kanyang misyon, at pagkatapos niyon, mahigit sa limampung taon ng pag-uusig sa ilalim ng paghahari ni Manases ang dinanas ng mga sumasampalatayang taga-Juda.
Translation: Cebuano
Sa mga tuig 630, ang tingog ni Sofonias mibuak sa kahilom, human sa 70 ka tuig nga wala madungog ang tingog sa Ginoo. Si Isaias mitapos sa iyang misyon sa tuig 690, ug human adto, ang mga matoohon sa Juda miagi sa kapin sa 50 ka tuig sa panglutos sa paghari ni Manases.
Translation: Spanish
En el año 630, más o menos, la voz de Sofonías vino a romper el silencio después de sesenta años en que no se había oído la Palabra de Dios. Pues Isaías terminó su misión alrededor del año 690 y después los creyentes del país de Judá conocieron más de cincuenta años de persecución con el reinado de Manasés.
Sofonías habla para decir que la paciencia de Yavé no soporta más y que va a purificar a Jerusalén, destruyendo a su pueblo, que no confía en él.
Pero también Sofonías anuncia la voluntad de Yavé de formar un «pueblo de pobres» en medio de los cuales vivirá: Dios saltará de gozo y danzará con alegría por Jerusalén humilde y purificada.
(The Catholic Christian Community Bible [first English edition 1997, other translations into Indonesian, Chinese, Cebuano, Chavacano, French, Ilonggo, Korean, Quechuan, Spanish, and Tagalog] “for the Christian Communities of the Third World” uses the following introduction.)
1 Maccabees：Introduction
After Ezra and Nehemiah the Judean province, at the extreme end of the Persian empire, lived on the fringes of history for three centuries. Those with greater initiative dedicated themselves to trading and left their country to settle in all the urban centers around the Mediterranean. Yet, one hundred years after Nehemiah, in 333 B.C., Alexander the Great began to chart the Middle East countries, defeating all the enemy armies and overthrowing the kings. Although he died when he was thirty years old, his triumphs opened the way for the spread of Greek culture with its longing for growth, its confidence in human potential and its open spirit which surpassed national individualism.
Alexander’s generals parceled out his huge empire among themselves. The Ptolemies, who dominated Egypt and Palestine, were understanding and did not disturb the Jews for the sake of their religion and customs. But when the Antiochians of Syria defeated the Egyptians in 197 and took Palestine away from them, they began to impose their pagan religion on the Jews.
This fierce persecution caused the uprising of the Jews headed by the Maccabean family. The first book of Maccabees – acknowledged as one of the most perfect books of ancient history — relates the events in the war and the deeds of the five Maccabean brothers, from the year 170 to 130 B.C.
Holy War, Liberation War
The book of Maccabees shows us a people who desire to live but for whom faith is more valuable than even life itself. When all have become accustomed to living without conflicts, persecution begins. Many are convinced they can do nothing against such a great power and that the risks are too great to overcome. Then the Spirit of God engenders new heroes through whom people recover their sense of dignity, fighting for those rights that make them fully human and true believers.
The Jewish people found themselves alone against their oppressors, and their Roman allies were not much help. They relied on their own strength and God helped them in their efforts.
The Maccabean wars are models of holy wars. They also proved that holy wars do not solve everything. Caught up in military problems and in political games, the Maccabees’ descendants soon became materialistic and were despised or opposed by true believers.
Down below are the introductions in the Mandarin Chinese, Tagalog, Cebuano, and Spanish editions.
Matapos ang panahon nina Esdras at Nehemias, tatlong dantaong nabuhay sa pinakagilid ng kasaysayan ang probinsya ng mga Judio sa pinakadulong hangganan ng imperyo ng Persia. Itinalaga ng mga mas masigasig ang kanilang sarili sa pagnenegosyo, at iniwan ang kanilang bayan para manirahan sa lahat ng sentrong siyudad sa palibot ng Dagat Mediterraneo. Pero sandantaon pagkatapos ni Nehemias, sa taong 333 bago kay Kristo, nagsimulang maglibot si Alejandrong Dakila sa mga bayan sa Gitnang Silangan, nilulupig ang lahat ng kalabang hukbo at ibinabagsak ang mga hari. At gayong tatlumpung taong gulang siya nang mamatay, ang kanyang mga tagumpay ang nagbukas ng daan para sa kulturang Griyego na may hangaring umunlad, may tiwala sa kakayahan ng tao at mas bukas na diwang nalalampasan ang makasariling nasyonalismo.
Pinaghati-hatian ng mga heneral ni Alejandro ang malawak niyang imperyo. Maunawain ang mga Tolomeong naghahari sa Ehipto at Palestina kaya hindi nila ginulo ang mga Judio nang dahil sa kanilang relihiyon at mga kaugalian. Pero nang malupig ng mga Antioko ng Siria ang mga Ehipsiyo sa taong 197 at maagaw ang Palestina, marahas nilang ipinagpilitan ang kanilang paganong relihiyon sa mga Judio.
Ang malupit na pag-uusig ang siyang naging sanhi ng pag-aalsa ng mga Judio na pinamunuan ng angkan ng mga Macabeo. Kinikilalang isa sa pinakamagaling na mga libro ng matandang kasaysayan ang Unang Aklat ng Mga Macabeo. Isinasalaysay nito sa atin ang mga pangyayari sa digmaan at mga kabayanihan ng limang magkakapatid na Macabeo mula sa taong 170 hanggang 130 bago kay Kristo.
Digmaang Banal, Digmaan ng Pagpapalaya
Ipinakikita sa atin ng libro ng mga Macabeo ang isang bayang naghahangad mabuhay ngunit mas pinahalagahan nila ang pananampalataya kaysa sariling buhay. Kung kailan nakasanayan na ng lahat ang buhay na walang problema, saka naman dumating ang pag-uusig. Marami ang kumbinsido na wala silang anumang magagawa laban sa isang napakalakas na kapangyarihan, at napakahirap makipagsapalaran. Pero nagpapalitaw ang Espiritu ng Diyos ng mga bagong bayani, at salamat sa kanila’t nababawi ng bayan ang dangal nito, at naipaglalaban ang mga karapatang saligan ng pagkatao at ng pagsampalataya.
Nakita ng sambayanang Judio na nag-iisa sila laban sa mga umaapi sa kanila, at hindi sila gaanong natulungan ng mga kakampi nilang Romano. Kaya sa sarili nilang lakas sila umasa, at tinulungan naman sila ng Diyos.
Ang mga pakikidigma ng mga Macabeo ay halimbawa ng mga digmaang banal na puno ng kabayanihan at katatagan, at ng pagsaklolo ng Diyos. Pero ipinakikita rin nito na hindi kayang lutasin ng banal na digmaan ang lahat. Bunga ng pagkasangkot sa mga problemang militar, at mula rito’y sa pamumulitika, ang mga inapo ng mga Macabeo ay agad na naging materyalista hanggang sila’y maging isang partido at mga pinunong walang pananampalataya ni moralidad.
Translation: Cebuano
Human ni Esdras ug Nehemias, ang lalawigan sa Juda nga nahimutang sa kinalay-ang bahin sa Persianong imperyo, morag napadaplin na sa kasaysayan sulod sa tulo ka siglo. Ang uban nila nga hilig sa negosyo, mibiya sa ilang yuta aron mopuyo sa mga dagkong syudad libot sa dagat sa Medeterraneo. Hinuon sa tuig 333 B.C., 100 ka tuig human ni Nehemias, gisugdan ni Alejandro Magno ang pagsulong sa mga nasod sa Tungatungang Silangan; iyang gipukan ang mga gingharian didto. Bisag namatay siya sa panuigong 30 anyos, ang iyang kadaogan naghatag og kahigayonan aron pagsabwag sa Griyegong kultura uban sa tinguha nga motubo ni, masaligon sa tawhanong posibilidad ug uban sa kadayag sa espiritu nga molabaw kay sa nasodnong pag-iya-iya.
Gibahinbahin sa mga heneral ni Alejandro ang lapad nga imperyo. Ang mga Tolomeo, nga nag-okupar sa Ehipto ug Palestina, masinaboton kaayo busa, wala nila hilabti ang mga Judio nga mobansay sa tinoohan ug magpuyo sumala sa ilang kultura ug batasan. Apan dihang gipukan sa mga Antioko sa Siria ang mga Ehiptohanon sa tuig 197, ug giilog ang Palestina, ilang gipugos ang mga Judio pagtuman sa pagano nilang kultura ug tinoohan.
Kining bangis nga pagpanglutos nagtukmod sa mga Judio sa pag-alsa, pinangulohan sa banay sa mga Macabeo. Ang unang basahon sa mga Macabeo giila nga usa sa labing hingpit nga basahon sa karaang kasaysayan nga naghan-ay sa panghitabo sa gubat nga gipasiugdahan sa lima ka igsoong Macabeo, gikan sa tuig 170 ngadto sa 130 B.C.
Balaang Gubat, Gubat sa Kalingkawasan
Gipakita kanato ining basahon ang katawhan nga buot mabuhi, kang kinsa ang pagtoo mas bililhon kay sa kinabuhi mismo. Dihang naanad na ang mga tawo sa pagpuyo nga walay panagbangi, nagsugod sab ang panglutos. Daghan ang naghunahuna nga wala silay mahimo batok sa usa ka higanti ug gamhanang nasod. Apan ang Espiritu sa Diyos nagpagula og bag-ong mga bayani, ug salamat nila, nabalik sa katawhan ang pagtamod sa ilang dignidad, nakiggubat sila alang sa mga katungod nga kon wala pa ni, wala untay mga magtotoo ug mga tawong isog nga mobarog.
Nakita sa mga Judio nga nag-inusara sila batok sa mga manlulupig, ug ang mga Romanong mga alalay, dyotay rag gikatabang. Busa, misalig sila sa kaugalingong kusog ug gitabangan sila sa Diyos.
Ang gubat nga gilusad sa mga Macabeo modelo sa balaang gubat. Apan nakita sab nila nga ang balaang gubat dili makasulbad sa tanang problema. Tungod sa ilang pagkahikot sa mga problemang pangmilitar ug ingon man sa mga duladula sa politika, ang mga sumusunod sa mga Macabeo nahimong sobra nga pakikwarta, hangtod nga gipadagan nila ang nasod nga himulag sa pagtoo ug pamatasan.
Translation: Spanish
Después de Esdras y Nehemías, la provincia judía, sector extremo del imperio persa, se quedó durante tres siglos y medio al margen de la historia. Los de mayor iniciativa se dedicaron al comercio y salieron de su país para establecerse en todos los centros urbanos, alrededor del mar Mediterráneo.
Sin embargo, una revolución silenciosa ya estaba afectando los países del Oriente Medio. La cultura griega llamada helenismo, penetraba los ambientes del comercio, los poderosos y los sacerdotes. Propulsada por sus realizaciones artísticas y su eficiencia en el terreno económico, pregonaba la confianza en las posibilidades del hombre, la supremacia de la razón, la superación de los indidualismos nacionales, presentando con esto un serio desafío a la cultura y la fe de los judíos.
El año 333 a.C, Alejandro Magno, dueño de Grecia, empezó a recorrer los países del Medio Oriente, derrotando a todos los ejércitos enemigos. Cuando murió a la edad de treinta años, dueño del imperio persa, sus generales se repartieron sus conquistas. La provincia judía, en un comienzo, perteneció a los Tolomeos establecidos en Egipto, que se conformaron con sacar de ella el máximo de impuestos, apoyándose en las familias ju días mas pudientes, ya conquistadas por el helenismo.
En el año 197 los Antíocos de Siria vencieron a los egipcios y les arrebataron Palestina. Más tarde pretendieron unificar a la fuerza los pueblos que dominaban, imponiéndoles el helenismo con su educación, sus prácticas y sus dioses. Una crisis profunda se produjo entonces en Israel: mientras unos preferían conseguirse los favores del poder, la persecución causó un levantamiento de creyentes encabezados por la familia de los Macabeos.
El primer libro de los Macabeos, reconocido como uno de los más perfectos de la historia antigua, nos relata los sucesos de la guerra y las hazañas de los cinco hermanos Macabeos, del año 170 al año 130 a. C.
Guerra Santa, guerra de liberación
El libro de los Macabeos nos muestra a un pueblo que considera su fe más preciosa que la existencia. Cuando la mayoría se convence de que nada se puede hacer contra un poder tan fuerte y que los riesgos son demasiado grandes, el Espíritu de Dios hace surgir nuevos héroes y, gracias a ellos, el pueblo recobra el sentido de su dignidad, luchando por unos derechos sin los cuales no hay hombres ni creyentes.
El pueblo judío se encontró solo frente a sus opresores, y sus aliados romanos le ayudaron muy poco. Contaron con sus propias fuerzas y Dios los ayudó.
Las guerras de los Macabeos fueron un modelo de la guerra santa en que no faltaron el heroísmo y la constancia, ni menos aún la ayuda de Dios. Pero también demostraron que la guerra santa no lo resolvía todo. Arrastrados por los problemas militares y por los juegos políticos, los descendientes de los Macabeos se materializaron muy pronto, llegando a ser unos gobernantes sin fe ni moralidad.
(The Catholic Christian Community Bible [first English edition 1997, other translations into Indonesian, Chinese, Cebuano, Chavacano, French, Ilonggo, Korean, Quechuan, Spanish, and Tagalog] “for the Christian Communities of the Third World” uses the following introduction.)
Who were the Galatians? Galatia was a northern province of today’s Turkey. Once Paul had stopped there (Acts 16:6) when an illness had prevented him from pursuing his journey (Gal 4:13-14). He had visited the Galatians again (Acts 18:23) before settling in Ephesus (Acts 19:1) and he had asked them to help the poor in Jerusalem (1 Cor 16:1).
Paul is writing because the community is in danger. Strangely enough, Paul does not make any reference to scandals, laxity or to conflicts of authority, as it was the case in Corinth. There were tensions and doubts as some people wanted to go back to Jewish practices. However, it seems that the community was not expecting such a warning from Paul. He had shown greater foresight. Some people wanted to return to religious practices because they had failed to understand that being Christian was primarily living one’s faith rather than practicing a religion.
For the Galatians, discovering the Gospel had been like a bath in freedom. Those who were Jewish were freed from the constraint of religious practices and those who were Greek (and pagan) were freed from the prejudices of their society: it was like a great cleansing. But were they able to follow Paul when he declared that Christ was able to fill our lives and that the Spirit is a much better guide than any religious obligations?
At first, the Galatians had experienced what was at the core of Paul’s life. But the community found it difficult to maintain itself along such a new line. After their initial enthusiasm, most of these new Christians felt a need for rules and practices. They did have faith in Christ but it was asking for a lot to want all of them to be’“spiritual” people.
It was precisely at that time that preachers of Jewish origin were exhorting them to be circumcised and to observe the customs of Israel (4:10) by promising them a life superior to the life obtained by conversion to Christ.
Belonging to Judaism would have brought material security to the Galatians since the Israelite religion was protected by Roman laws. If they refused both idolatry and the Jewish religion, they were running the risk of being persecuted (6:12-14). On the contrary, if they adopted the Jewish nationality and the customs of Israel, they would have avoided persecution but that would have been the same as saying that Christ had died for nothing (2:21).
This is the reason why Paul reacted passionately. All of us, Jews and pagans, are solely saved by the generosity of God who has forgiven our sins and who has given us, along with his Spirit, the freedom of love (5:13-14). When we give too much credit to the rules and practices of a religion, we are locking ourselves into a system, an order in which we expect, even without saying it, a reward for our good deeds. On the contrary, faith means surrendering to God and his mystery that is as awesome as its symbol, the cross. Faith also means believing that God wants the salvation of all human beings, regardless of their nationality (3:9).
This should be enough to understand that this letter to the Galatians is still addressing us in our time when so many people reduce religion to practices. Moreover, it is a fact that to the extent that the Church has to sustain many Christians who have a very limited experience of life in the freedom of the Spirit, it tends to bring itself to their level and to become a religion. This is why the Church has to regain the awareness of its identity and to rediscover the meaning of living by faith.
Down below are the introductions in the Mandarin Chinese, Tagalog, Cebuano, and Spanish editions.
Lahat tayo’y nagpapanggap na malaya. Ngunit ano bang ibig sabihin ng maging malaya? Ang mga tunay na malayang tao ay iyong mga inaakay ng malalim na inspirasyon ng Espiritu ng Diyos. Bawat Kristiyano’y dapat maging “inspirado” sa ganitong kahulugan. Gayunpaman, maraming bagay ang nagbabanta sa “kalayaang ibinigay ni Kristo sa atin”:
– Kalimita’y pinababayaan nating lumamig ang ating maalab na damdamin noong una nating makatagpo si Kristo at naramdaman nating kaya nating gawin ang kahit ano para sa kanya. At sinisimulan nating hubugin ang ating buhay ayon sa mga gawaing hindi makapapalit sa tunay na pag-ibig.
– Puwede rin namang mangyari na masyado nating hinahangaan ang mga halimbawa ng mga Kristiyano ng ibang panahon o ibang kalagayan. At kinokopya natin ang mga huwaran ng Kristiyanong pamumuhay na hindi katugma ng inaasahan ng Diyos sa atin, kaya hindi tayo pumupunta kay Kristo sa kabuuan ng ating pagkatao at paninindigan.
Malinaw ang lahat ng ito sa Sulat sa mga taga-Galasya. Ang mga paganong ito na napa-sampalataya ni Pablo ay nakinig pagkatapos sa mga Judiong nag-aakalang mga disipulo sila ni Kristo, ngunit hindi naunawaan ang Ebanghelyo. At sinasabi ng mga Judiong ito: “Pana-nampalataya kay Kristo, napakaganda nito! Ngunit mas mahalaga sa Diyos ang pagtupad ng mga tao sa lahat ng batas at kaugaliang panrelihiyon.”
Kaya ginawa ni Pablo ang napakarahas na sulat na ito: “Kung kilala ninyo si Jesus na ipinako at inaakay kayo ng kanyang Espiritu, ano pang kailangan ninyo?”
Sino ba ang mga taga-Galasya? Tinutukoy ang mga pamayanan ng Pisidia at Galasya. Sinasabi sa Gawa 13:13-14:25 at 16:6-6 ang tungkol sa pag-eebanghelyo sa kanila.
Translation: Cebuano
Kitang tanan nagpakaaron-ingnong gawasnon. Apan unsay kagawasan? Ang gawasnon mohimog desisyon dili pinasikad sa kaugalingong interes, kondili inagak sa mas lawom nga lamdag sa Espiritu sa Diyos, nga kanunayng nagdapit sa pagbag-o. Gilamdagan ini ang matag kristyano. Apan may duha ka butang nga naghulga sa “kagawasan nga gihatag kanato ni Cristo”:
– Kadaghanan nabugnaw ang kadasig sa unang paghimamat ni Cristo, ug sa iyang pagtulun-an nga nakapabuhat nato og bisag unsa alang niya. Ug giumol nato ang kinabuhi sumala sa balansayon nga dili makapuli sa matuod nga gugma.
– Usahay nadani ta sa kanhing panig-ingnan nga dili na tukma sa panahon o sa lahing kahimtang. Miawat ta sa mga sumbanan sa kristohanong pagpuyo nga dili mohaom sa gitinguha kanato sa Diyos, maong nalayo ta ni Cristo, sa tinuod nga pagkakita ug sa gihatagag bili.
Kining tanan naklaro sa Sulat alang sa taga Galacia. Ang mga pagano nga nakabig ni Pablo, nadala sa mga Judio nga nagpatoo nga mga tinun-an sila ni Cristo, apan wala makasabot sa Ebanghelyo. Gitudloan sila sa mga Judio nga nindot ang pagtoo ni Cristo, apan ang labing mahinungdanon sa Diyos: pagtuman sa tanang tulumanon, balaod ug batasan sa Judiong tinoohan. Kay gawas nga nasayran na ninyo nga si Jesus Judio, kinahanglang mosunod mo ug motuman sa pamaagi sa mga Judio: sa mga ritwal ug tulumanon, sa pagsimba ug pag-ampo; sa hunahuna ug panglihuklihok.
Nangusog si Pablo pagsulat: “kon nasayod mo nga gilansang si Jesus sa krus ug nga gigiyahan mo sa iyang Espiritu, nan unsa pay inyong gikinahanglan?
Kinsa man ang taga Galacia? Dili klaro kining ngalana, pwede kaayo nga katilingban sila sa Pisidia ug Galacia. Ang Mga Buhat 13:42 - 14:25 ug 16:1-6 naghisgot sa panahon sa pagwali didto.
Translation: Spanish
¿Quiénes eran los Gálatas? Este apelativo, tan poco preciso, tal vez indique a las comunidades de Pisidia evangelizadas por Pablo en su primera misión (H 13,22; 14,25; 16,1-3); o tal vez podría tratarse de otras comunidades que Pablo habría fundado más al norte, en la antigua Galacia, durante su segunda misión (H 16,6; 18,23).
Pablo escribe porque la comunidad está en peligro. Es algo extraño: no hace alusión a escándalos, ni a un relajamiento, ni a conflictos de autoridad, como ocurrió en Corinto. Había seguramente tensiones y dudas, ya que algunos se propasaban y querían volver a valorizar las prácticas judías. Sin embargo y según parece, ni los promotores de esa vuelta a la Ley, ni los que se les oponían, podrían haber esperado una advertencia semejante de Pablo. Pero su intención iba más lejos que ellos: los fieles piden de nuevo prácticas religiosas porque no han comprendido o porque han olvidado que ser cristiano no es ante todo practicar una religión, sino más bien vivir la fe.
El descubrimiento del Evangelio había sido para los Gálatas un baño de libertad. Los que eran judíos habían escapado así de la tiranía de las prácticas que marcaban toda la existencia. Los que eran griegos (y paganos) se habían liberado de una visión fatalista del mundo y de los prejuicios de su sociedad; ahí también la liberación se había hecho en la forma más radical. Mas, ¿eran capaces de seguir a Pablo cuando les participaba su propia experiencia? ¿Habían descubierto que Cristo es lo suficientemente grande como para llenar la existencia y que el Espíritu dirige mucho mejor que las obligaciones religiosas?
Durante un tiempo los Gálatas habían vivido lo mismo que vivía Pablo, pero era difícil que la comunidad se mantuviera en una línea tan nueva. Transcurrido el momento del primer entusiasmo, la gran mayoría de estos nuevos cristianos sintió la necesidad de reglas y prácticas. Tenían fe en Cristo, pero era demasiado pedirles que fueran todos «espirituales».
Además había allí gente que ofrecía una respuesta. Eran tal vez cristianos de origen judío que sabían lo bueno que es tener una ley. Aspiraban, por supuesto, a tomar la dirección de la comunidad, pero el capítulo 6 de esta carta nos da a entender que no eran totalmente desinteresados, ya que la vuelta a las prácticas judías les abría todas las puertas de la comunidad judía. Existía una solidaridad muy fuerte entre los judíos en un mundo que les era habitualmente hostil, y juntarse con ellos procuraba una seguridad real. Algunos prefe rían esta seguridad a la aventura de la fe y los riesgos que las comunidades cristianas enfrentaban en aquel tiempo.
La respuesta de Pablo es severa, y tal vez nos parecerá muy parcial y negativa con respecto a las prácticas religiosas —pero es palabra de Dios—. Dar demasiado crédito a las reglas y prácticas de una religión es encerrarse en un sistema, en un orden en el que se espera, aún sin decirlo, la recompensa por las buenas acciones. La fe, por el contrario, significa entregarse a Dios y a su misterio, tan temible como la cruz que es su símbolo.
Todo esto nos indica que esta carta a los Gálatas tiene hoy gran actualidad, pues son muchas las personas que andan en busca de certidumbres. Por otra parte, en la medida en que la Iglesia deba atender a muchos fieles que sólo tienen una limitada experiencia de la vida en el Espíritu, tiene siempre cierta obligación de ponerse a su nivel con ritos, preceptos y autoridades. Debe pues mantener clara o recuperar la conciencia de su identidad y al mismo tiempo redescubrir la vida por la fe.
(The Catholic Christian Community Bible [first English edition 1997, other translations into Indonesian, Chinese, Cebuano, Chavacano, French, Ilonggo, Korean, Quechuan, Spanish, and Tagalog] “for the Christian Communities of the Third World” uses the following introduction.)
When Everything Is Falling Apart
“A third of the people will die by plague and famine; another third by the sword, and I will scatter the rest everywhere; these I will also pursue and pour out my anger on them.” These are God’s words which prompted Ezekiel to announce the destruction of a holy people. Do these also apply to the present crisis in the Church?
In many countries in a short time the Church has lost its imposing facade of well-attended temples and rituals, a practicing majority, a faithful clergy who were present everywhere, the security of unquestioned faith and the universal obedience to the center: Rome. All is collapsing. Many people hoped that the renewal begun at the Council would produce quick results. Yet, every day what seemed to promise a secure future is disappearing.
Other words from Ezekiel come to mind: “I will not allow you to be a people like the rest, rather I will rule over you by force. I will gather you from among the nations and I will confront you. You will be under my authority.” Could God be calling on destructive forces? Could God be the one breaking down the human structures we believed to be the Church? Of course, something will remain, a remnant as Ezekiel puts it. That is to say, those whose faith will have been purified through trial and in whom the Holy Spirit will act with more freedom.
What was just said is enough to help us understand the value of the Book of Ezekiel for today. He was God’s witness in the final years of the kingdom of Judah, though living among those exiled in Babylon.
We will surely be surprised at the language he attributes to God. He shows God as venting his resentment and jealousy by continually threatening his people and taking delight in their predicament and agony. Would it be possible, however, to speak about love without mentioning jealousy and violence?
We also find jealousy and violence when God comes to conquer a sinful people. The husband goes looking for his unfaithful wife among her lovers and brings her back by force. Ezekiel’s excessive words must not make us forget other pages of the Bible where God expresses himself tenderly, but we cannot ignore them either, under the pretext that God is a good daddy. We may have experienced in our own flesh the misery of the sinner challenging God. Ezekiel’s role was to express the bitterness of sin and the anger of God.
The Book of Ezekiel
Ezekiel may have been a young priest taken to Chaldea with the ten thousand exiles after the first siege of Jerusalem in 598 (see 2 K 24:14). There he was called by God as he tells us (chapters 1 and 2). The first part of his book (chapters 1–24) contains his discourses predicting the total destruction of his country.
Down below are the introductions in the Mandarin Chinese, Tagalog, Cebuano, and Spanish editions.
“Ikatlong bahagi ng bayan ang mamamatay sa salot at gutom; isa pang ikatlo ang mabubuwal sa tabak; at ang malalabi nama’y pangangalatin sa lahat ng dako at uusigin ko pa rin ang mga ito at pagbubuntunan ng aking poot.” Ito ang mga salita ng Diyos na sinabi ni Ezekiel sa pagkawasak ng Bayang Banal. Magagamit din kaya ito sa kasalukuyang krisis ng Iglesya?
Sa loob ng ilang taon, nawala na sa Iglesya ang kahanga-hangang panlabas na anyo ng mga templo at mga seremonya, ang pagkarelihiyoso ng nakararami sa sambayanan, ang katapatan ng mga pari nito na nasa lahat ng dako, ang katatagan ng isang pananampalatayang di mapag-alinlanganan at ang pagsunod ng lahat sa Roma. Nabubuwag ang lahat ng ito. Maraming umaasa na magbubunga kaagad ang pagpapanibagong sinimulan ng Konsilyo. Ngunit naglalaho sa bawat araw ang waring pinakamahalagang magbibigay-katiyakan sa hinaharap.
Magugunita ang iba pang mga salita sa aklat ni Ezekiel: “Hindi ko maipahihintulot na kayo’y maging isang bayang tulad lamang ng iba; kundi sapilitan akong maghahari sa inyo. Titipunin ko kayo mula sa mga bayan at haharapin ko kayo. Sasailalim kayo ng aking kapangyarihan.” Hindi kaya tinatawag ngayon ng Diyos ang mga puwersa ng pagkawasak? Ang Diyos kaya ang nagbubuwal sa mga gawa-ng-tao na sa akala naman nati’y siyang Iglesya? May maiiwan siyempreng labi gaya ng sabi ni Ezekiel – silang ang pananampalataya’y dinalisay ng pagsubok at mas malayang magagalawan ng Espiritu ng Diyos.
Ang kasasabi ay sapat na para maintindihan ang kahalagahan sa ngayon ng aklat ni Ezekiel. Siya ang saksi ng Diyos sa mga huling taon ng kaharian ng Juda, bagamat nasa piling ng mga ipinatapon sa Babilonia.
Tiyak na magtataka tayo sa lengguwaheng iniuukol niya sa Diyos na laging nagbababala at parang nalulugod pa sa kagipitan at pagdurusa ng kanyang bayan bilang pagbibigay-daan sa kanyang galit at selos. Pero puwede kayang mangusap tungkol sa pag-ibig nang hindi binabanggit ang mga salitang selos at karahasan?
May selos at karahasan din sa pagsakop ng Diyos sa mga taong makalaman at makasalanan. Hinahanap ng asawa ang kanyang taksil na maybahay sa piling ng mga mangingibig nito at ibinabalik niya sa dahas. Ang may kalabisang pananalita ni Ezekiel ay hindi dapat makapagpalimot sa atin sa iba pang pahina ng Biblia kung saan ipinahahayag ng Diyos ang kanyang karinyo. Pero hindi rin naman natin maisasaisantabi ang mga ito sa pagdadahilang mabait na tatay ang Diyos. Maaaring naranasan na natin sa ating sariling laman ang kapighatian ng makasalanang humahamon sa Diyos: tungkulin ni Ezekiel na ibunyag na lahat ang pait ng kasalanan at ipagsigawan ang galit ng Diyos.
Ang Aklat ni Ezekiel
Malamang na isang batang pari si Ezekiel na dinalang bihag sa Kaldea kasama ng sampung libong ipinatapon makaraan ang unang paglusob sa Jerusalem sa taong 598 (tingnan ang 2 H 24:14). Doon siya tinawag ng Diyos gaya ng kanyang ikinukuwento sa atin (kab. 1 at 2).
Ang unang bahagi ng kanyang aklat (kab. 1-24) ay naglalaman ng kanyang mga pahayag na nagbabalita sa ganap na pagkawasak ng kanyang bayan.
Kasunod ng mga propesiya laban sa mga banyagang bansa (kab. 25-32), nasa ikatlong bahagi naman ng aklat ang mga pangako sa mga itinapon. Sapagkat ayaw ng Diyos na mamatay ang kanyang bayan.
May alam tayong mga lahing naglaho at mga dayuhang nakalimot sa sariling bayan sapagkat nakakita sila ng trabaho sa ibang bansa. Sa ganito rin sana mamamatay ang sambayanang Judio pagkaraan ng krisis na nagwasak sa Jerusalem. Nang nasa Babilonia sila, sa pagkakadeport sa isang mas maunlad na bansa, pinananabikan ng matatanda ang kanilang lupang tinubuan habang walang iniisip ang mga kabataan kundi samantalahin ang bago nilang kalagayan. Ngunit sa kanyang mapanghamong pagtuturo ay patuloy na hinuhubog ni Ezekiel ang konsiyensiya ng mga magsisiuwi sa Judea balang araw para itayo ang bagong kaharian ng Diyos (kab. 33-39).
Translation: Cebuano
Inigkabungkag sa Tanan
“Ang ikatulo ka bahin sa imong katawhan mamatay sa katalagman. Mamatay sila sa gutom sulod sa imong mga paril. Ang laing ikatulo mamatay sa espada gawas sa syudad. Ang kataposang bahin akong isalibay sa hangin ug gukdon ko sa akong espada nga gikuha na sa sakoban.” Kining mga pulonga sa Diyos ang gigamit ni Ezekiel sa pagpahibalo sa pagkalaglag sa balaang katawhan. Ikasulti ba ni nato bahin sa krisis sa simbahan karon?
Sa daghang kanasoran ang simbahan nawad-an sulod sa dyotayng panahon sa iyang bayhon nga makapataha, sa mga templo ug ritwal nga daghang manambong, sa kadaghanan nga nagbansay, sa kapariang masinugtanon nga naa sa tanang lugar, sa siguridad sa pagtoo nga dili ikapangutana ug sa pagtahod nga unibersal alang sa sentro, Roma. Kining tanan naghinayhinayg kalumpag. May daghang katawhan nga naglaom nga ang pagbag-o sa simbahan nga gisugdan sa konsilyo Vatikano mamunga dayon. Apan kada adlaw, ang morag nakapakitag dakong purohan sa sigurong kaugmaon, nagkawala.
Ang laing mga pulong ni Ezekiel moabot sa atong panumdoman: “Tapokon gikan sa daghan nga katawhan. Himoon tamo nga usa ka pundok gikan sa kanasoran diin kamo makatagkatag. Hatagan tamo sa yuta sa Israel.” Nagtawag ba kaha ang Diyos sa mga pwersang manglalaglag? Ang Diyos ba kaha ang naggun-ob sa mga istruktorang tawhanon nga atong gitoohan nga simbahan? Sa walay duda, duna gyoy mahibilin, ang salin sumala sa gisulti ni Ezekiel, sa ato pa, kadtong katawhan kansang pagtoo lunsayon pinaagi sa pagsulay, ug kang kinsa ang Espiritu Santo makahimo sa iyang gimbuhaton nga mas gawasnon.
Ang bag-o lang natong gisulti dili paigo aron pagtabang sa pagsabot sa bili sa libro ni Ezekiel alang karong panahona. Saksi siya sa Diyos sa kataposang katuigan sa gingharian sa Juda, bisag nagpuyo siya uban sa mga bihag didto sa Babilonia. Sigurado gyod nga mahibulong ta sa pinulongan nga iyang gibutang sa baba sa Diyos. Kay gipakita man niya nga ang Diyos mipahamtang sa iyang kasuko ug pangabugho pinaagi sa kanunay niyang paghulga sa katawhan ug sa kalipay nga iyang gipakita. Hinuon, dili ba posibli ang pagsulti mahitungod sa gugma nga dili maghisgot sa pangabugho ug kabangis?
Ato pod nga makita ang pangabugho ug kabangis diha nga ang Diyos moabot na aron pagbuntog sa makasasalang katawhan. Ang bana mangita sa mabudhiong asawa taliwala sa mga kabit nga dad-on pagbalik ginamit ang kusog. Ang sobra kaayong sinultihan ni Ezekiel kinahanglang magpahinumdom sa ubang panid sa Biblia diin ang Diyos nagpadayag sa kaugalingon sa tumang kalumo, apan dili ta makasalikway sa maong sinultihan, ubos sa pasangil nga ang Diyos maayong amahan. Tingali atong nasinati sa kaugalingon natong unod ang kaalaot sa makasasala nga naghagit sa Diyos: papel ni Ezekiel mao ang pagpadayag sa kapait sa sala ug sa kasuko sa Diyos.
Ang Ezekiel
Si Ezekiel batan-on tingling pari nga gidala sa Caldea uban sa mga 10,000 ka bihag human sa unang pagsulong sa Jerusalem sa tuig 598 (tan-awa 2 H 24:14). Didto gitawag siya sa Diyos ingon sa iyang gisulti kanato (Mga kapitulo 1 ug 2).
Ang unang bahin sa libro (kapitulo 1-24) nagdala sa mga diskurso nga nanagna sa hingpit nga pagkalaglag sa iyang nasod.
Human sa mga panagna batok sa langyawng kanasoran, naa ang ikatulong bahin sa libro, ang mga saad ngadto sa mga bihag: ang Diyos dili buot nga ang iyang katawhan mamatay.
Nasayod ta nga dunay mga rasa nga nangawala ug dunay milangyaw nga nalimot sa ilang yutang natawhan kay nakakita man sila og trabaho sa laing nasod. Niining paagiha ang katawhang Judio mawala na unta human sa krisis kanus-a ang Jerusalem nagun-ob. Samtang didto sila sa Babilonia, mga binihag sa usa ka nasod nga mas malamboon kaayo, ang gulanggulang nga katawhan nangandoy sa ilang yutang natawhan, samtang ang mga batan-on naghunahuna lang sa pagpahimulos sa bag-ong kahimtang. Apan si Ezekiel, sa iyang mahagitong pagpanudlo mipadayon pag-umol sa mga konsensya adtong katawhan nga sa usa ka adlaw mobalik sa Juda aron pagtukod sa bag-ong gingharian sa Diyos (mga kapitulo 33-39).
Translation: Spanish
A este profeta se suele recordarlo como se recuerda a la Cuaresma. Vivió y profetizó en el exilio, y si bien anunció un futuro prometedor para su pueblo arruinado, lo hizo después de haber denunciado, durante años, las falsas esperanzas a las que se aferraban sus compañeros. Dios mismo le ha impuesto largos ayunos y pruebas, además de la humillación de pertenecer a grupos marginales, en una ciudad segura de sí misma. Mientras que el “segundo Isaías” parece contemplar la tropa de los exiliados desde la altura que le inspiran sus grandes perspectivas, Ezequiel comparte la vida de un suburbio escuálido donde se enfrenta cada día a las miradas escépticas u hostiles de los exiliados
Ezequiel es sacerdote y Dios sale a su encuentro cuando tenia treinta años, la edad legal para comenzar su servicio en el templo. Como Jeremías, Ezequiel será a la vez sacerdote y profeta, lo que nos invita a no oponer demasiado estas dos funciones complementarias. El ministerio del sacerdote no se agota en el templo; el sacerdote enseña, juzga y precisa la aplicación de las leyes. El profeta, por su parte, es un carismático capaz de discernir a través de sueños, visiones y signos diversos, la palabra más actual de Dios. Los profetas que Dios ha llamado de una manera especial suelen tener su personalidad propia. Jeremías, por ejemplo, es un solitario y apenas se percibe en él al sacerdote, fuera de su primera predicación. Ezequiel, por el contrario, sigue muy preocupado acerca de lo puro y lo impuro; ejerce una actividad pastoral, y la restauración del templo constituye para él un elemento esencial del nuevo Israel.
Ezequiel ha estado entre los primeros grupos de deportados, en el 597, y toda su vida conocida la pasó en Babilonia. Algunos comentaristas han pensado que la llamada de Dios la recibió estando aun en Jerusalén y que esta llamada, que se puede leer en 2,9 - 3,9, habría sido fusionada después con la visión del capítulo 1. Se trata, sin embargo, de una hipótesis más que de una conclusión bien fundada. La gran visión del Nuevo Israel (caps. 40-48) es del 572, es decir, 25 años posterior.
La predicación de Ezequiel se ha conservado mejor que las de otros profetas bíblicos ya que se desarrolló en una comunidad viva cuya condición de exiliada en una ciudad prospera, ha protegido las enseñanzas del profeta. El hablaba a “ancianos” de los que la mayoría debían ser conocidos suyos, preocupándose de darles una formación adecuada. Sin lugar a duda, los primeros que regresaron del Exilio habían tomado su enseñanza como regla de vida y no tenían razón alguna para revisarla.
Ezequiel en nuestra historia
Tanto Ezequiel como Jeremías han dejado en la Biblia una de las más altas perspectivas desde la que contemplar la historia del pueblo de Dios. Ser infiel y rebelde parece que forma parte de la vocación de este pueblo. Es asimismo parte de la acción de Dios el destruir lo que se había construido con él, desde el momento en que el pueblo quiere instalarse en este mundo, siguiendo las huellas de los otros pueblos.
Hay períodos de la historia en que todo parece derrumbarse y sólo se ve a la muerte campeando por doquier. Es, sin embargo, en estos momentos en los que Dios alumbra una nueva etapa de su plan siempre imprevisible. Aunque es arriesgado hacer aplicaciones demasiado particularizadas a la época en que vivimos, es ahora presente, especialmente en la Iglesia Católica, la sensación de un derrumbamiento que afectaría a sectores aparentemente esenciales de la misma Iglesia, y que nos haría recordar la época en que desapareció el reino de Judá. Para muchos creyentes, el tiempo del Exilio ha comenzado ya, sea que se refieran a la Babilonia de este mundo, ciego a la verdad, o bien a la Iglesia convertida ella misma en Babilonia. En consecuencia, muchos miran por doquier, a la espera de un profeta o de un rayo de luz.
Jeremías y Ezequiel se complementan. Jeremías pertenecía al grupo de judíos que habían tenido la suerte de escapar a la deportación y sabía que nada se podía esperar de ellos. Por esta razón, desconoce la etapa siguiente, la del regreso y va directamente a lo esencial, es decir, a la alianza nueva. Ésta estará siempre más allá del mañana y más allá de las instituciones. Ezequiel, por el contrario, acompaña a los exiliados que constituirán el retoño del nuevo Israel. El profeta está bien anclado en su tarea pastoral y prepara la etapa siguiente. Con esto corre el riesgo tal vez de creer que los regresados del exilio serán mejores que sus predecesores y que se construirá un pueblo de Dios con leyes o con piedras y cemento. Esdras y Nehemías serán los herederos de Ezequiel y construirán el Judaísmo.
Jeremías se ha convertido en la gran figura del profeta perseguido, Ezequiel en cambio no tiene brillo ni belleza, y a veces desearíamos que fuera un poco menos excesivo y grosero, pero esto no puede disimular la fuerza que lo anima. El Espíritu lo llenó, igual que a Elías, de un amor celoso al Dios no reconocido.
Esto libro se divide fácilmente en seis secciones:
1. La vocación del profeta : 1,1—3,27
2. Actividad profética antes del segundo sitio de Jerusalén : 4,1—24,27
– el sitio y el juicio (4,1—8,2)
– las abominaciones en el templo (8,3—11,25)
– mentiras de los profetas y responsabilidad personal (12,1—14,23)
– los pecados acumulados de la historia de Israel (15,1—24,27).
3. Profecías contra las naciones : 25,1—32,32
4. La salvación de Israel : 33,1—37,28
5. Gog y Magog : 38,1—39,29
6. La visión del nuevo Israel : 40,1—48,30
– el nuevo templo (40,1—43,27)
– el nuevo culto (44,1—46,24)
– el nuevo Israel (47,1—48,35)
(The Catholic Christian Community Bible [first English edition 1997, other translations into Indonesian, Chinese, Cebuano, Chavacano, French, Ilonggo, Korean, Quechuan, Spanish, and Tagalog] “for the Christian Communities of the Third World” uses the following introduction.)
Is this James, the “brother of the Lord”? He is barely mentioned in the Gospel (Mk 6:3), and yet, a few years after Pentecost, appears as the leader, we might say the bishop of the Jerusalem community. Then, when the Gospel spread, it seems he was viewed as the one responsible for all Christian communities having a majority of Jews, which were established in Palestine, Syria and Cilicia (see Acts 15:13-29).
Of all the apostles, he was the most attached to Jewish traditions (the extreme opposite of Paul). In speaking to the faithful in Jerusalem, he taught them simple, practical things, inspired by the wisdom of the Old Testament. We hear the echo of his Sunday preaching in this letter addressed to the Christians of Jewish origin living in his huge diocese.
They are called “the twelve tribes scattered among the nations,” a name which was given to Jews who had settled outside their homeland. The letter was probably written between the years 50 and 60 after Christ.
Since the letter does not contain much doctrinal teaching, some people have looked down on it. It does in fact contain very valuable and relevant moral teaching, especially in reference to justice.
Down below are the introductions in the Mandarin Chinese, Tagalog, Cebuano, and Spanish editions.
Sino itong si Jaime, ang “kapatid ng Panginoon?” Halos hindi siya nababanggit sa Ebang¬helyo (Marcos 6:3), ngunit magkagayunman, ilang taon makaraan ang Pentekostes, lumitaw siya bilang namumuno, at maaaring sabihing siya ang obispo ng pamayanang Jerusalem. Pagkatapos, nang lumalaganap na ang Ebanghelyo, waring siya ang itinuturing na may kina¬laman sa lahat ng pamayanang Kristiyano na ang nakararami ay mga Judio, na itinatag sa Palestina, Siria at Cilicia (tingnan ang Gawa 15:13-29).
Sa lahat ng apostol, siya ang lalong napailalim sa mga tradisyong Judio (na kabaligtaran ni Pablo). Sa pagpapahayag niya sa mga mananampalataya ng Jerusalem, tinuruan niya ang mga iyon ng mga payak at praktikal na bagay, na pinasigla ng karunungan ng Matandang Tipan. Naririnig natin ang alingawngaw ng kanyang pangangaral kung Linggo sa liham na iniukol niya sa mga Kristiyano ng lahing Judio na naninirahan sa kanyang malaking diyosesis.
Tinatawag ang mga ito na “labindalawang lipi na ikinalat sa mga bansa,” isang pangalang ikinapit sa mga Judio na namalagi sa labas ng bayang tinubuan. Sinulat marahil ang liham sa pagitan ng mga taong 50 at 60 pagkasilang ni Kristo.
Sapagkat hindi nagtataglay ang liham ng mga pangangaral ng doktrina, hinamak iyon ng iba. Ngunit, ang totoo, ang liham ay nagtataglay ng pinakamahalaga at makabuluhang katuruang moral, laluna ang may kinalaman sa katarungan.
Translation: Cebuano
Kinsa si Jaime, ang “igsoon sa Ginoo”? Panagsa ra siyang hisgotan sa Ebanghelyo (Mc 6:3), apan sa pipila ka tuig human sa Pentekostes, mitumaw siya isip pangulo, ang obispo sa katilingban sa Jerusalem. Unya, sa mikaylap na ang Ebanghelyo, giila siyang responsabli sa tanang Kristohanong katilingban, kadaghanan mga Judio nga natukod sa Palestina, Siria, ug Cilicia (tan-awa ang Mga Buhat 15:13-29).
Sa tanang Apostol, siyay labing nalambigit sa mga tradisyon (ang kaatbang nga lahi ni Pablo). Sa pakig-istorya niya sa mga magtotoo sa Jerusalem, nagtudlo siya sa mga yano ug praktikong butang dinasig sa Kaalam sa Daang Kasabotan. Atong mabati ang kalanog sa wali sa Dominggo sa iyang sulat nga gipadala alang sa mga Judiong Kristyanos nga nanimuyo sa dako niyang dyosesis.
Sila “ang 12 ka tribo nga nakatag sa tanang kanasoran” – ang ngalan nga gihatag sa mga Judio nga nagpuyo gawas sa yutang natawhan. Gibanabana nga nasulat ni sa mga tuig 50-60 human sa kamatayon ni Jesus.
Kay ang maong sulat wala man maghisgot og mga doktrina, nagkamenos ini ang ubang tawo. Apan sa pagkatinuod naghupot ni sa bililhon ug haom nga pagtulon-ang moral, ilabina bahin sa hustisya.
Translation: Spanish
¿Quién es Santiago? Con toda probabilidad este nombre se refiere a Santiago, hermano del Señor. Fue favorecido con una aparición privada de Jesús resucitado (1Co 15,7) y al parecer fue a él a quien Pedro confió la Iglesia de Jerusalén (He 12,17; 15,13; 21,18) en el momento de pasar a la clandestinidad. Posteriormente fue considerado como el responsable de todas las comunidades cristianas de mayoría judía establecidas en Palestina, Siria y Cilicia (véase He 15,13-29).
Esta carta es el escrito del Nuevo Testamento que denota el mayor parentesco con el Evangelio de Mateo, aun cuando se traten temas que son comunes a todos los escritos apostólicos; se encontrarán en particular los ecos del Sermón del monte. Lo que revela de las comunidades judías de Palestina y de Siria complementa y corrige la imagen que se pudiera tener de ellas, si se atiene a las dificultades que experimentaban muchos de sus miembros para liberarse de la ley de Moisés. La carta de Santiago recuerda, al igual que el Evangelio de Mateo, que la Ley educa para la libertad (2,12). A su manera es un verdadero camino (2,8) para los que buscan la perfección.
Uno de los puntos de esta carta que más ha llamado la atención es la insistencia muy fuerte de Santiago en la inutilidad de la fe que no se traduce en obras (2,14-26). Esta in sistencia contrasta con las afirmaciones de Pablo quien, especialmente en Gál 5 y Rom 4, afirma que somos salvados por la fe y no por las obras. Es imposible negar la intención de corregirse el uno al otro; más aún, un estudio comparado de las epístolas obliga a decir que Santiago conocía la primera carta de Pablo a los Corintios cuando escribió la suya, y que Pablo, a su vez, conoció la carta de Santiago antes de responderle en Gálatas y en 2Corintios.
Los textos de los Hechos relativos al concilio de Jerusalén invitan a no acentuar en demasía la oposición entre ambos (véanse las notas de He 15); Pablo, que critica duramente el entorno de Santiago, parece que tuvo por él personalmente más que un simple respeto. Santiago, al dirigirse a los fieles de Jerusalén, enseña cosas sencillas y prácticas, inspiradas en la sabiduría del Antiguo Testamento. La religión auténtica se reconoce en la forma de vivir y de tratar a los que nos rodean.
La carta de Santiago, habida cuenta de lo que acabamos de decir, debe haber sido escrita el año 56 o 57. Se sabe que Santiago murió apedreado el año 62.
Chicahuaxtla Triqui: “cover over” (a figure of speech which is also employed in Hebrew, but which in many languages is not acceptable, because it implies “hiding” or “concealment”)
Warao: “not being concerned with him clean your obonja.” Obonja is a term that “includes the concepts of consciousness, will, attitude, attention and a few other miscellaneous notions” (source: Henry Osborn in The Bible Translator 1969, p. 74ff. See other occurrences of Obojona in the Warao New Testament.)
Martu Wangka: “throw out badness” (source: Carl Gross)
Kyaka: “burn the jaw bones” — This goes back to the pre-Christian custom of hanging the jaw bones of murdered relatives on ones door frame until the time of revenge. Christians symbolically burned those bones to show forgiveness which in turn became the word for “forgiveness” (source: Eugene Nida, according to this blog )
Koonzime: “remove the bad deed-counters” (“The Koonzime lay out the deeds symbolically — usually strips of banana leaf — and rehearse their grievances with the person addressed.”) (Source: Keith and Mary Beavon in Notes on Translation 3/1996, p. 16)
Ngbaka: ele: “forgive and forget” (Margaret Hill [in Holzhausen & Ridere 2010, p. 8f.] recalls that originally there were two different words used in Ngbaka, one for God (ɛlɛ) and one for people (mbɔkɔ — excuse something) since it was felt that people might well forgive but, unlike God, can’t forget. See also this lectionary in The Christian Century.
Amahuaca: “erase” / “smooth over” (“It was an expression the people used for smoothing over dirt when marks or drawings had been made in it. It meant wiping off dust in which marks had been made, or wiping off writing on the blackboard. To wipe off the slate, to erase, to take completely away — it has a very wide meaning and applies very well to God’s wiping away sins, removing them from the record, taking them away.”) (Source: Robert Russel, quoted in Walls / Bennett 1959, p. 193)
Gonja / Dangme: “lend / loan” (in the words of one Dangme scholar: “When you sin and you are forgiven, you forget that you have been forgiven, and continue to sin. But when you see the forgiveness as a debt/loan which you will pay for, you do not continue to sin, else you have more debts to pay” — quoted in Jonathan E.T. Kuwornu-Adjaottor in Ibadan Journal of Religious Studies 17/2 2010, p. 67ff. )
Kwere: kulekelela, meaning literally “to allow for.” Derived from the root leka which means “to leave.” In other words, forgiveness is leaving behind the offense in relationship to the person. It is also used in contexts of setting someone free. (Source: Megan Barton)
Merina Malagasy: mamela or “leave / let go (of sin / mistakes)” (source: Brigitte Rabarijaona)
Mauwake: “take away one’s heaviness” (compare sin as “heavy”) (source: Kwan Poh San in this article )
The translation of the tetragrammaton (YHWH or יהוה) is easily the most often discussed issue in Bible translation. This is exemplified by the fact that there is virtually no translation of the Bible — regardless of language — where the position of the respective translator or translation team on how to translate the name of God into the respective language is not clearly stated in the preface or introduction.
Click or tap here to read about the different ways the tetragrammaton is and has been translated
The literature on this topic is overwhelming, both as far as the meaning of YHWH and the translation of it by itself and in combination with other terms (including Elohim and Adonai). There is no reason or room to rehash those discussions. Aside from various insightful translations of YHWH into various languages (see below), what’s of interest in the context of this tool are official and semi-official statements regarding the translation by Bible translation agencies and churches. These include the 1992 statement by United Bible Societies’ “Names of God” Study Group (see The Bible Translator 1992, p. 403-407 ) or the “Letter to the Bishops’ Conference on ‘The Name of God'” by the Congregatio de Cultu Divino et Discriplina Sacramentorum of 2008 (see here et al.).
In summary, the UBS study group gives six different options on how to translate YHWH: 1) transliterate (some form of “Yahweh” or “Jehovah” if this is an already established term); 2) translate (along the lines of kurios — κύριος in the Septuagint); 3) translate the meaning of YHWH; 4) use a culture-specific name; 5) translate Elohim and YHWH in the same way; or 6) use a combination of any of these options.
The official Catholic directive states that for liturgical purposes YHWH is to be translated as an equivalent of Kurios (“Lord”) unless when appearing in combination with Elohim (“God”) or Adonai (“lord”), in which case it’s to be translated with “God.”
In the following collection of examples, any of the above-mentioned strategies are used.
Use of Typographical Means to Offset the Name of God
A large number of Bible translations in many Western European languages have used a similar strategy to translate YHWH as an equivalent of Kurios or Adonai (“lord” in Greek in Hebrew) but have used either small caps or all caps to denote these occurrences as an equivalent to a proper name. Here are some examples:
None of the European languages have found a “cultural-linguistic equivalent” with the possible exception of Eternal or l’Éternel (see below).
The rendering of the translation of YHWH in bold (and uppercase) characters is for instance used in Guhu-Samane: QOBEROBA (a term of address for a respected person and also connotes “forever”) (for “forever”, see below under Translations of the Name of God) and the upper-casing in Bible translations in several other languages in Papua New Guinea:
In Cebuano (Ang Pulong sa Dios edition, 2010) and Hiligaynon (all versions), Ginoo, a typographical variant of Ginoo (“Lord”) is used. Bible translation consultant Kermit Titrud (SIL): “‘Yahweh’ is too close to Yahwa, their word for ‘Satan.’ We were afraid that in the pulpits readers might misread ‘Yahweh’ and say ‘Yahwa.’ So we went with the tradition found in most English translations. Ginoo for ‘Yahweh’ and Ginoo for ‘adonai.'”
In languages where capitalization is not a typographical option, other options are available and used, such as in Japanese, where the generic term shu 主 for “Lord” is bolded in some translations to offset its meaning (Source: Omanson, p. 17).
In Pattani Malay, the word for “Lord” is underlined: ربي. (Source: Andy Warren-Rothlin)
A graphical way of representation beyond typography was used by André Chouraqui in his French La Bible hebraique et le Nouveau Testament (publ. 1974-1977) for which he superimposed adonai and Elohim over (the French rendition) of the tetragrammaton:
(Source: Andy Warren-Rothlin in Noss / Houser, p. 618ff.; see also tempt God / put God to the test)
Translations of the Name of God
A translation of YHWH with a rendering of the meaning of “Eternal” was done in English by James Moffatt (between 1926 and 1935) with Eternal, The Voice translation with Eternal One (2012), in French versions as L’ÉTERNEL by J. F. Ostervald in 1904 or l’Éternel by L. Segond (1910-1938, not in more recent revisions) and Zadoc Kahn (1964) (for the French translation, see also LORD of hosts), in Esperanto as “la Eternulo,” and in Obolo as Okumugwem: “The Ever-Living” (source: Enene Enene). In francophone Africa, translations of l’Éternel are widely used, due to the wide use of Segond’s early editions (see above). Examples include Nancere (Nandjéré) with Kumuekerteri, Ngambay (Ngambaï) with Njesigənea̰, Sar with Kɔ́ɔ̄ɓē, Mbay (Mbaï) with Bïraþe, Kim with Bage ɗiŋnedin, or Lélé uses Gojɛnɛkirɛkindiy (verbatim: “who remains for his eyes”). (Source: Andy Warren-Rothlin)
Similarly and at the same time expanding its meaning, the Nzima translation of 1998 translated YHWH as Ɛdεnkεma, the “Eternal All-Powerful Creator and Sustainer” (Source: David Ekem in The Bible Translator 2005, p. 72ff. ).
“Creator” is also used in Kazakh (Zharatkhan [Жаратқан]), Karakalpak (Zharatkhan [Жаратқан], sometimes in combination with Iyeg [Ийег] — “Master”), and Kirghiz (Zharatkhan [Жаратқан], likewise in combination with “Master” or Ege [Эге]). (Source: David Gray).
Nepali, Bengali, and Hindi are all derived from Sanskrit and have (eventually) all found similar translations of YHWH. In Bengali “God” is translated as Ishwar (ঈশ্বর) (widely used in Hindu scriptures, where it’s used as a title, usually associated with “Siva”) and YHWH as Shodaphrobhu (সদাপ্রভু) — “Eternal Lord”; in Nepali and NewariYHWH is translated as Paramaprabhu (परमप्रभु)– “Supreme Lord”; and Hindi translates YHWH as Phrabu (प्रभु) — “Lord.” In earlier translations all three languages used transliterations of Jehovah or Yahweh. (Source: B. Rai in The Bible Translator 1992, p. 443ff. and Barrick, p. 124).
The influential German Jewish translation of Martin Buber and Franz Rosenzweig (between 1925 and 1961) translates YHWH in Exodus 3:15 with “Ich bin da” (“I exist” or “I am”) and in all other instances with pronouns in small caps (Er, Ihm, Ihn, Ich — “he,” “him,” “his,” “I”).
The Jewish orthodox English ArtScroll Tanach translation (publ. 2011) uses Hashem or “The Name”
In the Bavarian translation by Sturmibund (publ. 1998), it is translated as Trechtein or “Sovereign, Lord.” “Trechtein” is related to the obsolete English “drighten.” (Source: Zetzsche)
In Ge’ez, Tigrinya, and Amharic it is translated with Igziabeher (እግዚአብሔር) or “Ruler/Lord of the Nations/Peoples.” In Ge’ez Igziabeher is used for “God” as well, whereas in Tigrinya and Amharic it is often, but not always used for “God.” In a recent revision by Biblica (see here ), an attempt was made to use Igziabeher exclusively for occurrences of the tetragrammaton in the Hebrew Bible, but after strong responses by the Christian community, a compromise was found by using Igziabeher in the first chapter of Genesis and changing it according to the Hebrew text elsewhere. (Source: Zetseat Fekadu)
Warlpiri uses Kaatu Jukurrarnu (Kaatu is a transcription of “God” and Jukurrarnu means “timelessness” and shares a root with jukurrpa — dreamings) (Source: Stephen Swartz, The Bible Translator 1985, p. 415ff. ).
The translation of YHWH into Weri with Aniak Tupup or “man of the holy house” intends “to maintain the Jewish practice of not uttering God’s name [with] the use of another vernacular phrase that signals that a ‘taboo’ name is being referred [which] could give a cue that would be recognizable in written or oral communication” (Source: P. King, The Bible Translator 2014, p. 195ff. ).
Aruamu translates it as Ikiavɨra Itir God or “Ever Present God” (source: Pioneer Bible Translators, project-specific translation notes in Paratext)
Idakho-Isukha-Tiriki: Nyasaye Wuvunyali Muno or “God powerful great” (source: Andy Warren-Rothlin)
Ruund uses Chinawej, a term that is otherwise used as a response of approval. Anna Lerbak (in The Bible Translator 1954, p. 84ff. ) tells the genesis of this term (click or tap to see an explanation):
“The name ‘Jehovah’ had been used in some contexts, but I had the feeling that it did not mean much to the people, and when I asked the pastors they all said it didn’t, and worse, it very often confused people, especially in the villages. During the conversation it was suggested that the name Chinawej be used in the place of ‘Jehovah’, and this met with immediate approval. A few days later I was working on a Psalm in which ‘Jehovah’ was used frequently, so I wrote Chinawej in its place and then read the Psalm to them. The response was about like this: “That is it, now people will understand, that is how Chinawej is. The Jews call God ‘Jehovah’, we call Him Chinawej, it is the same God. but we know Him as Chinawej as the Jews know Him as ‘Jehovah’ “. They often call God Chinawej in prayer, it seems to indicate warmth and intimacy.
The same word is used in two other ways. It is the name of a snake which never attacks human beings. And it is used as a response of approval. When told of something they are pleased to hear, something they find good, just, helpful, generous, they often respond by saying, Chinawej. When they call God Chinawej, it indicates that they think of Him as One Who is good and just and generous towards them. When it was suggested at the committee that we use Chinawej in place of ‘Jehovah’ it was accepted immediately and unanimously.
Ebira has Eneyimavara. Eneyimavara was created by merging a praise phrase that was only used for the traditional deity Ohomorihi (see here), that had become the word for the Christian God: ene e yi ma vara or “the one that never changes.” “The translators came to the agreement that this praise name that describes the unchangeableness of God is very close in meaning to the probable meaning of YHWH.” (Source: David O Moomo in Scriptura 88 (2005), p. 151ff. )
The Uzbek Bible uses the term Ega (Эга) — “master, owner” in various forms (including Egam / Эгам for “my Owner” or Egamiz / Эгамиз for “our Owner.” (Click or tap to see an explanation):
Jim Zvara (2019, p. 6) explains: “The Uzbek term ega means owner or master (‘master,’ in the historical context of an owner-slave relationship). By extension, it is natural for an Uzbek to speak to or refer to God as Egam (‘my owner’/’master’). In the Uzbek context to be God’s slave is a positive way of understanding one’s relation to him. It suggests that one is in a dependent and obedient relationship to God. The team felt that this relational connection and what it implies fits well with the concept of YHWH as the God who is in a covenant relationship with his people. In the Uzbek context, the choice of Ega was deemed to be the best balance of natural language with meaningful translation.”
The Seediq Bible translation team chose Utux Tmninun (“the weaving god”) for their translation of YHWH. (Click or tap to see a retelling of the process of how that decision was reached):
“(…) The Seediq team requested that we spend time with them on key terms. They had compiled a list of key terms that they wanted input on, and we went through the list item by item. The most important item was how to deal with the divine name. They had tentatively translated it as Yehoba, transliterated from Jehovah, but they were also aware that this transliteration may not be accurate, and they were keen to explore other options.
“We explored various alternatives. Were they interested in following the ancient Jewish practice of substituting ‘Lord’ for the divine name? Would capitalising the letters help? Would they be bold enough to use ‘Yahweh,’ following the opinion of most Old Testament scholars who regard this as the correct pronunciation? Was it feasible to adopt a mixed approach in dealing with the divine name (…)? Each option had its advantages as well as disadvantages.
“In the midst of the discussion, a participant said, ‘Our ancestors, as well as we today, always call God by the term Utux Tmninun. I suggest we use this term.’ The term Utux Tmninun in the Seediq culture means ‘the weaving God.’ In their culture, God is the weaver, the one who weaves life together. All the participants were excited about this proposal. They tried this term with all the composite terms that involve the divine name, and it seemed to work well, so they decided tentatively to adopt this term. After the workshop, the participants went back to their villages and sought feedback from the wider community, and eventually they confirmed the use of the term Utux Tmninun as the rendering of the divine name.
Translating the divine name as Utux Tmninun, the weaving God, is a creative solution. This term is viewed very positively in the Seediq community. It also correlates well with the concept of God as the creator (Gen. 1-2) and as the weaver who formed our inward parts and knit us together in our mothers’ wombs (Ps. 139:13). It also has the advantage of portraying God beyond the traditional masculine form.
“Some may argue that since names are usually transliterated, we should do the same with YHWH, most likely pronounced ‘Yahweh.’ Unfortunately, due to the influence of Chinese Union Version for almost one hundred years now, Chinese Christians only know God as Yehehua. Attempts to change the term Yehehua to Yahweh have not been successful. This is a reality that the Seediq Christians have to live with.
“Others may argue on theological grounds that YHWH is not only the creator, but also the God of the covenant, hence any attempt to substitute another term for YHWH will not do justice to the Hebrew text. In the case of the Seediq translation, there are significant similarities between Utux Tmninun and YHWH, though the terms are not identical. This is a reality translators often have to struggle with. Exact correspondence is hard to come by. Often it is a matter of approximation, give and take. Besides theological considerations, one has to deal with the constraints of past traditions (‘Jehovah,’ in this instance), the biblical cultures and one’s own culture, and audience acceptance. Hopefully, by using Utux Tmninun for YHWH, the Seediq term will be transformed and take on the aspect of the covenant God as well.” (Source: Yu Suee Yan, The Bible Translator 2015, p. 316ff. )
Nyankore: Nyakubaho or “the one who is from within itself” (source: Bühlmann 1950, p. 146)
‘One local dialect of Carpathian Romani: Drágon Dél or “Beloved/Dear God.” In most Romani dialects, the word Rai (Lord/Boss/landlord/shopkeeper) is sort-of acceptable, but in one particular subgroup of Carpathian Romani they said it only meant shopkeeper and ‘everyone knows that [majority term for YHWH] means God, and why can’t we translate it that way?’ We tried to explain, but they weren’t keen on anything but Dél (‘God’). We eventually compromised with Drágon Dél, a common expression for YHWH, and Dél for Elohim, but it took quite a lot of convincing them that there was any theological point there.
For the interconessional translation into Chichewa (publ. 1999) the term Chauta (“Great-One-of-the-Bow”) was chosen for YHWH (Click or tap to see the detailed story):
“The name Chauta, literally ‘Great-One-of-the-Bow’, i.e. [is] either the rainbow (descriptively termed uta-wa-Leza ‘the-bow-of-God’) or, less likely, the hunter’s bow. And yet Chauta was also distinct from Mulungu [“God”] in that it has reference to the specific tribal deity of the Chewa people — the God who ‘owns’ yet also ‘belongs to’ them — and hence it carries additional positive emotive overtones. Although research indicated that in an ancient traditional setting, Chauta too was probably associated with the indigenous ancestral rain cult, in the Christian era it has been progressively generalized to encompass virtually all religious contexts in which God may be either appealed to, proclaimed, or praised. After prolonged deliberation, therefore, the translation committee determined Chauta to be the closest functional equivalent to YHWH of the Hebrew Scriptures. The choice of this name is not without its difficulties, however, and these were carefully considered by the Chewa committee. For example, the use of a more specific local term, as opposed to the generic Mulungu, carries a greater likelihood of bringing along with it certain senses, connotations, and situations that were (and no doubt still are) associated with the indigenous, pre-Christian system of worship. If these happened to remain strong in any contemporary sacred setting, then of course the dangers connected with conceptual syncretism might well arise. In the case of Chauta, however, it appeared that the process of positive Christian contextualization had already reached an advanced stage, that is, judging from the widespread use of this name in all aspects of religious life and practice. A more scholarly argument against Chauta takes the position that there is too great a female component associated with this term because it was traditionally applied (by figurative metonymy) to refer also to the ritual ‘wife of God’, i.e. the chief officiant at a traditional rain shrine and worship sanctuary. However, this usage seems to be quite remote, and most people questioned do not even recognize the connection anymore. Besides, in a matrilineal society such as the Chewa, it does not seem inappropriate to have this aspect of meaning lying in the background, particularly since it is not completely foreign to the notion of God in the Bible (cf. Ps. 36:7; 73:15; Isa. 49:14-15; Mt. 23:37). In terms of ‘connotative fit’ or emotive identification and appeal, there can be little doubt that the name Chauta is by far the closest natural equivalent to YHWH in the contemporary Chewa cultural and religious environment. This aspect of meaning was probably also utmost from the ancient Jewish perspective as well; in other words, “for them the associated meaning of this special name [YHWH], in terms of their history and culture, far outweighed any meaning it may have suggested because of its form or derivation”. To be sure, this ‘new’ divine name — that is, new as far as the Scriptures are concerned — may take some getting used to, especially in the formal setting of public worship. But this is not a foreign god whom we are talking about; rather, he is certainly by now regarded as the national deity of the Chewa nation. Chauta is the great God who for one reason or another ‘did not make himself known to them by his holy name, the LORD’ (Exod. 6:3), that is, in the prior translations of his Word into Chewa. He is, however, and always has been “a God who saves … the LORD (Chauta), our Lord, who rescues us from death” (Ps. 68:20, Good News Bible)!” (Source: Wendland 1998, 120f.; see also The Bible Translator 1992, 430ff. )
Transliteration of YHWH
A 12th century reading of the Masoretic vowel points around יהוה (יְהֹוָה) was interpreted to be pronounced as Yehowah from which Iehouah and Jehovah were derived. This was reflected in the English versions of Tyndale (publ. 1530) and the Geneva Bible (significantly based on Tyndale and publ. in 1560) and again the King James Version (Authorized Version) (publ. 1611) which all used Iehouah or Jehovah in 7 different verses in the Old Testament. The translators and editors of the American Standard Version (publ. 1901), a review of the King James Version used Jehovah for all appearances of the tetragrammaton something that the Spanish Reina-Valera (publ. 1602) had already done as well.
In English versions, Yahweh as a transliteration of the tetragrammaton is used by the Catholic Jerusalem Bible (publ. 1966), the Protestant Holman Christian Standard Bible (publ. 2004) and the Legacy Standard Bible (publ. 2021). The Catholic translation by Knox (publ. 1949) occasionally uses Javé, “to make it a Latin name, to match all the other names in the Old Testament.” (Source Knox 1949, p. 80)
Mandinka for instance uses Yawe for YHWH. “The use of Yawe for YHWH is good and may be a trendsetter in this part of Africa.” (Source: Rob Koops)
In a group of related languages in another part of Africa an interesting development from a transliteration to a indigenous translation can be shown: In the Nandi Bible (1938) Jehovah was used as a translation for YHWH. Kamuktaindet (“The Powerful One”) was used as a translation for Elohim (“God”). This was taken over by a translation into the macrolanguage Kalenjin (1969) (intended to include the closely related Keiyo, Kipsigis, Markweeta, Nandi, Okiek, Sabaot, Terik, and Tugen). Sabaot, Markweeta, Tugen and Okiek later wanted there own translations. Both Sabaot and Markweeta use the indigenous word for “Creator” (Yēyiin in Sabaot and Iriin in Markweeta) to translate Elohim and YHWH of the Old Testament and Theos of the New Testament. The Kalenjin Bible has recently been revised to cater to Keiyo, Kipsigis, Nandi and Terik, and this revision has completely dropped Jehovah in favour of Kamuktaindet. (Source: Iver Larsen)
Early translations into Gilbertese faced a problem when transliterating “Jehovah” (a form of “Jehovah” was first used in Spanish Bible translations in 1569 and 1602): “There are only thirteen letters in the Kiribati alphabet: A, E, I, O, U, M, N, NG, B, K, R, T (pronounced [s] when followed by ‘i’), W For instance, ‘Jehovah’ is rendered Iehova, but Kiribati speakers can only pronounce it as ‘Iowa,’ since the phonemes [h] and [v] do not exist in Kiribati.” (source: Joseph Hong, The Bible Translator 1994, p. 329ff. .)
In a recent edition of a Thai translation (Thai Standard Version, publ. 2011) a combination of translation and transliteration is used: phra’ ya(h)we (h) (พระยาห์เวห์) (“Divine Yawe”). (Source: Stephen Pattemore)
In Nyarafolo Senoufo the transliteration is Yewe which also means “the being one” or “he that is.” David DeGraaf (in: Notes on Translation 3/1999, p. 34ff.) explains: “Since it is widely recognized that the vowels of the name are uncertain, another possible transliteration is Yewe. This proposal is in accord with the Nyarafolo rules of vowel harmony and is thus open to being understood as a normal nominalization in the language. Second, Yewe is exactly the word that would be formed by nominalizing the verb ‘to be’ in the class that includes sentient beings. Thus, Yewe can be understood as ‘the being one’ or ‘he that is’. This solution accords well with YHWH’s self-revelation to Moses in Exodus 3:14, ‘I am who I am.'”
In the Literary and Mandarin Chinese (Protestant) tradition the transliteration of “Jehovah” is historically deeply rooted, even though there are also some historical burdens (Click or tap to see more details):
“YHWH” is rendered in the Chinese Union Version — the most widely used Bible translation in China—as well as most other Chinese Bible translations as yehehua 耶和華. According to Chinese naming conventions, yehehua could be interpreted as Ye Hehua, in which Ye would be the family name and Hehua — “harmonic and radiant” — the given name. In the same manner, Ye would be the family name of Jesus (transliterated as yesu 耶穌) and Su would be the given name. Because in China the children inherit the family name from the father, the sonship of Jesus to God the Father, yehehua, would be illustrated through this. Though this line of argumentation sounds theologically unsound, it is indeed used effectively in the Chinese church.” (see Wright 1953, p. 298, see also Jesus).
“Ye 耶, an interrogative particle in classical Chinese, is part of the same phonetic series as ye 爺, which gives it a certain exchangeability. Ye 爺 carries the meaning “father” or is used as an honorable form of address. The choice of the first Bible translators to use the transliteration yehehua 爺火華 for Jehovah had a remarkable and sobering influence on the history of the 19th century in China by possibly helping to shape the fatal Taiping ideology, a rebellion that ended up costing an estimated 20 million lives.
“The founder of the Taiping rebellion, Hong Xiuquan, was given a tract (…) [that he used to] interpret a nervous breakdown he had had in 1837 as his “call” to be the “Messiah.” This “vision” that Hong experienced is likely to have had a direct correlation with the name of “God” in that tract. Shen yehuohua 神爺火華 (directly translated: ‘God (or: spirit); old man (or: father); fire; bright)” was the term that was used in that tract for ‘God Jehovah,’ but this was not indicated as a (in its second part) transliteration of a proper name. In his vision, Hong saw ‘a man venerable in years (corresponding with ye), with golden (corresponding with huo and hua) beard and dressed in a black robe,’ an image likely to have been inspired by a direct translation from that name for ‘God,’ especially as it appeared at the beginning of the tract. That this term was considered to be a term of some relevance to the Taiping ideology is demonstrated by the fact that both yehuohua 爺火華 as the personal name of God and ye 爺 as “God the Father” later appeared in Taiping writings.” (Source: Zetzsche in Malek 2002, p. 141ff.)
In American Sign Language it is translated with a sign that combines the letter Y and a sign that points up and is similar to the sign for “God.” (Source: Ruth Anna Spooner, Ron Lawer)
“YHWH” in American Sign Language, source: Deaf Harbor
In British Sign Language is is translated with a sign that combines the signs for “God” and “name” and the finger-spelling of Y-H-W-H. (Source: Anna Smith)
“YHWH” in British Sign Language (source: Christian BSL, used with permission)
Japanese Sign Language combines the sign for “Lord” with “exist” to make a name sign that technically means “the existent one,” but is close enough to “Lord” that it isn’t too jarring for people in the church who expect to see “Lord” in certain contexts (source: Mark Penner). For a Japanese Sign Language explanation, see here.
“YHWH” in Japanese Sign Language, source: 日本手話訳聖書を
For further reading on the translation of YHWH, see Rosin 1956, p. 89-125 and Andy Warren-Rothlin in Noss / Houser, p. 618ff.
