cast lots

The Greek and Hebrew that is translated as “casting” or “drawing lots” in English is often translated with a specific idiom, such as “to take out bamboo slips” — 掣 籤 chè qiān (in most Mandarin Chinese Bibles), “each to pick-up which is-written (i.e. small sticks inscribed with characters and used as slots)” (Batak Toba), a term for divination by means of reed stalks (Toraja-Sa’dan).

In some cases a cultural equivalent is not available, or it is felt to be unsuitable in this situation, e.g. in Ekari where “to spin acorns” has the connotation of gambling, one may have to state the fact without mentioning the means, e.g. “it came to him” (source for this and all above: Reiling / Swellengrebel). In Shipibo-Conibo there was no equivalent for “casting lots” so the translation for Mark 15:24 is descriptive: “they shook little things to decide what each one should take” (source: Nida 1952, p. 47).

Other solutions include:

  • Purari: “throw shells” (source: David Clark)
  • Kwara’ae (in Acts 1:26): “they played something like dice to find out who of the two God chose (God revealed his will that way)” (source: Carl Gross)
  • Navajo (Dinė): “draw straws”
  • Yatzachi Zapotec: “raffle”
  • Chol: “choose by a game” (source for this and above: M. Larson / B. Moore in Notes on Translation February 1970, p. 1-125)
  • Lalana Chinantec: “there were little round things that they played with which made evident who it would be who would be lucky” (source: John Beekman in Notes on Translation, March 1965, p. 2-20)
  • Chichimeca-Jonaz: “threw one or two little hard things that had a sign…to see which person it would be”
  • Kekchí: “try with luck”
  • Lalana Chinantec: “there were little things they played with that made evident who it would be who would be lucky”
  • Chuj: “enter luck upon them”
  • Ayutla Mixtec: “put out luck” (Source for this and five above: Viola Waterhouse in Notes on Translation August 1966, p. 86ff.)
  • Lacandon: “play with small stones in order to see who was going to win” (source: B. Moore / G. Turner in Notes on Translation 1967, p. 1ff.)
  • Matumbi: mpumbe a game of chance, typically done with a stone hidden in one hand while you present two fists to a guesser (source: Pioneer Bible Translators, project-specific notes in Paratext)

In North Alaskan Inupiatun a term for “gambling” is used. The same Inupiatun term is also used in Esther 3:7, “though there winning and losing is not in view, but rather choosing by chance” (source: Robert Bascom)

The stand-alone term that is translated “lots” in English is translated as “two pieces of potsherd” in Highland Totonac. (Source: Ronald D. Olson in Notes on Translation January, 1968, p. 15ff.)

Jonah draws his lot (image)

Hand colored stencil print on momigami by Sadao Watanabe (1968).

Image taken with permission from the SadaoHanga Catalogue where you can find many more images and information about Sadao Watanabe.

For other images of Sadao Watanabe art works in TIPs, see here.

Jonah

Drawing by Ismar David from H. L. Ginsberg 1969. For other images of Ismar David drawings, see here.

Following is an image of the Jonah Sarcophagus or the 3rd quarter of the 3rd century, housed in the Museo Pio Cristiano (photographed by Richard Stracke , shared under Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license):

Peppard (2024, p. 119ff.) analyzes the sarcophagus (click or tap here to see the analysis):

The textual version of the short story begins with God calling Jonah as a prophet to go east and preach repentance to the Gentiles of the great city of Nineveh (ancient Assyria; modern Mosul, Iraq). On the left the men load a boat, which Jonah has disobediently boarded to sail westward, away from Israel and away from God’s prophetic commandment (Jonah 1). Moving to the right, the men throw Jonah into the sea, in an attempt to quell the raging storm, which they (rightly) interpret has been caused by Jonah’s disobedience to his god. In this artistic version, he dives straight into the mouth of the great fish—portrayed here, as elsewhere, like a sea monster—and prays to God for salvation over three days and three nights (Jonah 2). He is then spit out onto shore and commanded again by God to preach repentance to Nineveh (Jonah 3). He does so but then becomes disgruntled when the Ninevites do repent and God does not enact his planned punishment. Despite having been saved himself, Jonah doesn’t think these others are deserving of God’s mercy. So God teaches him a final lesson (Jonah 4). While Jonah pouts alone outside of the city, God provides a large new plant to grow over Jonah, to protect him from the desert sun. This scene dominates the upper-right register, with Jonah reclining nude under bountiful shade, as if in a blessed afterlife. But as quickly as the plant grew, God sends a worm to destroy it, so that Jonah is again near death—first from a tempest-tossed ocean, and now from a sun-scorched desert. The story concludes with God delivering a prophetic sermon to his reluctant prophet: if Jonah is concerned over the life and death of just one plant that emerged and vanished so quickly, how much more should God be concerned with the fate of the thousands of lives in Nineveh, at that time the largest city in the known world?

The textual version of the story ends, like many prophetic oracles of the Old Testament, with a question. The question hangs in the air for ancient listeners and modern readers, opening up to reflection and discussion about the tension between justice and mercy, about God’s commitment to a chosen people while offering salvation to others, and about the persistent self-centered ways of even God’s chosen messengers. The earliest Christian textual interpreters seized on two aspects of the story. First, as represented by the Gospel of Luke, Jesus interprets “the sign of Jonah” for his generation to be a call toward repentance (Luke 11:29-32). Just as he began his ministry with, “Repent, for the Kingdom of God is at hand,” along with John’s baptismal ritual to enact such repentance, so, too, does he connect his preaching to the universalism of Jonah’s mission. Luke thus emphasizes chapters 3 and 4 of Jonah, but Matthew’s version of Jesus’ teaching draws from the action of chapter 2. Just as Jonah was in the belly of the great fish for three days, “so will the Son of Man be in the heart of the earth three days and three nights” (Matt 12:40). Matthew includes the same teaching of repentance as Luke but also adds the unique interpretation of Jonah’s “death” and “resurrection” as a foreshadowing of Jesus’ own. This second idea comes to dominate the subsequent reception history. Then, when the apostle Paul describes immersion baptism as a ritualized participation in death and resurrection (Rom 6:3-4), the resources are all present to close the loop on the Jonah cycle. The story of Jonah therefore portrays (for Christians) the necessity of repentance, the salvific role of immersion in water as a death and resurrection, and the universal message of the God of Israel for all people, whether Jews or Gentiles. No matter how wayward a son of Israel has been, no matter how wicked a king of the Gentiles has been, God’s mercy is available and boundless.

The artist of the sarcophagus surrounds the Jonah cycle with other stories to reinforce these meanings for the viewer. Looking closely at the water, between the sea monster and the reclining Jonah, one can see an inset Noah. Depicted in the “Jack-in-the-box” style typical of this era, Noah emerges from the ark to find the dove messenger returning with an olive branch (Gen 8:11), signifying the end of the flood and the salvation of those in the ark.- Early Christian artists often juxtapose various stories of salvation near or through water. One might even read the fisherman on the lower right, whose line casts near to where Jonah comes on shore, as a symbol of Jesus’ first metaphor for preaching and discipleship: “Come, follow me,” Jesus said to Simon Peter and Andrew while they were fishing, “and I will make you fishers of men” (Matt 5:19).

The upper left features Jesus’ raising of Lazarus, a “sign” performed in the Gospel of John that bears obvious connection to the “sign of Jonah” in the Gospel of Matthew. The center of the upper register shows two scenes that are open to multiple interpretations. One possibility is from the Old Testament: here depicts Moses drawing “water from the rock” to satisfy the thirst of the Israelites wandering the wilderness during the exodus (Exod 17 / Num 20); to its right might then be the rebellion of Israelites against Moses (perhaps Num 16).

Another possibility involves a different “water from the rock” miracle, that of Peter summoning a spring of water with which to baptize his repentant jailers. This is a non-canonical story about Peter’s life, but one apparently in very wide circulation, as there are at least 225 examples of it preserved from early Christian art. The scene to its right would thus be the arrest of Peter, another non-canonical but widely depicted story. Either option signifies God’s miraculous provision for salvation through water, whether through thirst-quenching or a new covenant with God. The upper right shows a shepherd guiding sheep out of a mausoleum-like structure, and this calls to mind various biblical images of a shepherd and flock as salvation from death: the “Lord is my shepherd” (Psalm 23), the parables of the lost sheep (Luke 15 / Matt 18), and the “good shepherd” and “gate” for the sheep (John 10), among others. Whoever “enters the gate” of death through Jesus will be saved, say the Gospel of John and the Jonah sarcophagus in unison. Both Jews and Gentiles will be “one flock” with “one shepherd” (John 10:16).

With these details in mind, we can zoom back out to see the big picture one final time. If you allow your eyes to be guided by the overall flow of the shapes and lines, you will see a curved arc of descent and ascent. Begin above the sail of the boat, where there stands in the sky what looks like a person peering through a circular portal in the heavens. In fact, this is the Roman sky god Caelus, who is often pictured this way during the Roman imperial era, with a billowing garment over his head. This personification of the sky or heaven (hence the word “celestial”) was adopted frequently in early Christian art as a way to communicate heavenly realms to the viewer (see also Figure 5.6 below). Some Roman writers even identified the God of Israel (as a sky god) with the Roman god Caelus, so we might imagine him here as a symbol of divine command over the drama below U His gaze looks down along the line of the sail and follows the halyard directly into the snout of the beast. The arc flattens at the center of the sarcophagus and then bends upward through the right-facing snout, upward along the reclining Jonah’s left arm, then his right arm, and above to the plant of his blessed afterlife. From its tiny details to its overall form, this artistic masterwork conjures a treasury of biblical stories and frames the hoped-for arc of salvation from death.

Following is a contemporary Coptic Orthodox icon of Jonah.

 

Orthodox Icons are not drawings or creations of imagination. They are in fact writings of things not of this world. Icons can represent our Lord Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary, and the Saints. They can also represent the Holy Trinity, Angels, the Heavenly hosts, and even events. Orthodox icons, unlike Western pictures, change the perspective and form of the image so that it is not naturalistic. This is done so that we can look beyond appearances of the world, and instead look to the spiritual truth of the holy person or event. (Source )

In Spanish Sign Language it is translated with a sign that depicts “swallow (by a large fish).” (Source: Steve Parkhurst)


“Jonah” in Spanish Sign Language, source: Sociedad Bíblica de España

In Swiss-German Sign Language it is translated with the sign for “stubbornness.”


“Jonah” in Swiss-German Sign Language, source: DSGS-Lexikon biblischer Begriffe , © CGG Schweiz

For more information on translations of proper names with sign language see Sign Language Bible Translations Have Something to Say to Hearing Christians .

inclusive vs. exclusive pronoun (Jonah 1:7)

Many languages distinguish between inclusive and exclusive first-person plural pronouns (“we”). (Click or tap here to see more details)

The inclusive “we” specifically includes the addressee (“you and I and possibly others”), while the exclusive “we” specifically excludes the addressee (“he/she/they and I, but not you”). This grammatical distinction is called “clusivity.” While Semitic languages such as Hebrew or most Indo-European languages such as Greek or English do not make that distinction, translators of languages with that distinction have to make a choice every time they encounter “we” or a form thereof (in English: “we,” “our,” or “us”).

For this verse, the Jarai and the Adamawa Fulfulde translation both use the inclusive pronoun, including everyone on board.

complete verse (Jonah 1:7)

Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Jonah 1:7:

  • Kupsabiny: “That person came with/brought Jonah to where the others were, Then they were told, ‘Fellow friends/guys! Let us cast lots to find out who has brought us this sin/trouble.’ After they had cast lots, the words caught/fell on Jonah.” (Source: Kupsabiny Back Translation)
  • Newari: “The ship’s crew talked among themselves — "Come, by casting lots let’s see because of whom [Lit. by whom doing] has this disaster happened to us." They cast lots and it fell on the name of Jonah.” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
  • Hiligaynon: “Now, the sailors said-to-each-other, ‘Come let- us (incl.) -cast-lots so-that we (incl.) will-know who (is) the cause of this calamity that has-come upon us (incl.).’ Therefore they cast-lots, and the name of Jonas was-the-one that was-selected-by-lot.” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
  • Kankanaey: “Then the workers/employees (oblantis) made-an-agreement and they said, ‘Let’s draw-lots so-that it will-be-made-known who is the reason for this bad happening.’ When they did that, Jonas was drawn-by-lot.” (Source: Kankanaey Back Translation)
  • English: “Then the sailors said to each other, ‘We need to cast lots/shake from a container small objects that we have all marked, to determine who has caused all this trouble!’ So they did that, and the object with Jonah’s mark fell out of the container.” (Source: Translation for Translators)

Commentaire sur la traduction de Jonas 1.7

Ce verset est caractérisé par la répétition de la racine נפל nfl, « tomber », qui apparaît trois fois dans ce verset.

Un changement de lieu et de temps, coïncidant avec un mouvement du fond du bateau vers le pont, à la surface du bateau, semble sous-entendu. La conjonction וְ we est rendue par « puis » dans plusieurs versions (Traduction œcuménique de la Bible, Bible de Jérusalem). Si nécessaire, on pourrait fournir une transition plus longue, par exemple, « Plus tard, lorsque Jonas est monté sur le pont… » La Bible du Rabbinat Français suggère « cependant » mais cette conjonction ne semble pas convenir ici.

Ils se dirent entre eux : en hébreu le texte dit « ils ont dit homme à son ami », une façon d’exprimer la réciprocité. Il ne s’agit pas d’un échange entre le capitaine et Jonas, mais plutôt d’une discussion entre les différents membres de l’équipage. On pourrait dire « les uns aux autres » (Bible de Jérusalem) ou être plus explicite, en disant « les marins discutaient/se dirent entre eux ».

Venez, consultons les sorts : constatant que les appels fervents à leurs dieux n’ont pas donné de résultat, les marins cherchent un autre moyen d’échapper à la tempête. Ils pensent que s’ils peuvent découvrir le coupable, la colère divine s’apaisera. Ils suggèrent donc de tirer au sort. Ici il s’agit d’une citation directe qui rend le récit très vif.

Venez (Traduction œcuménique de la Bible, Nouvelle Bible Segond) est la traduction du verbe de mouvement « aller » ou « marcher ». Les marins disent ceci pour introduire leur suggestion. Dans certaines langues, on dirait « Allons ! » (La Bible du Semeur, La Bible Pléiade) ou « Voyons » (Bible du Rabbinat Français). Les traducteurs pourraient aussi utiliser une particule ou expression dans leur langue, par exemple, « Tirons donc au sort ».

consultons les sorts est littéralement « faisons tomber les sorts ». En effet, beaucoup de cultures disposent d’une ou de plusieurs méthode(s) de tirer au sort. Dans les pays européens, on tire souvent à la courte paille ou l’on jette des dés. Dans d’autres cultures, on peut se servir de bâtonnets en bois, de cailloux, de cauris, etc. On ignore en quoi consistaient les sorts ici. Quelle que soit la méthode utilisée, dans une telle pratique les gens considèrent que c’est Dieu ou une divinité qui dirige le sort. Les Juifs aussi tiraient au sort pour désigner les gens qui allaient servir dans le temple ou qui allaient partir à la guerre. Voir Lév 16.8 ; Jug 20.9 ; Prov 16.33. En hébreu le mot גּוֹרָל gôrâl est au pluriel, les sorts, mais les traducteurs devraient utiliser la forme qui convient dans leur langue. Le verbe sera aussi à déterminer : « tirer » (Parole de Vie, Bible en français courant), « jeter », etc.

pour connaître le responsable du malheur qui nous frappe est littéralement « que nous sachions par qui ce mal à nous ». Le mot « qui » se réfère à une personne, c’est-à-dire, à la personne qui est responsable, et non à pas à une chose ou un événement qui est la cause de ce malheur. Plusieurs versions insèrent un verbe comme attire (Segond Révisée, Nouvelle Bible Segond) : « pour connaître celui qui nous attire ce mal ». Mais les traducteurs pourront aussi reformuler pour dire : « pour savoir de qui vient ce mal », « pour connaître le responsable du malheur qui nous arrive » (Bible en français courant).

malheur rend le même mot qu’en Jonas 1.2. Mais là il s’agit d’un mal moral commis par les gens, tandis qu’ici il s’agit d’une catastrophe ou malheur qui arrive aux gens.

qui nous frappe rend un seul mot en hébreu « à nous ». Les traducteurs pourraient utiliser une expression qui convient, par exemple « malheur qui nous arrive » (Parole de Vie).

Ils consultèrent les sorts, qui désignèrent Jonas. : la même expression avec le verbe « tomber » se trouve ici, litt. « et ils ont fait tomber les sorts ». Beaucoup de versions omettent le וְ we, mais on pourrait l’exprimer, en disant, par exemple, « Ils tirèrent donc au sort et… » (La Bible du Semeur).

qui désignèrent Jonas est en hébreu : « et il tomba sur Jonas ». Dans plusieurs langues, il y aura deux expressions différentes pour « tirer au sort » et « le sort tomba sur ». Dans ce dernier cas, on dira peut-être, « le sort a choisi » ou « a désigné Jonas ». Dans certaines langues, on évitera la répétition du mot sort pour dire « et c’est Jonas qui a été désigné ». On pourrait dire « Les marins ont décidé de tirer au sort pour voir qui était responsable de leur malheur, et le sort a désigné Jonas ».

Source: Péter-Contesse, René & Zogbo, Lynell. Jonas – Manuel de traduction – Commentaire linguistique et exégétique de la Bible. Alliance biblique universelle, 2021.