priest

The Hebrew, Aramaic, Ge’ez, and Greek that are typically translated as “priest” in English (itself deriving from Latin “presbyter” — “elder”) is often translated with a consideration of existing religious traditions. (Click or tap for details)

Bratcher / Nida (1961) say this:

“However, rather than borrow local names for priests, some of which have unwanted connotations, a number of translations have employed descriptive phrases based on certain functions: (1) those describing a ceremonial activity: Pamona uses tadu, the priestess who recites the litanies in which she describes her journey to the upper or under-world to fetch life-spirit for sick people, animals or plants; Batak Toba uses the Arabic malim, ‘Muslim religious teacher;’ ‘one who presents man’s sacrifice to God’ (Bambara, Eastern Maninkakan), ‘one who presents sacrifices’ (Baoulé, Navajo (Dinė)), ‘one who takes the name of the sacrifice’ (Kpelle, and ‘to make a sacrifice go out’ (Hausa); (2) those describing an intermediary function: ‘one who speaks to God’ (Shipibo-Conibo) and ‘spokesman of the people before God’ (Tabasco Chontal).”

In Obolo it is translated as ogwu ngwugwa or “the one who offers sacrifice” (source: Enene Enene), in Mairasi as agam aevar nevwerai: “religious leader” (source: Enggavoter 2004), in Ignaciano as “blesser, one who does ritual as a practice” (using a generic term rather than the otherwise common Spanish loan word sacerdote) (source: Willis Ott in Notes on Translation 88/1982, p. 18ff.), and in Noongar as yakin-kooranyi or “holy worker” (source: Warda-Kwabba Luke-Ang).

For Guhu-Samane, Ernest Richert (in The Bible Translator, 1965, p. 81ff. ) reports this: “The [local] cult of Poro used to be an all-encompassing religious system that essentially governed all areas of life. (…) For ‘priest’ the term ‘poro father’ would at first seem to be a natural choice. However, several priests of the old cult are still living. Although they no longer function primarily as priests of the old system they still have a substantial influence on the community, and there would be more than a chance that the unqualified term would (in some contexts particularly) be equated with the priest of the poro cult. We learned, then, that the poro fathers would sometimes be called ‘knife men’ in relation to their sacrificial work. The panel was pleased to apply this term to the Jewish priest, and the Christian community has adopted it fully. [Mark 1:44, for instance, now] reads: ‘You must definitely not tell any man of this. But you go show your body to the knife man and do what Moses said about a sacrifice concerning your being healed, and the cause (base of this) will be apparent.'”

For a revision of the 1968 version of the Bible in Khmer Joseph Hong (in: The Bible Translator 1996, 233ff. ) talks about a change in wording for this term:

​​Bau cha r (បូជា‌ចារ្យ) — The use of this new construction meaning “priest” is maintained to translate the Greek word hiereus. The term mean sang (មាន សង្ឃ) used in the old version actually means a “Buddhist monk,” and is felt to be theologically misleading. The Khmer considers the Buddhist monk as a “paddy field of merits,” a reserve of merits to be shared with other people. So a Khmer reader would find unthinkable that the mean sang in the Bible killed animals, the gravest sin for a Buddhist; and what a scandal it would be to say that a mean sang was married, had children, and drank wine.

In Cherokee (Jewish) priests are translated as atsilv-anelohi (ᎠᏥᎸ-ᎠᏁᎶᎯ), “fire feeders.” Bender / Belt (2025, p. 26) explain: “[This] provides a point of semantic overlap between the Jewish priests mentioned in the book of John and traditional Cherokee leaders who would have maintained a ceremonial fire. No loanword or semantic extension would have highlighted this specific similarity. Just as the New Testament Christ seeks to supersede the priests of his day, the missionaries working to translate the New Testament hoped to replace traditional ceremonialism with Christian beliefs and practices. Describing the Jewish priests as ‘fire feeders’ may have been a way to emphasize the obsolescence of fire-based ceremonialism. Strikingly, this word has become the term for Catholics. The vast majority of Cherokee converts to Christianity are Protestants.”

In Cuban Sign Language (the Jewish) priest is translated referencing the ephod , the traditional apron that was worn by priests:


“Priest” in Cuban Sign Language (source: La Biblia Para Personas Sorde )

Alain Montano (in: The Bible Translator 2026, p. 173ff.) explains: “A second challenge arose in translating the term ‘priest’ in Luke 10:31, referring to the priest who was descending from the temple. The translation team consisted primarily of Evangelical translators and included one Catholic translator. The initial sign proposed for ‘priest’ referenced the clerical collar, a symbol commonly associated with clergy across multiple Christian denominations, such as Methodists, Anglicans, Lutherans, Presbyterians, Reformed, Catholics, Moravians, and others. While most team members considered this option acceptable, the Catholic translator raised concerns that this representation could generate confusion, as it encompassed denominational identities not directly related to the priest described in the biblical text.

“Given this observation, the team began searching for a sign that accurately represented the priest in question and his role, with the aim of ensuring that the translation and interpretation of the text was as faithful as possible. Signs referencing a bishop’s miter or the skullcap worn by cardinals and popes were discarded, as the priest in question did not belong to the Catholic tradition as the evangelical translators initially understood it.

“The possibility of representing the high priest—using the breastplate and the Urim and Thummim — was also rejected, since the character in the text was not the high priest, but a Levitical priest serving his assigned turn in the temple. The challenge was ultimately resolved through the creation of a new sign referencing the ephod, which more accurately represented this type of priest, who served as an assistant in the work of the temple of Israel.”

See also idolatrous priests and Aaron.

Levite

The Greek, Hebrew, Aramaic, Ge’ez, and Latin that is transliterated “Levites” in English (only the Contemporary English Version translates it as “temple helpers”) is translated in Ojitlán Chinantec as “temple caretakers,” Yatzachi Zapotec as “people born in the family line of Levi, people whose responsibility it was to do the work in the important church of the Israelites,” in Alekano as “servants in the sacrifice house from Jerusalem place,” and in Tenango Otomi as “helpers of priests.” (Source: M. Larson / B. Moore in Notes on Translation February 1970, p. 1-125.)

In American Sign Language with a sign that combines “temple” + “servant.” (Source: Ruth Anna Spooner, Ron Lawer)


“Levite” in American Sign Language, source: Deaf Harbor

For the sign in Spanish Sign Language, see Levi.

More information about Levites .

Jerusalem

The name that is transliterated as “Jerusalem” in English is signed in French Sign Language with a sign that depicts worshiping at the Western Wall in Jerusalem:


“Jerusalem” in French Sign Language (source: La Bible en langue des signes française )

While a similar sign is also used in British Sign Language, another, more neutral sign that combines the sign “J” and the signs for “place” is used as well. (Source: Anna Smith)


“Jerusalem” in British Sign Language (source: Christian BSL, used with permission)

Learn more on Bible Odyssey: Jerusalem .

complete verse (Ezra 7:7)

Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Ezra 7:7:

  • Kupsabiny: “In the seventh year when Artaxerxes was ruling, Ezra led other Israelites together with the priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers and the people of work in the House of God leaving Babylon.” (Source: Kupsabiny Back Translation)
  • Newari: “In the 7th year of King Artaxerxes, a group of Israelites came from Babylon to Jerusalem. Included in that group were Priests, Levites, singers in the temple and temple guards and servants of the temple.” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
  • Hiligaynon: “There were some Israelinhon who also joined him when he returned to Jerusalem in the seventh year of the reign of Artaserkses. Included among those who joined were the priests, Levites, singers, guards at the gate/entrance of the temple, and servants in the temple.” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
  • English: “Some of the priests, some other descendants of Levi, some singers, some gatekeepers/men who guarded the gates of the temple, and some men who worked in the temple, and some other Israeli people came up with me here to Jerusalem. That was during the seventh year that Artaxerxes was the king of Persia.” (Source: Translation for Translators)

king

Some languages do not have a concept of kingship and therefore no immediate equivalent for the Greek, Hebrew, Ge’ez, Aramaic, and Latin that is translated as “king” in English. Here are some (back-) translations:

(Click or tap here to see details)

  • Piro: “a great one”
  • Highland Totonac: “the big boss”
  • Huichol: “the one who commanded” (source for this and above: Bratcher / Nida)
  • Ekari: “the one who holds the country” (source: Reiling / Swellengrebel)
  • Una: weik sienyi: “big headman” (source: Kroneman 2004, p. 407)
  • Pass Valley Yali: “Big Man” (source: Daud Soesilo)
  • Ninia Yali: “big brother with the uplifted name” (source: Daud Soesilio in Noss 2007, p. 175)
  • Nyamwezi: mutemi: generic word for ruler, by specifying the city or nation it becomes clear what kind of ruler (source: Pioneer Bible Translators, project-specific translation notes in Paratext)
  • Ghomála’: Fo (“The word Fo refers to the paramount ruler in the kingdoms of West Cameroon. He holds administrative, political, and religious power over his own people, who are divided into two categories: princes (descendants of royalty) and servants (everyone else).” (Source: Michel Kenmogne in Theologizing in Context: An Example from the Study of a Ghomala’ Christian Hymn))

Faye Edgerton retells how the term in Navajo (Dinė) was determined:

“[This term was] easily expressed in the language of Biblical culture, which had kings and noblemen with their brilliant trappings and their position of honor and praise. But leadership among the Navajos is not accompanied by any such titles or distinctions of dress. Those most respected, especially in earlier days, were their headmen, who were the leaders in raids, and the shaman, who was able to serve the people by appealing for them to the gods, or by exorcising evil spirits. Neither of these made any outward show. Neither held his position by political intrigue or heredity. If the headman failed consistently in raids, he was superceded by a better warrior. If the shaman failed many times in his healing ceremonies, it was considered that he was making mistakes in the chants, or had lost favor with the gods, and another was sought. The term Navajos use for headman is derived from a verb meaning ‘to move the head from side to side as in making an oration.’ The headman must be a good orator, able to move the people to go to war, or to follow him in any important decision. This word is naat’áanii which now means ‘one who rules or bosses.’ It is employed now for a foreman or boss of any kind of labor, as well as for the chairman of the tribal council. So in order to show that the king is not just a common boss but the highest ruler, the word ‘aláahgo, which expresses the superlative degree, was put before naat’áanii, and so ‘aláahgo naat’áanii ‘anyone-more-than-being around-he-moves-his-head-the-one-who’ means ‘the highest ruler.’ Naat’áanii was used for governor as the context usually shows that the person was a ruler of a country or associated with kings.”

(Source: Faye Edgerton in The Bible Translator 1962, p. 25ff. )

See also king (Japanese honorifics).

Translation commentary on Ezra 7:6 - 7:7

This Ezra went up from Babylonia: Verses 1-6 introduce the character Ezra. They are one sentence in Hebrew with no verb until verse 6. Because the subject “Ezra” in verse 1 is so far from the verb went up here, the name Ezra is repeated again here in verse 6. The translator needs to pay particular attention here to the introduction and description of this new and major character.

The verb went up, which is repeated three times in this section in verses 6, 7 and 9 and again in verse 28 at the end of the chapter, echoes the edict of Cyrus in Ezra 1.3. It emphasizes the fulfillment of that aspect of his decree. The repetition of the same verb here and the mention of Babylonia clearly links this second part of the book to the first part (see the comment at 1.3). For Babylonia see Ezra 1.11.

So far in this section the writer has identified the new character Ezra in the history that he is recounting, he has shown Ezra’s legitimacy as a teacher of the law through the presentation of his lineage, and he has briefly stated what Ezra did. Now a fuller description of the historical person of Ezra is given.

Quoted with permission from Noss, Philip A. and Thomas, Kenneth J. A Handbook on Ezra. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 2005. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Ezra is described as a scribe skilled in the law of Moses. Scribe was a word used of an official in the Persian imperial court and some commentators have suggested that Ezra was a kind of high commissioner for Jewish affairs whose principal responsibility was the implementation and administration of Jewish law. But the emphasis here is on his knowledge of the Law of Moses, qualifying him to be a teacher and interpreter of God’s written word (see verse 10 below). Originally, to be a skilled scribe meant to be a fast and accurate drafter of documents, but it became a stereotyped phrase to indicate that the person being described was able to do well whatever the job was. New Jerusalem Bible says he was “a scribe versed in the Law of Moses,” while Revised English Bible describes him as an “expert in the law of Moses.” In other words, “he had great knowledge of the Law of Moses” (compare Bible en français courant). Similarly, Good News Translation says “Ezra was a scholar with a thorough knowledge of the Law….”

Translators may use a technical term in their language with an equivalent meaning for scribe. However, the implication that Ezra was simply a secretary or writer of letters and books should be avoided. Therefore, a term similar to “scholar” in Good News Translation may be used (compare the New English Bible footnote, which has “doctor of the law”). Alternatively, a descriptive expression such as “person-know-book” or “person-teach-law” may be used. He may be described as a “specialist who knew the Law of Moses very well.”

The law of Moses is literally “the Torah of Moses” (see Ezra 3.2). Like “the book of Moses” (see Ezra 6.18), this refers to the Pentateuch, that is, the first five books of the Old Testament that were called the Torah. Although the root meaning of “Torah” is associated with “instruction, teaching,” this word is traditionally translated by “law.” Ezra was well versed in Jewish religious law.

That the LORD God of Israel had given: The LORD God of Israel (see Ezra 1.3), and not Moses, is acknowledged as the source of the Torah. In some languages it may be necessary to specify a recipient of the verb had given, although the Hebrew leaves this to be understood implicitly. Good News Translation and other versions restructure to make it clear that the law was given to Moses (also Contemporary English Version, Bible en français courant).

The king granted him all that he asked: It is not indicated here what Ezra asked for from the king or what the king granted. But the letter from the king in the next section (verses 12-26) may be a response of the king to what Ezra had requested. In any case, whatever the king provided was seen as given by God.

For the hand of the LORD his God was upon him: The expression hand … upon is repeated six times in this chapter and the next one (7.6, 9, 28; 8.18, 22, 31) and it occurs twice in the book of Nehemiah (2.8, 18). In the Hebrew language, hand may be used as a figure of speech called metonymy to refer to a person and a person’s deeds, especially with regard to power (see Ezra 5.12). Here it means that God’s active presence was with Ezra or that God acted with favor toward Ezra. If translators retain the Hebrew figure of speech by translating it literally, as many versions have done, it may be necessary to make the meaning explicit so that the gesture of God’s hand being upon Ezra is not understood wrongly. Priority should be given to the meaning over the figure of speech. Contemporary English Version indicates God’s intervention on Ezra’s behalf by saying “the LORD made sure,” while Bible en français courant says “The Lord his God conferred such prestige upon him.” His God does not mean that Ezra possessed God. Instead, it refers to the God that Ezra worshiped and served (compare “their God” in Ezra 5.5).

And there went up also to Jerusalem … some of the people of Israel, and some of the priests and Levites, the singers and gatekeepers, and the temple servants: The categories of people who went from Babylonia to Jerusalem with Ezra are the same as in Ezra 2 (see verses 36, 40, 41, 42, 58), except there are not as many categories. They are even listed in the same order. Ezra is not mentioned here, so some commentators have suggested changing the verb went up from the plural to the singular form to indicate that Ezra brought these people up to Jerusalem (so Good News Translation, which also combines verses 6-7). But the context suggests fairly clearly that they accompanied Ezra. Some translations make this explicit by adding “with him” (New English Bible). Revised English Bible says “He was accompanied to Jerusalem by….”

The time of departure is given as the seventh year of Artaxerxes the king. This refers to the seventh year of the reign of King Artaxerxes I, that is, the seventh year from the time that he began ruling. The departure for Jerusalem took place in 458 B.C.

Quoted with permission from Noss, Philip A. and Thomas, Kenneth J. A Handbook on Ezra. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 2005. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

SIL Translator’s Notes on Ezra 7:7

7:7a So in the seventh year of King Artaxerxes, he went up to Jerusalem

In the seventh year that King Artaxerxes ⌊ruled Persia⌋, Ezra ⌊departed from Babylon⌋ and went to Jerusalem.
-or-
During the seventh year after Artaxerxes became king, Ezra went up to Jerusalem.
-or-
In the seventh year of the reign of King Artaxerxes, I journeyed/traveled to Jerusalem,

7:7b with some of the Israelites, including priests, Levites, singers, gatekeepers, and temple servants.

Some of the people of Israel, including those who were priests, temple workers of/from the clan of Levi, singers, doorkeepers, and temple servants, went with him.
-or-
Some of the Jews ⌊in Babylon⌋, including some ⌊who were temple workers such as⌋ sacrificers, descendants of Levi, temple singers, those who guarded the gates of the temple, and other temple workers, traveled with him.
-or-
and some Israelites journeyed with me, including some who were priests, some who were from the clan of Levi, some who were singers, some who were gatekeepers, and some who were temple servants.

7:7a–b (reordered)

In the seventh year that Artaxerxes was king, some of the people of Israel traveled/journeyed to Jerusalem with Ezra. Among them were temple workers from the clan of Levi including priests, singers, and guardians of the gates/doors. There were also other workers/servants who helped the men of Levi.

© 2020 by SIL International®
Made available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA) creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.
All Scripture quotations in this publication, unless otherwise indicated, are from The Holy Bible, Berean Standard Bible.
BSB is produced in cooperation with Bible Hub, Discovery Bible, OpenBible.com, and the Berean Bible Translation Committee.