Start by entering a Bible verse here and select Find Verse
Step into the multitudes of languages of the Bible and join the worldwide conversation!
Language: Spanish
Spanish (spa) is a(n) Indo-European language of Andorra, Argentina, Bolivia, Plurinational State of, Brazil, Belize, Chile, Colombia, Costa Rica, Cuba, Dominican Republic, Ecuador, Spain, France, Gibraltar, Guatemala, Guyana, Honduras, Haiti, Morocco, Mexico, Nicaragua, Panama, Peru, Puerto Rico, Portugal, Paraguay, El Salvador, United States, Uruguay, Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of, marked as not endangered
The Greek that is translated as “fruit of the Spirit” in English is translated in British Sign Language with a sign that depicts the Spirit coming in to a person and then the person giving out. (Source: Anna Smith)
“Fruit of the Spirit” in British Sign Language (source: Christian BSL, used with permission)
In the German New Testament translation by Berger / Nord (publ. 1999) it is translated wer sich vom Heiligen Geist leiten lässt, der kann… or “whoever is guided by the Holy Spirit is able to… .”
The following is a stained glass window from John Hardman Powell (1827–1895) in the Christ Church Cathedral in Dublin, depicting the fruit of the Spirit:
Photo and accompanying text by Andreas F. Borchert, hosted by Wikimedia Commons under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Germany license
“In its centre is the Lord as Good Shepherd along with the Fruit of the Spirit, namely Love (inscription in centre), Joy & Peace (top inscription), and in clockwise direction: Longsuffering, Faith, Gentleness, Goodness, Meekness, Temperance in reference to Galatians 5:22-23, surrounded by medaillons, depicting an angel carrying a scroll with the inscription Gloria in excelsis deo (top, representing joy & peace), and then in clockwise direction: Job (upper right, representing longsuffering), Jonathan (lower right, representing faithfulness), Ruth (bottom, representing goodness and gentleness), Moses (lower left, representing meekness), and John the Baptist (upper left, representing temperance, see Matthew 3:4).”
Stained glass is not just highly decorative, it’s a medium which has been used to express important religious messages for centuries. Literacy was not widespread in the medieval and Renaissance periods and the Church used stained glass and other artworks to teach the central beliefs of Christianity. In Gothic churches, the windows were filled with extensive narrative scenes in stained glass — like huge and colorful picture storybooks — in which worshipers could ‘read’ the stories of Christ and the saints and learn what was required for their religious salvation. (Source: Victoria and Albert Museum )
The Latin Vulgate translation added three “fruits”: “forbearance” (longanimitas), “courtesy” (modestia), and “chastity” (castitas). This meant that all Catholic translations before app. 1950 that were based on the Latin version also had those additional attributes (EnglishDouay-Rheims: longanimity, modesty, chastity; SpanishBiblia Torres Amat: longanimidad, modestia, castidad etc.)
Ronald Knox writes in his translation of the Vulgate (1946): “The Greek only mentions nine of the Twelve Fruits; viz. the first six, together with gentleness, faith, and temperateness. It is possible that the Latin version has accidentally included, in some cases, two renderings of the same Greek word.” Note that neither earlier Latin versions (Vetus Latina) nor the revision of the Vulgate of 1979 / 1986 (Nova Vulgata) have these attributes. (Source: Jost Zetzsche)
The Greek that is usually translated as “the whole land” in English is translated in
Uma as “all over the village” (source: Uma Back Translation)
Yakan as “that whole place/country” (source: Yakan Back Translation)
Western Bukidnon Manobo as “the whole world” (source: Western Bukidnon Manobo Back Translation)
Tenango Otomi as “all the earth” (source: Tenango Otomi Back Translation)
Catholic translations that rely on the LatinVulgate‘s ambiguous totam terram (which, just as the Greek, could refer to the terrestrial globe or a particular place of land) tend to also stay ambiguous. The SpanishReina Valera has toda la tierra and the EnglishDouay Rheims likewise reads the whole earth. (Source: Knox 1949, p. 20)
The now commonly-used English idiom “eye for an eye” (meaning revenge or retribution) was first coined in 1526 in the English New Testament translation of William Tyndale. (Source: Crystal 2010, p. 285)
Likewise in Mandarin Chinese, the phrasing that was coined to translate “an eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth” — yǐyǎn huányǎn, yǐyá huányá (以眼还眼，以牙还牙 / 以眼還眼，以牙還牙) — has also become a Chinese proverb (see here ).
Other languages that have idioms based on the Hebrew that is translated “an eye for an eye” in English include:
In Alekano it is translated as “if someone gouges out your eye, gouge out his eye,” since in that language body parts need to have an obligatory possessive designator attached. (Source: Larson 1998, p. 42)
Newman / Nida describe some of the difficulties surrounding the translation of the Greek “Logos” which is typically translated as “Word” in English (click or tap here to read more):
“The term ‘the Word’ has a rich heritage, by way of both its Greek and Jewish backgrounds. For the Greeks who held to a theistic view of the universe, it could be understood as the means by which God reveals himself to the world, while among those who were pantheistic in outlook, the Word was the principle that held the world together and at the same time endowed men with the wisdom for living. In the Greek translation of the Old Testament (Septuagint), the Word could be used both of the means by which God had created the world (Ps 33:6) and through which he had revealed himself to the world (Jer 1:4; Ezek 1:3; Amos 3:1). Among certain of the Greek-speaking Jews of New Testament times, there was much speculation about the ‘wisdom’ of God, which God ‘made in the very beginning, at the first, before the world began’ (Prov 8:22-23). (…) By the time that John writes his Gospel, the Word is close to being recognized as a personal being, and it has roles relating to the manner in which God created the world and to the way in which God reveals himself to the world that he brought into being. Moffatt [whose English translation of the New Testament was published in 1913], realizing the difficulty in finding a term equivalent in meaning to the one used by John, transliterates the Greek term: ‘the Logos existed in the very beginning’ [see also Hart’s translation below or The Orthodox New Testament, 2000)]; while Phillips [New Testament translation published in 1958] at least makes an effort to give his translation meaning: ‘at the beginning God expressed himself.’
“Though the Greek term logos may be rendered ‘word,’ it would be wrong to think it indicates primarily a grammatical or lexical unit in a sentence. Greek has two other terms which primarily identify individual words, whether they occur in a list (as in a dictionary) or in a sentence. The term logos, though applicable to an individual word, is more accurately understood as an expression with meaning; that is, it is ‘a message,’ ‘a communication,’ and, as indicated, a type of ‘revelation.’ A literal translation, therefore, more or less equivalent to English ‘word,’ is frequently misleading.
“In some languages there are additional complications. For example, in some languages the term ‘word’ is feminine in gender, and therefore any reference to it must also be feminine [or neuter — see German below]. As a result, the possible use of pronouns in reference to Jesus Christ can be confusing. Furthermore, in many languages a term such as ‘word’ must be possessed. One cannot speak about ‘the word’ without indicating who spoke the word, since words do not exist apart from the persons who utter them.
“Because of these and other difficulties, many translators treat the term ‘Word’ or Logos as a title, and that is precisely what it is. The very fact that it is normally capitalized in English translations marks it as a title; but in many languages the fact of its being a title must be more clearly indicated by some explicit expression, for example, ‘the one who was called the Word’ [see Xicotepec De Juárez Totonac below] or ‘the one known as the Word’ [see German below] In this way the reader can understand from the beginning that ‘Word’ is to be understood as a designation for a person.
“Therefore, this first sentence in John 1:1 may be rendered ‘Before the world was created, the one who was known as the Word existed’ or ‘… the person called the Word existed.’ In languages which employ honorific forms it is particularly appropriate to use such an indication with the title ‘Word.’ Such a form immediately marks the designation as the title of deity or of a very important personage, depending, of course, upon the usage in the language in question.”
Garifuna: “the one named Word, the one who gives life” (Source for this and two above: John Beekman in Notes on Translation 12, November 1964, p. 1ff.)
Tzeltal de Oxchuc y Tenejapa (Highland Tzeltal): te C’opile: “the Word” (in a new, 2001 version of the New Testament to avoid the previous translation “the Word of God,” a term also used for “Bible.” — Source: Robert Bascom)
German: Der, der ‘das Wort’ ist: “He who is ‘the Word'” — this solution circumvents the different gender of Jesus (masculine) and “das Wort” (neuter) (in Neue Genfer Übersetzung 2009 / BasisBibel 2021) / Zürcher Bibel, 2007 revision: “the Word, the Logos” (das Wort, der Logos — “Logos” is defined as masculine)
Polish: Just like in German, “Word” (Słowo) is neuter, whereas “Jesus” is masculine. The various translations switch to a masculine form in the John’s prologue at different points. (For more tap or click here.)
The recent Przekład Otwarty translation switching in verse 14 with the masculine pełen: jaką jedyny ma od Ojca – pełen łaski i prawdy (“[glory] such as the only one has from the Father, full of grace and truth”). “The Greek form does not settle what ‘full’ refers to: πλήρης looks like a nominative, agreeing with ὁ λόγος at the start of the verse, but Abbott-Smith takes it here as indeclinable, and Codex Bezae has the accusative, agreeing with ‘glory.’ We chose the masculine because the fullness belongs to the Person: 1:16 speaks of “his fullness”, and 1:17 names Jesus Christ as the one through whom grace and truth came. The neuter pełne would agree with the noun Słowo, but in this sentence it could also be read with ciało (“flesh”), which is neuter too. The masculine pełen can go only with the Word as a Person or with ‘the only one’ just before it, and both are the same Person. The masculine that refers to the Word beyond doubt comes in 1:15 (To był Ten, ‘This was he’).” (Source: Piotr Szuszkiewicz)
Anindilyakwa: Originally translated as N-ayakwa-murra or “he having the properties of a word/message/language.” Since this was not understandable, it is now “Jesus Christ, the one who revealed God who was hidden from us.” (Source: Julie Waddy in The Bible Translator 2004, p. 452ff. )
Kwang: “He who is called ‘The reality (lit: the body) of the Word of God himself’” (source: Mark Vanderkooi)
Dholuo: Wach: “Word” (but also: “problem,” “issue,” or “matter”) (source: Jim Harries)
Matumbi: Liyi’gi’yo or “spoken Word” (as opposed to yi’gi’ya or “the word to be heard”) (source: Pioneer Bible Translators, project-specific notes in Paratext)
Assamese: বাক্য (bakya) / Bengali: বাক্ (bāk) / Telugu: వాక్యము (vākyamu) / Hindi (some versions): वचन (vachan). All these terms are derived from the Sanskrit vach (वाच्), meaning “speech,” “voice,” “talk,” “language,” or “sound.” Historically, “in early Vedic literature, vach was the creative power in the universe. Sometimes she appears alone, sometimes with Prajapati, the creator god. She is called ‘Mother of the Vedas.’ All of this suggest an interesting parallel with logos. From the Upanishads on [late Vedic period, the Vedic period overall stretches from c. 1500–500 BC), however, she retreats from her creative role and becomes identified with Saraswati, the goddess of speech.”
Sanskrit and Hindi (some versions): शब्द (shabda), meaning “speech sound.” Historically, “Shabda is of importance from the Upanishads on. As shabda-brahman it is eternal and is the ground of the phenomenal world.” (Source for this and above: R.M. Clark in The Bible Translator 1962, p. 81ff. )
Sinhala: ධර්මයාණෝ (dharmayāṇō), meaning “philosophy” or “religion.”
Tongan: Folofola: “Originally, the term is used in the kingly language and is related to the meaning of unrolling the mat, an indispensable item in Tongan traditions. The mats, especially those with beautiful and elaborate designs, are usually rolled up and kept carefully until the visit of a guest to the house. The term thus evokes to the Tongans the idea of God’s Word being unrolled to reveal his love and salvation for mankind.” (Source: Joseph Hong in The Bible Translator 1994, p. 329ff. )
Pitjantjatjara: Tjukurnga: “Dreaming” (“a form of religious mapping, an ideological construction whereby the universe is rendered understandable in religious terms; it is the collection of myths, stories, and practices by which the land is perceived and through which a person makes sense of the world.” For more tap or click here.)
“Like many crucial terms [Tjukurnga] is thankfully untranslatable. Its possible meanings are: (1) story; (2) Dreaming or Law (with a capital; there is an emerging Aboriginal desire for this sense of the word not to be given an English equivalent any longer); (3) message; (4) news; (5) individual word; (6) what someone says, thing said; and (7) birthmark, wart, which is regarded as showing something that is distinct and personal.
“It seems that with tjukurpa [the root form of Tjukurnga] is not so much the untranslatability of Christian and Aboriginal ideas but the potential for a word such as this to release the controls and spin out in all sorts of unexpected direction. For what takes off here is precisely the ‘Word.’ Not only does tjukurpa designate the Word, the logos, the meaningful expression or creative principle — or indeed story, saying, message, news, birthmark, Law … — but it is also used at times for ‘parable’ (Mark 4:13 et al.), for the translation of ‘word’ elsewhere (Mark 4:14), and for ‘gospel’ itself. Thus, Mark 1:1 has Tjukurpa Palya, ‘good Tjukurpa‘ (with a capital!) for ‘gospel.’ (…) Once let loose, it is as though tjukurpa cannot stop, for the whole mini-Bible, comprising most of the New Testament and sections of the Hebrew Bible, is itself Tjukurpa Polya: Irititja munu Kuwaritja, ‘The good Tjukurpa: old and new.’ (Source: Boer 2008, p. 154ff.)
“There are other words that the learned translators of the West have in vain tried to render into rich tongues as French or Latin. They found obscure expressions for the common ‘word’ or ‘speech’ (…) It would seem that these words would present insurmountable difficulties for the translator in primitive languages. Missionaries of the Loyalty Islands could not find the word to translate ‘Word,’ nor have they imagined that there could be a corresponding term in the native language. They simply introduced the Greek word into the vocabulary, pronouncing it in the native fashion, ‘In the beginning the Logos’. These people are intelligent; and do not appreciate pronouncing words which make no sense whatsoever. However, when a Caledonian speaks French, he translates his thoughts as they seem to him the most adequate. He can easily express himself relative to the man who has conceived good things, has said them, or done them. He simply describes such a person as, ‘The word of this man is good’. Thought, speech, and action are all included in the New Caledonian term nô. In speaking of an adulterous man one may say, ‘He has done an evil word’. One may speak of a chief who does not think, order, or act correctly as, ‘His word is not good’. The expression ‘the Word of God’ is limited in our speech to meaning of the divine Scriptures, but in New Caledonian it includes the thoughts and acts of God, ‘God said and it was done’. The New Caledonian has no difficulty in seeing the Word becoming action, becoming flesh, the word becoming a physical reality. Our deceased colleague Laffay once said: ‘I prefer to read John in the Ajië rather than in French’.
Spanish / Portuguese / Italian: Palabra / Palavra / Parola vs. Verbo. In all of these Romance languages, there is an older version of “Word” (Verbo), that today primarily means “verb” or “action,” mostly used by older Bible translations, and a more modern word (Palabra / Palavra / Parola) which primarily means “Word,” mostly used by newer Bible translations. This not only creates two different historical translations for a major theological term in those languages but also opens up new semantic facets when taking the meaning of Verbo in a modern context. (See Mindy Misener in The Christian Century). Note that La Biblia Latinoamérica (publ. 1972) has “el Verbo (la Palabra)” in John 1:1.
The recent English New Testament translation by David Bentley Hart (2017), that uses the transliteration Logos for the Greek Λόγος, says this about its translation (p. 549ff.): “In certain special instances it is quite impossible for a translator to reduce [Λόγος] to a single word in English, or in any other tongue (though one standard Chinese version of the Bible renders logos in the prologue of John’s Gospel as 道 (dao), which is about as near as any translation could come to capturing the scope and depth of the word’s religious, philosophical, and metaphoric associations in those verses, while also carrying the additional meaning of “speech” or “discourse”).”
Below you can find some background of this remarkable Chinese translation (click or tap here to read more):
Dao 道, which developed into a central concept of classical Chinese philosophy, originally carried the meaning of “path” and “(main) road.” From there it developed into “leading” and “teaching” as well as “say” and “speak.”
As early as the 7th century BC, however, dao appears with the meaning “method.” With this and the derived meaning of “the (right) way” and “moral principle,” dao became one of the central concepts of the Confucian writings.
In Daoist writings (especially in the Daodejing ), dao goes far beyond the Confucian meaning to take on creative qualities.
With this new compendium of meaning, the term became suitable for numerous foreign religions to represent central points of their doctrine, including Buddhism (as a translation for bodhi — “enlightenment”), Judaism (similar to the Confucians as the “right [Jewish] way”), and Islam (likewise the “right [Muslim] way”).
The Jesuits, who had intensively dealt with Confucianism from the 16th century on, also took over dao as the “correct (Catholic) way,” and the so-called Figurists, a group of Jesuits in the 18th century who saw the Messianic figure of Jesus Christ outlined in Chinese history, went so far as to point to the existence of John’s Logos in the dao of Daodejing.
In later Catholic Bible translations, dao was rarely used as a translation for Logos; instead, the LatinVerbum (from the Latin Vulgate) was transliterated, or yan 言 — “language”, “meaning” — was used, usually with the prefix sheng 圣 — “holy” (also used by the Russian Orthodox Church).
Protestant translations, however, began to use dao as a translation for Logos in the 1830s and have largely retained this practice to this day.
Some voices went so far as to describe Logos and dao as a point of contact between Christianity and the Chinese religions. By its gradual shaping in Greek and Jewish philosophy, Logos had become an appropriate “word vessel.” Similarly, dao’s final formation in Daodejing had also assumed the necessary capacity to serve as a translation for Logos.
The origins of dao and Logos have some clear differences, not the least being the personal relationship of Logos as the Son of God with God the Father. But it is remarkable that using dao as the translation of Logos emulates John’s likely intention with the use of Logos: the central concept of the philosophical and religious ideas of the target culture was used to translate the central concept of Christian theology.
This was not possible in the case of European cultures, which for the most part have offered only translations such as Word or Verbum, terms without any prior philosophical or religious meaning. Only advanced civilizations like China — or ancient Greece — were able to accomplish that. (Summarized version of: Zetzsche, Jost. Aspekte der chinesischen Bibelübersetzung. R. Malek (ed.) Fallbeispiel China. Beiträge zur Religion, Theologie und Kirche im chinesischen Kontext. Nettetal: Steyler Verlag, 1996.)
Peng Kuo-Wei adds this perspective (in Noss / Houser, p. 885): “The Chinese term chosen for logos is not hua (‘word’ or ‘utterance’) but dao from which the term ‘Taoism’ is derived and which can denote a general principle, a way (concrete or abstract), or reason. Thus, Chinese readers can understand that the dao of God is not just words spoken by God, but it constitutes the guiding salvific principle underlying the whole biblical account, including his action in history and teaching and action of Jesus whom he sent. Jesus is the dao of God because his ministry, death and resurrection comprises the fulfillment and realization of God’s theological and ethical principles for humanity.”
For another use of dao in the Chinese Bible, see the Way.
The English translation by Sarah Ruden (2021) uses true account in John 1. She explains (p. lxiii): “Logos can mean merely ‘statement’ or ‘speech,’ but it also has lofty philosophical uses, especially in the opening of the Book of John, where it is probably connected to the Stoic conception of the divine reasoning posited to pervade the universe. The essential connotation here is not language but the lasting, indisputable, and morally cogent truth of numbers, as displayed in correct financial accounting: this is the most basic sense of logos.” (For other uncommon English translations, see Translation commentary on John 1:1.
Famously, Goethe also had Faust ponder the translation of Logos into German in the first part of the play of the same name (publ. 1808). The German original is followed by the English translation of Walter Kaufmann (publ. 1963) (click or tap here to read more):
Geschrieben steht: “Im Anfang war das Wort!”
Hier stock ich schon! Wer hilft mir weiter fort?
Ich kann das Wort so hoch unmöglich schätzen,
Ich muß es anders übersetzen,
Wenn ich vom Geiste recht erleuchtet bin.
Geschrieben steht: Im Anfang war der Sinn.
Bedenke wohl die erste Zeile,
Daß deine Feder sich nicht übereile!
Ist es der Sinn, der alles wirkt und schafft?
Es sollte stehn: Im Anfang war die Kraft!
Doch, auch indem ich dieses niederschreibe,
Schon warnt mich was, daß ich dabei nicht bleibe.
Mir hilft der Geist! Auf einmal seh ich Rat
Und schreibe getrost: Im Anfang war die Tat!
It says: “In the beginning was the Word.”
Already I am stopped. It seems absurd.
The Word does not deserve the highest prize,
I must translate it otherwise
If I am well inspired and not blind.
It says: In the beginning was the Mind.
Ponder that first line, wait and see,
Lest you should write too hastily
Is mind the all-creating source?
It ought to say: In the beginning there was Force.
Yet something warns me as l grasp the pen,
That my translation must be changed again.
The spirit helps me. Now it is exact.
I write: In the beginning was the Act.
(The Catholic Christian Community Bible [first English edition 1997, other translations into Indonesian, Chinese, Cebuano, Chavacano, French, Ilonggo, Korean, Quechuan, Spanish, and Tagalog] “for the Christian Communities of the Third World” uses the following introduction.)
In the last centuries before Christ, Greek culture, spread by Alexander, penetrated into the countries of the Middle East (see introduction to Maccabees). The Greeks had a new way of viewing the freedom of the individual and nobility of spirit. They promoted scientific research and esteemed highly physical beauty, etc.
The Jews had to be open to this new way of thinking: when a people encloses itself in its national culture, without looking beyond it, it ends up being asphyxiated. Their culture was intimately linked to the words of God they had received for centuries, but the revelation of God was not finished and could no longer enclose itself within the molds of Hebraic culture.
The Book of Wisdom is the first important effort to express the faith and wisdom of Israel, not only in Greek, but also in a form adapted to Greek culture.
It gives an answer to the crucial questions of evil, pain and death; it sketches a proof of the existence of God that will inspire Paul and shows that God’s mercy extends to all beings without exception.
Note especially the magnificent chapters 3–5 concerning the death of the just and hope in eternal life and also the hymn to wisdom in chapter 7.
The Book of Wisdom was written in Egypt between 80 and 50 before Christ by one of the many Jews who were living in the Greek world. It is one of the deuterocanonical books.
Down below are the introductions in the Mandarin Chinese, Tagalog, Cebuano, and Spanish editions.
Sa mga huling dantaon bago kay Kristo, ang mga bansa ng Gitnang Silangan ay napasok ng kulturang Griyegong dala ng mananakop na Alejandro (tingnan ang Introduksyon sa Mga Macabeo). Dala ng mga Griyego ang isang bagong pang-unawa sa kalayaan ng tao, sa kadakilaan ng espiritu, sa interes sa siyentipikong pananaliksik, sa kahulugan ng pisikal na kagandahan, atbp.
Kinailangan nilang maging bukas sa ibang paraan ng pag-iisip: kapag nananatiling sara ang alinmang sambayanan sa sarili nitong pambansang kultura na wala nang nakikita pang iba bukod dito, di-magtatagal at namamatay ito. Matalik ang kaugnayan ng kanilang kultura sa mga salita ng Diyos na tinanggap nila sa loob ng maraming siglo, pero hindi pa natatapos ang pagbubunyag ng Diyos at hindi na nito maikulong ang sarili sa balangkas ng kulturang Hebreo.
Ang aklat ng Karunungan ang unang importanteng pagsisikap para maipahayag ang pananampalataya at karunungan ng Israel hindi lamang sa wikang Griyego kundi maging sa kaayusang angkop sa kulturang Griyego.
Sinasagot nito ang lumiligalig na katanungan tungkol sa kasamaan, pagdurusa at kamatayan. Binabalangkas nito ang isang patunay na mayroon ngang Diyos, na magbibigay-inspirasyon naman kay Pablo. Ipinapakita rin nito na iginagawad ng Diyos ang Kanyang awa sa lahat ng nilalang nang walang itinatangi.
Isa ito sa mga aklat na deuterocanonical.
Pansining mabuti ang napakagandang mga kabanata 3-5 tungkol sa kamatayan ng makatarungan at pag-asa sa buhay na walang hanggan, pati na rin ang awit sa karunungan sa kabanata 7.
Translation: Cebuano
Sa ulahing mga siglo sa wala pa si Cristo, ang Griyegong kultura nga gisabwag ni Alejandro nakatuhop na pag-ayo sa mga nasod sa Tungatungang Silangan (basaha ang pasiuna sa Macabeo). Ang mga Griyego dunay bag-o ug kinaugalingong panglantaw bahin sa kagawasan sa tawo, sa kahamili sa espiritu, sa pagdukiduki sa syensya, sa kahulogan sa mga butang nga nindot, ug daghan pa. Kining tanan ilang nakab-ot ginamit ang kalantip sa hunahuna ug salabotan.
Ang kultura sa Judio lahi. Milambo ni samtang namalandong sila sa kalihokan sa Diyos diha sa ilang kinabuhi ug sa dagan sa ilang kasaysayan. Angay silang pasalamatan ining tanan. Hinuon mas makatabang kon sila bukas ug gawasnon sa pagdawat sa mga bag-ong panghunahuna, imbis mosira sa bisag unsang kultura nga dili ilaha. Diha nga ang katawhan magapos pagtan-aw sa ila rang kaugalingon ug dili makalantaw latas sa kultura sa uban, nan, sa dili madugay, mahimo silang hiktin, pinugngan ug madudahon. Ang diyosnong pagpadayag sa kamatuoran sa mga Judio wala pa matapos, ug kinahanglan nga ipakita ni sa bag-o nga paagi sa tanang katawhan, nga wala maghunahuna ni magsulti sama sa mga Judio.
Ang Kaalam unang dakong paningkamot aron ang pagtoo ug kaalam sa Israel ikapadayag, dili lang sa Griyego, apan sa pamaagi sab nga gipahaom sa Griyegong kultura.
Misulay ni pagtubag sa makapahasol nga mga pangutana bahin sa kadaotan, sa sakit ug kamatayon; naghatag sab og lakbit nga kapasikaran nga dunay Diyos, kamatuoran nga makadasig ni San Pablo; nagpadayag sab nga ang kaluoy sa Diyos nakakaylap na sa tanang tawo sa walay pagpinig.
Ang Kaalam nasulat sa Ehipto taliwala sa katuigan 80 ug 50 sa wala pa si Cristo. Gisulat kini sa usa sa kapid-an ka Judio nga nanimuyo sa kalibotan nga naghupot sa Griyegong kultura.
Ayoha pagbasa ang nindot nga mga kapitulo 3 ngadto sa 5, mahitungod sa kamatayon sa mga tarong ug ang paglaom sa kinabuhing dayon, ingon man ang himno sa kaalam sa kapitulo 7.
Translation: Spanish
El libro de la Sabiduría se presenta como obra del rey Salomón, pero esto no es más que una ficción literaria. En realidad fue escrito mucho más tarde, hacia el año 50 a.C.
Su autor pertenecía a la comunidad judía de Alejandría, importante colonia en la ciudad más poblada del mundo grecorromano. No había biblioteca que se igualase a la de Alejandría; según se decía albergaba 700.000 volúmenes. Dos siglos antes, su director había ordenado una traducción griega de la Biblia, la que fue llamada de los "Setenta".
El autor, pues, está en el punto en que se entrelazan dos culturas y dos lenguas, el hebreo y el griego. Ahí se enfrentan dos mundos religiosos, el de la Biblia y el de los griegos, con sus dioses, sus poetas y sus filosofías. Por lo demás, Égipto acaba de cambiar de dueños y los judíos de Alejandría que se consideraban vejados por la administración egipcia, esperan que los romanos, ahora dueños de Oriente Medio, les sean más favorables.
Este es el marco en que nace el Libro de la Sabiduría. En la primera parte (capítulos 1-5), el autor se dirige a creyentes algo desanimados por las pruebas que su pueblo sufrió durante el transcurso del siglo. Más que todo la fe se viene abajo porque los tiempos han cambiado. En Palestina, la vida religiosa de los judíos se encontraba intimamente ligada a su tierra; la fe se arraigaba en la vida nacional más que en las personas, y los individuos no contaban mucho. Hoy, en cambio, viven en medio de los paganos, y los desafíos de la vida obligan a cada cual a que se haga responsable de su propio destino.
El autor planteará, pues, el problema de la sabidauría sobre bases nuevas: la cuestión esencial es saber en qué desemboca la vida presente. Existe un juicio y otra vida, y mientras no se lo haya comprendido, nada se puede juzgar bien. Estos capítulos se cuentan entre los más bellos de la Biblia, especialmente los textos que se refieren a la inmortalidad, la resurrección y el desquite de los justos y los mártires.
En la segunda parte del libro (capítulos 6-10) el autor expone los diversos aspectos de la presencia divina en el universo. Esta cuestión era fundamental para los griegos; muchos confundían a Dios, alma del mundo, con un universo divinizado, y sus respuestas eran muy a menudo próximas a las que circulan hoy bajo la etiqueta de la New Age. El libro de la Sabiduría retoma aquí las fórmulas y las aspiraciones del mundo griego, pero aporta las precisiones necesarias para que Dios, presente y activo por doquier, siga siendo Dios, el único Santo y Glorioso.
La tercera parte de la obra (capítulos 11-19) intenta mostrar cómo Dios hace justicia a su pueblo, y en esto expresa muchas verdades, pero en ella no faltan la agresividad y las rencillas políticas y en más de un lugar echaremos de menos esta sabiduría más profunda que revela el evangelio.
(The Catholic Christian Community Bible [first English edition 1997, other translations into Indonesian, Chinese, Cebuano, Chavacano, French, Ilonggo, Korean, Quechuan, Spanish, and Tagalog] “for the Christian Communities of the Third World” uses the following introduction.)
In the year 50, Paul arrived in Thessalonica, a major city and the capital of the province of Macedonia (see Acts 17:1). Here, after being rejected by the Jews, he addressed his preaching to the pagans and succeeded in forming a community. After barely three months, a riot caused by the Jews forced him to leave.
What is going to happen to these recent converts to whom Paul taught the mere basics of Christian life?
Paul is quite concerned, so he sends Timothy to see them and to strengthen their church. Timothy comes back with an optimistic report and Paul, reassured, sends this letter at the beginning of 51.
This is the oldest writing of the New Testament.
Down below are the introductions in the Mandarin Chinese, Tagalog, Cebuano, and Spanish editions.
Noong taong 50, dumating si Pablo sa Tesalonika na importanteng lunsod at kapitolyo ng probinsya ng Macedonia (tingnan ang Mga Gawa 17:1). Matapos tanggihan ng mga Judio, dito iniuukol ni Pablo ang kanyang pangangaral sa mga pagano at nakabuo siya ng isang pamayanan. Halos tatlong buwan pa lamang siya roon pero napilitan siyang umalis sa Tesalonika dahil sa gulong ginawa ng mga Judio.
Ano kaya ang mangyayari sa mga bagong kaanib sa pananampalataya na mga panimula pa lamang sa buhay-Kristiyano ang naituturo ni Pablo?
Lubhang nababahala si Pablo kaya pinapunta niya si Timoteo para makita sila at sikaping patatagin ang kanilang Iglesya. Bumalik si Timoteong may magandang balita at naging panatag ang loob ni Pablo kaya ipinadala niya ang sulat na ito sa simula ng taong 51.
Ito ang pinakamatandang akda sa Bagong Tipan.
Translation: Cebuano
Sa tuig 50, miabot si Pablo sa Tesalonika, dakong syudad ug ulohan sa lalawigan sa Macedonia (basaha sa Buhat 17:1). Dihang gisalikway siya sa mga Judio didto, mibalhin siyag wali sa mga pagano, ug nakaumol didtog katilingban. Human sa mga tulo ka bulan, dihay kasamok nga gipasiugdahan sa mga Judio, hinungdan sa iyang pagbiya.
Unsay nahitabo sa mga nakabig nga bag-o pang nakadawat og mga pagtulon-an sa kristohanong kinabuhi gikan ni Pablo?
Nabalaka pag-ayo si Pablo ug nagpadala ni Timoteo aron pagsusi ug paglig-on sa ilang simbahan. Malipayon siyang mitaho kang Pablo sa sangpotanan sa pagduaw, mao nga nadasig si Pablo sa pagpadala ining sulata sa unang bahin sa tuig 51.
Ang labi ning karaan nga sinulat sa Bag-ong Kasabotan.
Translation: Spanish
El año 50 Pablo llegó a Tesalónica, ciudad importante y capital de la Macedonia (véase He 17,1). Después de haber sido rechazado por los judíos, Pablo se dirigió a los paganos y llegó a formar una comunidad en esa ciudad. Pero sólo tres meses después, una revuelta provocada por los judíos le obligó a irse.
¿Qué pasaría con esos nuevos cristianos, que no habían recibido de Pablo más que las bases de la vida cristiana? Preocupado, Pablo pide a Timoteo que vaya a afirmar esa Iglesia. Timoteo regresa optimista y Pablo, ya tranquilo, les envía esta carta a comienzos del año 51.
Es el texto más antiguo de todo el Nuevo Testamento.
Esta carta no cautiva a sus lectores; podría decirse que el estilo de Pablo está aun muy “verde”. Pero se siente el afecto del misionero hacia los convertidos por quienes se ha desvivido, las preocupaciones que siente por ellos y los flecos de su primera formación, tan fanática como generosa.
La fe cristiana que Pablo proclamaba no se oponía menos a la razón en las primeras comunidades del mundo grecorromano que en las nuestras. La libertad sexual les parecía tan legítima como a nuestros contemporáneos; la resurrección de los muertos y la otra vida no entraban en sus perspectivas, aunque periódicamente algunos filósofos o religiones “mistéricas” trataran de suscitar tales esperanzas.
Pablo reafirma la doctrina bíblica sobre estos puntos en el cap. 4. Se encontrará allí la afirmación clara de las exigencias morales inherentes a nuestra integración en el pueblo de Cristo: sean santos, manténganse despiertos, como personas que esperan algo mejor.
Se encontrará igualmente, en el lenguaje y con las imágenes de las apocalipsis, la primera afirmación de la resurrección de los muertos.
Desde el principio la comunidad es invitada a vivir en oración constante y a preocuparse ante todo de sus miembros más débiles.
(The Catholic Christian Community Bible [first English edition 1997, other translations into Indonesian, Chinese, Cebuano, Chavacano, French, Ilonggo, Korean, Quechuan, Spanish, and Tagalog] “for the Christian Communities of the Third World” uses the following introduction.)
An Immigrant People
Moses’ mission finished at Mt. Nebo. As we see in the Book of Deuteronomy, Moses had been called by God to ‘bring up the people’, from the slavery of Egypt to the gates of the Promised land. The people are there facing this territory and it is now Joshua, the first Jesus — Joshua and Jesus are one and the same word in Hebrew — who is to lead the people into the land of promise.
Can we even speak of a people? Actually there are no more than a few clans guided by Moses across the desert, increased doubtless by new elements they have met at the holy place Qadesh-Barné. However few in number, these nomads carry such a religious experience that it will become, after meeting other tribes that did not leave Palestine, the spiritual heritage of them all.
Facing the Canaanites who inhabit the towns and cultivate the surrounding land, those nomads gradually become aware of their identity. He who revealed himself on Mt. Sinai and multiplied marvels in favor of these escapees from Egypt, Yahweh – God, has made a covenant with this nomadic people; he has entrusted to them at the same time his promises. From now on they are the people he has chosen; and he is their God. It is during this period of Joshua and the Judges that the people of Israel will be truly formed.
Although laden as they are with favors from Yahweh, these nomads cannot but admire the Canaanites among whom they live. This period of the second millennium before Jesus Christ has doubtless been the most prestigious period of Palestine history from a cultural point of view. Compared to the Canaanite towns with their ramparts, their temples and palaces with cedar panelling and inlaid ivory the nomads cut a poor figure. The contrast was the same on the religious level; the Canaanites in the towns multiplied celebrations, feasts and rituals under the eyes of tribes who hadn’t even a temple.
The books of Joshua and Judges as well as Samuel and Kings show us how easily the Israelites let themselves be influenced. Attracted by this brilliant civilization, they abandoned their customs and faith to adopt the cults of the country.
The Reality of a Conquest
A people seduced by Canaanite culture, leaders who resist and proclaim a call to fidelity — such is the permanent conflict presented by the Bible texts of this period. The Book of Joshua seems to present a systematic conquest of the country led by Joshua at the head of the clans; but actually it must have happened quite differently.
Town dwellers and nomads were certainly very different and the obligation of both to cohabit on common land did not prevent conflicts: at one time the Canaanites were stronger, at another the nomads. But gradually the tribes imposed their law on the former inhabitants of the land, and at the time of Saul, the one-time nomads, now citizens of the country had the power to rule. David and later Solomon were to confirm such a situation.
Active minorities are the ones that make history: when we speak of the Church and its impact on the world it is often a matter of a minority of the faithful. The prophets who, several centuries after Joshua, assemble the traditions and documents on the “conquest,” made no pretense of giving us an exact account and complete history. Let us not be deceived by the triumphal tone of these accounts where Joshua and all Israel won fantastic victories. The Book of Joshua narrates small events that make up great history.
Down below are the introductions in the Mandarin Chinese, Tagalog, Cebuano, and Spanish editions.
Pangalawang Batas ang ibig sabihin ng Deuteronomio. Ganito ang itinawag dito dahil sa pagkakalagay nito sa ating Biblia pagkatapos ng kabuuan ng mga batas na nasa mga aklat ng Levitico at Mga Bilang. Subalit unang isinulat ang Deuteronomio kaysa mga ito. Para pag isahin ang mga utos at mga kaugalian ang unang layunin nito at para ibigay sa Israel ang Batas na katatagpuan nito ng buhay.
At nang inedit ang Deuteronomio, sa ika-7 dantaon bago dumating si Kristo, higit sa limandaang taon na ang lumipas mula nang makipagtagpo si Moises sa Diyos. Nasakop na ang lupain ng Kanaan, naitatag na ang Kaharian nina David at Solomon at pagkatapos ay nahati.
Bumagsak na ang mas malaki at mas masaganang probinsya sa hilaga na tinatawag na Kaharian ng Israel. At gayon ding kapalaran ang nagbabanta nang mga taong iyon sa Kaharian ng Juda na probinsya sa timog.
Noon ipinagbigay-alam ang Batas na ito ni Yawe. Inilantad nito sa kanyang bayan ang dahilan ng kanilang mga pagkatalo at iniaalok ang isang pagkakataon para maligtas. Matagal na itong nalimutan sa Templo sa panahon ng pag-uusig ni Manases. Ngunit ang pagkatuklas dito sa taong 622 (2 H 22) ang siyang pinakaugat ng reporma ni Yosias.
Si Moises at ang Deuteronomio Tinanggap ng bayan ng Israel at ng kanilang mga pastol ang Deuteronomio bilang salita ng Diyos at aral ni Moises, pero ang mga pari at ang mga propeta naman ang sumulat nito. Binuod nila sa mga pahinang ito ang kanilang karanasan sa kabuuan ng kanilang kasaysayan.
Tulad sa iba pang mga libro sa Natapos sa Bundok Nebo ang misyon ni Moises. Tulad ng nakita natin sa Aklat ng Deuteronomio, tinawag ng Diyos si Moises para "hanguin ang bayan" mula sa pang aalipin ng Ehipto patungo sa pintuan ng Lupang Pangako. Naroon na ang bayan sa harapan ng lupaing ito at si Josue na ngayon, ang unang Jesus - pareho ang Josue at Jesus sa Hebreo -- ang siyang mamumuno sa bayan pagpasok sa lupa ng mga pangako.
Bayang Dayo Masasabi ba nating isang bayan sila? Sa katunayan, hindi sila hihigit pa sa ilang angkan na pinamumunuan ni Moises patawid sa disyerto, na tiyak na nadagdagan ng mga bagong grupo na nakatagpo nila sa Kades Barnea na isang banal na lugar. Bagamat kakaunti, dala naman ng mga lagalag na ito ang gayong kahalagang karanasang reli hiyoso na magiging pamanang espiritwal nilang lahat, pati na ng mga tribung hindi umalis sa Palestina na makakatagpo nila. Sa harap ng mga Kananeong nakatira sa mga bayan at nagsasaka sa nakapaligid na lupain, unti-unting nakita ng mga lagalag na ito kung ano sila. Sila ang mga takas sa Ehipto na (PAGE 321) ginawan ng Yawe-Diyos ng mga kahanga-hangang bagay. Sila ang bayang lagalag na pinagbunyagan niya ng kanyang sarili sa Bundok Sinai. Sa kanila siya gumawa ng tipan kasabay ng kanyang mga pangako. Mula sa panahong iyon, sila ang kanyang bayang hinirang; at siya ang kanilang Diyos. Sa panahong ito ni Josue at ng Mga Hukom talagang mabubuo ang bayang Israel.
Bagamat sagana sila sa mga biyaya ni Yawe, hindi maaaring hindi hangaan ng mga lagalag na ito ang mga Kananeong pinakikipamayanan nila. Hindi mapag-aalinlanganan na ang panahong ito ng ikalawang sanlibong taon bago dumating si Jesukristo, ang pinakatanyag na bahagi ng kasaysayan ng Palestina kung kultura ang pag-uusapan. Mukhang kawawa ang mga lagalag kung ihahambing sa mga Kananeong may mga bayan na may muog, mga templo at palasyo na may mga dingding na mamahaling kahoy at nadedekorasyonan ng garing. Gayundin ang kaibhan kung relihiyon ang pag-uusapan: maraming pagdiriwang, kapistahan at seremonya ang mga Kananeo sa mga bayan, na nakikita ng mga tribu na wala ni isang templo man lang.
Ipinakikita sa atin ng mga aklat ni Josue at ng Mga Hukom, pati na ni Samuel at ng Mga Hari, kung paano pinabayaan ng mga Israelita na maimpluwensyahan sila nang gayon na lamang. Naakit sila ng maringal na sibilisasyong ito kaya tinalikdan nila ang kanilang mga kaugalian at pananampalataya at ginaya ang mga seremonya ng pagsamba ng lupain. Biblia, inilagay sa bibig ni Moises ng mga sumulat ng Deuteronomio ang mga diskursong gusto nila mismong sabihin sa kanilang bayan. Gawa-gawa lamang ang pagsasalaysay nila na bago mamatay ay nakinikinita na ni Moises ang masaklap na kapalarang naghihintay sa kanyang bayan. Sinasabi nilang sa kanya galing ang mga babala at mga batas na pupuwede pang magligtas sa Israel. Sa totoo'y ginagamit ng Deuteronomio ang pangangaral ng mga propeta tungkol sa katarungan at pag-ibig: ito ang kauna-unahang pagsisikap na ginawa sa daigdig para bumuo ng isang lipunang may pagkakaisa't pagka kapatiran.
Translation: Cebuano
Gidala ni Moises ang mga Israelita sa kapatagan sa Moab latas sa suba Jordan, apan kinahanglan pa silang mosulod sa Yuta sa Saad sa ilang katigulangan.
Bisan sa lig-ong pagpangulo ni Moises, dili organisadong nasod ang Israel. Nagpabilin ni nga mga pundok pundok sa lainlaing tribu, kabanayan ug lungsod nga nahiusa gumikan sa kumong paninguha. Ang maayong pagbasa sa Biblia morag magpakita nga daghan ang mga Israelita nga wala mouban ni Moises sa kamingawan sa Cades. Gani, nag-una sila ni Josue sa Palestina subay sa habagatang bahin; miokupar na ang uban sa kabungtoran sa Moab (Num 32).
Misulod ug mipuyo didto nga malinawon ang mitabok sa Jordan sa panahon ni Josue. Dala ang mga tolda ug karnero, nanimuyo sila sa kabungtoran libot sa kinotahang mga syudad nga Kananeo. Wala sila mopuyo sa kapatagan, kay didto na man ang mga Kananeo nga mas lig-ong nagkahugpong. Hinuon, dunay pagbinayloay tali nila ug sa mga mag-uumang Kananeo. Ug kay mas milambo man ang Kananeong kultura, may daghan sa mga Israelita nga nasuyop ug misagop sa ilang tradisyon ingon man sa pagsimba sa mga diosdios sa mga Kananeo nga nakapamiligro nga mahanaw sila isip katawhan.
Miluwas sa Israel ang mga kursonado nga uban ni Josue nakahukom sa pagbuntog sa Canaan. Dili ta uyon sa paggamit nilag kusog ug kabangis. Apan nagsunod lang sila sa laraw sa Diyos, ginamit ang pamaaging naandan adtong panahona. Ang kasyudaran ug ang mga harihari sa Canaan (nga mga dakudako lang sa gagmayng lugar) wala magkahiusa busa, wala maglisod ang mga manggugubat ni Josue sa pagbuntog nila. Tungod ini, naisa ang nasodnong kaamgohan sa Israel. Gisugdan nila ang inanayng pag-angkon sa Yuta sa Saad. Tahas ni nga malipayog katumanan human sa 200 ka tuig ubos sa pagpangulo ni David.
Ang kasagarang nahitabo maoy nga nakamugna ang malimbasugong minoriya og kasaysayan. Kon maghisgot ta sa Simbahan ug sa tahas ini sa kalibotan, makahisgot ta labi na ining gagmayng pundok sa mga magtotoo. Kadaghanan nagapos ni sa naandang gawi ug wala makaamgo sa ilang misyon. Sa samang paagi, makahisgot tag kalihokan sa kalingkawasan, apan dyotay ra ang naglihok ug nagpuyo ining panglantawa ug paglaoma. Bisan pa ini, kining gagmay ug militanting pundok mao hinuoy makaduso sa masa sa katawhan sa unahan. Mao ni ang nahitabo sa Israel. Human sa 500 ka tuig gikan ni Josue, gihipos sa mga propeta ang kasulatan mahitungod sa ilang kadaogan, ug namugna kining basahona. Wala sila mag-asoy sa kompleto ug tukmang mga hitabo sa kasaysayan. Nagpahinumdom lang sa nakatabang sa pag-umol sa Israel isip nasod. Busa, dili ta magpadala sa giingon dinhi nga “ang tanang Israelita” nakig-away uban ni Josue o nga gibuntog ni Josue ang Palestina sa pagpatay sa tanang lumolupyo. Ang Josue nagsaysay og gagmayng mga butang nga nakamugna og dakong kasaysayan nga nasinati sa katawhan sa Israel.
Translation: Spanish
EL SIGLO DE JOSUÉ
La misión de Moisés se había acabado en el monte Nebo. Como lo vimos en el Deuteronomio, Moisés había sido llamado por Dios para guiar al pueblo y hacer que “subiera” desde la esclavitud de Egipto hasta las puertas de la Tierra Prometida. El pueblo está pues allí, frente a esa tierra que Dios le da en herencia y en ese momento es Josué, el primer Jesús (pues Josué y Jesús en hebreo tienen la misma grafía) quien va a introducir al pueblo en el la tierra prometida.
Un pueblo de emigrantes
Hablar de pueblo es mucho decir. En efecto, todavía no se trata más que de algunos clanes guiados por Moisés a través del desierto y que sin duda se han incrementado con nuevos elementos con los cuales se encontraron en el lugar santo de Cadés-Barne. Por pocos que hayan sido estos nómadas confiados ahora a Josué, llevan consigo una experiencia de una riqueza tal que se transformará, después de reunirse con otras tribus que no habían abandonado la Palestina, en la herencia espiritual de todos.
Frente a los cananeos que habitaban las ciudades y cultivaban las tierras de los alrededores, estos nómadas toman poco a poco conciencia de su originalidad y de su identidad. El que se reveló a Moisés en el Sinaí y que multiplicó las maravillas a favor de los fugitivos de Egipto, Yavé-Dios, hizo una alianza con este pueblo de nómadas, con estas tribus de beduinos. Les dio su ley al mismo tiempo que su promesa. En adelante serán el pueblo que él se eligió y él será su Dios. Es durante este período de Josué y de los Jueces cuando se constituirá realmente el pueblo de Israel.
Sin embargo, por muy colmados que se sientan por Yavé, estos nómadas no pueden dejar de sentir admiración por los cananeos en medio de los cuales viven. Los historiadores nos dicen que este período del segundo milenio antes de Cristo es el período más prestigioso de la historia de Palestina en el plano cultural. Frente a las ciudades cananeas con sus fortificaciones, sus templos y sus palacios con artesonado de cedro, y decorados con incrustaciones de marfil, el nivel de vida de los nómadas parecía muy pobre. El mismo contraste se daba en el plano religioso: los cananeos de las ciudades multiplicaban sus celebraciones, fiestas y ritos a la vista de los beduinos que no tenían ni siquiera templo.
La tentación es grande, y tanto los libros de Josué y de los Jueces como los de Samuel y de los Reyes no cesarán de mostrarnos con cuánta facilidad el pueblo de Israel se dejaba arrastrar. Atraído por esa civilización brillante, abandona al mismo tiempo sus costumbres propias y su fe para adoptar los cultos de los habitantes del país. Durante todo el período de la realeza los profetas no dejarán de recordar al pueblo las exigencias de la alianza y de la fidelidad a Yavé.
La verdad sobre la conquista
Un pueblo seducido por la cultura cananea, hombres de Dios que resisten proclamándole el llamado a la fidelidad, tal es el conflicto permanente que nos presentan los textos de la Biblia con respecto a este período. El libro de Josué parece que nos presentara una conquista sistemática del país llevada a cabo por Josué a la cabeza de las tribus; sin embargo las cosas debieron suceder de manera muy distinta.
La gente de las ciudades y los nómadas eran muy diferentes, y la obligación que tenían unos y otros de cohabitar en un mismo territorio, no impidió que hubiera conflictos, unas veces eran los cananeos los que ganaban, otra, los nómadas. Con el tiempo, las tribus fueron imponiendo su ley a los antiguos habitantes del país, y en la época de Saúl, los nómadas de otrora, convertido en citadinos a medida que pasaban los años, se habían apoderado del poder en el país. David primero, y después Salomón deberían confirmar esta situación.
Las minorías activas son las que hacen la historia. Cuando hablamos de la Iglesia y de su impacto en el mundo, no se trata a veces más que de una minoría de creyentes. Los grupos de profetas que, varios siglos después de Josué, recopilaron las tradiciones y los documentos sobre la conquista, no pretendieron entregarnos una historia exacta y completa de aquélla. No nos dejemos engañar por el aspecto triunfador de estos relatos en que todo Israel obtiene junto a Josué victorias asombrosas: el libro de Josué narra pequeñas cosas que constituyeron una gran historia.
EL LIBRO DE JOSUÉ Y SUS AUTORES
Cuando se redactó el presente libro, la historia de Josué se perdía en un pasado del que ya se habían olvidado muchos detalles, sin embargo, bastaban algunas imágenes y recuerdos para ilustrar la vocación del pueblo de Dios y el sentido de sus aventuras.
Josué inaugura la serie de libros que la Biblia hebraica llama Profetas Anteriores, entendiendo por este título que estos libros históricos nos hablan de una historia que comenzó bastante antes que los profetas, pero que fueron pensados y compuestos en las cofradías de profetas. Toda la serie que lleva desde Josué a los libros de los Reyes forma en realidad una unidad con la reflexión del Deuteronomio. Hoy día se habla habitualmente de historia Deuteronomista para designar este conjunto.
El libro de Josué se compuso en gran parte en los últimos tiempos del reino de Judá. Entonces la idea de que la tierra de Palestina es el gran don de Dios a su pueblo y la señal de su alianza, invitaba a constatar en el pasado una correspondencia entre las conquistas y la fidelidad a la alianza, entre las infidelidades y el fracaso.
El autor ha conocido el tiempo de Josué a través de múltiples fuentes: tradiciones orales muy maltratadas, sin duda, a causa de los 500 años transcurridos; documentos conservados tal vez en los santuarios antiguos de Israel, como el de Guilgal, y documentos sobre el catastro de las tribus que databan de la época real.
El libro debe de haber sido retocado en tiempos del exilio de Babilonia. Fue entonces cuando intervinieron los sacerdotes y en muchos de sus pasajes impusieron otra interpretación, acentuando al mismo tiempo el carácter litúrgico de los acontecimientos importantes.
(The Catholic Christian Community Bible [first English edition 1997, other translations into Indonesian, Chinese, Cebuano, Chavacano, French, Ilonggo, Korean, Quechuan, Spanish, and Tagalog] “for the Christian Communities of the Third World” uses the following introduction.)
Obadiah probably wrote after 500 and before the conquest of Edom in 312. His work is filled with calls for revenge which, deep down, shows his faith in God’s justice.
Down below are the introductions in the Mandarin Chinese, Tagalog, Cebuano, and Spanish editions.
Maaaring nagsulat si Abdias pagkatapos ng taong 500 at bago nasakop ang Edom sa taong 312. Puno ng mga sigaw ng paghihiganti ang kanyang mga tula, na sa pinakapuso ng mga ito ay nagpapakita ng pananampalataya niya sa katarungan ng Diyos.
Translation: Cebuano
Si Obadias nagsulat tingali sa mga tuig human sa 500, ug sa wala pa ang pagbuntog sa Edom sa tuig 312. Ang iyang sinulat puno sa panawagan sa panimalos, nga sa kailadman, nagpakita sa iyang pagtoo sa hustisya (katarong) sa Ginoo.
Translation: Spanish
Abdías escribió probablemente después del año 500 y antes de la conquista de Edom, el año 312. Sus poemas están llenos de gritos de venganza que en el fondo demuestran su fe en la justicia de Dios.
