The Hebrew, Latin, and Greek that is translated as “mourn” or similar in English is translated in Newari as “have one’s heart broken” or “have a bursting heart” (source: Newari Back Translation).
In Cherokee it is translated as “going around feeling badly” (source: Bender / Belt 2025, p. 16).
The Greek and Hebrew that is translated in English as “grain” (or: “wheat”) is translated in Kui as “(unthreshed) rice.” Helen Evans (in The Bible Translator 1954, p. 40ff. ) explains: “Padddy [unthreshed rice] is the main crop of the country and rice the staple diet of the people, besides which [grain] is unknown and there is no word for it, and it seemed to us that paddy and rice in the mind of the Kui people stood for all that corn meant to the Jews.” “Paddy” is also the translation in Pa’o Karen (source: Gordon Luce in The Bible Translator 1950, p. 153f. ).
Other translations include: “wheat” (Teutila Cuicatec), “corn” (Lalana Chinantec), “things to eat” (Morelos Nahuatl), “grass corn” (wheat) (Chichimeca-Jonaz) (source: Viola Waterhouse in Notes on Translation August 1966, p. 86ff.), “millet” (Lambya) (source: project-specific notes in Paratext), “food” (Nyamwezi) (source: Pioneer Bible Translators, project-specific notes in Paratext) or ntimumma lujia / “seeds for food” (Lokạạ — “since Lokạạ does not have specific terms for maize and rice that can be described as grains”) (source: J.A. Naudé, C.L. Miller Naudé, J.O. Obono in Acta Theologica 43/2, 2023, p. 129ff. )
The Hebrew, Aramaic, Ge’ez, and Greek that are translated as “wine” in English is translated into Pass Valley Yali as “grape juice pressed long ago (= fermented)” or “strong water” (source: Daud Soesilo). In Guhu-Samane it is also translated as “strong water” (source: Ernest L. Richert in The Bible Translator 1965, p. 198ff. ), in Noongar as “liquor” (verbatim: “strong water”) (source: Warda-Kwabba Luke-Ang), in Hausa as ruwan inabi or “water of grapes” (with no indication whether it’s alcoholic or not — source: Mark A. Gaddis), in sar as kasə nduú or “grape drink” (source: Andy Warren-Rothlin), or in Papantla Totonac and Coyutla Totonac as “a drink like Pulque” (for “Pulque,” see here ) (source: Jacob Loewen in The Bible Translator 1971, p. 169ff. ).
In Swahili, Bible translations try to avoid local words for alcoholic drinks, because “drinking of any alcohol at all was one of the sins most denounced by early missionaries. Hence translators are uncomfortable by the occurrences of wine in the Bible. Some of the established churches which use wine prefer to see church wine as holy, and would not refer to it by the local names used for alcoholic drinks. Instead church wine is often referred to by terms borrowed from other languages, divai (from German, der Wein) or vini/mvinyo (from ltalian/Latin vino/vinum). Several translations done by Protestants have adapted the Swahili divai for ‘wine,’ while those done by Catholics use vini or mvinyo.” (Source: Rachel Konyoro in The Bible Translator 1985, p. 221ff. )
The Swahili divai was in turn borrowed by Sabaot and was turned into tifaayiik and is used as such in the Bible. Kupsabiny, on the other hand, borrowed mvinyo from Swahili and turned it into Finyonik. (Source: Iver Larsen)
In Nyamwezi, two terms are used. Malwa ga muzabibu is a kind of alcohol that people specifically use to get drunk (such as in Genesis 9:21) and ki’neneko is used for a wine made from grapes (source: Pioneer Bible Translators, project-specific translation notes in Paratext).
In some Hindi translations (such as the Common Language version, publ. 2015 ), one term (dākharasa दाखरस — grape juice) is used when that particular drink is in the focus (such as in John 2) and another term (madirā मदिरा — “alcohol” or “liquor”) when drunkenness is in the focus (such as in Eph. 5:18).
In Mandarin Chinese, the generic term jiǔ (酒) or “alcohol(ic drink)” is typically used. Exceptions are Leviticus 10:9, Numbers 6:3, Deuteronomy 29:6, Judges 13:4 et al., 1 Samuel 1:15, and Luke 1:15 where a differentiation between weak and strong alcohol is needed. The Mandarin Chinese Union Version (2010) translates that as qīngjiǔ lièjiǔ (清酒烈酒) and dànjiǔ lièjiǔ (淡酒烈酒), both in the form of a Chinese proverb and meaning “light alcohol and strong drink.” (Source: Zetzsche)
Click or tap here to see a short video clip about wine in biblical times (source: Bible Lands 2012)
The different Hebrew, Ge’ez, and Greek terms that are translated as “(olive) oil” and “(animal) fat” in English are translated in Kwere with only one term: mavuta. (Pioneer Bible Translators, project-specific translation notes in Paratext)
Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Joel 1:10:
Kupsabiny: “The farms are left bare/empty. The land is crying because the crops are destroyed. There is no more wine in the land or olive oil.” (Source: Kupsabiny Back Translation)
Newari: “Fields are barren, the ground has become dry, grain has been destroyed, there is no longer any new grape wine, nor any oil.” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
Hiligaynon: “The fields are-ruined/destroyed as-if-like a person who mourns. The grains are-ruined/destroyed and no-more juice of the grapes and oil.” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
Kankanaey: “It’s as if the soil is also mourning, because the (rice)-fields and what can-be-harvested there are ruined, the grapes have dried-up and the olive (loan olivo) trees have died.” (Source: Kankanaey Back Translation)
This verse serves in part as an explanation of the previous verse, giving the reason why there are no supplies for the daily Temple offerings. The description here applies to the devastation brought on by the locusts, although in verse 12 it seems that a drought occurred at the same time. The Hebrew of verse 10 can be understood as referring to either locusts or drought.
The fields are laid waste: The Hebrew word for fields is a collective singular; most languages will need to express this as plural. The Hebrew verb rendered laid waste (New Revised Standard Version “devastated”) can apply to destruction by locusts, drought, or other calamities. Good News Translation says “bare,” which simply shows the result, leaving the action to be understood from the context. The Revised English Bible (Revised English Bible) and New Jerusalem Bible are similar with “ruined.”
The ground mourns is a personification of the ground; that is, the ground is described as if it were a person mourning over its loss of crops. Some languages may not be able to retain this figure of speech and will need to say “the ground produces no food” or “… has dried up.” Bible en français courant keeps it by saying “the ground is plunged into sadness.” If the personification is not suitable, translators may want to consider a simile; for example, “the ground is like someone who mourns.”
Because the grain is destroyed, the wine fails, the oil languishes: These are three reasons for the mourning. Grain, wine, and oil are traditionally mentioned in that order as symbols of God’s blessings on the land and its inhabitants. Now these three blessings have been taken away. As a result of the locusts, and perhaps the drought as well, the grain, wine, and oil are scarce or no longer available.
The Hebrew word rendered grain is a generic term covering all such cereal crops as wheat and barley (see the comments on verse 11 about “wheat” and “barley”). The Hebrew verb translated destroyed is the same verb rendered laid waste in the first line. New Revised Standard Version and Revised English Bible use “ruined” both times.
Wine is literally “must,” that is, grape juice that has started to ferment but is not yet fully wine. The Hebrew verb rendered fails is somewhat ambiguous. The Hebrew verb can be a form of the verb for “be ashamed” or the verb for “dry up” (see verse 12, where the same verb is rendered “withers” and “fails”). If the fourth line means “the wine is ashamed,” it uses the figure of wine as a person, as if it stood there ashamed and helpless. The verb fails in Revised Standard Version seems to be based on this interpretation. New Revised Standard Version follows the other verb with “the wine dries up,” which means either that the grapes have dried up (from the drought), or that the container for the fermenting wine has dried up because no grapes are available. The poet may have used this ambiguous verb intentionally in order to relate this line to both the drought and the locusts. In either case the meaning is simply that the wine-making process has come to a halt, and this is the general idea that should be understood, whatever form the translation may take.
The oil is fresh olive oil, newly squeezed from olives. If the olive oil is unknown in a particular language, it is important to bring out that this oil is the product of a fruit tree. The Hebrew verb rendered languishes means the supply of oil will soon be used up and there will be none left. New Revised Standard Version says “the oil fails,” and New Jerusalem Bible has “of olive oil only a trickle.” As with the wine, the Hebrew text refers to the agricultural product, oil, while Good News Translation, for purposes of a good English translation, has used terms closer to the agricultural source—the “grain” in the field, the “grapes” on the vine, and the “olive trees” themselves—and has assumed that this verse describes a drought in addition to the plague of locusts.
The definite article the is not used in the Hebrew with the nouns fields, ground, grain, wine, and oil. English usage requires the article when speaking of specific objects that are known by the speaker and hearer. In this case the nouns refer to the agricultural land and its products in the neighborhood of Jerusalem and in Judah. Translators will have to determine how their own languages express references to known objects.
Verses 9 and 10 have been combined in Die Bibel im heutigen Deutsch in a way that mentions the problem first and the results last as follows:
• The fields are devastated and dried up. The harvest is destroyed; no one brings any more grain, oil, and wine as food and drink offerings to the Temple of the LORD. Therefore the priests, who do the work of sacrificing for the LORD, mourn.
Some languages, when dealing with cause-effect relationships, require this kind of restructuring.
Quoted with permission from de Blois, Kees & Dorn, Louis. A Handbook on Joel. (UBS Helps for Translators). Miami: UBS, 2020. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .
Le thème de deuil se poursuit. Les champs et les terres sont personnifiés car ils sont décrits comme étant en deuil.
En hébreu le sujet se trouve à la fin de chaque proposition, créant un rythme assez frappant :
dévasté… (le) champs
en deuil… (la) terre
car… dévasté… (le) blé
épuisé… (le) nouveau vin
tarie… (l’)huile fraîche
Dans ces vers parallèles, les champs correspond aux terres, et le moût (nouveau vin) à l’huile fraîche. Les éléments essentiels à la vie israélite, la terre, le blé, le vin et l’huile, font défaut. Tous ces éléments sont au singulier en hébreu, mais les traducteurs pourront utiliser la forme qui convient dans leur langue.
Les champs sont dévastés : le monde agricole a déjà été beaucoup évoqué dans ce poème, mais c’est la première fois que le mot champ apparaît. En hébreu le terme se réfère à la campagne, pas nécessairement à des champs cultivés. Il s’agit plutôt des endroits où le bétail aurait pu se nourrir.
La racine rendue comme dévasté a plusieurs sens en hébreu : « détruit », « gâté », « ravagé » et dans d’autres contextes, « tué ». Les traducteurs devraient naturellement utiliser le terme qui convient à la destruction des champs.
les terres en deuil : il n’est pas étonnant de trouver une personnification des terres ici car le mot en hébreu qui désigne la terre est אֲדָמָה ʾadâmâh, proche du mot « Adam ». les terres sont décrites comme « tristes » ou en deuil. Si un langage figuré n’est pas acceptable ici, on pourra dire « la terre est vide » ou peut-être « le sol ne donne rien ». La Contemporary English Version combine les deux vers parallèles pour dire : « les champs vides se lamentent », mais dans la majorité des langues, deux vers parallèles rendront mieux la poésie ici. En hébreu il s’agit du participe « étant en deuil », qu’on pourrait rendre par une expression idiomatique. La Bible en français courant donne une traduction très poétique, « plongée dans la tristesse ».
le blé est dévasté : il s’agit du mot générique pour « grain », mais souvent le mot blé fait déjà partie de la langue cible et le mot d’emprunt pourra être utilisé ici. Le texte ne dit pas comment et quand le blé est dévasté : dans le champ, avant ou après la récolte. Ce qui est sûr, c’est qu’il y a un manque important de grain. En effet, le blé est nécessaire pour préparer le pain, un aliment de base en Israël. En hébreu le mot rendu par dévasté n’est pas le même que dans le premier vers. Il s’agit d’une forme verbale qui veut dire « a été séché », mais on pourra aussi dire que cette céréale est « ruinée » ou « gâtée ». Cette racine jouera un rôle important dans les versets suivants.
le moût fait défaut : le moût se réfère au vin nouveau. Bien qu’en hébreu il s’agisse d’un autre mot que celui dans Joël 1.5, dans la majorité des langues, il y aura une seule expression pour « nouveau vin » qui pourra être utilisé dans les deux contextes. fait défaut veut dire « manque » ou « est épuisé » (Nouvelle Bible Segond).
l’huile fraîche est tarie : l’huile qui vient d’être produite était particulièrement appréciée. En hébreu il y a un mot unique désignant cette huile fraîche, mais dans beaucoup de langues, comme en français, il faudrait qualifier l’huile de fraîche ou « nouvelle ». La Nouvelle Bible Segond parle d’huile tout court, mais cette traduction n’est pas recommandée. Le mot hébreu rendu dans la Traduction œcuménique de la Bible par tarie veut dire « séchée ».
L’hébreu fournit un différent verbe pour chaque élément cité dans la liste ci-dessus (dévasté … fait défaut … est tarie), mais il sera aussi possible d’utiliser une ou deux expressions dans la langue cible en disant par exemple, « il n’y a plus de grain, plus de nouveau vin, plus d’huile fraîche (dans le pays) » ou « Le blé, le nouveau vin et l’huile fraîche sont tous finis ».
Source: Aroga Bessong, Dieudonné P.; Somé, Joachim & Zogbo, Lynell. Joël – Manuel de traduction – Commentaire linguistique et exégétique de la Bible. Alliance biblique universelle, 2010.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.