The now commonly-used English idiom “God forbid” was first coined in 1560 in the Geneva Bible. (Source: Crystal 2010, p. 273)
For other idioms in English that were coined by Bible translation, see here.
οὐκ οἴδατε ὅτι τὰ σώματα ὑμῶν μέλη Χριστοῦ ἐστιν; ἄρας οὖν τὰ μέλη τοῦ Χριστοῦ ποιήσω πόρνης μέλη; μὴ γένοιτο.
15Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ? Should I therefore take the members of Christ and make them members of a prostitute? Never!
The Greek, Latin, and Hebrew that is typically translated as “prostitute” in English (in some, mostly earlier translation also as “harlot” or “whore”) is translated in the 2024 revision of the inter-confessional Latvian Jauna Pārstrādāta latviešu Bībele as netikle or “hussy.” This replaced the previous translation mauka or “whore.” Nikita Andrejevs, editor of the Bible explains the previous and current translations: “The translators at the time felt that this strong word best described the thought contained in the main text. Many had objections, as it seemed that this word would not be the most appropriate for public reading in church.” (Source: Updated Bible published in Latvia ).
Other translations include:
See also Translation commentary on Genesis 34:31, Rahab, and prostitute oneself / play the prostitute.
Learn more on Bible Odyssey: Prostitution in the Bible .
Following are a number of back-translations of 1 Corinthians 6:15:
The Greek Christos (Χρηστός) is typically transliterated when it appears together with Iésous (Ἰησοῦς) (Jesus). In English the transliteration is the Anglicized “Christ,” whereas in many other languages it is based on the Greek or Latin as “Kristus,” “Cristo,” or similar.
When used as a descriptive term in the New Testament — as it’s typically done in the gospels (with the possible exceptions of for instance John 1:17 and 17:3) — Christos is seen as the Greek translation of the Hebrew mashiaḥ (המשיח) (“anointed”). Accordingly, a transliteration of mashiaḥ is used, either as “Messiah” or based on the Greek or Latin as a form of “Messias.”
This transliteration is also used in the two instances where the Greek term Μεσσίας (Messias) is used in John 1:41 and 4:25.
In some languages and some translations, the term “Messiah” is supplemented with an explanation. Such as in the German Gute Nachricht with “the Messiah, the promised savior” (Wir haben den Messias gefunden, den versprochenen Retter) or in Muna with “Messiah, the Saving King” (Mesias, Omputo Fosalamatino) (source: René van den Berg).
In predominantly Muslim areas or for Bible translations for a Muslim target group, Christos is usually transliterated from the Arabic al-Masih (ٱلْمَسِيحِ) — “Messiah.” In most cases, this practice corresponds with languages that also use a form of the Arabic Isa (عيسى) for Jesus (see Jesus). There are some exceptions, though, including modern translations in Arabic which use Yasua (يَسُوعَ) (coming from the Aramaic Yēšūa’) alongside a transliteration of al-Masih, Hausa which uses Yesu but Almahisu, and some Fula languages (Adamawa Fulfulde, Nigerian Fulfulde, and Central-Eastern Niger Fulfulde) which also use a form of Iésous (Yeesu) but Almasiihu (or Almasiifu) for Christos.
In Indonesian, while most Bible translations had already used Yesus Kristus rather than Isa al Masih, three public holidays used to be described using the term Isa Al Masih. From 2024 on, the government is using Yesus Kristus in those holiday names instead (see this article in Christianity Today ).
Other solutions that are used by a number of languages include these:
In Finnish Sign Language both “Christ” and “Messiah” are translated with a sign signifying “king.” (Source: Tarja Sandholm)
“Christ / Messiah” in Finnish Sign Language (source )
“Another important word in the New Testament that comes from the Septuagint is christos, ‘Christ.’ Christ is not part of the name of the man from Nazareth, as if ‘the Christs’ were written above the door of his family home. Rather, ‘Christ’ is an explicitly messianic title used by the writers of the New Testament who have learned this word from the Septuagint’s translation of the Hebrew mashiach, ‘anointed,’ which itself is often rendered in English as ‘Messiah.’ To be sure, one detects a messianic intent on the part of the Septuagint translator in some places. Amos 4:13 may have been one of these. In the Hebrew Bible, God ‘reveals his thoughts to mortals,’ but the Septuagint has ‘announcing his anointed to humans.’ A fine distinction must be made, however, between theology that was intended by the Septuagint translators and that developed by later Christian writers. In Amos 4:13 it is merely possible we have a messianic reading, but it is unquestionably the case that the New Testament writers exploit the Septuagint’s use of christos, in Amos and elsewhere, to messianic ends.”
Learn more on Bible Odyssey: Christ .
Like a number of other East Asian languages, Japanese uses a complex system of honorifics, i.e. a system where a number of different levels of politeness are expressed in language via words, word forms or grammatical constructs. These can range from addressing someone or referring to someone with contempt (very informal) to expressing the highest level of reference (as used in addressing or referring to God) or any number of levels in-between.
One way Japanese shows different degree of politeness is through the choice of a formal plural suffix to the second person pronoun (“you” and its various forms) as shown here in the widely-used Japanese Shinkaiyaku (新改訳) Bible of 2017. In these verses, anata-gata (あなたがた) is used, combining the second person pronoun anata and the plural suffix -gata to create a formal plural pronoun (“you” [plural] in English).
(Source: S. E. Doi, see also S. E. Doi in Journal of Translation, 18/2022, p. 37ff. )
The Greek for Do you not know in this verse and in verse 16 is the same (see comments on 3.16). However, the content of the two verses suggests that verse 15a contains traditional teaching that the Corinthians had already been given. Verse 16a, though, introduces new teaching that should be immediately obvious to the Corinthian Christians, especially in the light of the Old Testament quotation in verse 16b.
As elsewhere, Rom 11.16-24 for example, Paul’s use of figurative language is a little confused. In this verse the bodies [plural] of Christians are described as parts or organs of the body of Christ. Later in 12.12-27 it is clear that Paul is describing individual Christians as parts or organs of the body of Christ, which is the church (see also Rom 12.5). The difference between this passage and chapter 12 is that Paul is not at present concerned with unity and diversity within the church, but rather with its purity. Members of Christ (Good News Bible‘s “part of Christ’s body”) here as in chapter 12 means the church. Paul’s point at the moment is that the members belong to Christ and must therefore be holy.
In the second half of the verse, as in verse 12b, Paul takes himself as an example. As in Rom 7.7-25, Paul writes I but includes other people in addition to himself. In some languages it may therefore be necessary to use an inclusive “we.” The meaning is not very clear either in Greek or in English, but Paul explains himself in the next verse. The meaning of the Greek word translated take is usually “take away” (Translator’s New Testament, An American Translation). Barclay brings out the full meaning by translating “And am I then going to take the limbs that rightly belong to Christ and make them the limbs that belong to a prostitute?” Shall I … take is a rhetorical question that in many languages may be translated as a statement; for example, “I would never take….”
The words take and make are really part of a single action or event, as in the English phrase “come and see.”
The word prostitute is clearly feminine in the Greek text. Prostitute in many languages will be expressed figuratively; for example, “woman who sells her body,” or “woman of the night.”
Never! translates a Greek phrase that is frequently used in the theological arguments of Romans and Galatians (see, for example, Rom 11.11; Gal 2.17), but it is not used elsewhere in 1-2 Corinthians. There is no reference to God here, although King James Version has “God forbid.” The phrase means literally “let (it) not be.” One could also render it as “certainly not” or “that is impossible!”
Quoted with permission from Ellingworth, Paul and Hatton, Howard A. A Handbook on Paul’s First Letter to the Corinthians, 2nd edition. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1985/1994. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .
6:15a Do you not know that your bodies are members of Christ?
Do you not know that your bodies are parts of Christ himself?
-or-
You surely remember/know that your bodies are like parts/components of Christ’s body.
-or-
⌊When you think/say that behaving immorally is all right,⌋ you show that you have forgotten that your bodies are like limbs and organs of the body of Christ.
6:15b Shall I then take the members of Christ and unite them with a prostitute? Never!
So should I take ⌊this body⌋, a part of Christ, and make it one with a prostitute? Absolutely not!
-or-
So then, because my body is joined together with Christ, it is not proper/right for me to join it to a prostitute’s body! I should never think of such a thing!
-or-
Since our bodies are joined to Christ, it is unthinkable that we should unite them to prostitutes!
© 1998, 2019, 2020, 2022, 2023 by SIL International®
Made available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA) creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.
All Scripture quotations in this publication, unless otherwise indicated, are from The Holy Bible, Berean Standard Bible.
BSB is produced in cooperation with Bible Hub, Discovery Bible, OpenBible.com, and the Berean Bible Translation Committee.
No comments yet.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.