The Hebrew that is translated as “adoption” in English is translated in Makonde as “chosen by God to be his children” since there is no formal process of adoption in that part of Tanzania. (Source: Pioneer Bible Translators, project-specific notes in Paratext)
Abba
The Greek that is a transliteration from the Aramaic abba (אבא) and is itself transliterated into “Abba” in English is transliterated into Mandarin Chinese as ābà (阿爸). This is interesting because bà (爸) is the regularly-used term of endearment for “father” (“daddy”) and even the very combination of ābà (阿爸) is used in some dialects as the equivalent of “daddy.” This is exactly the meaning of the Aramaic abba as well.
Translations in other Chinese languages, including Wu Chinese, Min Nan Chinese, Hakka Chinese, Yue Chinese (Cantonese), as well as Literary Chinese use the same transliteration.
my Father / our Father
The Greek that is translated as “my Father” in English is translated in Matumbi as Tati’ bangu’ or “my fathers.” “Our Father” is translated as “our Fathers” (and likewise “our ancestor” as “our ancestors”). Matumbi uses a majestic plural as an honorific when addressing parents. (Source: Tim Macsaveny)
See also addressing one’s or someone else’s father humbly / respectfully in Japanese (父) and Father (address for God).
inclusive vs. exclusive pronoun (Rom. 8:15)
Many languages distinguish between inclusive and exclusive first-person plural pronouns (“we”). (Click or tap here to see more details)
The inclusive “we” specifically includes the addressee (“you and I and possibly others”), while the exclusive “we” specifically excludes the addressee (“he/she/they and I, but not you”). This grammatical distinction is called “clusivity.” While Semitic languages such as Hebrew or most Indo-European languages such as Greek or English do not make that distinction, translators of languages with that distinction have to make a choice every time they encounter “we” or a form thereof (in English: “we,” “our,” or “us”).
For this verse, translators typically select the inclusive form (including the writer of the letter and the readers).
Source: Velma Pickett and Florence Cowan in Notes on Translation January 1962, p. 1ff.
complete verse (Romans 8:15)
Following are a number of back-translations of Romans 8:15:
- Uma: “Formerly, while we were still bound to the Lord’s Law, we were afraid of the punishment of God. But now, we are no longer afraid, because we have received the Holy Spirit. For the Holy Spirit makes us the children of God. And because of the power of that Holy Spirit, we say to God: ‘O Mama! [vocative used by a child when speaking to his/her father] O my Father!'” (Source: Uma Back Translation)
- Yakan: “Because we (incl.) were given by God his Spirit, we (incl.) no longer have to be afraid like a slave is afraid of his master. But he has given his Spirit to us (incl.) so that we (incl.) become his children. That’s why it is possible for us (incl.) to name God our (incl.) Father.” (Source: Yakan Back Translation)
- Western Bukidnon Manobo: “For the Holy Spirit, which God gave us, He has not made us slaves which are very much afraid of God, but rather He has made us to be children of God. And by means of the power of the Holy Spirit it’s possible for us to call God our Father.” (Source: Western Bukidnon Manobo Back Translation)
- Kankanaey: “Because the Spirit whom God has given us has not made us slaves who are afraid to be punished like our previous status, but rather he has made us God’s children. So because of him, it is possible for us to address God as Father.” (Source: Kankanaey Back Translation)
- Tenango Otomi: “Now we are walkers with the Holy Spirit, now it is not necessary that we again fear like a person might fear his boss. Because truly we are God’s children now. The Holy Spirit we walk with is the one who puts in our hearts that we say to God: ‘You are my Father’ we say.” (Source: Tenango Otomi Back Translation)
Father (address for God)
The Greek that is translated with the capitalized “Father” in English when referring to God is translated in Highland Totonac with the regular word for (biological) father to which a suffix is added to indicate respect. The same also is used for “Lord” when referring to Jesus. (Source: Hermann Aschmann in The Bible Translator 1950, p. 171ff. )
Like a number of other East Asian languages, Japanese uses a complex system of honorifics, i.e. a system where a number of different levels of politeness are expressed in language via words, word forms or grammatical constructs. These can range from addressing someone or referring to someone with contempt (very informal) to expressing the highest level of reference (as used in addressing or referring to God) or any number of levels in-between. In the widely-used Japanese Shinkaiyaku (新改訳) Bible of 2017, God the Father is addressed with mi-chichi (御父). This form has the “divine” honorific prefix mi– preceding the archaic honorific form chichi for “father.”
If, however, Jesus addresses his Father, he is using chichi-o (父を) which is also highly respectful but does not have the “divine” honorific. (Source: S. E. Doi, see also S. E. Doi in Journal of Translation, 18/2022, p. 37ff. )
See also Lord and my / our Father.
formal 2nd person plural pronoun (Japanese)
Click or tap here to see the rest of this insight.
Like a number of other East Asian languages, Japanese uses a complex system of honorifics, i.e. a system where a number of different levels of politeness are expressed in language via words, word forms or grammatical constructs. These can range from addressing someone or referring to someone with contempt (very informal) to expressing the highest level of reference (as used in addressing or referring to God) or any number of levels in-between.
One way Japanese shows different degree of politeness is through the choice of a formal plural suffix to the second person pronoun (“you” and its various forms) as shown here in the widely-used Japanese Shinkaiyaku (新改訳) Bible of 2017. In these verses, anata-gata (あなたがた) is used, combining the second person pronoun anata and the plural suffix -gata to create a formal plural pronoun (“you” [plural] in English).
(Source: S. E. Doi, see also S. E. Doi in Journal of Translation, 18/2022, p. 37ff. )
Translation commentary on Romans 8:15
In Greek the first part of this verse includes a phrase that is equivalent to a passive (see Revised Standard Version “for you did not receive the spirit of slavery to fall back into fear”), which the Good News Translation transforms into an active construction. “You received” indicates that someone has given something, and the implied subject is God, God has given you. The phrase “spirit of slavery” is taken to mean “a spirit which brings about slavery.” In this context “spirit” is taken as a specific reference to God’s Spirit, for the Spirit that God has given you does not make you a slave. Finally, the phrase “into fear” implies result, and so the Good News Translation renders cause you to be afraid. The phrase which the Revised Standard Version renders “to fall back into fear” is literally “again into fear.” Most translations make the idea of “again” explicit, whereas the Good News Translation leaves this as an implicit item in the translation. The idea is that before the coming of God’s Spirit the believers were slaves of fear, but now God’s Spirit has released them from fear.
The Good News Translation has the same sort of restructuring in the second clause of this verse (literally “but you received a spirit of adoption”) as it has in the earlier part. The phrase “spirit of adoption” is again a reference to the Holy Spirit, while the genitive relation means that the Spirit (of God) makes you God’s sons. Some translators make a full stop at this point (so Revised Standard Version, Moffatt) and connect the remainder of this verse with the following verse. The reason for this is that Paul here uses a phrase which is ambiguous; it may mean either “by whom” or “in the time which.” Most translators understand the phrase in the former sense, while those who take it in the latter sense connect it with what follows (see Revised Standard Version “when we cry”). If the former interpretation is accepted, then the reference is clearly to God’s Spirit and so the Good News Translation renders this phrase as by the Spirit’s power (see New English Bible “Spirit … enabling us to cry”.)
If in this verse one understands “spirit” in the sense of the human spirit, the rendering must, of course, be quite different. In some languages, for example, translators employ expressions such as “God has not given you a heart like a slave, thus causing you to be afraid, but he has given you a heart like a son, and therefore you can say to God, You are my Father.” However, this type of interpretation seems to be far less satisfactory than one which recognizes the use of “Spirit” as a reference to God’s Spirit.
Similar judgments may be made regarding an exegesis such as the New English Bible, which sees in the first part of this verse a reference to the human spirit (“a spirit of slavery”) and in the second half of the verse a reference to God’s Spirit (“a Spirit that makes us sons”). Although it is possible to understand these as contrasting phrases, this is contrary to Paul’s usage of “spirit” throughout this entire passage. Throughout this chapter the focus of reference is God’s Spirit, and it is unlikely that Paul would change in this one instance. Moreover, it is better to see these two halves of the verse as a contrast between what God’s Spirit does and does not do, rather than a contrast between the activity of the human spirit and God’s Spirit.
In this verse Paul uses two different words for Father, the one Aramaic and the other Greek. Most translators transliterate the former of these terms “Abba,” and translate the latter “Father.” It is doubtful that the average reader can fully appreciate what Paul has done, and so it seems best to translate both of these words as Father. The Good News Translation qualifies the second term as my Father, which is supported by the observation that in Greek the word meaning “Father” is preceded by the article and so may be rendered as my Father or “our Father,” depending on the context. In some languages there may be a distinct problem of number in using an equivalent of my Father. For example, if one uses a second person plural “you” throughout this verse or shifts to “we” in the last clause, it may be necessary then to say “you are our Father.” However, one can introduce a singular by employing a preceding expression “each one of you” or “each one of us.” As is already implied, it may be difficult to employ a double expression of “Father” as in Father! my Father! The more common equivalents involve several formal adjustments—for example, “each one of us may address God and say, My Father” or “we may all speak to God as our Father.”
The phrase by the Spirit’s power is best taken as causative—for example, “the Spirit causes us to say to God.”
Quoted with permission from Newman, Barclay M. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on Paul’s Letter to the Romans. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1973. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.