The Greek Christos (Χρηστός) is typically transliterated when it appears together with Iésous (Ἰησοῦς) (Jesus). In English the transliteration is the Anglicized “Christ,” whereas in many other languages it is based on the Greek or Latin as “Kristus,” “Cristo,” or similar.
When used as a descriptive term in the New Testament — as it’s typically done in the gospels (with the possible exceptions of for instance John 1:17 and 17:3) — Christos is seen as the Greek translation of the Hebrew mashiaḥ (המשיח) (“anointed”). Accordingly, a transliteration of mashiaḥ is used, either as “Messiah” or based on the Greek or Latin as a form of “Messias.”
This transliteration is also used in the two instances where the Greek term Μεσσίας (Messias) is used in John 1:41 and 4:25.
In some languages and some translations, the term “Messiah” is supplemented with an explanation. Such as in the GermanGute Nachricht with “the Messiah, the promised savior” (Wir haben den Messias gefunden, den versprochenen Retter) or in Muna with “Messiah, the Saving King” (Mesias, Omputo Fosalamatino) (source: René van den Berg).
In predominantly Muslim areas or for Bible translations for a Muslim target group, Christos is usually transliterated from the Arabic al-Masih (ٱلْمَسِيحِ) — “Messiah.” In most cases, this practice corresponds with languages that also use a form of the Arabic Isa (عيسى) for Jesus (see Jesus). There are some exceptions, though, including modern translations in Arabic which use Yasua (يَسُوعَ) (coming from the Aramaic Yēšūa’) alongside a transliteration of al-Masih, Hausa which uses Yesu but Almahisu, and some Fula languages (Adamawa Fulfulde, Nigerian Fulfulde, and Central-Eastern Niger Fulfulde) which also use a form of Iésous (Yeesu) but Almasiihu (or Almasiifu) for Christos.
In Indonesian, while most Bible translations had already used Yesus Kristus rather than Isa al Masih, three public holidays used to be described using the term Isa Al Masih. From 2024 on, the government is using Yesus Kristus in those holiday names instead (see this article in Christianity Today ).
Other solutions that are used by a number of languages include these:
Dobel: “The important one that God had appointed to come” (source: Jock Hughes)
Noongar: Keny Mammarap or “The One Man” (source: Warda-Kwabba Luke-Ang)
Mairasi: “King of not dying for life all mashed out infinitely” (for “mashed out,” see salvation; source: Lloyd Peckham)
Toposa: “chosen rescuer” (source: Schröder 2026, p. 127)
Western Bukidnon Manobo: “One chosen by God to rule mankind” (source: Western Bukidnon Manobo Back Translation)
Bacama: Ma Pwa a Ngɨltən: “The one God has chosen” (source: David Frank in this blog post )
Binumarien: Anutuna: originally a term that was used for a man that was blessed by elders for a task by the laying on of hands (source: Desmond Oatridges, Holzhausen 1991, p. 49f.)
Noongar: Keny Boolanga-Yira Waangki-Koorliny: “One God is Sending” (source: Warda-Kwabba Luke-Ang)
Uab Meto: Neno Anan: “Son of heaven” P. Middelkoop explains: “The idea of heavenly power bestowed on a Timorese king is rendered in the title Neno Anan. It is based on the historical fact that chiefs in general came from overseas and they who come thence are believed to have come down from heaven, from the land beyond the sea, that means the sphere of God and the ghosts of the dead. The symbolical act of anointing has been made subservient to the revelation of an eternal truth and when the term Neno Anan is used as a translation thereof, it also is made subservient to a new revelation of God in Jesus Christ. The very fact that Jesus came from heaven makes this translation hit the mark.” (Source: P. Middelkoop in The Bible Translator 1953, p. 183ff. )
In Finnish Sign Language both “Christ” and “Messiah” are translated with a sign signifying “king.” (Source: Tarja Sandholm)
“Christ / Messiah” in Finnish Sign Language (source )
Law (2013, p. 97) writes about how the Ancient GreekSeptuagint‘s translation of the Hebrew mashiah was used by the New Testament writers as a bridge between the Old and New Testaments (click or tap here to read more):
“Another important word in the New Testament that comes from the Septuagint is christos, ‘Christ.’ Christ is not part of the name of the man from Nazareth, as if ‘the Christs’ were written above the door of his family home. Rather, ‘Christ’ is an explicitly messianic title used by the writers of the New Testament who have learned this word from the Septuagint’s translation of the Hebrew mashiach, ‘anointed,’ which itself is often rendered in English as ‘Messiah.’ To be sure, one detects a messianic intent on the part of the Septuagint translator in some places. Amos 4:13 may have been one of these. In the Hebrew Bible, God ‘reveals his thoughts to mortals,’ but the Septuagint has ‘announcing his anointed to humans.’ A fine distinction must be made, however, between theology that was intended by the Septuagint translators and that developed by later Christian writers. In Amos 4:13 it is merely possible we have a messianic reading, but it is unquestionably the case that the New Testament writers exploit the Septuagint’s use of christos, in Amos and elsewhere, to messianic ends.”
The Greek Iēsous is “only” a proper name but one with great importance. The following quote by John Ellington (in The Bible Translator1993, p. 401ff. ) illustrates this:
“In Matthew’s account of the birth of Jesus Christ, Joseph is told that when Mary gives birth to a son ‘you will name him Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins’ (1:21). This name is a Greek transliteration of the Hebrew name [Yeshua (יֵשׁוּעַ) which is a short form of a name meaning] ‘the Lord [Yahweh] saves.’ The name is very significant and is in itself especially dear to Christians around the world. (…) Unquestionably great importance is attached to the name of Jesus by Christians of all persuasions and backgrounds.”
While Iēsous (pronounced: /i.ɛː.suːs/) is transliterated as “Jesus” (pronounced /ˈdʒiːzəs/) in English (but was translated as “Hælend” [the “healing one”] in Old English — see Swain 2019) it is transliterated and pronounced in a large variety of other ways as well, following the different rules of different languages’ orthographies, writing systems and rules of pronunciation. The following is a (partial) list of forms of Jesus in Latin characters: aYeso, Azezi, Boiyesuq, Cecoc, Chesús, Chi̍i̍sū, Chisɔsi, Ciisahs, Ciise, Ciisusu, Djesu, Ɛisa, Ƹisa, Eyesu, Gesù, Gesû, Gesü, Ġesù, Ghjesù, Giêsu, ꞌGiê‑ꞌsu, Giê-xu, Gyisɛse, Hesu, Hesús, Hisus, Hisuw, Ià-sŭ, Iesen, Ié:sos, Iesu, Iesui, Iesusɨn, Iesusiva, Ié:sos, Ihu, Īhu, Iisus, Iisussa, Ijeesu, iJisọsị, Iji̍sɔ̄ɔsi, Iosa, Íosa, Ìosa, İsa, I’sa, Isiso, Isõs, Ísu, Isus, Isusa, Iisussa, Isuthi, Itota, Îtu, Isuva, Izesu, Izesuq, Jasus, Jeeju, Jeesus, Jeesuse, Jeezas, Jehu, Jeisu, Jeju, Jejus, Jesesi, Jeshu, Jeso, Jesoe, Jesosa, Jesoshi, Jesosi, Jesosy, Jesu, Jesû, Jesua, Jesuh, Jesuhs, Jesuo, Jesús, Jésus, Jesúsu, Jethu, Jetsóó, Jezed, Jezi, Jézi, Ježiš, Jezu, Jezus, Jézus, Jėzus, Jēzus, Jezusi, Jėzus, Jezuz, Jiijajju, Jíísas, Jiisusi, Jiizas, Jíìzọ̀s, Jisas, Jisase, Jisasi, Jisasɨ, Jisaso, Jisesi, Jisɛ̀, Jisos, Jisọs, Jisɔs, Jisu, Jiszs, Jizọs, Jizɔs, Jizọsi, Jizọsu, Jòso, Jusu, Jweesus, Ketsutsi, Njises, ọYẹsọ, Sesi, Sisa, Sísa, Sisas, Sises, Sīsū, Sizi, Txesusu, uJesu, Ujísɔ̄si, ŵaYesu, Xesosi, ´Xesús, Xesús, Yasu, Ya:su, yasuɛ, Yasuuⓐ, Ɣaysa, Yecu, Yeeb Sub, Yeeh Suh, Yeesey, Yeeso, Yeesso, Yēēsu, Yehsu, Yëësu, Yeiqsul, Yeisu, Yeisuw, Yeshu, Yē shú, Yeso, Yéso, Yesò, Yëso, Yɛso, ye-su, Yésu, Yêsu, Yẹ́sụ̃, Yěsù, Yésʉs, Yeswa, Yet Sut, Yetut, Yexus, Yezo, Yezu, Yiesu, Yiisa, Yiisu, Yiitju, Yis, Yisɔs, Yisufa, Yitati, Yusu, ‑Yusu, :Yusu’, Zeezi, Zezi, Zezì, Zezuz, Zezwii, Ziizɛ, Zisas, Zîsɛ, Zjezus, Zozi, Zozii, and this (much more incomplete) list with other writings systems: ᔩᓱᓯ, ᒋᓴᔅ, Հիսուս, ᏥᏌ, ኢየሱስ, ያሱስ, ܝܫܘܥ, Ісус, Їисъ, 耶稣, იესო, ईसा, イエス, イイスス, イエスス, 예수, येशू, येशो, ਈਸਾ, ພຣະເຢຊູ, ජේසුස්, যীশু, ଯୀଶୁ, ཡེ་ཤུ་, ‘ঈছা, இயேசு, ಯೇಸು, ພຣະເຢຊູ, ယေရှု, ઇસુ, जेजू, येसु, เยซู, យេស៊ូ, ᱡᱤᱥᱩ, ယေသှု, యేసు, ᤕᤧᤛᤢ᤺ᤴ, އީސާގެފާނު, ਯਿਸੂ, ꕉꖷ ꔤꕢ ꕞ, ⵏ⵿ⵗⵢⵙⴰ, ଜୀସୁ, يَسُوعَ,ㄧㄝㄙㄨ, YE-SU, ꓬꓰ꓿ꓢꓴ, 𖽃𖽡𖾐𖼺𖽹𖾏𖼽𖽔𖾏, ꑳꌠ, ᠶᠡᠰᠦᠰ (note that some of these might not display correctly if your device does not have the correct fonts installed).
Click or tap here to read more.
In some languages the different confessions have selected different transliterations, such as in Belarusian with Isus (Ісус) by the Orthodox and Protestant churches and Yezus (Езус) by the Catholic church, Bulgarian with Iisus (Иисус) by the Orthodox and Isus (Исус) by the Protestant church, Japanese with Iesu (イエス) (Protestant and Catholic) and Iisusu (イイスス) (Orthodox), or Lingala with Yesu (Protestant) or Yezu (Catholic). These differences have come to the forefront especially during the work on interconfessional translations such as one in Lingala where “many hours were spent on a single letter difference” (source: Ellington, p. 401).
In Literary and Mandarin Chinese where transliterations of proper names between the Catholic and Protestant versions typically differ vastly, the Chinese name of Jesus (Yēsū 耶稣) remarkably was never brought into question between and by those two confessions, likely due to its ingenious choice. (Click or tap here to see more).
The proper name of God in the Old Testament, Yahweh (YHWH), is rendered in most Chinese Bible translations as Yēhéhuá 耶和華 — Jehovah. According to Chinese naming conventions, Yēhéhuá could be interpreted as Yē Héhuá, in which Yē would be the family name and Héhuá — “harmonic and radiant” — the given name. In the same manner, Yē 耶 would be the family name of Jesus and Sū 稣 would be his given name. Because in China the children inherit the family name from the father, the sonship of Jesus to God the Father, Jehovah, would be illustrated through this. Though this line of argumentation sounds theologically unsound, it is indeed used effectively in the Chinese church (see Wright 1953, p. 298).
Moreover, the “given name” of Sū 稣 carries the meaning ‘to revive, to rise again’ and seems to point to the resurrected Jesus. (Source: J. Zetzsche in Malek 2002, p. 141ff., see also tetragrammaton (YHWH))
There are different ways that Bible translators have chosen historically and today in how to translate the name of Jesus in predominantly Muslim areas: with a form of the Arabic Isa (عيسى) (which is used for “Jesus” in the Qur’an), the Greek Iēsous, or, like major 20th century Bible translations into Standard Arabic, the Aramaic Yēšūaʿ: Yasua (يَسُوعَ). (Click or tap here to see more.)
Following are languages and language groups that use a form of Isa include the following (note that this list is not complete):
In Indonesian, while most Bible translations had already used Yesus Kristus rather than Isa al Masih, three public holidays used to be described using the term Isa Al Masih. From 2024 on the government is using Yesus Kristus in those holiday names instead (see this article in Christianity Today ).
Some languages have additional “TAZI” editions (TAZI stands for “Tawrat, Anbiya, Zabur, and Injil” the “Torah, Prophets, Psalms and Gospel”) of the New Testament that are geared towards Muslim readers where there is also a translation in the same language for non-Muslims. In those editions, Isa is typically used as well (for example, the Khmer TAZI edition uses Isa (អ៊ីសា) rather than the commonly used Yesaou (យេស៊ូ), the Thai edition uses Isa (อีซา) rather than Yesu (เยซู), the Chinese edition uses Ěrsā (尔撒) vs. Yēsū (耶稣), and the English edition also has Isa rather than Jesus.)
In German the name Jesus (pronounced: /ˈjeːzʊs/) is distinguished by its grammatical forms. Into the 20th century the grammatical rules prescribed a unique Greek-Latin declination: Jesus (nominative), Jesu (genitive, dative, vocative), Jesum (accusative), from which today only the genitive case “Jesu” is still in active use. Likewise, in Seediq (Taroko), the morphological treatment of “Jesus” also occupies a special category by not falling under the normal rule of experiencing a vowel reduction when the object-specific suffix an is added “since it was felt that the readers might resent that the name has been changed that drastically.” (Compare Msian for “Moses” (Mosi) as an object, but Yisuan for “Jesus” (Yisu).) (Source: Covell 1998. p. 249)
In Lamba the name ŵaYesu consists of a transliteration Yesu and the prefix ŵa, a plural form for “proper names when addressing and referring to persons in any position of seniority or honor.” While this was avoided in early translations to avoid possible misunderstandings of more than one Jesus, once the church was established it was felt that it was both “safe” and respectful to use the honorific (pl.) prefix. (Source C. M. Doke in The Bible Translator 1958, p. 57ff. )
In virtually all sign languages, “Jesus” is signed with the middle finger of each hand pointing to the palm (or wrist) of the other in succession (signing the nails of the cross). In the context of Bible translation this has been pointed out as theologically problematic since the “semantic connections of the original name Jesus do point towards ‘salvation,’ they do not naturally lead to crucifixion.” (Source: Phil King in Journal of Translation 1 (2020), p. 33ff.)
Following is the oldest remaining Ethiopian Orthodox icon of Jesus from the 14th or possibly 13th century (found in the Church of the Saviour of the World in Gurji, Ethiopia). As in many Orthodox icons, Jesus’ right hand forms the Greek letters I-C-X-C for IHCOYCXPICTOC or “Jesus Christ.” Another interpretation of the right hand is that it shows three fingers pointing to the Trinity, while the two other fingers point to Jesus’ two natures.
Orthodox icons are not drawings or creations of imagination. They are in fact writings of things not of this world. Icons can represent our Lord Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary, and the Saints. They can also represent the Holy Trinity, Angels, the Heavenly hosts, and even events. Orthodox icons, unlike Western pictures, change the perspective and form of the image so that it is not naturalistic. This is done so that we can look beyond appearances of the world, and instead look to the spiritual truth of the holy person or event. (Source )
The following is the so-called “Wales Window for Alabama.” It is a stained-glass window by the artist John Petts from Carmarthenshire, Wales, created in response to the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing which took place in 1963:
Stained glass is not just highly decorative, it’s a medium which has been used to express important religious messages for centuries. Literacy was not widespread in the medieval and Renaissance periods and the Church used stained glass and other artworks to teach the central beliefs of Christianity. In Gothic churches, the windows were filled with extensive narrative scenes in stained glass — like huge and colorful picture storybooks — in which worshipers could ‘read’ the stories of Christ and the saints and learn what was required for their religious salvation. (Source: Victoria and Albert Museum )
The style of the following drawing of Jesus by Annie Vallotton is described by the artist as this: “By using few lines the readers fill in the outlines with their imagination and freedom. That is when the drawings begin to communicate.” (see here ; see also We All are One in Christ)
Illustration by Annie Vallotton, copyright by Donald and Patricia Griggs of Griggs Educational Service.
For the problem of identifying who Peter is, one is referred to the introduction. The Gospel accounts are agreed that Jesus gave the nickname “Peter” (which means “rock”) to Simon, one of his disciples. (See Mark 3.16; Matt 16.18; John 1.42.) The Aramaic form of “Peter” is “Cephas” (see John 1.42; Gal 2.11); the Today’s English Version (Good News Bible) and many other modern translations have used simply “Peter” to translate both the Greek and Aramaic forms so as to avoid the problem of the reader interpreting these two names as referring to two different people.
In a number of languages it is not possible to speak of oneself in the third person; moreover, the relationship between the writer of a letter and those to whom it is sent must often be made more explicit, so that verse 1 must begin as “I, Peter, who am an apostle of Jesus Christ, write to you who are God’s chosen people…” or “I am Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, and I write to you, God’s chosen people….”
Peter describes himself as an apostle. The word apostle is used to describe a person who is sent by someone in order to proclaim a message and to speak or act in behalf of the one who sent him. In the New Testament, apostle is used either in a limited sense, referring to the disciples chosen by Jesus during his earthly ministry (see Luke 24.48), or in a wider sense, referring to all the early Christian missionaries and evangelists (Acts 15.2; Rom 16.7; 2 Cor 8.23). In 1 Peter, the word may be interpreted either way, but it is more likely that it should be taken with the limited sense, since it is used to describe Peter, who was one of the twelve disciples. But the more important thing is to realize that Peter’s authority to speak and to write comes from Jesus himself.
It is sometimes possible to translate apostle as “specially sent one.” In other instances the term apostle is best represented by a word which means “representative” or “a representative who has been sent out” or “… sent out for a purpose.”
The relationship between “apostle” and “Jesus Christ” may be expressed in some languages as “one who is sent by Jesus Christ” or “one who is sent by Jesus Christ to represent him.” It is important to avoid a rendering of “apostle” which in combination with Jesus Christ would simply mean that Peter was “Jesus Christ’s errand boy.”
The recipients of the letter are identified as coming from five places in Asia Minor, now a part of western Turkey. Pontus is on the South coast of the Black Sea; Galatia is the central part of Asia Minor; Cappadocia is inland, located east of Galatia and south of Pontus. Asia is the land extending along the west coast, comprising the famous cities of Ephesus, Smyrna, Miletus, etc. It is not the continent of Asia that is referred to. All the seven churches mentioned in the book of Revelation belong to this province. Bithynia is west of Pontus along the Black Sea.
Some commentaries have suggested that the order of these places is important, in that since the letter is intended to be a circular letter, this would be the circular route that its bearer would follow. He would begin in Pontus and end in Bithynia.
It may not be possible to find in some languages a term which corresponds precisely to provinces. One can, of course, use a more general term such as “areas” or “regions,” or even as in some cases, “lands.”
In transliterating the names of the provinces of Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia it is important to follow the pronunciation of the dominant languages of an area or to employ the traditional forms used in languages which have established a pattern for such ancient geographical terms. One should avoid a transliteration resulting in combinations of consonants and vowels which would be difficult for persons to pronounce. It may also be advisable to have a brief note indicating that these provinces were all part of what came to be known as Asia Minor (now called Turkey), and it may be particularly important to have a note indicating clearly that the term Asia does not refer to the Orient but to a particular area in what is now western Turkey.
The recipients are described as God’s chosen people. In the Greek this is simply “chosen ones,” with the agent left implicit. This particular Greek term, however, was traditionally used to describe the people of Israel as a whole, to designate their being called and chosen by God to be his own people. Therefore, it is clear from the text that God is the implicit agent of “chosen,” and this information is made explicit in Good News Translation. It is worth noting that the same term used for Jews is now used to refer to Christians, which means that God has chosen the Christians individually and the church collectively as the new Israel, that is, the new people of God. This is made much clearer in chapter 2, especially verses 9,10.
The phrase God’s chosen people may be slightly restructured as “the people whom God has chosen.” It is important, however, in choosing a term for “chosen,” to avoid the implication that such individuals are merely privileged individuals. The implication should be that they are “chosen for a purpose.” It is particularly important to avoid any term which will suggest that they are the ones that “God has bet on.”
Refugees scattered throughout is literally “exiles of the Dispersion” (Revised Standard Version [Revised Standard Version]), which is another popular way of describing the Jews. The Greek word for “exiles” primarily means “temporary residents,” foreigners who settle temporarily in a place, without any intention of residing there permanently. The word “Dispersion” was a popular way of referring to Jews who were living outside the Holy Land.
It is possible to take the expression “exiles of the Dispersion” as referring to Christians of Jewish origin who were living in the provinces mentioned. It is more likely, however, that the expression is used figuratively, as referring to all Christians, primarily non-Jewish Christians in Asia Minor. This would indeed be an appropriate figure in two ways. (1) In the same way that the Jews were strangers everywhere outside the Holy Land, not only in nationality but also in culture and religion, so the Christians were strangers in the areas where they lived. (2) And in the same way that the Jews longed for the time that they would be able to return to the Holy Land, their true home, so the Christians too, long for the time when their temporary stay is over, and they attain full citizenship in heaven (see 1.9 below).
Within this figurative usage, two primary meanings of the expression can be derived. (1) The term emphasizes the transitory existence of the Christian in the world, that is, he is a temporary resident of the world, since his real citizenship is in heaven, (compare New International Version [New International Version] “strangers in the world”). (2) The term emphasizes the feeling of strangeness among Christians as they live in the midst of pagan neighbors, and as a result, encounter various difficulties. The first of these is supported by the strong eschatological tone of the letter, that is, that the world is about to end, and therefore the Christian’s attainment of full citizenship in heaven is also near at hand. The second is supported by the actual situation of the readers which is described in the letter, a situation in which they are actually suffering persecutions, trials, and various difficulties as a result of their faith. Perhaps, then, both of these meanings are intended. In view of circumstances throughout the world, it is normally possible to find a perfectly good word for refugees, but one should avoid a kind of literal rendering which would suggest that the people were continually in flight from one place to another. Sometimes the appropriate connotations may be introduced by a phrase such as “people living as strangers in a foreign land” or “those who live as strangers in other places” or “those who are dwelling for a time in foreign countries.”
A literal rendering of scattered throughout might be misleading in that it would suggest that someone had purposely “scattered them in the various provinces.” A satisfactory equivalent of scattered throughout may in some instances be “living in various places” or “living in different cities throughout.”
A word should be added about the relation of the expression “exiles of the Dispersion” with “chosen ones.” With the Greek text, it is possible to translate “chosen” as an adjective qualifying “exiles of the Dispersion” (for example, Anchor Bible “chosen immigrants”). The danger here, however, is that it conveys the meaning that the letter is not written to all the “exiles” but only to a few of them. In view of this, it is better to take “chosen” as a descriptive term referring to all the Christians in the provinces mentioned (as in Good News Translation and most other modern translations)
Quoted with permission from Arichea, Daniel C. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on The First Letter from Peter. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1980. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .
In this section, Peter began his letter by greeting the believers to whom he was writing his letter.
Peter began this letter in the usual way that people wrote letters during the time that he lived. First, he wrote his name, “Peter.” Then he added a description of himself: “an apostle of Jesus Christ.” Next, he identified the people to whom he was writing. He was writing to the Christians living in five areas of Asia Minor, and he included a description of these Christians in 1:2a–d. Finally, Peter gave them a Christian greeting or blessing in 1:2e.
In some languages it is more common for a writer to begin a letter by mentioning the people who will receive it before he mentions his own name. If it is not polite in your language to put the author’s name first, it may be necessary to reorder the information. For example:
To God’s elect from Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ: I write to you who are strangers….
-or-
This letter is for those who have been chosen by God and who are living as strangers in the world, who are scattered throughout Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia. It is I, Peter, an apostle of Jesus Christ, who am writing to you.
However, try to find a polite way in your language to maintain the original order, if possible.
Other possible headings for the section are:
Greetings from Peter (New Living Translation (2004))
-or-
Peter began his letter to scattered believers/Christians
Paragraph 1:1–2d
1:1a
Peter: The author began his letter by giving his name. In some languages it may be more natural to use a statement here, such as:
⌊I,⌋ Peter, ⌊am writing this letter⌋
an apostle of Jesus Christ: The Greek word that the Berean Standard Bible translates as apostle is literally “sent one.” It refers to a person who is sent by someone to accomplish a purpose. An apostle has authority from the one who sent him. Jesus Christ chose apostles and gave them authority. After he returned to heaven, his apostles were the leaders for those who believed in him. Peter was one of those apostles.
If you have already translated the Gospels, you may want to use the same word for apostle as you used there. Some ways to translate an apostle of Jesus Christ are:
one whom Jesus Christ sent ⌊on a mission⌋
-or-
a person with authority from Jesus Christ ⌊to do his work⌋
-or-
a chief leader in Jesus Christ’s work
Christ: The word Christ is used in two ways in the New Testament:
• It is used as a name (that is, “Jesus Christ” or “Christ”).
• It is used as a title that means “the anointed one” (that is, “the Messiah” or “the Christ”).
In this letter, Peter used Christ as a name. Often it occurs with Jesus, as it does in this verse, Jesus Christ.
1:1b
the elect: The Greek phrase that the Berean Standard Bible translates as the elect means “God’s chosen ones,” that is, “(people) whom God chose.” God chose them and all other people who believe in Jesus to be his special people. Some possible ways to translate the elect are:
God’s chosen ⌊people⌋
-or-
⌊the people⌋ whom God has chosen ⌊to be his own special people⌋
In this context Peter was writing to the elect in certain provinces. He did not mean that those people were the only people whom God had chosen. The Greek text indicates this by connecting the ideas of being strangers and being scattered. In some languages it may be necessary to indicate it in the first clause. For example:
you ⌊who are among⌋ God’s chosen people
1:1c–d
exiles of the Dispersion: The Greek word that the Berean Standard Bible translates as exiles refers to people who are living in a foreign country rather than in their own native country. This may be a simple geographic reference by which Peter is identifying the recipients of his letter. However, there could also be a sense here that the true home of believers in Jesus is heaven, not this world. Some translations bring out that sense.
Other ways to translate this are:
living as foreigners (New Living Translation (2004))
-or-
temporary residents in the world (God’s Word)
1:1d
of the Dispersion: The Greek word that the Berean Standard Bible literally translates as of the Dispersion is the noun form of the verb “disperse,” which means “cause to go in different directions” or “scatter.” In Peter’s time, Jewish people who did not live in their own land of Israel referred to themselves in this way. Peter is using the term to refer to Christians, both Jews and Gentiles, to identify them as living in or near the Jewish communities that were outside of Israel but perhaps also to suggest that they are not currently living in their true land, which is heaven.
. Some ways to translate this word include:
dispersed
-or-
living in ⌊various places⌋
Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia, and Bithynia: These were the names of different provinces or areas where the Christians to whom Peter was writing lived. They were all located in the western part of the modern country of Turkey.
chosen: The Berean Standard Bible has supplied the word chosen, which has the same meaning as “elect” in 1:1b. The Berean Standard Bible did this to show the connection between the ideas in verses 1 and 2. In Greek the ideas in 1:2a explain more about the “elect” in 1:1b. Be sure to make this connection clear in your language. Some ways to do this are:
• Mention the idea again in 1:2, as the New International Version does:
1b To God’s elect…2a who have been chosen
• Wait until 1:2 to mention the idea “chosen,” as the Revised Standard Version does:
1b To the exiles…2a chosen
• Reorder 1:1 (see the General Comment on 1:1b–d below):
…who are chosen by God
Use a natural connection in your language. In some languages it may also be more natural to express the idea as an active clause. For example:
⌊God⌋ chose you
General Comment on 1:1b–d
In some languages it may be more natural to reorder 1b–c. For example:
⌊I am writing⌋ to ⌊you people⌋ ⌊who are⌋ 1d located in ⌊the provinces of⌋ Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia, 1c ⌊and who are only⌋ temporary residents of this world. 1b God has chosen ⌊you⌋.
-or-
1c to those living as foreigners/sojourners 1d in Pontus, Galatia, Cappadocia, Asia and Bithynia, 1b who are chosen by God.
Such a reordering may also help you to make a natural connection with the next verse.
Au 1er siècle apr. J.-C., une lettre commençait normalement par une salutation. Celle-ci comprenait le nom de l’auteur, son titre, la mention du ou des destinataires et une formule de salutation. La plupart des lettres figurant dans le NT débutent par une salutation de ce genre, y compris cette première lettre de Pierre. L’auteur donne d’abord son nom, Pierre, puis son titre, apôtre de Jésus Christ. Ensuite il nomme ses destinataires dans cinq provinces d’Asie Mineure : les élus qui vivent en étrangers dans la dispersion. Il les salue finalement en disant Que la grâce et la paix vous viennent en abondance.
Pierre, apôtre de Jésus Christ est le nom et le titre de l’auteur de cette lettre. Pierre est le surnom donné par Jésus à un pêcheur juif nommé Simon (Matt 4.18). Jésus l’appelle Simon Pierre ou « Céphas », transcription grecque de l’araméen כֵּיפָא kêyfâʾ, « roc », pour signaler le rôle important que Simon va jouer dans l’Église (Matt 16.18 ; Jean 1.42 ; voir aussi Marc 3.16). Dans ses lettres, Paul utilise souvent le nom « Céphas » pour parler de Pierre. Voir 1 Cor 1.12 ; 3.22 ; 9.5 ; 15.5 ; Gal 1.18 ; 2.9,11,14 dans la Traduction œcuménique de la Bible, Nouvelle Bible Segond et Jerusalem Bible. Dans la traduction, on doit éviter de donner l’impression que Pierre et Céphas sont deux personnes différentes. Pour éviter l’ambiguïté, certaines versions comme la Bible en français courant utilisent Pierre partout.
Pour ce début de lettre, certains traducteurs préféreront utiliser un style plus naturel dans leur langue, par exemple, « Moi, Pierre, apôtre de Jésus-Christ, j’écris à ceux que Dieu a choisis » (Parole de Vie) ou « je m’adresse à vous que Dieu a choisis ». La La Bible du Semeur propose « Pierre, apôtre de Jésus-Christ, salue ceux que Dieu a choisis ».
apôtre de Jésus Christ : le terme traduit par apôtre désigne une personne chargée de proclamer un message. Cette personne parle ou agit au nom de celui qui l’a envoyée. Dans le NT, le mot grec correspondant désigne d’abord les douze disciples choisis par Jésus durant son ministère terrestre (Luc 6.13) et ensuite les premiers missionnaires ou évangélistes chrétiens. Voir, par exemple, 2 Cor 8.23, « ce sont les envoyés des Églises » (Bible en français courant) et Phil 2.25, litt. « votre envoyé ». Pierre se qualifie comme apôtre des deux points de vue, puisqu’il était l’un des douze apôtres désignés par Jésus de son vivant et après la mort du Christ, il est aussi un « envoyé ». L’autorité de Pierre lui vient de Jésus Christ. Dans beaucoup de langues, il est possible de traduire apôtre par « envoyé » ou « représentant ». Les traducteurs devraient cependant envisager en même temps la traduction des termes pour « ange » et « prophète » qui expriment des notions similaires mais distinctes.
de Jésus Christ dans ce contexte veut dire « envoyé par Jésus-Christ ». Pour Jésus Christ, voir l’Intro.
aux élus qui vivent en étrangers dans la dispersion : l’expression les élus, littéralement « les choisis », a été traditionnellement utilisée pour désigner l’ensemble du peuple d’Israël, puisque Dieu l’avait appelé et choisi pour être son propre peuple. Dieu est donc l’agent implicite de ce choix, comme le montre la Bible en français courant « A ceux que Dieu a choisis ». Mais ce terme appliqué autrefois au peuple juif est maintenant utilisé pour tout croyant chrétien, juif ou non-juif. L’auteur, qui est lui-même juif, sous-entend que Dieu a aussi choisi un nouveau peuple qui est l’Église. Voir aussi 1 Pierre 2.9. Bien que certains considèrent que la lettre ne s’adresse qu’aux chrétiens d’origine juive vivant dans les provinces mentionnées, il est plus probable qu’elle s’adresse à tous les chrétiens d’Asie Mineure, en majorité non juifs d’origine. Une note de la Traduction œcuménique de la Bible précise « aux chrétiens dispersés dans le monde ». Dans la majorité des langues, on parlera de « peuple choisi » ou « peuple désigné par Dieu ». Le terme pour « choisi(s) » ne doit pas suggérer, en un sens négatif, un choix entre ce qui est bon et mauvais, avec rejet de ce qui est mauvais. Pour lever tout équivoque, le traducteur pourrait dire « Dieu s’est choisi un nouveau peuple ».
qui vivent en étrangers dans la dispersion est littéralement « exilés de la dispersion ». Mais dans certaines langues il va falloir ajouter un verbe, comme le font la Traduction œcuménique de la Bible et la Bible en français courantqui vivent, ou « qui résident », « qui se trouvent comme étrangers… »
étrangers : le mot grec pour « exilés » signifie en premier lieu des résidents temporaires, c’est-à-dire des étrangers qui résident à un endroit sans avoir l’intention d’y demeurer de façon durable. Dans la majorité des langues, ce mot ne posera pas de problème. Cependant, il faut éviter de suggérer qu’il s’agit de personnes en fuite. On pourra aussi parler de « ceux qui habitent pour un temps dans des pays étrangers ». D’après le texte grec, il est possible de considérer élus ou « choisis » comme adjectif qualifiant étrangers ou « exilés », ce qui donnerait « les exilés choisis ». Mais il est préférable de considérer élus comme un terme s’appliquant à tous les chrétiens des provinces mentionnées, une interprétation adoptée par la majorité des versions françaises.
dans la dispersion : le mot dispersion a désigné tout d’abord les Juifs vivant hors de la Palestine (Jean 7.35), tandis qu’ici il semble s’appliquer aux chrétiens. Cette image se prête à deux interprétations : premièrement, de même que les Juifs étaient des étrangers partout hors de la Terre Sainte (quant à leur nationalité, leur culture et leur religion), de même ceux qui croyaient en Jésus étaient en quelque sorte des étrangers dans les régions où ils vivaient. Deuxièmement, de même que les Juifs attendaient ardemment le moment où ils pourraient retourner dans la Terre Sainte, leur vraie patrie, de même les chrétiens attendent le moment où leur résidence temporaire dans ce monde prendra fin et où ils obtiendront leur pleine citoyenneté dans le ciel. Voir 1 Pierre 1.4, 1 Pierre 1.9. Cet usage figuré met l’accent sur le fait que les chrétiens ne résident que pour un temps limité dans le monde, puisque leur véritable patrie est dans le ciel. Elle évoque aussi le fait que les chrétiens sont des étrangers parmi les gens au milieu desquels ils vivent (dont la majorité sont païens). Ces différents aspects laissent entendre que la fin du monde s’approche. Plus tard Pierre évoquera les persécutions, épreuves et autres difficultés que les croyants ont à subir à cause de leur foi.
En rendant la notion de dispersion, les traducteurs ne doivent pas laisser entendre que quelqu’un a volontairement « dispersé ces gens » dans diverses provinces. En fait, leur dispersion est due aux multiples facteurs, y compris des persécutions. Dans quelques langues, on pourrait dire « qui se trouvent en divers endroits » ou « qui résident dans toutes sortes de localités ». On pourra aussi parler des croyants « éparpillés dans les provinces du Pont, de Galatie… »
dans le Pont, la Galatie, la Cappadoce, l’Asie et la Bithynie : les destinataires de la lettre sont identifiés comme provenant de cinq différentes régions d’Asie Mineure, qui correspond à la Turquie actuelle. Le Pont se situe sur la côte sud de la mer Noire. La Galatie se trouve au centre de l’Asie Mineure, et la Cappadoce à l’est de la Galatie et au sud du Pont. Quant à l’Asie, il ne s’agit pas du continent asiatique, mais d’une province longeant la côte ouest de l’Asie Mineure, et comprenant en particulier des villes célèbres, dont Éphèse, Smyrne et Milet. Enfin, la Bithynie est à l’ouest du Pont, le long de la mer Noire. Selon certains commentateurs, l’ordre de présentation de ces régions est important, en ce sens que la lettre devait être circulaire. Cet ordre se référerait à la route suivie par le porteur de la lettre : il commencerait par le Pont pour finir en Bithynie. Voir la carte dans l’introduction.
Comme l’indique la traduction de la Bible en français courant, il s’agit de « provinces » et non pas de villes. On pourra utiliser un terme général tel que « régions », « territoires » ou, dans certaines langues, « pays ». Les traducteurs seront obligés de translittérer les noms Pont, Galatie, Cappadoce, Asie et Bithynie, en utilisant l’orthographe de leur langue. Ils pourront ajouter une note indiquant que ces provinces faisaient partie de l’Asie Mineure, appelée aujourd’hui « Turquie d’Asie », et que le mot Asie ne désigne pas le continent connu sous ce nom aujourd’hui.
Source: Margot, Jean-Claude. La première lettre de Pierre – Manuel de traduction – Commentaire linguistique et exégétique de la Bible. Alliance biblique universelle, 2021.
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.