complete verse (Psalm 30:7)

Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Psalm 30:7:

  • Chichewa Contempary Chichewa translation, 2002/2016:
    “You Jehovah, when you were kind to me,
    You made my mountain to stand still;
    but when you hid your face,
    I lost my heart.” (Source: Mawu a Mulungu mu Chichewa Chalero Back Translation)
  • Newari:
    “O LORD, You cared for me.
    You made me strong like a mountain!
    But when You turned away from me,
    then I became afraid.” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
  • Hiligaynon:
    “This is because of your (sing.) goodness, LORD.
    You (sing.) strengthened me like a mountain.
    But when you (sing.) hid from me, I (was) afraid.” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
  • Eastern Bru:
    “At that time you, God, have compassion for me. You have already made me secure/fixed like a mountain. But after that you turned away from me, so that I have only fear.” (Source: Bru Back Translation)
  • Laarim:
    “LORD, when you were glad to me,
    you made me to be strong
    but instead you hide your face,
    then I became worried.” (Source: Laarim Back Translation)
  • Nyakyusa-Ngonde (back-translation into Swahili):
    “Ee Bwana, ulinibariki,
    uliniimarisha, nilikuwa kama mlima mkubwa.
    Lakini wakati umejificha,
    nikawa na hofu.” (Source: Nyakyusa Back Translation)
  • English:
    “Yahweh, because you were good to me,
    at first you caused me to be safe as though I was inside a mountain.
    But then I became ill, and I thought that you had turned away from me, and I became afraid.” (Source: Translation for Translators)

favor / grace (Japanese honorifics)

Click or tap here to see the rest of this insight.

Like a number of other East Asian languages, Japanese uses a complex system of honorifics, i.e. a system where a number of different levels of politeness are expressed in language via words, word forms or grammatical constructs. These can range from addressing someone or referring to someone with contempt (very informal) to expressing the highest level of reference (as used in addressing or referring to God) or any number of levels in-between. One way to do this is through the usage (or a lack) of an honorific prefix as shown here in the widely-used Japanese Shinkaiyaku (新改訳) Bible of 2017. When the referent is God or a person or persons to be greatly honored, the honorific prefix go- (御 or ご) can be used, as in go-onchō (ご恩寵), a combination of “favor” (onchō) and the honorific prefix go-. (Source: S. E. Doi, see also S. E. Doi in Journal of Translation, 18/2022, p. 37ff. )

addressing God

Translators of different languages have found different ways with what kind of formality God is addressed.

Click or tap here to see the rest of this insight

Like many languages (but unlike Greek or Hebrew or modern English), Tuvan uses a formal vs. informal 2nd person pronoun (a familiar vs. a respectful “you”). Unlike other languages that have this feature, however, the translators of the Tuvan Bible have attempted to be very consistent in using the different forms of address in every case a 2nd person pronoun has to be used in the translation of the biblical text.

As Voinov shows in Pronominal Theology in Translating the Gospels (in: The Bible Translator 2002, p. 210ff. ), the choice to use either of the pronouns many times involved theological judgment. While the formal pronoun can signal personal distance or a social/power distance between the speaker and addressee, the informal pronoun can indicate familiarity or social/power equality between speaker and addressee.

In these verses, in which humans address God, the informal, familiar pronoun is used that communicates closeness.

Voinov notes that “in the Tuvan Bible, God is only addressed with the informal pronoun. No exceptions. An interesting thing about this is that I’ve heard new Tuvan believers praying with the formal form to God until they are corrected by other Christians who tell them that God is close to us so we should address him with the informal pronoun. As a result, the informal pronoun is the only one that is used in praying to God among the Tuvan church.”

In Gbaya, “a superior, whether father, uncle, or older brother, mother, aunt, or older sister, president, governor, or chief, is never addressed in the singular unless the speaker intends a deliberate insult. When addressing the superior face to face, the second person plural pronoun ɛ́nɛ́ or ‘you (pl.)’ is used, similar to the French usage of vous.

Accordingly, the translators of the current version of the Gbaya Bible chose to use the plural ɛ́nɛ́ to address God. There are a few exceptions. In Psalms 86:8, 97:9, and 138:1, God is addressed alongside other “gods,” and here the third person pronoun o is used to avoid confusion about who is being addressed. In several New Testament passages (Matthew 21:23, 26:68, 27:40, Mark 11:28, Luke 20:2, 23:37, as well as in Jesus’ interaction with Pilate and Jesus’ interaction with the Samaritan woman at the well) the less courteous form for Jesus is used to indicate ignorance of his position or mocking.” (Source Philip Noss)

In the most recent Manchu translation of 1835 (a revision of an earlier edition from 1822), God is never addressed with a pronoun but with “father” (ama /ᠠᠮᠠ) instead. Chengcheng Liu (in this post on the Cambridge Centre for Chinese Theology blog ) explains: “In Manchu tradition, as in Chinese etiquette, second-person pronouns could be considered disrespectful when speaking to superiors or spiritual beings. Manchu Shamanist prayers avoided si [‘you’] and sini [‘your’] for this very reason. To use them for God would be, in Lipovzoff’s [one of the two translators] words, ‘the most uncouth and indecent way to speak to the Almighty — as if He were a servant or slave.’ There was also a grammatical problem. In Manchu, si and sini could refer to both singular and plural subjects. For a faith that insisted on the singularity of God, this was potentially confusing. By contrast, repeating ama removed any ambiguity.”

In Dutch, Afrikaans, Gronings, and Western Frisian translations, God is always addressed with the formal pronoun.

See also formal pronoun: disciples addressing Jesus, female second person singular pronoun in Psalms.

face (of God) (Japanese honorifics)

Click or tap here to see the rest of this insight.

Like a number of other East Asian languages, Japanese uses a complex system of honorifics, i.e. a system where a number of different levels of politeness are expressed in language via words, word forms or grammatical constructs. These can range from addressing someone or referring to someone with contempt (very informal) to expressing the highest level of reference (as used in addressing or referring to God) or any number of levels in-between.

One way to do this is through the usage (or a lack) of an honorific prefix as shown here in the widely-used Japanese Shinkaiyaku (新改訳) Bible of 2017. When the referent is God, the “divine” honorific prefix mi- (御 or み) can be used, as in mi-kao (御顔) or “face (of God)” in the referenced verses.

(Source: S. E. Doi, see also S. E. Doi in Journal of Translation, 18/2022, p. 37ff. )

Japanese benefactives (-sete)

Click or tap here to see the rest of this insight.

Like a number of other East Asian languages, Japanese uses a complex system of honorifics, i.e. a system where a number of different levels of politeness are expressed in language via words, word forms or grammatical constructs. These can range from addressing someone or referring to someone with contempt (very informal) to expressing the highest level of reference (as used in addressing or referring to God) or any number of levels in-between.

One way to do this is through the usage (or a lack) of an honorific prefix as shown here in the widely-used Japanese Shinkaiyaku (新改訳) Bible of 2017. When the referent is God, the “divine” honorific prefix mi- (御 or み) can be used, as in mi-kao (御顔) or “face (of God)” in the referenced verses.

(Source: S. E. Doi, see also S. E. Doi in Journal of Translation, 18/2022, p. 37ff. )

Honorary "are" construct denoting God ("hide")

Click or tap here to see the rest of this insight.

Like a number of other East Asian languages, Japanese uses a complex system of honorifics, i.e. a system where a number of different levels of politeness are expressed in language via words, word forms or grammatical constructs. These can range from addressing someone or referring to someone with contempt (very informal) to expressing the highest level of reference (as used in addressing or referring to God) or any number of levels in-between.

One way Japanese shows different degree of politeness is through the usage of an honorific construction where the morpheme are (され) is affixed on the verb as shown here in the widely-used Japanese Shinkaiyaku (新改訳) Bible of 2017. This is particularly done with verbs that have God as the agent to show a deep sense of reverence. Here, kakus-are-ru (隠される) or “hide” is used.

(Source: S. E. Doi, see also S. E. Doi in Journal of Translation, 18/2022, p. 37ff. )

Translation commentary on Psalm 30:6 - 30:7

The psalmist recalls his past, when in his ease he boasted of his success; but when Yahweh withdrew his presence, he felt afraid.

The word translated prosperity is found only here; it means quietness, ease. One may translate “when things went well”; New Jerusalem Bible “when I was untroubled”; New English Bible and New Jerusalem Bible have “Carefree”; both Good News Translation and Biblia Dios Habla Hoy translate “I felt secure.”

For verse 6b see the same statement in 10.6.

In verse 7a thy favor translates the same word that appears in verse 5b.

The exact meaning of the Hebrew in verse 7b is disputed, though the general sense of security is clear enough. New Jerusalem Bible has “Your favour, Yahweh, set me on unassailable heights”; New American Bible, following the Septuagint, “You had endowed me with majesty and strength”; another possible version is “you established strength for my mountain”; similarly An American Translation and Traduction œcuménique de la Bible.6-7 Hebrew Old Testament Text Project also takes the Masoretic text to mean “by your favor you had established strength for my mountain” (“B” decision). It is unclear what “my mountain” means in this context, and Hebrew Old Testament Text Project does not explain. Dahood has “by your favor you made me more stable than the mighty mountains”; New Jerusalem Bible “You … made [me] firm as a mighty mountain.” New English Bible, however, translates “it was thy will to shake my mountain refuge”; this, however, is quite improbable. Established me as a strong mountain will have little meaning where the highest hill is a barely-noticeable elevation of ground. In such areas it will be necessary to employ a different figure of strength or to avoid the use of the figure altogether; for example, “you protect me like a strong fortress” or “you are like a fortress and you protect me.”

For thou didst hide thy face, see comment at 13.1. It was the psalmist’s illness that caused him to conclude that Yahweh had forsaken him, and for this reason he was dismayed, that is, afraid (see the same verb, translated “terrify,” in 2.5).

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Reyburn, William D. A Handbook on the Book of Psalms. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 1991. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Psalm 30 as classical Chinese poetry

John Wu Ching-hsiung (1899-1986) was a native of Ningbo, Zhejiang, a renowned jurist who studied in Europe and the United States, and served as a professor of law at Soochow University, as a judge and the Acting President of the Shanghai Provisional Court, and as the Vice President of the Commission for the Drafting of the Constitution of the Republic of China, before becoming the Minister of the Republic of China to the Holy See. Wu has written extensively, not only on law but also on Chinese philosophy, and has also written his autobiography, Beyond East and West, in English. Wu was a devout Catholic and had a personal relationship with Chiang Kai-shek (1887-1975). Wu began translating the the Psalms in 1938, and was encouraged by Chiang to translate the entire New Testament, which he corrected in his own handwriting. (…) John Wu Ching-hsiung’s translation of the Psalms (first draft in 1946, revised in 1975) was translated into Literary Chinese in the form of poetic rhyme, with attention paid to the style of writing. According to the content and mood of the different chapters of the original psalm, Wu chose Chinese poetic forms such as tetrameter, pentameter, heptameter [4, 5 or 7 syllables/Chinese characters per stanza], and the [less formal] Sao style, and sometimes more than two poetic forms were used in a single poem. (Source: Simon Wong)

John Wu Ching-hsiung himself talks about his celebrated and much-admired (though difficult-to-understand) translation in his aforementioned autobiography: (Click or tap here to see)

“Nothing could have been farther from my mind than to translate the Bible or any parts of it with a view to publishing it as an authorized version. I had rendered some of the Psalms into Chinese verse, but that was done as a part of my private devotion and as a literary hobby. When I was in Hongkong in 1938, I had come to know Madame H. H. Kung [Soong Ai-ling], and as she was deeply interested in the Bible, I gave her about a dozen pieces of my amateurish work just for her own enjoyment. What was my surprise when, the next time I saw her, she told me, “My sister [Soong Mei-ling] has written to say that the Generalissimo [Chiang Kai-shek] likes your translation of the Psalms very much, especially the first, the fifteenth, and the twenty-third, the Psalm of the Good Shepherd!”

“In the Autumn of 1940, when I was in Chungking, the Generalissimo invited me several times to lunch with him and expressed his appreciation of the few pieces that he had read. So I sent him some more. A few days later I received a letter from Madame Chiang [Soong Mei-ling], dated September 21, 1940, in which she said that they both liked my translation of the few Psalms I had sent them. ‘For many years,’ she wrote, ‘the Generalissimo has been wanting to have a really adequate and readable Wen-li (literary) translation of the Bible. He has never been able to find anyone who could undertake the matter.’ The letter ends up by saying that I should take up the job and that ‘the Generalissimo would gladly finance the undertaking of this work.’

“After some preliminary study of the commentaries, I started my work with the Psalms on January 6, 1943, the Feast of the Epiphany.

“I had three thousand years of Chinese literature to draw upon. The Chinese vocabulary for describing the beauties of nature is so rich that I seldom failed to find a word, a phrase, and sometimes even a whole line to fit the scene. But what makes such Psalms so unique is that they bring an intimate knowledge of the Creator to bear upon a loving observation of things of nature. I think one of the reasons why my translation is so well received by the Chinese scholars is that I have made the Psalms read like native poems written by a Chinese, who happens to be a Christian. Thus to my countrymen they are at once familiar and new — not so familiar as to be jejune, and not so new as to be bizarre. I did not publish it as a literal translation, but only as a paraphrase.

“To my greatest surprise, [my translation of the Psalms] sold like hot dogs. The popularity of that work was beyond my fondest dreams. Numberless papers and periodicals, irrespective of religion, published reviews too good to be true. I was very much tickled when I saw the opening verse of the first Psalm used as a headline on the front page of one of the non-religious dailies.”

A contemporary researcher (Lindblom 2021) mentions this about Wu’s translation: “Wu created a unique and personal work of sacred art that bears the imprint of his own admitted love and devotion, a landmark achievement comparable to Antoni Gaudi’s Basilica of the Sagrada Família in Barcelona, Spain. Although its use is still somewhat limited today, it continues to attract readers for the aforementioned qualities, and continues to be used in prayers and music by those who desire beauty and an authentic Chinese-sounding text that draws from China’s ancient traditions.”

The translation of Psalm 30 from the 1946 edition is in tetrameter and the rhyme schemes are -i and -u (the 1946 edition did not have verse numbers either):

先悲後喜

心感雅瑋。扶持小子。未令敵人。揚眉吐氣。 曩者有患。呼籲於爾。爾應我求。吾病以治。 肉我白骨。生我於死。 蒙主煦育。可不頌美。勗哉諸聖。讚主莫已。 聖怒一時。慈恩永世。長夜悲泣。拂曉乃喜。
昔處康樂。自謂安固。 主為磐石。寧用後顧。忽掩慈顏。心生憂怖。 哀哀求主。聽我仰訴。 小子之血。於主何補。倘轉溝壑。化為塵土。塵土何知。寧能讚主。 求主垂憐。加以神助。 主聞吾禱。化泣為舞。解我麻衣。被以歡緒。 感銘靈府。焉能默默。稱謝洪恩。永世不息。

Transcription into Roman alphabet with the rhyme scheme highlighted:

xiān bēi hòu xǐ

xīn gǎn yǎ wěi 。 fú chí xiǎo 。 wèi líng dí rén 。 yáng méi tǔ 。 nǎng zhě yǒu huàn 。 hū xū yú ěr 。 ěr yīng wǒ qiú 。 wú bìng yǐ zhì 。 ròu wǒ bái gǔ 。 shēng wǒ yú 。 mēng zhǔ xù yù 。 kě bù sòng měi 。 xù zāi zhū shèng 。 zàn zhǔ mò 。 shèng nù yī shí 。 cí ēn yǒng shì 。 cháng yè bēi qì 。 fú xiǎo nǎi
xī chǔ kāng lè 。 zì wèi ān 。 zhǔ wéi pán shí 。 níng yòng hòu 。 hū yǎn cí yán 。 xīn shēng yōu 。 āi āi qiú zhǔ 。 tīng wǒ yǎng 。 xiǎo zǐ zhī xuè 。 yú zhǔ hé 。 tǎng zhuǎn gōu hè 。 huà wéi chén 。 chén tǔ hé zhī 。 níng néng zàn zhǔ 。 qiú zhǔ chuí lián 。 jiā yǐ shén zhù 。 zhǔ wén wú dǎo 。 huà qì wéi 。 jiě wǒ má yī 。 bèi yǐ huān xù 。 gǎn míng líng 。 yān néng mò mò 。 chēng xiè hóng ēn 。 yǒng shì bù xī 。

With thanks to Simon Wong.