The Hebrew and Greek that is translated as “messenger” in English is translated in Noongar as moort yana-waangki or “person walk-talk” (source: Warda-Kwabba Luke-Ang).
Job
The name that is transliterated as “Job” in English means “the persecuted,” “hated,” “one ever returning to God,” “he that weeps,” “a desert.” (Source: Cornwall / Smith 1997 )
In Spanish Sign Language it is translated with a sign for “patience,” referring to James 5:11 and many other passages within the book of Job. (Source: Steve Parkhurst)
“Job” in Spanish Sign Language, source: Sociedad Bíblica de España
In Swiss-German Sign Language it is translated with the sign for “suffering.”
“Job” in Swiss-German Sign Language, source: DSGS-Lexikon biblischer Begriffe , © CGG Schweiz
In Hungarian Sign Language it is translated with a sign that refers to the ulcers (sores) covering his body (see Job 2:7). (Source: Jenjelvi Biblia and HSL Bible Translation Group)
“Job” in Hungarian Sign Language — note that only the first part refers to “Job,” the second part refers to “book” (source )
For more information on translations of proper names with sign language see Sign Language Bible Translations Have Something to Say to Hearing Christians .
Learn more on Bible Odyssey: Job .
complete verse (Job 1:14)
Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Job 1:14:
- Kupsabiny: “Suddenly, a person came and said to Job, ‘We were plowing with oxen, while donkeys were also grazing nearby.” (Source: Kupsabiny Back Translation)
- Newari: “A man came running to Job’s place and brought this news, "While we were plowing a field with oxen, and grazing donkeys nearby,” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
- Hiligaynon: “there was a man who arrived to Job and told-the-news, ‘While we (excl.) were-having- your (sing.) cows -plow, and your (sing.) donkeys were-grazing nearby,” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
- English: “While they were doing that, a messenger arrived at Job’s home and said to him, ‘While your oxen were plowing the fields and the donkeys were grazing nearby,” (Source: Translation for Translators)
donkey
The Hebrew, Ge’ez, and Greek that is translated as “donkey” in English was translated in the 1900 Kalaallisut (Greenlandic) translation (a newer version was published in 2000) as siutitôĸ or “‘something with big ears.” “[This] is based on the word siut ‘ear’ combined with the same suffix –tôĸ (-tooq).” (Source: Lily Kahn & Riitta-Liisa Valijärvi in The Bible Translator 2019, p. 125ff.)
These Hebrew and Greek words (with the exception of pōlos and hupozugion — see discussion below) all definitely refer to the Domestic Donkey equus asinus. However the different words do have slight semantic differences among them.
Chamor and onos are the generic words for donkey while ’athon (feminine gender) refers specifically to a saddle donkey or a donkey used for riding. A saddle donkey is usually a large strong female donkey the males are too difficult to control when they are near a female in heat. The Hebrew word is derived from a root that means “strong”.
‘Ayir refers to the young male or jack donkey (probably with an emphasis on its liveliness and the difficulty in controlling it since the Hebrew root means something like “frisky”).
Onarion means a young donkey of either sex. Some languages will have a special word for a young donkey. This will be appropriate for translating onarion.
The word hupozugion often translated “donkey,” actually indicates any beast of burden. Walter Bauer, the famous German New Testament scholar, has argued very convincingly that the animal referred to in Matthew 21:5 in the expression epi pōlon huion hupozugiou is the foal of a horse not a donkey (1953:220-229). In some languages it will be possible to express this in a way that does not designate a specific species of animal`, as in “beast of burden.”
Pōlos usually refers to a foal, that is a young horse, unless a word for donkey follows.
Donkeys are domestic animals belonging to the same family as the horse, but they are smaller and have longer ears. The donkey bred and used in the Middle East is the domesticated Nubian or Somali Wild Ass Equus Asinus africanus. In its original wild state this was a gray ass with pale, whitish belly and dark rings on the lower part of the legs. It was domesticated in Egypt as early as 2500 B.C. In its domesticated version, as a result of interbreeding with donkeys from Europe and Persia, the donkey came to be a variety of colors from dark brown, through light brown to the original gray and occasionally white. The Hebrew chamor comes from a root meaning “reddish brown.”
Donkeys are good pack animals being able to carry as much as the larger mule without the latter’s unpredictable moods. They also have great stamina and are easy to feed since they eat almost any available vegetation. Larger individual animals (usually females) are also often used for riding.
Donkeys were highly prized in biblical times especially females since they were suitable for packing and riding and had the potential for producing offspring. Donkeys were seen as man’s best friend in the animal kingdom. They were the common man’s means of transport and many ordinary families owned a donkey. They were used for plowing and for turning large millstones as well as a means of transport.
Today domestic donkeys are found all over savannah Africa the Middle East South and Central Asia Europe Latin America and Australia. They do not seem to be reared in rain forest or monsoon areas but they are nevertheless often known in these areas.
A donkey was considered to be a basic domestic requirement and thus the number of donkeys available was a means of measuring the relative prosperity of a society at any given time. While only powerful political or military people rode horses (which were usually owned by the state) the common people rode donkeys. This is the significance of the passage in Zechariah 9:9: the victorious king would return to the city riding a donkey thus identifying himself as a common Israelite rather than a victorious warlord.
In the majority of languages there is a local or a borrowed word for donkey. This is the obvious choice. In areas of Southeast Asia, Papua New Guinea, West Africa, and other places, where donkeys are rare or unknown, the word from the dominant major language or trade language (for example, English, Spanish, French, Chinese, or Arabic) is often transliterated.
In most contexts ’athon should be translated by the equivalent of “female” donkey, but in some contexts riding donkey is better.
‘Ayir should be translated according to the specific context. In Genesis 32:15 the translation should definitely be the equivalent of “male donkey”, and probably also in Judges 10:4 and Judges 12:14. The significance of these latter passages is that female donkeys were the more normal choice of mount.
In Job 11:12 the emphasis is probably on the friskiness of the donkey, and the translation should be the equivalent of “He ties his young donkey to a grapevine, his frisky young ass to the best of the vines” (indicating a certain amount of irresponsibility, and perhaps extravagance).
In Job 11:12 and Zechariah 9:9 the obvious emphasis is on the youth of the donkey, so the equivalent of “colt”, “foal”, “young donkey”, and so on should be used.

Source: All Creatures Great and Small: Living things in the Bible (UBS Helps for Translators)
See also young donkey and wild ass.
Translation commentary on Job 1:14
And there came a messenger to Job: with verse 14 begins a swift succession of events, each repeated in much the same language until the end of verse 19. The word translated messenger can also mean “angel” (as it does in 4.18 and 33.23), but here the context makes clear that a human messenger is meant. Good News Translation “came running to Job” translates “came to Job” (also in verses 16, 17, 18), and in the context of the rapid series of events, “running” is appropriate; it is used likewise in New English Bible, Die Bibel im heutigen Deutsch. The author does not pause to tell where Job may be; however, in verse 20 he stands up and shaves his head. It is probably implied that he was in his house, and in languages which require locating Job, one may translate “a messenger ran to Job’s house and told him…,” or more generally, “a messenger ran to where Job was sitting and told him….”
The oxen were plowing and the asses feeding beside them: the scene reveals a normal agricultural day in the Middle Eastern winter, when plowing is done; winter in the Middle East starts in October and ends in April. This is the second time the author calls attention to the fact that life was going along in its habitual routine. Job’s sons, if they ever worked, certainly did not do so when feasting was called for. Plowing was done by Job’s farm hands using teams of oxen joined by a yoke. The asses refers to the female donkeys of verse 3. Feeding beside them gives a picture of these animals grazing in a freshly plowed field, which is hardly the case. The Good News Translation rendering has the messenger report to Job as a participant in the work, “We were plowing…,” which is more natural and vivid than in Revised Standard Version. Good News Translation also makes it clear “the donkeys were in a nearby pasture.” In languages in which “oxen” and “plowing” are unknown, some adaptations will have to be made. As suggested in verse 3, sometimes a borrowed word from a major language has to be used. It is also possible sometimes to use a generic such as “animal” joined with a limiting qualifier such as “work”; for example, “work animals” or “work animals called oxen.” The same procedure may be necessary where the plow is unknown. For example, one may say “the animals were pulling the instrument called plow.” It is also possible to express the idea without using “plow” by saying “the work animals were preparing the ground for planting.” If the ox is unknown and another animal is used for plowing, it may be possible to substitute that animal, provided it can also be done with no conflict in verse 3. Illustrations can usually help make the picture clear. In some languages the absence of a possessor in The oxen and the asses will suggest that these animals were wild. Accordingly we should say “Job’s oxen” and “Job’s donkeys.”
Quoted with permission from Reyburn, Wiliam. A Handbook on Job. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 1992. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.