Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Isaiah 57:5:
Kupsabiny: “The desire of your bodies push/entice you and you practice illicit sex under every green tree. You offer your children to be killed in the valley and where there is an open ground.” (Source: Kupsabiny Back Translation)
Newari: “Staying among the sacred oak trees and staying like lust under all the spreading trees. You sacrifice your sons and daughters in the gorge and on the cliff.” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
Hiligaynon: “You (plur.) worship your (plur.) little-gods/false-gods by having-sex under every leafy tree. You (plur.) even sacrifice your (plur.) children in the places-where- water -flows under the cliffs.” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
Click or tap here to see the rest of this insight.
Like a number of other East Asian languages, Japanese uses a complex system of honorifics, i.e. a system where a number of different levels of politeness are expressed in language via words, word forms or grammatical constructs. These can range from addressing someone or referring to someone with contempt (very informal) to expressing the highest level of reference (as used in addressing or referring to God) or any number of levels in-between.
One way Japanese shows different degree of politeness is through the choice of a formal plural suffix to the second person pronoun (“you” and its various forms) as shown here in the widely-used Japanese Shinkaiyaku (新改訳) Bible of 2017. In these verses, anata-gata (あなたがた) is used, combining the second person pronoun anata and the plural suffix -gata to create a formal plural pronoun (“you” [plural] in English).
Before the time of Abraham at least five breeds of sheep had already been developed in Mesopotamia. From mummified remains (that is, preserved dead bodies) and ancient art it is also known that at least two different breeds had reached Egypt by about 2000 B.C. Thus it is likely that the sheep mentioned in the Bible were of more than one breed.
The Hebrew word kar seems to be used of imported foreign sheep and may refer to a special breed but some scholars think it refers to a wether (castrated ram), since this word is never used in the context of sacrifice. This word is also used for a battering ram, that is, a heavy pole suspended on a rope, used in war for breaking down walls. ’Ayil is the word for a ram or adult male sheep, rachel is a breeding ewe or female sheep, and taleh is a very young lamb, probably still unweaned. The remaining Hebrew words refer to sheep in general.
The Greek word probaton is the general word for sheep, or flocks that may include goats. Krios is the Greek word for a ram or male sheep. Pascha is a technical name for the Passover lamb exclusively, and the remaining Greek words all mean lamb. Ovis is the Latin word for sheep.
Click or tap here for the rest of this entry in United Bible Societies’ All Creatures Great and Small: Living things in the Bible.
The early Hebrews were nomadic shepherds to whom sheep were the most important domestic animal. While goats eat almost any vegetation, sheep are much more selective about the grasses and plants they eat. This meant that suitable grazing for them was not always easy to find, and shepherds had to keep moving their flocks from place to place. This led to a nomadic lifestyle, with movable tents rather than houses being the normal household shelter. It was not until the occupation of Canaan after the Exodus that the lifestyle of the Israelites changed, and they became settled village-dwelling farmers and fruit growers.
However, even then, most households owned sheep, and some family members would function as shepherds, often living away from home for fairly long periods.
Sheep in the Bible were a source of meat, milk, wool, hides, and horns, and it seems likely that various strains were bred selectively to enhance production of these commodities. Wool is mentioned in the Bible as early as the Mosaic Law, which forbade the weaving of cloth containing both wool and plant fibers. The shearing of sheep is mentioned even earlier, in Genesis 31:19. Wool was in fact the most common and available fiber known to the people of Israel.
There was a very extensive wool trade in biblical times, stretching from Egypt to China. In the Middle East wool was cheaper than cotton or linen, which were the other common fibers. (Silk was known by the time of Solomon, but it was extremely expensive as it was produced in China and handled by numerous traders on its way west.) It would be a mistake to think of all wool at that time as being white, as Genesis 30 indicates quite clearly that there were also dark colored sheep and sheep that had dark and light patches, probably varying combinations of black, white, and brown.
We can be fairly sure that one breed of sheep known to the Israelites was the Fat-tailed Sheep Ovis laticaudata and that its fatty tail is referred to in Exodus 29:22, Leviticus 3:9 et al.
Rams’ horns had a variety of uses. Whole ram horns were used as drinking vessels, jars, and trumpets. But pieces of horn were used as handles for knives and other household implements, and for jewelry such as bracelets and beads. Needles too, and probably also arrow heads, were made from horn, as well as from bone and later from bronze and iron.
Sheep were also very important in Israelite religion. They were a very important element in the sacrificial system and in the traditional religious feasts, especially the Feast of Passover.
Sheep and goats belong to the same general family. They differ in that sheep produce wool, which is a special type of soft hair, among the ordinary hairs on their bodies. A ram’s horns too differ in shape from a goat’s horns, those of a ram curling down in a tight spiral beside its face, with those of a goat curving more gently back towards its shoulders. The sheep of biblical times produced much shorter wool than is common with wool-bearing breeds of today.
The fat-tailed or broad-tailed sheep is a smallish breed usually brown and white with a very broad tail. Like most other breeds of sheep in the Middle East it has large floppy ears.
Sheep are generally fairly timid animals, lacking the self-confidence and adaptability of goats. While goats will spread out in their search for food and then regroup without much difficulty, sheep become very insecure when they are separated from other sheep and tend to stay bunched together. They thus require a lot of shepherding. In the Middle East the method of shepherding involves training the dominant ram to follow the shepherd. The remaining sheep then follow this dominant ram, which often wears a wooden clapper or a bell. As they feed, the sheep usually keep within earshot of this sound. It is likely that this method is centuries old.
In most modern breeds only male sheep have horns, but in most ancient breeds female sheep had short horns too. This made separating sheep from goats in a single flock more difficult than it is today.
Of all animals the sheep was the most important for the Israelite nation. It had great religious, social, and economic importance.
The metaphor of a lamb is used in the New Testament to refer to Christ, with an emphasis on his being a sacrifice for the sin of the world. This is especially the case in John’s gospel and Revelation. In the latter book the metaphor is introduced in a very striking way. In Revelation 5:5 as the writer is mourning the fact that no one can be found to open the scroll, he is comforted by one of the elders who tells him that “the Lion of the tribe of Judah” has triumphed and can thus open the scroll. Then the writer, expecting to see the Lion, sees instead a Lamb that looks as if it has been killed for sacrifice. The remainder of the book is then concerned with describing the triumph of this Lamb over the forces of evil.
In the gospels Jesus also refers to his disciples as “sheep” and “lambs” (Matthew 10:17; John 10:1 et al.).
The metaphor of the shepherd is extended to God himself who is the ultimate “Shepherd of Israel” (Psalms 23:1; 80:1). Then those who are responsible for the nurture, guidance, ruling, and protection of Israel, be it kings, prophets, or priests, are also likened to shepherds (Isaiah 56:11; Jeremiah 23:4; 49:19; Ezekiel 34:2; Zechariah 10:2).
The Messiah is also called a shepherd (Isaiah 40:11), and Jesus refers to himself as “the good shepherd” (John 10:11). In Hebrews 13:20 he is referred to as “the great shepherd of the sheep” and in 1 Peter 2:25 he is called “the Shepherd and Guardian of your lives”.
In languages that have a word for sheep, it is advisable to translate according to the meanings given above. If possible, the feminine forms should be translated as “female lamb” or “female sheep”. In languages in which sheep are not known, a word has usually been coined or borrowed by the time Bible translation begins, and this word should be used. It is not advisable to substitute another locally well-known animal in this case, since doing so negates the ritual and symbolic importance that sheep had for the biblical cultures.
In translating Psalms 23:1 it is extremely important to make sure that the phrase “my shepherd” preserves the relationship intended by the writer and reflects the psalmist’s theme that Yahweh is his benefactor, protector, and guide. There are really two metaphors involved in the opening verse-the caring shepherd (God) and by clear implication, the dependent sheep (the psalmist). In many languages the literal phrase “my shepherd” depicts a wrong relationship, meaning something like “the one who looks after my sheep” or “the one I employ to watch my sheep.” In many African languages unwary translators have produced a rendering that means “The Chief is (nothing more than) my herdsman.” It is often necessary to restructure the whole verse as something like “I am a sheep, and the lord is my shepherd.”
The prophet’s accusations in this verse indicate some of the Israelites practiced Canaanite forms of worship.
Who burn with lust among the oaks, under every green tree: The rhetorical question begun in the last two lines of verse 4 continues to the end of this verse, but it is possible to start a new question here by saying “Are you not the people who…?” Burn with lust renders a Hebrew verb that usually means “to be warm” (see, for example, 44.15-16). However, in this context it means “to be anxious to have sex.” A comparable English slang expression is “to be hot.” Many English versions use a phrase with the term “lust,” but New Jewish Publication Society’s Tanakh leaves room for a wider interpretation with “inflame yourselves.” It adds a footnote to explain that this happens “in some frenzied idolatrous rite.”
The Hebrew word for oaks is ʾelim. ʾEl is the general Semitic word for “god,” so ʾelim may be an unusual plural form of ʿel that can mean “gods.” We follow this sense in the third example below, but no version consulted adopts it. Most versions say oaks (RSV/NRSV, New International Version) or “terebinths” (New Jerusalem Bible, New American Bible, New Jewish Publication Society’s Tanakh). Revised English Bible has “sacred oaks” to indicate that these trees were associated with Canaanite worship (see the comments on 1.29; see also Jdg 9.37; Hos 4.13). Among the oaks is expanded by the phrase under every green tree, which is a hyperbole to emphasize the wide extent of the Canaanite worship practices. This phrase is a favorite one of Jeremiah (see Jer 2.20; 3.6, 13). Every green tree refers to all the healthy trees full of leaves. This phrase may be rendered “every lush tree” or “every leafy tree.”
Good News Translation gives the plain sense of the first two lines of this verse by saying “You worship the fertility gods by having sex under those sacred trees of yours.” The people worshiped the fertility gods in this way to have more children and plentiful livestock and crops. Although Good News Translation‘s rendering is quite free and explicit, it is a possible model for translators who would find a more formal translation meaningless.
Who slay your children in the valleys, under the clefts of the rocks: The prophet also accuses the people of sacrificing their children. Human sacrifices in Canaan were offered to the gods Molech (see verse 9) or Baal. There is some evidence that this Canaanite practice found its way into Israelite religion, but King Josiah tried to put a stop to it (see 2 Kgs 23.10). However, it probably survived and was still practiced after the exile. Apparently, this religious ritual was performed when there was a serious crisis in the land. It is not clear why it was done in the valleys. The word rendered valleys refers to a wadi, which is normally a dry riverbed in which water runs only after heavy seasonal rain. It is also unclear why the human sacrifices took place under the clefts of the rocks. For the clefts of the rock, see the comments on 2.21. New International Version renders this whole phrase as “under the overhanging crags.” Good News Translation provides a good model with “in the rocky caves.”
Translators may break the long rhetorical question here into several shorter questions (see the first example below) or strong statements (see the second and third examples below). For the translation of this verse consider the following examples:
• Are you not those who have ritual sex
among the oak trees and under every lush tree?
Are you not those who offer your children as sacrifices in the wadis?
Do you not offer them also in the holes of the rocks [or, mountains]?
• You are people who have ritual sex
under the oak trees and every [other] leafy tree!
You offer your children as sacrifices
in the wadis and in the rocky caves!
• You have sex with the gods under every leafy tree!
You kill your children as sacrifices
in the valleys and in the cracks in the rocks!
Quoted with permission from Ogden, Graham S. and Sterk, Jan. A Handbook on Isaiah. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 2011. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.