וַיְמָאֲנ֣וּ הָעָ֔ם לִשְׁמֹ֖עַ בְּק֣וֹל שְׁמוּאֵ֑ל וַיֹּאמְר֣וּ לֹּ֔א כִּ֥י אִם־מֶ֖לֶךְ יִֽהְיֶ֥ה עָלֵֽינוּ׃
Israel’s Request for a King Granted
19But the people refused to listen to the voice of Samuel; they said, “No! We are determined to have a king over us,
The Hebrew, Latin, and Greek that is transliterated as “Samuel” in English is translated in Spanish Sign Language with the sign for “listen” referring to 1 Samuel 3:10. (Source: Steve Parkhurst)
“Samuel” in Spanish Sign Language, source: Sociedad Bíblica de España
The inclusive “we” specifically includes the addressee (“you and I and possibly others”), while the exclusive “we” specifically excludes the addressee (“he/she/they and I, but not you”). This grammatical distinction is called “clusivity.” While Semitic languages such as Hebrew or most Indo-European languages such as Greek or English do not make that distinction, translators of languages with that distinction have to make a choice every time they encounter “we” or a form thereof (in English: “we,” “our,” or “us”).
For this verse, the Jarai and the Adamawa Fulfulde translation both use the exclusive pronoun, excluding Samuel.
(Click or tap here to see details)
Faye Edgerton retells how the term in Navajo was determined:
“[This term was] easily expressed in the language of Biblical culture, which had kings and noblemen with their brilliant trappings and their position of honor and praise. But leadership among the Navajos is not accompanied by any such titles or distinctions of dress. Those most respected, especially in earlier days, were their headmen, who were the leaders in raids, and the shaman, who was able to serve the people by appealing for them to the gods, or by exorcising evil spirits. Neither of these made any outward show. Neither held his position by political intrigue or heredity. If the headman failed consistently in raids, he was superceded by a better warrior. If the shaman failed many times in his healing ceremonies, it was considered that he was making mistakes in the chants, or had lost favor with the gods, and another was sought. The term Navajos use for headman is derived from a verb meaning ‘to move the head from side to side as in making an oration.’ The headman must be a good orator, able to move the people to go to war, or to follow him in any important decision. This word is naat’áanii which now means ‘one who rules or bosses.’ It is employed now for a foreman or boss of any kind of labor, as well as for the chairman of the tribal council. So in order to show that the king is not just a common boss but the highest ruler, the word ‘aláahgo, which expresses the superlative degree, was put before naat’áanii, and so ‘aláahgo naat’áanii ‘anyone-more-than-being around-he-moves-his-head-the-one-who’ means ‘the highest ruler.’ Naat’áanii was used for governor as the context usually shows that the person was a ruler of a country or associated with kings.”
(Source: Faye Edgerton in The Bible Translator 1962, p. 25ff. )
See also king (Japanese honorifics).
The common Hebrew conjunction at the beginning of this verse introduces the response of the people of Israel following Samuel’s detailed explanation of what it would be like to have a king. Since they may have been expected to react differently, the conjunction But is used by Revised Standard Version, New International Version, and New Revised Standard Version. Several other versions have “However” (Revised English Bible, New American Bible, New Jerusalem Bible).
Refused to listen: the people had, of course, already listened to the discourse from verse 11 through 18. But the point here is that they would not heed the clear warning of Samuel. In such a context some languages will say “refused the words of Samuel” or “rejected the advice of Samuel.”
To the voice of Samuel is a literal translation of the Hebrew. The expression means that they refused to take seriously what he said and refused to accept his negative advice.
The negative response, represented by the word No! in Revised Standard Version, is at the same time both a denial of what Samuel had said about the behavior of kings and a refusal to take seriously Samuel’s advice. New American Bible translates the negation “Not so!” The clear implication is that they did not believe that what Samuel was saying would really happen. The rendering of La Bible du Semeur (“It makes no difference”) gives a different impression and is not recommended.
Quoted with permission from Omanson, Roger L. and Ellington, John E. A Handbook on the First and Second Books of Samuel, Volume 1. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 2001. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .