25Over the king’s treasuries was Azmaveth son of Adiel. Over the treasuries in the country, in the cities, in the villages and in the towers was Jonathan son of Uzziah.
The Hebrew and Greek that is translated as “village” or “town” in English is translated in Noongar as karlamaya or “fire (used for “home“) + houses” (source: Warda-Kwabba Luke-Ang).
In Elhomwe it is typically translated as “place.” “Here in Malawi, villages very small, so changed to ‘places,’ since not sure whether biblical reference just to small villages or also to bigger towns. (Source: project-specific translation notes in Paratext)
The Greek and Hebrew that is translated as “son of” in English is translated in all Icelandic Bible versions of the Icelandic Bible Society (latest edition 2007) in parallel with the Icelandic naming system . This means that for instance in Matthew 16:17 the name that is transliterated and translated in English as “Simon son of Jonah” becomes “Simon Jónasson” or in Isaiah 8:2 “Zechariah son of Jeberechiah” becomes “Sakaría Jeberekíason” where in both cases the “-son” means “son of.”
In cases where “son of” does not refer to a literal father or perhaps stepfather but to lineage, however, this system is not used. So in Matthew 1:1 “Jesus the Messiah, the son of David, the son of Abraham” is translated as “Jesú Krists, sonar Davíðs, sonar Abrahams.”
The referenced verses all have at least one instance where the Icelandic patronymic or matronymic naming system is used. (Source: Halldór Elías Guðmundsson)
Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of 1 Chronicles 27:25:
Kupsabiny: “Azmaveth son of Adiel was in charge of the treasury of the king in Jerusalem, Jonathan son of Uzziah was in charge of the treasures which were out in the fields, the cities, the villages and in the guarded houses.” (Source: Kupsabiny Back Translation)
Newari: “Azmaveth son of Adiel was in charge of the king’s treasuries. Jonathan son of Uzziah was in charge of the city treasuries, the village treasuries, and the fortress treasuries of the land.” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
Hiligaynon: “Azmavet the child of Adiel was the one-overseeing the storehouses of the palace of the king. Jonatan the child of Uzia was the one-overseeing the storehouses in the districts, towns, barrios, and in the towers.” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
Some languages do not have a concept of kingship and therefore no immediate equivalent for the Greek, Hebrew, Ge’ez, Aramaic, and Latin that is translated as “king” in English. Here are some (back-) translations:
Ninia Yali: “big brother with the uplifted name” (source: Daud Soesilio in Noss 2007, p. 175)
Nyamwezi: mutemi: generic word for ruler, by specifying the city or nation it becomes clear what kind of ruler (source: Pioneer Bible Translators, project-specific translation notes in Paratext)
Ghomála’: Fo (“The word Fo refers to the paramount ruler in the kingdoms of West Cameroon. He holds administrative, political, and religious power over his own people, who are divided into two categories: princes (descendants of royalty) and servants (everyone else).” (Source: Michel Kenmogne in Theologizing in Context: An Example from the Study of a Ghomala’ Christian Hymn))
Faye Edgerton retells how the term in Navajo (Dinė) was determined:
“[This term was] easily expressed in the language of Biblical culture, which had kings and noblemen with their brilliant trappings and their position of honor and praise. But leadership among the Navajos is not accompanied by any such titles or distinctions of dress. Those most respected, especially in earlier days, were their headmen, who were the leaders in raids, and the shaman, who was able to serve the people by appealing for them to the gods, or by exorcising evil spirits. Neither of these made any outward show. Neither held his position by political intrigue or heredity. If the headman failed consistently in raids, he was superceded by a better warrior. If the shaman failed many times in his healing ceremonies, it was considered that he was making mistakes in the chants, or had lost favor with the gods, and another was sought. The term Navajos use for headman is derived from a verb meaning ‘to move the head from side to side as in making an oration.’ The headman must be a good orator, able to move the people to go to war, or to follow him in any important decision. This word is naat’áanii which now means ‘one who rules or bosses.’ It is employed now for a foreman or boss of any kind of labor, as well as for the chairman of the tribal council. So in order to show that the king is not just a common boss but the highest ruler, the word ‘aláahgo, which expresses the superlative degree, was put before naat’áanii, and so ‘aláahgo naat’áanii ‘anyone-more-than-being around-he-moves-his-head-the-one-who’ means ‘the highest ruler.’ Naat’áanii was used for governor as the context usually shows that the person was a ruler of a country or associated with kings.”
Section 27:25-34These were the men in charge of King David’s property
27:25a Azmaveth son of Adiel was in charge of the royal storehouses.
Adiel’s son Azmaveth supervised the king’s storehouses/treasuries ⌊in Jerusalem⌋ . -or-
Azmaveth was responsible for the storerooms in the palace of King ⌊David⌋ . Azmaveth’s father was Adiel.
27:25b Jonathan son of Uzziah was in charge of the storehouses in the country,
Uzziah’s son Jonathan supervised the storehouses in the rest of Israel. The storehouses were in the fields/countryside, -or-
Jonathan was responsible for the storehouses elsewhere. Jonathan’s father was Uzziah.
27:25c in the cities, in the villages, and in the fortresses.
in the towns/cities, in the villages, and in the fortresses. -or-
⌊Jonathan managed the storehouses of Israel⌋ in the towns and villages and the guard posts ⌊at Israel country’s borders⌋ .
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.