The Hebrew and Greek that is translated with “clothes” or similar in English is translated in Enlhet as “crawling-in-stuff” (source: Jacob Loewen in The Bible Translator 1971, p. 169ff. ) and in Noongar as bwoka or “Kangaroo skin” (source: Warda-Kwabba Luke-Ang).
Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Psalm 22:18:
Chichewa Contempary Chichewa translation, 2002/2016:
“They have divided my clothes among them
and cast lots on those clothes of mine.” (Source: Mawu a Mulungu mu Chichewa Chalero Back Translation)
Newari:
“They draw lots for my clothing
and share them out to one another.” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
Hiligaynon:
“They divided my clothes by-means-of casting lots.” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
Eastern Bru:
“My clothes they divide, and they cast lots for my long shirt.” (Source: Bru Back Translation)
Laarim:
“They divided for themselves my clothes
and they case lot for my garment.” (Source: Laarim Back Translation)
Nyakyusa-Ngonde (back-translation into Swahili):
“Waligawana nguo zangu,
na kufanya uaguzi wa kanzu yangu.” (Source: Nyakyusa Back Translation)
English:
“They looked at the clothes that I was wearing and gambled to determine which piece each of them would get.” (Source: Translation for Translators)
I can count all my bones (verse 17a) pictures the psalmist as dead, his flesh stripped off (as by dogs) and his bare skeleton lying in public view; or else, with no logical connection with verse 16, the psalmist sees himself as so weak and thin that he is nothing more than skin and bones, and this is a much more likely interpretation. (Revised Standard Version‘s line a in verse 17 is actually a parenthetic expression, marked by a dash before and after; this means that they stare refers to the same people as “they have pierced” in verse 16, but most readers will not recognize this fact.) In some languages it may be unnatural to speak of counting one’s bones, even in a poetic discourse, and the passive construction of Good News Translation may not be available. In such cases it may be necessary to say, for example, “I can see all my bones.” Good News Translation has provided a subject, “My enemies,” which is necessary because the antecedent of the pronoun they is quite distant.
Revised Standard Version translates the second verb in verse 17b by gloat over, while Good News Translation has “stare.” The Hebrew verb is the same one used in 10.14 (where it is parallel with “see”) and 13.3 and means, quite generally, “regard, notice,” in parallel with the first verb “look”; so Bible en français courant has “they look at me fixedly.” It may be that the context allows for the meaning gloat over, and the translator should feel free to use a word that means that.
In verse 18 my garments in line a and my raiment in line b are synonyms, both referring to the psalmist’s clothes; the raiment is not a piece of clothing different from the garments. (In John 19.23-24 the quotation from the Septuagint of this passage is taken to mean separate items of clothing.)
The psalmist’s enemies cast lots (probably small marked stones) to determine who will get his clothes. The parallelism in verse 18 focuses upon the general word divide in line a and the specific word cast lots in line b. Again, the word order in the second line is the reverse of the first line. The Hebrew text does not mean that two different actions were performed, that is, the division of some items of clothing and then the casting of lots for another item. The meaning is that by means of casting lots they divided the psalmist’s clothes among themselves. Cast lots in Revised Standard Version is replaced by the more generic “gamble” in Good News Translation. By using “gamble” before “divide,” Good News Translation succeeds in giving the impression that these lines describe the whole procedure for apportioning the clothing. Games of chance are not universal. Therefore it will be necessary in some languages to avoid both the specific expression and the generic one. One may, however, speak of getting something by playing a game against someone; for example, “they played a game to see who would get my clothes” or “they held a contest to see who would win my clothes.”
Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Reyburn, William D. A Handbook on the Book of Psalms. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 1991. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .
The following are presentations by the Psalms: Layer by Layer project, run by Scriptura . The first is an overview and the second an introduction into the exegesis of Psalm 22.
John Wu Ching-hsiung (1899-1986) was a native of Ningbo, Zhejiang, a renowned jurist who studied in Europe and the United States, and served as a professor of law at Soochow University, as a judge and the Acting President of the Shanghai Provisional Court, and as the Vice President of the Commission for the Drafting of the Constitution of the Republic of China, before becoming the Minister of the Republic of China to the Holy See. Wu has written extensively, not only on law but also on Chinese philosophy, and has also written his autobiography, Beyond East and West, in English. Wu was a devout Catholic and had a personal relationship with Chiang Kai-shek (1887-1975). Wu began translating the the Psalms in 1938, and was encouraged by Chiang to translate the entire New Testament, which he corrected in his own handwriting. (…) John Wu Ching-hsiung’s translation of the Psalms (first draft in 1946, revised in 1975) was translated into Literary Chinese in the form of poetic rhyme, with attention paid to the style of writing. According to the content and mood of the different chapters of the original psalm, Wu chose Chinese poetic forms such as tetrameter, pentameter, heptameter [4, 5 or 7 syllables/Chinese characters per stanza], and the [less formal] Sao style, and sometimes more than two poetic forms were used in a single poem. (Source: Simon Wong)
John Wu Ching-hsiung himself talks about his celebrated and much-admired (though difficult-to-understand) translation in his aforementioned autobiography: (Click or tap here to see)
“Nothing could have been farther from my mind than to translate the Bible or any parts of it with a view to publishing it as an authorized version. I had rendered some of the Psalms into Chinese verse, but that was done as a part of my private devotion and as a literary hobby. When I was in Hongkong in 1938, I had come to know Madame H. H. Kung [Soong Ai-ling], and as she was deeply interested in the Bible, I gave her about a dozen pieces of my amateurish work just for her own enjoyment. What was my surprise when, the next time I saw her, she told me, “My sister [Soong Mei-ling] has written to say that the Generalissimo [Chiang Kai-shek] likes your translation of the Psalms very much, especially the first, the fifteenth, and the twenty-third, the Psalm of the Good Shepherd!”
“In the Autumn of 1940, when I was in Chungking, the Generalissimo invited me several times to lunch with him and expressed his appreciation of the few pieces that he had read. So I sent him some more. A few days later I received a letter from Madame Chiang [Soong Mei-ling], dated September 21, 1940, in which she said that they both liked my translation of the few Psalms I had sent them. ‘For many years,’ she wrote, ‘the Generalissimo has been wanting to have a really adequate and readable Wen-li (literary) translation of the Bible. He has never been able to find anyone who could undertake the matter.’ The letter ends up by saying that I should take up the job and that ‘the Generalissimo would gladly finance the undertaking of this work.’
“After some preliminary study of the commentaries, I started my work with the Psalms on January 6, 1943, the Feast of the Epiphany.
“I had three thousand years of Chinese literature to draw upon. The Chinese vocabulary for describing the beauties of nature is so rich that I seldom failed to find a word, a phrase, and sometimes even a whole line to fit the scene. But what makes such Psalms so unique is that they bring an intimate knowledge of the Creator to bear upon a loving observation of things of nature. I think one of the reasons why my translation is so well received by the Chinese scholars is that I have made the Psalms read like native poems written by a Chinese, who happens to be a Christian. Thus to my countrymen they are at once familiar and new — not so familiar as to be jejune, and not so new as to be bizarre. I did not publish it as a literal translation, but only as a paraphrase.
“To my greatest surprise, [my translation of the Psalms] sold like hot dogs. The popularity of that work was beyond my fondest dreams. Numberless papers and periodicals, irrespective of religion, published reviews too good to be true. I was very much tickled when I saw the opening verse of the first Psalm used as a headline on the front page of one of the non-religious dailies.”
A contemporary researcher (Lindblom 2021) mentions this about Wu’s translation: “Wu created a unique and personal work of sacred art that bears the imprint of his own admitted love and devotion, a landmark achievement comparable to Antoni Gaudi’s Basilica of the Sagrada Família in Barcelona, Spain. Although its use is still somewhat limited today, it continues to attract readers for the aforementioned qualities, and continues to be used in prayers and music by those who desire beauty and an authentic Chinese-sounding text that draws from China’s ancient traditions.”
The translation of Psalm 22 from the 1946 edition is in the so-called Sao style (the 1946 edition did not have verse numbers either and underlined proper names):
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.