lion

Among the English versions there seems to be a great deal of confusion and inconsistency in the translation of the various Hebrew words. This is due in large part to the fact that the English translators and the commentators who have guided them have had many mistaken ideas about lions and their behavior. To take Amos 3:4 as an example, Smalley and de Waard (A Handbook on Amos. New York, 1979), commenting on this verse and echoing many others, claim: “The lion’s roar in the first picture is the ferocious roar with which the lion attacks an animal he is going to kill and eat. When someone hears this roar, he knows that the lion has found his victim. In the second picture, however, it is the lion’s contented growl when he has dragged the food to his den.” (see here)

However, lions do not roar as they attack their prey, (in fact they kill very silently as a rule), and lions do not normally live in dens. Moreover, they do not growl contentedly when eating. Instead they growl and snarl at the other lions in the pride who are trying to share the meal.

Click or tap here for the rest of this entry in United Bible Societies’ All Creatures Great and Small: Living things in the Bible

In case there are readers who react by thinking that it is unlikely that unsophisticated ancient peoples would have known these details, it should be pointed out that unsophisticated people all over Africa, who live in areas where there are lions, are very familiar with lion behavior, and it is highly likely that the Jewish writers were too. The problem would seem to lie with the mistaken presuppositions of western biblical scholars, rather than those of the Jewish writers. Later in this section evidence will be given that the biblical writers were very familiar with lion behavior.

In a similar vein, it is likely that the many Hebrew words for lions each have a slightly different meaning from one another. A closer study of lions and their behavior may help to define these meanings.

In biblical times lions were found all over the Middle East, in Mesopotamia, in Egypt, and in the area of Sudan and Ethiopia called Cush.

The Greek word leōn and the Latin leo are general words for lion, while the Greek leontēdon means something like “fierce lion”.

In order to dispel many of the wrong presuppositions about lions that are current among biblical scholars, the description of this animal will be more detailed and extensive than for other animals in this book.

Lions Panthera leo are the largest of the great cats, often being about 2.8 meters (9 feet) from nose to tip of tail, standing as high as 1 meter (3 feet 3 inches) at the shoulder. However, the difference in size between lions and Bengal Tigers Panthera tigris is minimal. An adult lion is at least half a meter (20 inches) longer than a Leopard Panthera pardus and weighs twice as much, often reaching 250 kilograms (550 pounds) in weight; it is about 30 centimeters (1 foot) longer and 100 kilograms (220 pounds) heavier than a Jaguar Panthera onca or Mountain Lion (Puma) Puma concolor. Lions are a pale yellowish brown, but at birth they have spots that usually disappear gradually as they grow. Around the neck and shoulders of adult males grows a mane that is darker than the rest of their fur. Some even have black manes. Females and young males do not have manes and look very similar to each other.

Lions live in family groups called “prides”, which are made up of a dominant male lion (often called “the pride male”), plus a group of adult and sub adult females and young males. Males may leave the pride, and occasionally one or two females may go off with a wandering male, but normally the females continue in the pride and develop very close bonds with one another that last a lifetime. The dominant male will often make ritual attacks on the younger males of the pride, who roll over in submission rather than fight.

However, adult males from within and outside the pride challenge the dominant male and one another when a female is in season and will try to mate with her. This results in serious fights. If the dominant male is defeated from within the pride, he leaves the pride to wander alone, but the remainder of the pride remains intact. If a male from outside the pride takes over from the pride male, he usually chases away the other males, which then wander singly or in small groups of three or four. These wandering males will try to take over other prides or steal females from them. Ousted pride males, since they are alone and have no help in hunting, are often hungry, thin, undernourished, and dangerous.

About two or three days before a pregnant female is about to give birth to cubs, she digs a temporary den under a rock or fallen log and visits it with one or two of the other females. After she gives birth in the den, one of the other females will bring her meat from a kill. This enables the mother to remain with her newborn cubs continuously for the first week or two of their lives. The mother lioness moves the newborn cubs to a new den every three or four days. When the cubs are about two weeks old, the mother carries the cubs to where the other pride members are, and the pride makes their acquaintance by licking them. Thereafter the cubs belong to the pride and suckle on any lactating lioness that happens to be near.

Until they are old enough to hunt, cubs hide in thickets while the pride hunters do their work. At a later stage they accompany the hunting lions, but watch the killing from the sidelines. Finally the mother will help them kill small animals, until they are able to kill efficiently. Then they join the pride hunts.

A pride lives together in the same territory. Bushes and tree trunks are marked by spraying a liquid from a gland next to the anus. This marked territory is defended against intruding lions. The pride will come together at feeding time and remain together after a feed, but will scatter across the territory prior to hunting.

Lions utter a variety of sounds, and this should be borne in mind when translating Scripture passages that refer to the noises lions make. The Hebrew words are usually not very specific, but the context will indicate the type of noise intended.

Roaring is the loudest of the lion sounds and is usually produced by the males. It is believed to be territory-marking behavior and a means of maintaining pride solidarity. It is usually done before hunting begins and also functions to help the pride locate the positions of scattered members. This is important for hunting. Roaring consists of a long, very loud moaning sound followed by shorter rhythmic panting moans, which are repeated as many as twenty times, while becoming softer and softer. No two lions roar in exactly the same way, and they can be identified from their roars. Roaring is also a means by which wandering male lions make known their availability as potential mates. Hungry lions roar more frequently than well-fed ones, and this is an indication of how hungry they are.

Growling is a warning sound. It is a very deep rumbling repeated with each breath. It is intended to chase away strange lions or other potential enemies, such as leopards, hyenas, or humans. When a lion or lioness growls, it usually advances towards its enemy. If growling does not have the desired effect, it is replaced with snarling, which is similar to growling but is more intense and is produced with exposed teeth, the body in a low crouch, and ears laid back flat. This behavior is usually the prelude to an attack. When the attack is actually made on an enemy, a deep trembling moan is uttered, and the ensuing fight takes place with a lot of loud snarling and growling.

When lions are feeding together on one carcass, there is usually a lot of growling, snarling, and snapping among the feeding lions.

Other types of sound made by lions are:

  • woofing sounds when pride members meet after two or three days’ absence from each other. This sound is also used to call cubs from their hiding places;
  • drawn out yawning moans by females in heat and by both lions and lionesses when mating;
  • grunting sounds when chasing prey toward other lions waiting in ambush;
  • contented loud purring, much as cats do.

Hunting and feeding behavior: After lions have fed well, they rest and relax together for two or three days. Towards the end of this time some of the pride members will begin to move away from the others in the direction of places where prey animals are likely to be grazing. Then, before they begin to hunt, they signal their locations by roaring on and off for an hour or two. They then fall silent and begin to hunt in earnest. Hunting usually takes one of two forms. If there is good cover near the prey, two or three lionesses and young males will stalk the prey using the cover. When they get close enough, one or two will break cover and charge at the prey, while the others maneuver to cut off any escape.

If the terrain is more open, the lionesses and young males will take up ambush positions downwind of the prey animals. Adult males then move fairly openly into upwind positions. They then run toward the prey uttering loud grunts with each breath. With either method, at the first charge the lions try to disable the animal by seizing a leg or by biting the spine. Once they have slowed down the prey, one lion will seize the animal by the throat and suffocate it. Thus death is usually fairly slow and drawn out. If the animal is large, the kill takes a considerable amount of energy, and the lions rest, usually standing, before they begin to feed.

Single wandering male lions are at a great disadvantage in hunting and often go hungry. They thus roar more frequently than pride lions. They often begin to kill domestic animals and sometimes humans.

Among the lions present at the time of the kill, there is a type of seniority, with age being important. The most senior lion or lioness present will begin to feed, and this will be a signal for the others to join in. If the kill is large, they feed in relative silence, but if the prey is small, there is a lot of snarling, growling, and snapping. Whenever a dominant pride male arrives, however, the feeding lions withdraw and leave him to feed alone. A dominant male will sometimes allow an immature cub to feed with him but no mature lions. The pride members will only resume feeding when the dominant male is satisfied. Dominant males are very seldom involved in the chase or the kill. At most they make the charge that drives the prey towards lionesses and young males in ambush.

In the Bible the lion is a symbol of danger and destruction, often being paired with the bear. The lion is also a symbol of great political power and regal majesty.

Before discussing specific passages in detail, it is useful first to try and identify the various Hebrew words with likely lion types. If we examine the verbs and adjectives with which the Hebrew nouns co-occur, we find the following:

  • ’Ari: This, the most frequently used word for lion, is associated with a very wide range of verbs in the Bible, including crouching in ambush, leaping, growling, roaring, killing, destroying, tearing prey to pieces, breaking bones, attacking, breaking from cover, scattering sheep, trampling, and standing on prey. The adjectives used with this noun include strong, destructive, brave, and hungry. From this evidence we can see that ’ari or its feminine form ’aryeh is the general word for lion or lioness.
  • ’ari’el in 2 Samuel 23:20 and 1 Chronicles 11:22 literally means “lion of God” or “mighty lion”, but it is an idiom denoting a human hero or mighty warrior, not a lion.
  • ’Aryeh: Although this is a feminine form, in English versions it is invariably translated as “lion”, because this form usually occurs in the Hebrew phrase gur ’aryeh, which is literally “a cub of lioness”, but which is more naturally translated as “lion cub” in English.
  • Beney shachats: This expression, which literally means “sons of pride”, occurs only once, in a poetic passage (Job 28:8) as the parallel of “lion” (shachal). Probably, besides having similar sounds, the two expressions both refer to lions. Only KJV reflects this in the translation.
  • Kefir: The verbs associated with this noun include kill, prowl, hunt, snarl, attack, break cover, tear prey to pieces, roar, and growl. The only adjective associated with the noun is “angry”. Translators often render this as “young lion”. Ezekiel 19:1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9 seems to support an identification of kefir with a young male lion that is an efficient killer.
  • Laviy’: The verbs associated with this noun are growling, devouring, lying down, crouching, and raising cubs. The only descriptive phrase that co-occurs is big teeth. The usual JB rendering of this word as “lioness” seems well founded.
  • Layish: This noun occurs only three times. The verb phrase that co-occurs is “ dying from lack of prey”. The adjectives that co-occur are “stately in its walk”, and “strong”. The evidence would fit an interpretation such as “lion in its prime time” or “mighty lion”. The reference would seem to be to a dominant male lion or “pride male”. Versions that render this word as “old lion” in some contexts, seem to be slightly misleading.
  • Shachal: The verbs that co-occur are roaring, hunting, and tearing prey to pieces. Some scholars, using evidence from Assyrian and classical Arabic, believe that this Hebrew word is derived from an older Semitic root meaning “to roar” or “to produce a call”. All available evidence would seem to allow for the interpretation of shachal as “male lion”. It may possibly be a word for a wandering male lion rather than a male that is a member of a pride.

In some English versions of Maccabees the Greek word skumnos is incorrectly translated as “cub” or “whelp”. The context refers to this creature roaring, which lion cubs do not do. The word seems rather to refer to a virile young adult lion. It is better translated as lion in its prime.

In areas where lions are completely unknown, it is better to borrow a word from a dominant language or from Hebrew or Greek, rather than to try and find a local equivalent. This is because the biblical references to the behavior of lions are fairly specific, and if a word for a local animal is used, it will not fit the behavior mentioned in the text. This is especially so because the lion is the only great cat (apart from the cheetah) that lives and hunts in large family groups.

Some attempt should be made to maintain the slight differences in meaning of the various Hebrew words for lions, when the context requires this. This can often be done by using short, natural-sounding descriptive phrases. Often, however, in contexts where only one of the Hebrew words for lion is used, there is no need to maintain a difference, and a simple word for lion or lioness will suffice.

The most common Hebrew phrases used for the sounds lions make are sha’ag, (natan) qol, naham. When sha’ag is used in contexts of human vocal behavior, it indicates cries of pain or distress. In contexts of animal vocal behavior, however, it can signal pain and distress but can also be an aggressive sound and can be translated “bellow, roar, moan, snarl, growl” or sometimes “bark”. A similar Arabic word usually refers to the lowing of cattle or the bleating of goats. For lions English translators have consistently chosen “roar”, because of their mistaken preconception that a lion’s “roar” is an aggressive sound. In most contexts it is best interpreted as “growl” or “snarl”.

(Natan) qol, on the other hand, is a more general expression and can mean any sort of vocalization, from calling, to groaning or singing. English translators of Amos 3:4 have chosen “growl” and “cry out”. In this text this word is the parallel of sha’ag, so the reason for these interpretations is plain. However, a neutral translation, such as “make a sound”, would be equally valid. Of all the Hebrew expressions for lion sounds, this is the one most likely to mean roar, especially in contexts where the noun shachal occurs for “lion”, as for example in Job 4:10.

Naham means to moan in sorrow or pain when used of humans and is usually translated as to growl when used of animals.

Lion habitats and the meaning of ma‘on in the context of lions: Generally the word ma‘on means dwelling place, hiding place, or refuge. In one or two places it refers to a military refuge or fortress. When used of animals, it can mean “lair” (as for jackals), “hiding place”, “territory”, or simply “place where the animals are found”. The choice in translating this Hebrew word has been either “lair” or “den” in all English translations. This choice again seems to be related to the misconceptions about the behavior of lions. Lions do not usually live in dens or lairs, and it is better to translate ma‘on as “territory” or “place where lions live”.

Source: All Creatures Great and Small: Living things in the Bible (UBS Helps for Translators)

 

There are no lions in Bawm country, so the Bawm Chin translation uses “a tiger with a mane” and in Kahua it becomes a “fierce animal.”

In 1 Peter 5:8, the “roaring lion” is a krasi tigri or “aggressive tiger” in Sranan Tongo and in Uripiv “a hungry shark.”

Sources: David Clark for Bawm Chin and Kahua, Japini 2015, p. 33, for Sranan Tongo, and Ross McKerras for Uripiv.

For the use of “lion” for “Lord” or “lord” in Hdi, see Lord.

Translation commentary on Exod 19:4

These are Yahweh’s words that Moses is to speak to the Israelites. You have seen, literally “You [plural], you saw,” is emphatic, so Revised English Bible has “You yourselves have seen” (so also New American Bible, New Jerusalem Bible, and Translator’s Old Testament). What I did to the Egyptians means “What I, the LORD did” (Good News Translation). In some languages the appositional construction, “I, the LORD,” will be unnatural style. In such cases one may say, for example, “What [or, The things that] I who am Yahweh did.” And how I bore you on eagle’s wings is literally “and I lifted you up on wings of eagles.” This is a metaphor that Good News Translation changes to a simile, “and how I carried you as an eagle carries her young on her wings.”

The word for eagle includes several varieties of large birds of prey, known for their powerful wings and swift flight. This figure of speech is based on a poetic picture of how the eagle teaches its offspring to fly, namely, that it will catch them on its wings when they fall. Such an activity has never been seen in real life, and so it is best to deal with this as a poetic figure created in order to picture God’s care for his people. (See Deut 32.11 for a more complete description of this metaphor.) In areas where eagles are not known, one may substitute another large bird of prey; but it should be one that can be pictured as catching its babies on its wings. If such a bird is not available, one may say something like “as a huge bird named ‘eagle’ carries….” It will also be helpful to include an illustration of an eagle and a note in the Glossary. And brought you to myself suggests that Yahweh means, as Good News Translation and Contemporary English Version express it, “how I brought you here to me,” that is, to this mountain.

Quoted with permission from Osborn, Noel D. and Hatton, Howard A. A Handbook on Exodus. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 1999. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

 

Exodus 19:4: The expression “I carried you on eagles’ wings” (NIV) involves a metaphor that has been taken literally by readers in many languages. However, the text does not mean that eagles carried the Israelites to Sinai. Rather the metaphor refers to God’s protection, speed, and power and means “I brought you here as if I had been a flying eagle carrying you.”

Some commentaries have quoted an often repeated but unsubstantiated statement to the effect that the Israelites believed that eagles carry their young on their wings. Some commentaries have even claimed that naturalists have actually seen eagles doing this. There is no independent evidence for this belief apart from two biblical passages of which this is one, and none of the naturalists who have specialized in the observation of eagles has ever reported this kind of behavior. These commentaries have actually misinterpreted the Hebrew idiom “on wings,” which does not mean “on the upper surface of the wings” but rather “in flight.”

Source: All Creatures Great and Small: Living things in the Bible (UBS Helps for Translators)

Translation commentary on Leviticus 11:22

In some languages it may be more appropriate to begin this verse with something like “Therefore you may eat…” or “Here, then, are the ones you may eat:….” The repetition of the phrase according to its kind, as in verses 13-19, may be dropped or left implicit. Although the Hebrew lists four different kinds of insects here, Revised Standard Version and Good News Translation have reduced this to three.

The problem is dealt with in New Jerusalem Bible by borrowing certain Hebrew terms: “the various kinds of solham locust, hargol locust and hagab locust.” But this is not a satisfactory solution in a common language translation. An attempt should be made to find well-known words that correspond more or less to the biblical ideas. If the correspondence is not exact, an explanation may be offered in a footnote. In languages where there are very few words for this type of insect, a more general statement like “the various kinds of crickets and grasshoppers” may be required. It may even be necessary in some languages to say simply “all kinds of grasshoppers,” but this is not advised unless it is impossible to do otherwise.

Quoted with permission from Péter-Contesse, René and Ellington, John. A Handbook on Leviticus. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 1990. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

This text contains four clean insects. The two Hebrew words sol‘am and chargol occur only here, so it is very difficult to be precise about their meaning. The suggestions, therefore, have to be very tentative.

From the general rule given in this verse about the characteristics of clean insects, we can deduce that all four of the insects have specialized legs for hopping. This would suggest that locusts (’arbeh), grasshoppers (chagav), and crickets (probably chargol) would be included in the list, as various species of these three insects are commonly eaten in the Middle East, Africa, and parts of Asia. Since a fourth name occurs in the list, New International Version translates sol‘am as “katydid”, while New American Bible translates chargol as “katydids” and sol‘am as “grasshoppers”. The katydid is a nocturnal hopping insect similar to a grasshopper in many respects, but usually with green leaf-shaped wings. However, katydids are usually solitary creatures, and not very easy to collect, and thus they are not commonly a food source.

All that can be said with certainty about the list of clean insects is that it most probably contains locusts, grasshoppers, and crickets. It is probably safest to translate the list as “all kinds of locusts, all kinds of grasshoppers, and all kinds of crickets,” and add this footnote: “In Hebrew there are four insects in the list. Some scholars suggest that these are four different types of locust.”

Source: All Creatures Great and Small: Living things in the Bible (UBS Helps for Translators)

Translation commentary on Deuteronomy 32:11

Like an eagle that stirs up its nest: of the four lines in this verse, the meaning of this line is the most difficult to determine. New Revised Standard Version is the same as Revised Standard Version; other renderings are New Jewish Publication Society’s Tanakh “Like an eagle who rouses his nestlings,” BÍBLIA para todos Edição Comum “like an eagle keeping watch over its young who are in the nest,” New Jerusalem Bible “Like an eagle watching its nest,” Revised English Bible “As an eagle watches over its young.” The Hebrew verb usually means to “disturb” or “stir up”; but the meaning “watch” found in the Septuagint is defended by some and is the meaning given by Revised English Bible and New Jerusalem Bible, and it is an alternative rendering given in the Good News Translation footnote. This meaning is the one recommended here. So we may also say something like “Yahweh is like an eagle watching over its young in the nest.”

An eagle: in cultures where eagles are unknown, some other large bird of prey may be used.

That flutters over its young: the verb in this line is the same one used in Gen 1.2 of the spirit (or, wind) of God hovering over the abyss. Good News Translation “teaching its young to fly” (also Contemporary English Version) follows theVulgate, provocans ad volandum, “enticing [its young] to fly.” This, however, is most unlikely, and it is recommended that the Revised Standard Version rendering be followed.

Spreading out its wings, catching them: Revised Standard Version and other translations take this line and the next one to apply to the eagle and its young. But a number of commentaries and translations take this line and the next one to apply to Yahweh and his people, not to the eagle and its young. So New Jewish Publication Society’s Tanakh says “so did he spread his wings and take them” (also Osty-Trinquet, Pléiade).

The last line, bearing them on its pinions, therefore refers also to God, not to the eagle. So God “carries them on his wings”; the Hebrew word for “wings” here is different from the one used in the previous line. For the figure of God doing this for his people, see Exo 19.4.

A possible alternative translation model for this verse is:

• The LORD is like an eagle guarding its nest,
and hovering over its young.
The LORD is always ready to spread his wings
and catch his people when they are falling.

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Hatton, Howard A. A Handbook on Deuteronomy. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 2000. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

 

There are a number of problems in verse 11. In the Hebrew poem verses 10 and 11 are closely linked, so that the main thought of verse 10 is continued in verse 11. In verse 10 the last three verbs are “shielded or, encircled, cared for, guarded.” In this context the translation of verse 11 as “stirs up its nest” (RSV, NIV) is not likely. “Watches over its nest” (NEB, JB, REB) is a better exegesis, but this verb is often translated elsewhere as encourage so “encourages its nestlings” is entirely possible (see NAB).

All of the English versions misrepresent how an eagle teaches its young to fly, probably because they accept the hypothetical myth mentioned above, namely that eagles carry their young on their wings.

What actually happens is that young eagles are shown by their parents how to set their wings by spreading them when the wind blows, while holding on to the side of the nest. Eventually when the young eagles have mastered this, they let go and ride the wind out of the nest. At this stage the parent eagles are usually nearby, circling overhead.
The Hebrew text, if the myth hypothesis is rejected, is actually open to a very different interpretation that is in accordance with what really happens. Th
is interpretation has some scholarly support, but has not yet been mentioned in any commentary or translation. It involves interpreting the last verb in verse 11 as meaning “lifts himself up” rather than “is lifted up.” The following model gives this interpretation:

10 He found him in a desert land,
in a barren howling waste.
He circled around him, cared for him,
guarded him like the apple of his eye.
11 Like an eagle encouraging its nestling,
hovering over its offspring,
spreading its wings, instructing him,
until he rises up on his strong wings,
12 Yahweh alone guided Israel,
with no foreign god at his side.

In verse 11 there are two words for “wing”, the second of which is a poetic word derived from a Hebrew root meaning “mighty”.

Source: All Creatures Great and Small: Living things in the Bible (UBS Helps for Translators)

Translation commentary on Job 24:20

The pattern of this verse is unusual. Instead of the usual two lines of equal length, which are normal in Job, the first half of the Hebrew text has three sentences of two words each. The second half consists of a line of the normal length. The clue to the pattern of parallelism in the first half of the verse consists of the balancing of forget and no longer remembered. But this leaves the middle section of the first part disconnected from the other two. So in order to make two lines of average length in the first half of the verse, in place of the three short lines, Revised Standard Version distributes the three lines into two.

The squares of the town forget them: the Revised Standard Version footnote indicates that the Hebrew is obscure. The Hebrew has “the womb forgets him,” and Revised Standard Version has changed the word for “womb” and the following word to get The squares of the town, meaning “the centers of the towns.” This change does not seem necessary. Dhorme keeps the Hebrew and translates “The womb which has formed him forgets him,” which Good News Translation translates more naturally as “Not even his mother remembers him now.” Hebrew Old Testament Text Project supports this. In some languages it will be more meaningful to express “mother” as “the one who gave birth to him.”

Their name is no longer remembered is literally “the worm sucks on him and he is not remembered.” Aside from Exodus 16.24 and Job 25.6, the word rendered “worm” in Hebrew is always used with dead or decaying bodies, so Good News Translation has “he is eaten by worms…,” the reason being that he is dead. Their name is a change based on the word for “worm” and is preferred by Dhorme. Revised Standard Version has made one line of what can also be read as two lines in the Hebrew. Good News Translation does not repeat no longer remembered. This line may be translated without any change, as suggested by Good News Translation and others; for example, “worms eat his corpse” or “his dead body is eaten by worms (maggots).”

So wickedness is broken like a tree: this line is a summary statement of the preceding thoughts. Revised Standard Version makes no textual changes. Good News Translation takes wickedness to be the same subject as in the two preceding lines. Broken like a tree is at best a vague simile; only certain kinds of trees can be described as broken. Therefore Good News Translation translates more meaningfully “destroyed like a fallen tree.” This line may also be expressed “he is destroyed like a tree that is cut down,” or “like a tree he is cut down,” or “they destroy him in the same way as they cut down a tree and destroy it.”

In Revised Standard Version verse 20 concludes Job’s quoting the friends. Verses 21-25 in Revised Standard Version are Job’s own words.

Quoted with permission from Reyburn, Wiliam. A Handbook on Job. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 1992. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

In Job 24:20 the Masoretic Text is very obscure and difficult to understand. It contains a reference to rimah. Revised Standard Version supports a correction of the Hebrew text, changing rimah “maggot” to shemo “his name”. However, many commentators and most modern English versions interpret the verse without making this change and have wording similar to:

The womb [that is, his mother] forgets him,
And worms feast on him [or, suck him dry].
Thus are evil men forgotten,
like broken trees.

Source: All Creatures Great and Small: Living things in the Bible (UBS Helps for Translators)

Translation commentary on Daniel 4:33

Immediately: literally “At that moment.” Compare “At that very moment” (Revised English Bible), “Instantly” (Moffatt), “There and then” (New Jerusalem Bible), “At once” (New American Bible), and “At that same instant” (Bible en français courant).

The word was fulfilled: the word is singular in form but has a collective meaning and should therefore be translated as a plural in many languages. Revised English Bible translates “this judgement came upon Nebuchadnezzar.” Another way of saying this may be “what had been predicted actually happened.”

He was driven from among men: see verse 25.

Till his hair grew as long as eagles’ feathers: the figurative language used here may be more naturally translated by a different image or by an emphatic nonfigurative statement such as “very, very long” or “remarkably lengthy.” However, some languages may natural similes that would be appropriate to describe the length or fullness of a person’s hair. (See below)

His nails were like birds’ claws: it may be important in some instances to say in what way the king’s nails resembled the claws of birds. As in the case of the hair, the focus is probably on their length rather than the sharpness or danger they may be to others.

It may be noted that New English Bible reads “until his hair grew long like goat’s hair and his nails like eagles’ talons.” This, however, is not a rendering of the Aramaic but of a conjecture of what the original text might have been, and it has been rejected by Revised English Bible. Translators are therefore advised to stay with the traditional reading reflected in Revised English Bible and most other versions.

Quoted with permission from Péter-Contesse, René & Ellington, John. A Handbook on Daniel. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 1994. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

 

The reference here to Nebuchadnezzar’s hair growing “as long as an eagle’s feathers” may seem a strange one, since the eagles indigenous to the land of Israel have rather neat-looking heads, and the large vultures have either short bristles on their heads or are bald. The comparison may be to the small Egyptian vulture, which has very untidy long feathers on its head and neck, or perhaps to the Long-crested Eagle Lophaetus occipitalis, which is very common all over eastern and southern Africa, as far north as Ethiopia and Sudan.

In those parts of Africa where the Egyptian vulture or the long-crested eagle are known, the name for either one would fit this context well. Elsewhere an expression such as “his hair grew as long as an eagle’s feathers” is probably the best alternative.

Source: All Creatures Great and Small: Living things in the Bible (UBS Helps for Translators)

Translation commentary on Acts 12:23

Struck Herod down is equivalent to “caused him to become sick.”

He did not give honor to God indicates that he claimed for himself the honor that belonged only to God, and thus was guilty of pride and sacrilege. The expression give honor to God is rather too general in some languages for this kind of context. Therefore one must say “because he did not insist that he was just a man and not God.” In other instances one may employ “because he did not have the people praise God rather than himself.”

To be eaten by worms was a death frequently described by ancient writers to extremely evil persons, especially of persons with great power and authority. The worms spoken of in this context should refer to some kind of intestinal worms rather than to maggots for, according to the text, it was the worms which caused his death and not maggots, which would eat his flesh after he had died.

Quoted with permission from Newman, Barclay M. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on The Acts of the Apostles. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1972. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

In Acts 12:23 there is a Greek verb skōlēkobrōtos, which means “eaten by maggots”. The death of Herod Agrippa was seen as punishment for an evil life, and it was believed to result from his being eaten by maggots. The reference may be to sores that did not heal (as may happen with gangrene, diabetes, syphilis, or tropical ulcers) and in unhygienic conditions became infected with maggots, eventually leading to blood poisoning and death. Another possible interpretation is that the “maggots” are intestinal parasites, such as tapeworms or liver flukes, which may cause ill health and eventually death.

Source: All Creatures Great and Small: Living things in the Bible (UBS Helps for Translators)