mule

The Greek and Hebrew that is translated with “mule” in English is translated in Swahili with nyumbu which also is a homonym for “wildebeest,” potentially causing confusion.

In Kutu it is translated with “big donkey” because there is no other adequate term in Kutu. (Source: Pioneer Bible Translators, project-specific translation notes in Paratext)

In the Hausa Common Language Bible it is translated jakin-doki or “donkey-horse,” since mules are also not known in Nigeria. (Source: Andy Warren-Rothlin)

 

The word pirdah refers to the female mule while pered can refer to either the male or the female. In biblical times mules were used for riding and as pack animals while horses were mainly used to pull military chariots. They appear to have been introduced into Canaan much later than horses. Mules are not mentioned in the Bible until the time of David while horses are mentioned in the Joseph story and in Deuteronomy 17:16 where the king is forbidden to acquire them. Technically the owning of mules was not prohibited although the breeding of them would have fallen under the prohibition of Leviticus 19:19, which forbade the cross-breeding of animals. The Israelites thus seem to have relied on mules imported from neighboring countries.

The mule is not an animal found naturally anywhere, but is the result of people breeding male donkeys with female horses. It is also possible to breed male horses with female donkeys, but the offspring, technically called “hinnies”, not “mules”, are usually smaller than mules. Mules are bigger and stronger than donkeys and are much more resistant to disease than either horses or donkeys. They are usually dark brown with bigger ears than the parent horse.

Although there are male and female mules they are infertile and not able to breed. This makes the stronger males much easier to handle than stallions.

Although the mule in English is associated with stubbornness this is not usually the case in other cultures since mules are very easy to handle if treated properly. In Psalms 32:9 the mule is linked to the horse as both being animals that lack sufficient understanding and need to be guided in the right direction.

Even in languages of societies that know mules, they are often referred to as “horse-donkeys”, or “donkey-horses”. This seems to be a good translation solution even in languages that have no word for mule.

complete verse (Ezra 2:66)

Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Ezra 2:66:

  • Kupsabiny: “They went with 736 horses, 245 animals like donkeys,” (Source: Kupsabiny Back Translation)
  • Newari: “They had 736 horses, 245 mules,” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
  • Hiligaynon: “The total of the ones-who-returned from captivity was 42,360, not included their servants who were 7,337, and singers who were 200, who are males and females. They brought with-them 736 horses, 245 mules, 435 camels, and 6,720 donkeys.” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
  • English: “The Israelis brought with them from Babylonia 736 horses, 245 mules,” (Source: Translation for Translators)

Translation commentary on Ezra 2:64 - Ezra 2:67

The whole assembly is a technical expression for the community of men, women, and children who were qualified to participate in the religious activities of the people of Israel (see Ezra 10.1; Neh 13.1). King James Version uses “congregation” for this community, but New King James Version says “assembly” like Revised Standard Version and New Jerusalem Bible, while New Jewish Publication Society’s Tanakh refers to it as a “community.” This did not include the servants and singers who were counted separately from the assembly. The number 42,360 is not the total of the people in the lists. They only add up to 29,818. The difference is probably due to scribal error in copying early manuscripts. Good News Translation introduces the list that gives the final sum with the common English expression “Total number” (see also Bible en français courant), and this may serve as a model.

Menservants and maidservants: These were servants who belonged to the Jewish families. The same Hebrew word is used here for menservants that was used in verse 55 above (“servants”) and some translations therefore translate “male and female slaves” here (New Jerusalem Bible; similarly New English Bible, Biblia Dios Habla Hoy). Many translations, however, use a word for those who serve or who work, in both the masculine and feminine forms (Traduction œcuménique de la Bible, Nouvelle version Segond révisée, New International Version).

The singers referred to here sang for social occasions; they were a different group from the Temple singers listed in verse 41. It is again specified that they were male and female or “men and women.” Good News Translation uses the more general term “musicians” to indicate that their duties included not only singing but also playing musical instruments. Like the servants, they served the people who returned to Judah.

Horses … mules … camels … asses: The animals that are listed were for riding and carrying burdens. Horses were used in battle and were ridden by kings. A horse may be called an “animal for riding.” Mules are the offspring of a horse and a donkey. They were used especially for riding but also for carrying loads. They can be compared to big donkeys. Camels, as referred to here, were dromedaries. They had one hump and were capable of traveling long distances especially over dry sandy terrain. They could be ridden and they could carry big loads at a fairly high speed. They can be described as “large load-carrying animals of the desert.” Asses or “donkeys” are smaller than horses and mules. They could be ridden, but they were mostly used for carrying loads. They may be called “load-carrying animals.” Some languages may refer to mules and donkeys by the same word. Perhaps they may then be included together as “two kinds of donkeys.” If mules and asses are combined, then the total number for the two also needs to be combined, which is 6,965.

In some languages words may not exist for all these animals. Words must then be borrowed to refer to these animals or compound words can be formed to describe them. Another solution is to compare them to an animal that is known or simply describe them and add what they are called in another language that is known to the receptor audience. If the animals are not known, illustrations can be included in the translation to show what they look like and an explanation can be given in footnotes or in the glossary.

Quoted with permission from Noss, Philip A. and Thomas, Kenneth J. A Handbook on Ezra. (UBS Helps for Translators). New York: UBS, 2005. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

SIL Translator’s Notes on Ezra 2:66

2:66 They had 736 horses, 245 mules,

They brought with them seven hundred and thirty-six (736) horses, two hundred and forty-five (245) mules,
-or-
The people ⌊who returned⌋ had seven hundred thirty-six large horses and two hundred forty-five small horses

© 2020 by SIL International®
Made available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA) creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.
All Scripture quotations in this publication, unless otherwise indicated, are from The Holy Bible, Berean Standard Bible.
BSB is produced in cooperation with Bible Hub, Discovery Bible, OpenBible.com, and the Berean Bible Translation Committee.