Text:

Instead of autois ‘them’ of all modern editions of the Greek text, Textus Receptus has autō ‘him.’

Exegesis:

genea (cf. 8.12) ‘generation’: here also refers to the contemporaries of Jesus.

apistos (only here in Mark) ‘unbelieving,’ ‘not having faith,’ ‘faithless’ (rather than ‘unfaithful’).

heōs pote ‘until when?’ ‘how long?’

heōs (6.23; 13.19, 27; 14.25, 34, 54; 15.33, 38) ‘until,’ ‘till.’

pote (13.4, 33, 35) ‘when.’

anexomai (only here in Mark) ‘I will endure,’ ‘bear,’ ‘put up with.’

Translation:

For generation see 8.12.

Faithless is to be understood in an active sense ‘you people who do not believe’ (Copainalá Zoque, Highland Puebla Nahuatl). For faith see 1.15.

How long am I to be with you is equivalent in some languages to ‘how long must I remain with you,’ in the sense of how long must I remain with you in order for you to have faith.

Bring should be translated by the same word as brought of verse 17.

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Text:

Instead of kai ‘and’ before peran tou Iordanou ‘beyond the Jordan’ of the great majority of the modern editions of the Greek text, Textus Receptus and Soden have dia tou ‘through the,’ so that the whole clause reads ‘through the other side of the Jordan.’

Exegesis:

anastas erchetai (cf. anastas apēlthen 7.24) ‘rising, he comes,’ i.e. ‘leaving that place (ekeithen ‘thence’) he went.’

horia (cf. 5.17) ‘boundaries,’ ‘region’: the phrase eis ta horia does not mean ‘to the boundaries’ but ‘into the region.’ The route indicated by the words of the text goes through Judea, across the river Jordan into Perea (cf. Goodspeed).

peran tou Iordanou (cf. 3.8; 4.35) ‘beyond the Jordan,’ ‘Perea.’

sumporeuontai palin ochloi pros auton ‘again crowds come together to him.’

sumporeuomai (only here in Mark) ‘go along with’; with reference to many people, as here, ‘come together,’ ‘flock,’ ‘gather.’

ochloi ‘crowds’: here only, in Mark, is the plural used.

eiōthei (only here in Mark) ‘he was accustomed’: the form eiōtha is the perfect of ethō but has a present sense ‘to be accustomed’: the pluperfect eiōthei, therefore, has an imperfect sense. The meaning here is not ‘as he had been accustomed,’ but ‘as he was accustomed,’ ‘as his custom was.’

Translation:

Beyond the Jordan identifies ‘the region on the other side of the Jordan’ (or ‘Jordan river,’ if a classifier is required).

Crowds involves certain difficulties, since in, many languages there are two types of plurals, aggregates and distributives. In Greek, however, it is not certain whether the plural actually denotes different crowds or whether it is a so-called augmentative plural, i.e. a plural which emphasizes the extent or size rather than the actual number of objects or occurrences. If, therefore, the Greek term ochloi is taken to mean simply the size of the crowd, then ‘many, many people’ or ‘very large crowd’ may be used. However, the use of the Greek form may indicate a distributive plural, implying that Jesus met with crowd after crowd wherever he went, in which case, of course, a distributive – whether of time or space – may be used. One must, however, avoid the mistake made in some languages of using an aggregate plural, for Jesus would not be addressing himself to several crowds at the same time.

As his custom was is translatable in many languages by a habitual, or customary, aspect of the verb. However, in some languages the idea of customary action can only be expressed by a separate verb phrase, e.g. ‘he was accustomed to teach; he began to teach again’ (Tzeltal).

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Exegesis:

empaixousin (15.20, 31) ‘they will ridicule,’ ‘they will make fun of,’ ‘they will mock.’

emptusousin (14.65; 15.19, cf. ptuō 7.33; 8.23) ‘they will spit on.’

mastigōsousin (only here in Mark; cf. mastix 3.10; 5.29, 34) ‘they will scourge,’ ‘they will flog’: here the verb refers to the whipping given those who were condemned to death (Latin verberatio).

The other words have already been dealt with: for apokteinō ‘kill’ cf. 3.4; meta treis hēmeras ‘after three days’ cf. 8.31; anastēnai ‘to rise (from the dead)’ cf. 8.31.

Translation:

They refers to the Gentiles.

In some languages the equivalent of and connecting a series of events is ‘then,’ e.g. ‘they will mock him; then they will spit on him; then they will….’

In some parts of the world spitting is regarded as a symbol of blessing, e.g. among the Shilluk. In this instance one must translate so that the people will understand that spitting among the people of ancient Palestine had a different meaning, e.g. ‘spit on him to show they hate him’ (or ‘despise him’).

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Text:

Before agorazontas ‘buying’ Textus Receptus omits tous ‘the ones,’ ‘those,’ which is retained by all modern editions of the Greek text.

Exegesis:

hieron (cf. 11.11) ‘Temple’: here specifically the Court of the Gentiles where all this traffic was carried on.

tous pōlountas (cf. 10.21) ‘those who sold’: the merchants who sold the animals, as well as oil, wine, and salt, for the Temple sacrifices.

tous agorazontas (cf. 6.36) ‘those who bought’: pilgrims who came to offer sacrifice and worship in the Temple.

tas trapezas (cf. 7.28) ‘the tables’ on which the money changers displayed their coins; ‘banks.’

tōn kollubistōn (only here in Mark) ‘of the money changers’: many of the worshipers, Jews of the Dispersion, would not have the half shekel coins required for the payment of the Temple tax (cf. Rawlinson).

tas kathedras (only here in Mark) ‘the chairs,’ ‘seats,’ ‘stools.’

tas peristeras (cf. 1.10) ‘the doves’ used in sacrifices, according to the requirements of the Law (cf. Lev. 12.6, 8; 14.22; 15.14, 29).

katestrepsen (only here in Mark) ‘he upset,’ ‘he overturned.’

Translation:

Came to may require alteration to ‘arrived at.’

Drive out may be rendered in a form parallel to what is used in other Gospels where the action is described as accomplished – at least in part – by the use of a whip. Where languages require a distinction between driving out as a group, or singly (as, for example, in Navajo), the former is probably preferable.

Sold and … bought is in some languages best rendered as ‘exchanged’ (or in some cultures as ‘bartered’).

Pigeons, which are very widespread, – at least in some relatively similar form – may be translated by the closest local parallel, even though the relationship may not be exact.

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Exegesis:

dōmen ē mē dōmen; ‘are we to pay, or not?’: an example of what is called the deliberative subjunctive.

ho de eidōs autōn tēn hupokrisin ‘but he, perceiving their hypocrisy’: cf. Goodspeed (and Lagrange) ‘but he saw through their pretense.’

hupokrisis (only here in Mark; cf. hupokrites 7.6) ‘dissimulation,’ ‘outward show,’ ‘hypocrisy.’

ti me peirazete; ‘why do you put me to the test?’: cf. the similar use of the verb in 8.11; 10.2.

pherete moi dēnarion hina idō ‘bring me a denarius that I may look (at it)’: the hina clause expresses purpose; Rawlinson and Revised Standard Version, however, understand it as being imperatival ‘let me look at it.’

dēnarion (cf. 6.37) ‘denarius’: a silver coin, minted by the Roman government.

Translation:

Should implies the concept of obligation, which is equivalent in some languages to ‘must we pay.’ This is a question of obligation, not of mere future possibility.

Knowing may be rendered either as ‘being acquainted with’ or ‘recognizing’; either meaning would fit this context.

For hypocrisy see 7.6. In this particular context the San Mateo del Mar Huave language employs an interesting idiom ‘he could see that they were talking just with their mouth,’ that is to say, ‘not with the heart,’ which would have implied sincerity.

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Exegesis:

For grēgoreō ‘watch’ cf. the preceding verse; ho kurios ‘the master,’ ‘the owner’ cf. 1.3.

Listed here are the four watches of the night, according to the Roman system, of three hours each, running from 6:00 P.M. to 6:00 A.M.

opse (cf. 11.11) ‘the evening,’ ‘late’: here, the first watch, from 6:00–9:00 P.M.

mesonuktion (only here in Mark) literally ‘the middle of the night’: here, the second watch, from 9:00 P.M. to 12:00 midnight.

alektorophōnias (only here in the N.T.) ‘at the crowing (phōnē) of the rooster (alektōr)’: here, the third watch, from 12:00 midnight to 3:00 A.M.

prōi (cf. 1.35) ‘early,’ ‘at dawn’: here, the fourth watch, from 3:00–6:00 A.M. (cf. 6.48 where ‘the fourth watch’ is referred to).

Translation:

Watch is variously translated in this context, e.g. ‘be on the look-out,’ ‘keep a close watch,’ ‘be constantly alert,’ or ‘wait, look.’

The paraphrastic expression included within dashes in the Revised Standard Version text combines quite well with the introductory verb watch. Where the difficulty arises is the connection of this sentence with the following verse, which expresses a negative purpose. This latter expression cannot be combined with the last of verse 35. There are usually three different types of solutions: (1) punctuation as a parenthetical expression, either within parentheses or dashes – a solution which is quite acceptable to rather literate people; (2) the repetition of ‘watch’ at the beginning of verse 36, so that the proper syntactic relationship may be preserved; or (3) an alteration in order in which the clause within dashes in the Revised Standard Version is placed first in the verse, followed by the imperative, ‘watch,’ e.g. ‘since you do not know when the owner of the house will come, whether in the evening, or at midnight, or at cockcrow, or in the early morning, therefore watch, lest he come suddenly and find you sleeping.’

Many languages have highly developed expressions for periods of the night, some of which rather closely parallel the series occurring in this verse. For example, the evening is ‘the sun lost’ (Tzotzil) and ‘the sitting together time’ (Mende). The period around midnight is ‘the stomach of the night’ (Uduk). A cockcrow is ‘when the owls make a noise,’ ‘when the cock screams’ (Piro), and ‘rooster-cry-time’ (Maninka). The period in the morning before sun-up may be described as ‘when the world begins to get white’ (Tzeltal), and ‘before the sky-opens-door’ (Maninka).

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Exegesis:

to triton ‘the third time’: an adverbial phrase modifying the verb erchetai ‘he comes.’

katheudete to loipon kai anapauesthe – How this sentence is to be taken is subject to wide differences of opinion. Most Greek texts punctuate it as a statement, either as a command (‘you are to sleep … and rest’) or as a simple statement (‘you are sleeping … and resting’); Kilpatrick, however, punctuates it as a question. Though the verb forms may be read as imperative or indicative, with a semi-colon following, and in the context, the Greek would normally be read as an imperative – and presumably that is what the majority of editors of the Greek text assume it to be. The words have been translated in three ways: (1) as a statement, indicating surprise, ‘You are still sleeping and resting!’ (Le Nouveau Testament. Version Synodale); (2) as a command, intended either seriously or ironically, ‘Sleep on now and rest’ (Vulgate; King James Version, American Standard Version, The Modern Speech New Testament; Zürcher Bibel, O Novo Testamento de Nosso Senhor Jesus Cristo. Revisdo Autorizada; Gould, Swete, Lagrange); (3) as a question, ‘Are you still sleeping and resting?’ (Revised Standard Version, Moffatt, Goodspeed, Berkeley, Manson, Translator’s New Testament, Williams; Rawlinson, Taylor). The context would seem to favor the third alternative. However, if we interpret this as a question, it must be admitted that to loipon, in this case, assumes a meaning it does not ordinarily have, since, as an adverbial phrase indicating time, it means ‘henceforth,’ ‘from now on,’ ‘for the future.’ Arndt & Gingrich suggest various interpretations, including the interrogative sense, which they state thus, ‘Do you intend to sleep on and on?’ or, possibly, ‘You are sleeping in the meantime?’ On the whole it would seem that the words should be taken as a question.

anapauō (cf. 6.31) ‘to rest.’

apechei. On this single word, used nowhere else in the New Testament in an absolute sense, as here, Vincent says, with some justification: “Expositors are utterly at sea as to its meaning.” The meaning ‘it is enough,’ favored by most translations and commentators, goes as far back as the Vulgate, which has sufficit. By most this is taken to refer to the sleeping and resting of the disciples: ‘enough of that!’ ‘no more of that!’ Lagrange, however, translates C’en est fait with reference to Jesus himself and his thrice-repeated prayer concerning his approaching Passion: ‘sleep, I am now ready.’ Montgomery seems to assume some such meaning by translating, ‘it is over.’

The form apechei is normally used of receipting bills, with the meaning ‘paid in full’ (cf. Moulton & Milligan). Following this meaning, J. de Zwaan (quoted by Rawlinson) suggested that the verb here has a personal sense and is to be referred to Judas, as the subject: ‘He did receive (the promised money).’ Thus Manson translates ‘the money has been paid!’ and E. K. Simpson paraphrases, ‘It is settled! The deed of infamy is done! He pockets his reward.’

Another translation has been suggested by G. H. Boobyer. He proposes the meaning ‘take possession of,’ and refers the verb to Judas, as the subject: ‘He is taking possession of (me)!’ Translator’s New Testament translates ‘Is he far away?’

Emendation, the last resource of the translator, has also been proposed. Black, following the variant reading (found in the sixth century uncial manuscript D) apechei to telos kai hē hōra, suggests that there was a mistranslation of the underlying Aramaic which meant, ‘The end and the hour are pressing.’ It should be noted that the Peshitto version of the Syriac has ‘the end has come’ (reading to telos as the subject of the verb and apparently translating the Greek ēggiken ‘has come’ rather than apechei). Otherwise it has been proposed that the original Marcan phrase was to telos apechei meaning, ‘the end is holding off,’ to be taken as a question: ‘The end is far away?’ (cf. Taylor).

Although these proposed variant readings and their emendations offer a reasonable explanation of what is otherwise quite an obscure saying (cf. Taylor, who inclines to accept either one of the proposed emendations), so long as the accepted text can be made to bear some intelligible meaning it should be followed and translated. In the present case it would seem best to go along with the majority.

ēlthen hē hōra (cf. v. 35) ‘the hour has come,’ ‘the hour is here.’

idou (cf. 1.2) ‘see’: should not be omitted (as in Revised Standard Version) here, even though repeated in the next verse.

paradidotai (cf. 1.14; cf. 9.31) ‘is delivered’: the ordinary meaning of the verb should be observed here, as in the identical phrase in 9.31. It is to be doubted that ‘deliver’ is to be understood in 9.31 and ‘betray’ here (as done by Revised Standard Version).

ho huios tou anthrōpou (cf. 2.10) ‘the Son of man.’

eis tas cheiras tōn hamartōlōn ‘into the hands of sinful men,’ ‘into the power of sinners’: hoi hamartōloi here presumably has the moral and theological connotation of ‘sinners’ who transgress God’s will, rather than the specialized sense in which it is used in 2.15f.

For similar statements concerning the Son of man cf. 9.31; 10.33.

Translation:

For the translation of came as ‘went back’ see verse 37.

Said may be in some languages better rendered as ‘asked,’ because of the following question.

The form of the question ‘Are you still sleeping and resting?’ should not imply that Jesus was actually asking for information. This is a rhetorical question implying a certain amount of surprise and irony. Hence, if in the receptor language special forms of questions are used for this type of expression, one should make certain that the appropriate equivalent is employed.

The problems involved in the translating of it is enough depend largely upon the exegesis. However, even then one will find that the closest equivalent is likely to be relatively idiomatic, e.g. ‘it is over,’ ‘it has happened,’ and ‘that is all.’

The hour has come is translatable as ‘the time has come’ or ‘now is the time.’

For the use of the Son of man as a third person reference in a first person relationship, see 2.10.

In many languages is betrayed must be translated as an immediate future, rather than present, e.g. ‘is going to be betrayed’ or ‘is about to be betrayed.’

The hands of sinners cannot be translated literally in many languages, since ‘hands’ do not always stand for ‘power’ or ‘control.’ The closest equivalent in some instances is ‘into the power of evil men’ or ‘under the authority of sinful men.’

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .