Translation commentary on Matthew 11:21

Many languages will begin the sentence with a marker of direct speech or the phrase “He said.”

Woe or “Alas” is the rendering of most translations. A few attempt something dynamic: “How terrible it will be” (Good News Translation), “Tragic will be your fate” (Barclay), and “It will go ill with you” (New American Bible). Elsewhere Matthew utilizes this interjection in 18.7 (twice); 23.13, 15, 16, 23, 25, 27, 29; 24.19; 26.24. Woe is almost the opposite of “Blessed” or “Happy” in 5.3 and following. It means things are going to be bad for those towns, that they will receive God’s punishment. Thus possible translations are “Terrible things are in store for you” or “How awful are the things that will happen to you.”

Often it will be more natural to put Chorazin and Bethsaida at the beginning of the sentence, as in “Chorazin, terrible things will happen to you. Bethsaida, terrible things will happen to you.” It may be more natural to address them together, as in “Chorazin and Bethsaida, how awful is the fate that awaits you.”

In those languages where it is not natural to address a town, then translators will say “You people of Chorazin, you people of Bethsaida, the troubles coming to you are terrible.”

The town of Chorazin is mentioned in the Bible only here and in Luke 10.13; it is located about two miles northwest of Capernaum.

Bethsaida (literally “house of fish”) is probably a reference to the town of Bethsaida Julias, on the east bank of the Jordan, north of Lake Galilee. There is no mention in Matthew’s Gospel of Jesus’ having performed any miracles there. Mark alone mentions the healing of a blind man in Bethsaida (Mark 8.22-26).

Mighty works is the same expression used in verse 20; see comments on 7.22. If the passives done in you and had been done are not natural, then translators can say “if I had done the miracles in Tyre and Sidon that I did in your towns, these people…” or “if it had been in Tyre and Sidon that I performed the mighty works instead of your town, those people….”

Tyre and Sidon were towns along the Phoenician coastline. Especially during Old Testament times these two towns were notorious for their evil, and Israel’s prophets spoke against them (see Isa 23; Ezek 26–28; Amos 1.9, 10; Joel 3.4; Zech 9.2-4). Some translators feel this implicit information is important, and say “those evil towns of Tyre and Sidon.”

Sackcloth and ashes were signs of repentance and sorrow (see Isa 58.5; Jonah 3.6; Dan 9.3). Sackcloth was a coarse cloth that can be translated simply as “rough cloth.” The significance of the act can then be indicated, too, as in “the rough cloth that shows they have turned from their sins.” The sackcloth was worn, but the ashes were sprinkled on the head. Sentences that will convey the meaning of the actions clearly are “they would have repented long ago and worn the coarse cloth and sprinkled ashes on their heads to show it” and “long ago they would have worn the coarse cloth and put ashes on their heads to show they were turning from their sins.” Some translations have dropped the actual actions and said simply “long ago they would have shown to all that they were turning from their sins.” However, translators should try to retain these cultural actions in the text, since they were a common aspect of biblical culture.

Quoted with permission from Newman, Barclay M. and Stine, Philip C. A Handbook on the Gospel of Matthew. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1988. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

SIL Translator’s Notes on Matthew 11:21

11:21–22

Verses 11:21–22 contain a figure of speech called apostrophe. In this figure of speech, Jesus spoke to the towns of Chorazin and Bethsaida as if they were persons.

Here are some other ways to translate this verse:

• Keep the apostrophe as in the Berean Standard Bible.

21aWoe to you, Chorazin! Woe to you, Bethsaida! 21bFor if the mighty works done in you had been done in Tyre and Sidon, 21cthey would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes.

• Translate it so that Jesus is speaking to the people of those towns. For example:

21aYou people of Chorazin are in for trouble! You people of Bethsaida are in for trouble too! 21bIf the miracles that took place in your towns had happened in Tyre and Sidon, 21cthe people there would have turned to God long ago.

11:21a

Woe to you: The Greek word that the Berean Standard Bible translates as Woe expresses a warning. It is a warning of God’s coming judgment and a call to people to change the way that they are living. Jesus knew that God would punish the people who lived in the town of Chorazin. They had seen Jesus do miracles, but most people did not believe in him.

Here are some other ways to translate this phrase:

How terrible it will be for you (Good News Translation)
-or-
Great trouble awaits you
-or-
It will be bad for you
-or-
God will punish you

Chorazin: The word Chorazin is the name of a town in the northern region of Galilee. (Notice that some English versions spell this word Korazin.) By naming the town, Jesus was speaking to the people of the town. These people were Jews. In some languages, it will be natural to make some of this information explicit. For example:

⌊people of⌋ Chorazin
-or-

⌊Jews who live in the town of⌋ Korazin

In some languages, it will be natural to put the town before the word “woe.” For example:

⌊People of⌋ Chorazin, woe to you!

Woe to you, Bethsaida!: The same words of woe are repeated for the Jewish town of Bethsaida. This is done to emphasize the woe to each of these two towns. If repeating the phrase Woe to you does not emphasize that phrase in your language, you may want to emphasize the phrase in another way. For example:

Chorazin and Bethsaida, you will certainly have trouble!

11:21b–c

For if the miracles that were performed in you had been performed in Tyre and Sidon, they would have repented long ago in sackcloth and ashes: This is a long sentence that begins with an if clause. It is further complicated because it contrasts two situations. The first situation is a real situation: Jesus did miracles in the Jewish towns of Chorazin and Bethsaida. It is implied that they did not repent. The second situation is a hypothetical situation: If Jesus had done those same miracles in the Gentile towns of Tyre and Sidon, the people there would have repented.

In some languages, it will be natural to divide this long sentence into several shorter sentences. For example:

I did miracles in your towns, ⌊but you did not repent⌋. If, ⌊for example,⌋ I had done these same miracles in the towns of Tyre and Sidon, they would have put on sackcloth and ashes ⌊to show that⌋ they had repented.
-or-
I did miracles in your towns, ⌊but you did not repent⌋. Suppose that I had done these same miracles in the towns of Tyre and Sidon. ⌊They are not Jews, but⌋ they would have repented long ago. ⌊They would have shown their repentance⌋ by putting on sackcloth and putting ashes ⌊on their heads⌋.

11:21b

For: Verses 11:21b–22 explain the reason why Jesus warned the towns of Chorazin and Bethsaida (in 11:21a). The Greek introduces this explanation with a conjunction that the Berean Standard Bible translates as For.

Here is another way to introduce this explanation:

⌊I say this⌋ because

Some English versions do not translate this conjunction. In some languages, it may not be necessary to translate this conjunction either.

if the miracles that were performed in you: The Greek word that the Berean Standard Bible translates as miracles can also be translated as “mighty works” (as in the English Standard Version). Here Jesus referred to the miracles that he has done in the Jewish towns of Chorazin and Bethsaida. It is implied that even though he did miracles there, the Jewish people in those towns did not repent.

Here are some other ways to translate this clause:

if the miracles I did in you (New Living Translation (2004))
-or-
If the miracles that took place in your towns (Contemporary English Version)
-or-
I did amazing deeds/acts in your towns, ⌊but you Jews did not repent⌋

had been performed in Tyre and Sidon: This part of the “if” clause is hypothetical. This means that it refers to something that did not happen. Jesus did not do miracles in the towns of Tyre and Sidon. But if he had done miracles there, the people there would have repented.

Here are some other ways to translate this clause:

had been done in Tyre and Sidon ⌊but they were not done⌋
-or-

⌊I did not do miracles⌋ in Tyre and Sidon. But if I had done miracles there
-or-
If, ⌊for example,⌋ I had done these same miracles in the towns of Tyre and Sidon

in Tyre and Sidon: Tyre and Sidon were two towns where Gentile (non-Jewish) people lived. God had punished them for their sins. This happened about 700 years before Jesus was born. The Jews knew about this situation from Isaiah 23. So the Jews considered them bad people. But Jesus showed the Jews that they were even worse sinners than the people of Tyre and Sidon.

If it is not clear to your readers that the comparison is between Jews and Gentiles, you may want to:

• Include some implied information in the text. For example:

in ⌊the non-Jewish towns of⌋ Tyre and Sidon
-or-
in ⌊the Gentile/foreign towns of⌋ Tyre and Sidon

• Include a footnote. For example:

Chorazin and Bethsaida were Jewish towns. Tyre and Sidon were Gentile towns. Jesus was showing that the Gentiles were more likely to repent and believe in him than the Jews were.

11:21c

they would have repented long ago: This clause is another part of the hypothetical statement. The Gentile people in the towns of Tyre and Sidon would have repented long ago if they had seen Jesus’ miracles. They would not have waited to repent. But Jesus did not do miracles there, and the people did not repent.

Here are some other ways to translate this clause:

they would have quickly repented
-or-
they would not have waited to turn from their sins

in sackcloth and ashes: This phrase indicates two ways that people at that time showed that they had repented. They wore an itchy cloth called sackcloth, and they put ashes on their heads.

The word sackcloth refers to a rough cloth made of animal hair and then made into clothing. Wearing such clothing was not comfortable because the cloth was scratchy. To add to their misery, people also either sat in ashes or they poured ashes on their heads.

Here are some other ways to translate this phrase:

• Explain in the text that sackcloth and ashes were ways of showing they had sincerely repented. For example:

They would have worn rough cloth and put ashes on themselves to show they had changed. (New Century Version)
-or-
put on sackcloth and sprinkled ashes on themselves, to show that they had turned from their sins! (Good News Translation)

• Explain this custom in a footnote. A sample footnote is:

The custom of those people at that time was to put on rough cloth and to sprinkle ashes on themselves. This showed that they had turned from their sins.

© 2023 by SIL International®
Made available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA) creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.
All Scripture quotations in this publication, unless otherwise indicated, are from The Holy Bible, Berean Standard Bible.
BSB is produced in cooperation with Bible Hub, Discovery Bible, OpenBible.com, and the Berean Bible Translation Committee.