Exegesis:
emblepsas (cf. 10.21) ‘looking at,’ ‘looking on.’
para anthrōpois … para theō ‘with men … with God’: para with the dative has, in this construction, the force of the dative – ‘for men … for God.’ The implied subject is touto ‘this’ (i.e. to sōzesthai ‘the being saved’).
adunaton (only here in Mark) ‘impossible.’
“All things are possible with God” is an O.T. phrase (Gen. 18.14; cf. Job 42.2; Zech. 8.6).
dunata (cf. 9.23) ‘possible.’
Translation:
With men it is impossible is a highly elliptical phrase, quite understandable, but quite difficult to reproduce in certain languages, where it is impossible to use an indefinite pronoun such as ‘it’ referring to a process of being saved and to employ ‘impossible’ without specifically stating what is impossible. Accordingly, one must translate in some instances ‘people cannot cause saving’ or ‘people cannot save themselves’ (in which case a reflexive may be necessary if an object of the verb ‘save’ is required). The following clause is then combined with the first as ‘but God can save them.’
In some languages a generic type of verb can be used, e.g. ‘men cannot do this, but God can do so,’ in which case ‘do’ is a type of substitute verb for ‘save,’ employed in the previous verse.
All things are possible with God must often be changed, as in the case of Tzeltal, to a direct active expression, e.g. ‘God can do anything’ (or ‘all things’).
Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.