Jesus

The Greek Iēsous is “only” a proper name but one with great importance. The following quote by John Ellington (in The Bible Translator 1993, p. 401ff. ) illustrates this:

“In Matthew’s account of the birth of Jesus Christ, Joseph is told that when Mary gives birth to a son ‘you will name him Jesus, because he will save his people from their sins’ (1:21). This name is a Greek transliteration of the Hebrew name [Yeshua (יֵשׁוּעַ) which is a short form of a name meaning] ‘the Lord [Yahweh] saves.’ The name is very significant and is in itself especially dear to Christians around the world. (…) Unquestionably great importance is attached to the name of Jesus by Christians of all persuasions and backgrounds.”

While Iēsous (pronounced: /i.ɛː.suːs/) is transliterated as “Jesus” (pronounced /ˈdʒiːzəs/) in English (but was translated as “Hælend” [the “healing one”] in Old English — see Swain 2019) it is transliterated and pronounced in a large variety of other ways as well, following the different rules of different languages’ orthographies, writing systems and rules of pronunciation. The following is a (partial) list of forms of Jesus in Latin characters: aYeso, Azezi, Boiyesuq, Cecoc, Chesús, Chi̍i̍sū, Chisɔsi, Ciisahs, Ciise, Ciisusu, Djesu, Ɛisa, Ƹisa, Eyesu, Gesù, Gesû, Gesü, Ġesù, Ghjesù, Giêsu, ꞌGiê‑ꞌsu, Giê-xu, Gyisɛse, Hesu, Hesús, Hisus, Hisuw, Ià-sŭ, Iesen, Ié:sos, Iesu, Iesui, Iesusɨn, Iesusiva, Ié:sos, Ihu, Īhu, Iisus, Iisussa, Ijeesu, iJisọsị, Iji̍sɔ̄ɔsi, Iosa, Íosa, Ìosa, İsa, I’sa, Isiso, Isõs, Ísu, Isus, Isusa, Iisussa, Isuthi, Itota, Îtu, Isuva, Izesu, Izesuq, Jasus, Jeeju, Jeesus, Jeesuse, Jeezas, Jehu, Jeisu, Jeju, Jejus, Jesesi, Jeshu, Jeso, Jesoe, Jesosa, Jesoshi, Jesosi, Jesosy, Jesu, Jesû, Jesua, Jesuh, Jesuhs, Jesuo, Jesús, Jésus, Jesúsu, Jethu, Jetsóó, Jezed, Jezi, Jézi, Ježiš, Jezu, Jezus, Jézus, Jėzus, Jēzus, Jezusi, Jėzus, Jezuz, Jiijajju, Jíísas, Jiisusi, Jiizas, Jíìzọ̀s, Jisas, Jisase, Jisasi, Jisasɨ, Jisaso, Jisesi, Jisɛ̀, Jisos, Jisọs, Jisɔs, Jisu, Jiszs, Jizọs, Jizɔs, Jizọsi, Jizọsu, Jòso, Jusu, Jweesus, Ketsutsi, Njises, ọYẹsọ, Sesi, Sisa, Sísa, Sisas, Sises, Sīsū, Sizi, Txesusu, uJesu, Ujísɔ̄si, ŵaYesu, Xesosi, ´Xesús, Xesús, Yasu, Ya:su, yasuɛ, Yasuuⓐ, Ɣaysa, Yecu, Yeeb Sub, Yeeh Suh, Yeesey, Yeeso, Yeesso, Yēēsu, Yehsu, Yëësu, Yeiqsul, Yeisu, Yeisuw, Yeshu, Yē shú, Yeso, Yéso, Yesò, Yëso, Yɛso, ye-su, Yésu, Yêsu, Yẹ́sụ̃, Yěsù, Yésʉs, Yeswa, Yet Sut, Yetut, Yexus, Yezo, Yezu, Yiesu, Yiisa, Yiisu, Yiitju, Yis, Yisɔs, Yisufa, Yitati, Yusu, ‑Yusu, :Yusu’, Zeezi, Zezi, Zezì, Zezuz, Zezwii, Ziizɛ, Zisas, Zîsɛ, Zjezus, Zozi, Zozii, and this (much more incomplete) list with other writings systems: ᔩᓱᓯ, ᒋᓴᔅ, Հիսուս, ᏥᏌ, ኢየሱስ, ያሱስ, ܝܫܘܥ, Ісус, Їисъ, 耶稣, იესო, ईसा, イエス, イイスス, イエスス, 예수, येशू, येशो, ਈਸਾ, ພຣະເຢຊູ, ජේසුස්, যীশু, ଯୀଶୁ, ཡེ་ཤུ་, ‘ঈছা, இயேசு, ಯೇಸು, ພຣະເຢຊູ, ယေရှု, ઇસુ, जेजू, येसु, เยซู, យេស៊ូ, ᱡᱤᱥᱩ, ယေသှု, యేసు, ᤕᤧᤛᤢ᤺ᤴ, އީސާގެފާނު, ਯਿਸੂ, ꕉꖷ ꔤꕢ ꕞ, ⵏ⵿ⵗⵢⵙⴰ, ଜୀସୁ, يَسُوعَ,ㄧㄝㄙㄨ, YE-SU, ꓬꓰ꓿ꓢꓴ, 𖽃𖽡𖾐𖼺𖽹𖾏𖼽𖽔𖾏, ꑳꌠ, ᠶᠡᠰᠦᠰ (note that some of these might not display correctly if your device does not have the correct fonts installed).

Click or tap here to read more.


In some languages the different confessions have selected different transliterations, such as in Belarusian with Isus (Ісус) by the Orthodox and Protestant churches and Yezus (Езус) by the Catholic church, Bulgarian with Iisus (Иисус) by the Orthodox and Isus (Исус) by the Protestant church, Japanese with Iesu (イエス) (Protestant and Catholic) and Iisusu (イイスス) (Orthodox), or Lingala with Yesu (Protestant) or Yezu (Catholic). These differences have come to the forefront especially during the work on interconfessional translations such as one in Lingala where “many hours were spent on a single letter difference” (source: Ellington, p. 401).

In Literary and Mandarin Chinese where transliterations of proper names between the Catholic and Protestant versions typically differ vastly, the Chinese name of Jesus (Yēsū 耶稣) remarkably was never brought into question between and by those two confessions, likely due to its ingenious choice. (Click or tap here to see more).

The proper name of God in the Old Testament, Yahweh (YHWH), is rendered in most Chinese Bible translations as Yēhéhuá 耶和華 — Jehovah. According to Chinese naming conventions, Yēhéhuá could be interpreted as Yē Héhuá, in which Yē would be the family name and Héhuá — “harmonic and radiant” — the given name. In the same manner, Yē 耶 would be the family name of Jesus and Sū 稣 would be his given name. Because in China the children inherit the family name from the father, the sonship of Jesus to God the Father, Jehovah, would be illustrated through this. Though this line of argumentation sounds theologically unsound, it is indeed used effectively in the Chinese church (see Wright 1953, p. 298).

Moreover, the “given name” of Sū 稣 carries the meaning ‘to revive, to rise again’ and seems to point to the resurrected Jesus. (Source: J. Zetzsche in Malek 2002, p. 141ff., see also tetragrammaton (YHWH))

There are different ways that Bible translators have chosen historically and today in how to translate the name of Jesus in predominantly Muslim areas: with a form of the Arabic Isa (عيسى) (which is used for “Jesus” in the Qur’an), the Greek Iēsous, or, like major 20th century Bible translations into Standard Arabic, the Aramaic Yēšūaʿ: Yasua (يَسُوعَ). (Click or tap here to see more.)

Following are languages and language groups that use a form of Isa include the following (note that this list is not complete):

  • Indo-Iranian languages: Persian, Dari, Central Pashto, Southern Pashto all use Eysa (عيسی or عيسىٰ for Southern Pashto), Sindhi uses Eysey (عيسيٰ), Southern Balochi Issa (ایسّا), Central Kurdish (Sorani) and Northern Kurdish (Kurmanji) use Îsa (عیسای and Иса respectively), Turkmen has Isa, and Tajik Isoi (Исои — compare Iso/Исо in the Tajik Qur’an)
  • Turkic languages: Turkish uses İsa, Kazakh, Kumyk, Nogai, Crimean Tatar all have Isa (Иса), Kirghiz has Iysa (Ыйса), Uzbek has Iso (Исо — compare Iiso/Ийсо in the Uzbek Qur’an), Bashkir uses Aaisa (Ғайса), North Azerbaijani İsa, Uighur uses Eysa (ئەيسا), and Kara-Kalpak İysa (Ийса)
  • Caucasian languages: Bezhta and Lezghian use Isa (Иса), Avaric has Aisa (ГІиса), and Chechen Iza (Иза)
  • Various African languages: Somali, a Cushitic language, has Ciise, Kabyle has Ɛisa and Tahaggart Tamahaq has Yeswa (both Berber languages), the Saharan languages Central Kanuri, Manga Kanuri have Isa, the Atlantic-Congo languages Dagbani, Mampruli, and Bimoba use Yisa, and the Chadian Arabic Bible has Isa (عِيسَى)
  • In Indonesian, while most Bible translations had already used Yesus Kristus rather than Isa al Masih, three public holidays used to be described using the term Isa Al Masih. From 2024 on the government is using Yesus Kristus in those holiday names instead (see this article in Christianity Today ).
  • Some languages have additional “TAZI” editions (TAZI stands for “Tawrat, Anbiya, Zabur, and Injil” the “Torah, Prophets, Psalms and Gospel”) of the New Testament that are geared towards Muslim readers where there is also a translation in the same language for non-Muslims. In those editions, Isa is typically used as well (for example, the Khmer TAZI edition uses Isa (អ៊ីសា) rather than the commonly used Yesaou (យេស៊ូ), the Thai edition uses Isa (อีซา) rather than Yesu (เยซู), the Chinese edition uses Ěrsā (尔撒) vs. Yēsū (耶稣), and the English edition also has Isa rather than Jesus.)

In German the name Jesus (pronounced: /ˈjeːzʊs/) is distinguished by its grammatical forms. Into the 20th century the grammatical rules prescribed a unique Greek-Latin declination: Jesus (nominative), Jesu (genitive, dative, vocative), Jesum (accusative), from which today only the genitive case “Jesu” is still in active use. Likewise, in Seediq (Taroko), the morphological treatment of “Jesus” also occupies a special category by not falling under the normal rule of experiencing a vowel reduction when the object-specific suffix an is added “since it was felt that the readers might resent that the name has been changed that drastically.” (Compare Msian for “Moses” (Mosi) as an object, but Yisuan for “Jesus” (Yisu).) (Source: Covell 1998. p. 249)

In Lamba the name ŵaYesu consists of a transliteration Yesu and the prefix ŵa, a plural form for “proper names when addressing and referring to persons in any position of seniority or honor.” While this was avoided in early translations to avoid possible misunderstandings of more than one Jesus, once the church was established it was felt that it was both “safe” and respectful to use the honorific (pl.) prefix. (Source C. M. Doke in The Bible Translator 1958, p. 57ff. )

In virtually all sign languages, “Jesus” is signed with the middle finger of each hand pointing to the palm (or wrist) of the other in succession (signing the nails of the cross). In the context of Bible translation this has been pointed out as theologically problematic since the “semantic connections of the original name Jesus do point towards ‘salvation,’ they do not naturally lead to crucifixion.” (Source: Phil King in Journal of Translation 1 (2020), p. 33ff.)


“Jesus” in German Sign Language (source )

Following is the oldest remaining Ethiopian Orthodox icon of Jesus from the 14th or possibly 13th century (found in the Church of the Saviour of the World in Gurji, Ethiopia). As in many Orthodox icons, Jesus’ right hand forms the Greek letters I-C-X-C for IHCOYC XPICTOC or “Jesus Christ.” Another interpretation of the right hand is that it shows three fingers pointing to the Trinity, while the two other fingers point to Jesus’ two natures.

source (c) Jacques Mercier and Alain Mathieu

Orthodox icons are not drawings or creations of imagination. They are in fact writings of things not of this world. Icons can represent our Lord Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary, and the Saints. They can also represent the Holy Trinity, Angels, the Heavenly hosts, and even events. Orthodox icons, unlike Western pictures, change the perspective and form of the image so that it is not naturalistic. This is done so that we can look beyond appearances of the world, and instead look to the spiritual truth of the holy person or event. (Source )

The following is the so-called “Wales Window for Alabama.” It is a stained-glass window by the artist John Petts from Carmarthenshire, Wales, created in response to the 16th Street Baptist Church bombing which took place in 1963:

Stained glass is not just highly decorative, it’s a medium which has been used to express important religious messages for centuries. Literacy was not widespread in the medieval and Renaissance periods and the Church used stained glass and other artworks to teach the central beliefs of Christianity. In Gothic churches, the windows were filled with extensive narrative scenes in stained glass — like huge and colorful picture storybooks — in which worshipers could ‘read’ the stories of Christ and the saints and learn what was required for their religious salvation. (Source: Victoria and Albert Museum )

The style of the following drawing of Jesus by Annie Vallotton is described by the artist as this: “By using few lines the readers fill in the outlines with their imagination and freedom. That is when the drawings begin to communicate.” (see here ; see also We All are One in Christ)

Illustration by Annie Vallotton, copyright by Donald and Patricia Griggs of Griggs Educational Service.

Other visual representation of Jesus in TIPs include several non-Western styles of art: traditional Korean art, traditional Chinese art, modern Chinese abstract art, northern and central Thailand’s popular art, Indian Hamzanama style, traditional Vietnamese art, or Japanese prints.

See also this devotion on YouVersion .

Translation commentary on John 18:36

Jesus does not give a direct answer to Pilate’s question, What have you done? Rather, he describes the nature of his kingdom; though he is a king, his kingdom does not belong to this world (so also New English Bible, New American Bible, Barclay; Moffatt “My realm does not belong to this world”). Jesus’ statement is literally “my kingdom is not of this world” (see Jerusalem Bible “Mine is not a kingdom of this world”). Goodspeed translates “My kingdom is not a kingdom of this world”; the Living Bible has “I am not an earthly king.” Jesus is not denying that his kingdom exercises authority in this world; rather, he is affirming that the origin and nature of his kingly authority are not the same as those of the kings of this world. His authority is not of human origin, and the nature of his rule is different from that exercised by the rulers of this world. One may translate the whole of Jesus’ response: “My kingly authority does not have its origin in this world. If it did, my followers would fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jews. No, my authority is not like that of earthly kings” (or “… No, my kingly authority does not have its origin in this world”). One may also translate: “I am not an earthly king. If I were, my followers would fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jews. No, my kingly authority does not have its origin in this world.” On the other hand, it may be very difficult to speak of “kingly authority” or “having its origin in this world.” The closest equivalent in some languages may be “I am not like the kings who rule here in this world.” The rest of Jesus’ statement may then be rendered “If I were like kings who rule in this world, then my followers would fight in order not to have me handed over to the Jewish authorities.” Jesus’ final statement, No, my kingdom does not belong here! may then be rendered “No, I am not like those kings who rule here on earth.”

No translates “but now” of the Greek text, the same expression used in 8.40; 9.41; 15.22. Its force is to contrast the real situation with that presupposed by Pilate.

Quoted with permission from Newman, Barclay M. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of John. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1980. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

SIL Translator’s Notes on John 18:36

Paragraph 18:36–38a

Jesus explained that he was not a king of an earthly kingdom.

18:36a

Jesus answered: In some languages it is more natural to say explicitly whom Jesus answered. For example:

Jesus answered Pilate

My kingdom is not of this world: This sentence indicates that Jesus agreed that he was a king but denied that he had an earthly, worldly kingdom. The phrase not of this world indicates that the source or origin of Jesus’ kingdom was not this world. He implied that his kingdom was spiritual, and that it came from God in heaven. It does not mean that his kingdom was not present or active in this world. Here are other ways to translate this sentence:

My kingdom does not belong to this world. (Good News Translation)
-or-
My Kingdom is not an earthly kingdom. (New Living Translation (2004))

My kingdom: This phrase here refers to Jesus’ ruling as king rather than to the territory over which he ruled. Translate using an expression referring to the right/authority to rule, rather than to land. For example:

My rule
-or-
My ruling as king
-or-
My authority to rule as king

this world: This phrase here refers to the powers and authorities of this world system. Jesus’ authority to rule does not come from the political or military system of this world. God is the one who gives Jesus the right to rule.

18:36b–c

if it were, My servants would fight to prevent My arrest by the Jews: In these clauses Jesus denied that his kingdom was from this world by saying that a necessary result had not happened. He knew, and Pilate knew, that his followers were not fighting. They had not resisted Jesus’ arrest in the garden. That proved that Jesus was not an earthly king. He did not have to protect himself.

Jesus’ followers would be fighting if his kingdom was from this world. So because his followers were not fighting, Jesus’ kingdom was not from this world. This kind of logic may not be natural or common in some languages. It may be more natural to use true-to-fact statements. See the General Comment on 18:36a–c.

18:36b

if it were: This clause proposes a condition that was not fulfilled. It suggests a situation that is not true. Jesus’ kingdom is not from this world.

Refer back to Jesus’ statement in 18:36a in a way that is natural in your language. For example:

If it were from this world
-or-
If it belonged to this world (New Century Version)
-or-
If it did (Contemporary English Version)
-or-
If I were like kings who rule in this world (TH)

18:36c

My servants would fight to prevent My arrest by the Jews: This clause tells the necessary result of the condition given in 18:36b. Because 18:36b was not fulfilled, this result did not happen. Jesus’ followers (or servants—see below) had not fought and were not fighting to protect him. In some languages this may need to be made explicit. For example:

my servants would fight…⌊but they do not⌋

My servants: The Greek word that the Berean Standard Bible translates literally as servants is also used in 18:3 to refer to the temple guards. There are two ways to interpret the word servants here:

(1) It means “servants” and refers to the servants that a worldly king might have. Those servants could be the more than 12 legions (many thousands) of angels that Jesus could command (see Matthew 26:53). For example:

my servants (New International Version)

(Berean Standard Bible, New International Version, NET Bible, Revised Standard Version, New American Standard Bible, English Standard Version, King James Version, New Century Version)

(2) It means “followers” and refers to Jesus’ disciples, either just his closest disciples or all his followers. For example:

my followers (Good News Translation)

(New Revised Standard Version, Good News Translation, Contemporary English Version, New Living Translation (2004), Revised English Bible, God’s Word)

The New Jerusalem Bible translates this phrase as “my men,” which could follow either interpretation. It is recommended that you follow interpretation (1) because it is the usual meaning of the Greek word.

would fight to prevent My arrest by the Jews: The tense of the verb would fight is ambiguous. It could refer to the present time (they would be fighting now) or the past (they would have fought). This seems to be a general statement. Jesus’ followers would have fought to protect him at some time. It is recommended that you translate this phrase in a general way.

If you cannot translate the verb in a general or ambiguous way, it is recommended that you use past tense. That would then refer back to Jesus’ arrest in the garden. For example:

my servants would have fought to keep me from being given over to the Jewish leaders (New Century Version)

to prevent My arrest: The Greek phrase that the Berean Standard Bible translates as to prevent My arrest is more literally “so that I would not be handed over.” A worldly king would have servants that would fight anyone trying to arrest the king. (Peter fought a little, but Jesus did not accept his help.) Consider how it is natural to indicate action done to prevent others from doing something. For example:

so that I would not be given over to the Jews (New Century Version)
-or-
that I might not be delivered over to the Jews (English Standard Version)
-or-
to prevent my being handed over to the Jews (Phillips’ New Testament in Modern English)

My arrest: The Greek verb that the Berean Standard Bible translates as My arrest is more literally “being handed over.” It refers to enabling the Jewish authorities to arrest Jesus. It is part of a general statement, though it could refer to Judas leading the authorities to arrest Jesus. See how you translated this verb in the active form in 18:35. Here the verb is passive. There are several ways to translate this verb:

• Use a passive verb. For example:

be delivered over to the Jews (English Standard Version)

• Use an active verb. Judas was the one who handed Jesus over, but it is the Jewish authorities who are in focus here. For example:

so that the Jewish authorities could/would not arrest me

• Use a noun. For example:

to prevent my arrest by the Jews (New International Version)

Translate this verb in the way that is most natural in your language in this context.

by the Jews: The phrase the Jews here refers to the leaders of the Jewish people. For example:

the Jewish leaders (New Living Translation (2004))
-or-
the Jewish authorities (Good News Translation)
-or-
our leaders (Contemporary English Version)

General Comment on 18:36a–c

In some languages it may be natural to translate 18:36a–c without using a condition that was not fulfilled. For example:

My kingdom is not a worldly kingdom. That is the reason why my servants did not fight to keep me from being handed over to the Jewish authorities.
-or-
My kingdom is not of this world. That is why my servants did not fight to prevent my arrest by the Jews.

18:36d

But now My kingdom is not of this realm: This clause repeats Jesus’ statement that his right to rule did not come from this world. He implied that his kingdom, his right to rule, was from God.

But now: The Greek phrase that the Berean Standard Bible translates literally as But now here introduces a contrast between the real situation and the one Pilate was thinking of. See how you translated the same phrase in 8:40. For example:

But (English Standard Version)
-or-
No (Good News Translation)

My kingdom: Translate this phrase the same way here and in 18:36a so that the connection is clear.

is not of this realm: This phrase indicates that Jesus’ authority is not from this world. Jesus implied that he received his authority to rule from God. Here are other ways to translate this phrase:

doesn’t have its origin on earth (God’s Word)
-or-
doesn’t belong to this world (Contemporary English Version)

© 2020 by SIL International®
Made available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA) creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.
All Scripture quotations in this publication, unless otherwise indicated, are from The Holy Bible, Berean Standard Bible.
BSB is produced in cooperation with Bible Hub, Discovery Bible, OpenBible.com, and the Berean Bible Translation Committee.