The word slaves is the same word rendered servants in verse 18. Since the same category of persons is referred to it is better to translate the same in each instance,
Spoke up is literally “says”; New English Bible and New American Bible translate “insisted.”
The first part of this verse is rather complicated, for the phrase a relative of the man whose ear Peter had cut off is in apposition with one of the High Priest’s slaves. However, the appositional phrase involves a complex relative clause whose ear Peter had cut off. It may be necessary to restructure as follows: “One of the High Priest’s slaves was there. He was related to the man whose ear Peter had cut off. This man spoke up. He asked Peter….”
The third question (Didn’t I see you with him in the garden?) expects an affirmative answer. One may employ such a form as “I saw you in the garden with Jesus, didn’t I?” It may be necessary to use the name “Jesus,” rather than the pronoun “him,” in order to avoid a possible misinterpretation of the antecedent of the pronoun, for in some languages the pronoun could refer to the man whose ear Peter had cut off.
Quoted with permission from Newman, Barclay M. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of John. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1980. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.