Translation commentary on Mark 3:14 – 3:15

Text:

After dōdeka ‘twelve’ Westcott and Hort add hous kai apostolous ōnomasen ‘whom he also called apostles’: the great majority of the modern editions of the Greek text reject this clause (cf. Swete’s arguments, however, for its inclusion).

Verse 15. After exousian ‘authority’ Textus Receptus adds therapeuein tas nosous kai ‘to heal the sicknesses and’: this reading is rejected by all modern editions of the Greek text.

Exegesis:

epoiēsen dōdeka ‘he appointed twelve’: for this use of poieō ‘do,’ ‘make,’ cf. (in the Septuagint) Ex. 18.25, 36.1. and in the N.T. Heb. 3.2. The influence of the Septuagint is seen in this use of the verb (cf. Rawlinson, Lagrange).

The two hina ‘in order that’ clauses indicate purpose and are coordinate: ‘that they be with him and that he send them’ are the two purposes for which Jesus appointed the twelve men.

hina apostellē autous ‘that he should send them out’: it is better to translate the verb as an active form, with Jesus as subject, than to translate it by a passive (as does Revised Standard Version) ‘to be sent out.’

apostellō (cf. 1.2) ‘send out’: from this verb the noun apostolos (6.30) ‘apostle’ is formed (cf. 6.7 for the ‘sending out’).

kērussein kai echein exousian ‘to preach and to have authority’: the two infinitives ‘to preach’ and ‘to have authority’ are coordinate, and are both the object of apostellō ‘send out.’ A translation should preserve this construction if possible rather than make the second infinitive a subordinate clause (as does Translator’s New Testament).

kērussō (cf. 1.4) ‘proclaim,’ ‘announce,’ ‘preach.’

echein exousian (cf. 1.22) ‘to have authority.’

ekballein ta daimonia (cf. 1.34) ‘to cast out the demons’: this infinitive clause is the object of echein exousian ‘to have authority.’

Translation:

Appointed is not always an easy term to translate. In general the cultural background which may provide an adequate equivalent is to be found in many societies in the practice of (1) medicine men who appoint associates or (2) chiefs or kings who designate certain men to offices of responsibility. When this is done the process is often described in more concrete terms, e.g. ‘gave them jobs to do,’ ‘gave then important names,’ or ‘chose them for tasks.’ Such expressions can generally be adapted to this type of context. Cf. Toraja-Sa’dan ‘he exalted (the status of) twelve people’; Pamona and Indonesian ‘he appointed twelve people for good.’

Twelve must usually have some added noun, e.g. ‘twelve men,’ ‘twelve persons,’ or even ‘twelve followers.’ Most languages require some type of classifier with a numeral such as ‘twelve.’

If the full meaning of to be with him is to be understood it must often be elaborated in one of two directions: (1) by some verbal mode or aspect which would indicate that the apostles were to remain with him in some more permanent relationship than the crowds which followed, or (2) by related lexical elements, e.g. ‘to remain with him,’ ‘to be associated with him,’ or ‘to be with him more constantly.’ Note, however, that their appointment was for a double purpose – not only association, but commission to go out. The words used at this point should not be contradictory. On the other hand, their close association with the Master was to precede their being sent out on their own.

For preach see 1.4.

For authority see 2.10, but note that the important aspect of the word exousia ‘authority’ is that of delegated power. Accordingly, in this passage ‘to receive power (or strength) to cast out’ would be quite satisfactory.

For cast out, in speaking of demons, see 1.34.

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Translation commentary on Mark 4:22 – 4:23

Text:

ti ‘anything’ in v. 22 is omitted by Westcott and Hort, Lagrange, and Taylor, but retained by Textus Receptus and the great majority of modern editions of the Greek text.

Exegesis:

The two parallel clauses, in Semitic style, both state the same truth: ‘if something is hidden, it is in order that it (eventually) be manifested; if something is covered up, it is in order that it (eventually) be brought out into the open.’

krupton (only here in Mark) ‘hidden.’

phanerōthē (16.12, 14) ‘that it be revealed,’ ‘that it be manifested.’

apokruphon (only here in Mark) ‘covered up,’ ‘secret.’

elthē eis phaneron (cf. 3.12) ‘that it come into the open,’ ‘that it become known.’

For v. 23 see 4.9.

Translation:

It is often quite difficult to treat the double negatives in verse 22, literally ‘nothing … if not.’ In some languages such a construction must be rendered by positives (e.g. Cashibo-Cacataibo and Guerrero Amuzgo) ‘everything that is hidden is that way in order that it may be made to be seen.’

In the word ‘hid’ there is no implication that such objects were purposely hidden. The Greek does not imply in this first instance any process, only a state of being. On the other hand, in the second form of essentially this same concept (typical of Hebrew parallelism) the Greek verb egeneto may imply that something ‘has become hidden,’ e.g. ‘if there is anything that has become hidden, it is that way in order that it will be put out in the light’ or ‘everything that has become hidden….’ On the other hand, egeneto may be only a stylistic variant of the previous estin.

For verse 23, see 4.9.

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Translation commentary on Mark 5:28 – 5:29

Exegesis:

elegen gar ‘for she said’: not aloud, but to herself (cf. Mt. 9.21). Verse 28 is parenthetical, being added to show why the woman did what she did.

ean apsōmai kan tōn himatiōn autou ‘if I get to touch at least his clothes.’

kan (the contraction of kai ean ‘and if’) (6.56; 16.18) ‘if only,’ ‘at least,’ ‘just’: modifies ‘his clothes,’ not ‘if I touch.’

sōthēsomai (cf. v. 23) ‘I shall be made well,’ ‘I shall be healed.’

exēranthē (cf. 3.1) ‘it became dry,’ i.e. ‘ceased,’ ‘stopped.’

pēgē (only here in Mark) ‘spring,’ ‘fountain.’

kai egnō tō sōmati hoti iatai ‘and she knew in her body that she has been healed’: notice the distinction between the aorist egnō ‘she knew’ and the perfect iatai ‘she has been healed.’

iaomai (only here in Mark) ‘heal’: in the passive ‘to be healed.’

mastigos (cf. 3.10) ‘of (her) affliction,’ ‘suffering.’

Translation:

It may be necessary to specify the manner in which the woman spoke about her intention expressed in verse 27, for languages may distinguish between ‘speaking to people’ and ‘speaking to oneself.’ Obviously, the woman speaks to herself (see above), for she was trying to remain unnoticed by the crowd.

The same Greek verb (here sōthēsomai) may mean ‘to be saved’ and ‘to be healed.’ It is rarely possible to combine these two ideas in any single word in a receptor language (though this does happen to be the case in Tzeltal). In this context the meaning must obviously be related to the healing process.

Some languages have a number of verbs meaning ‘touch,’ depending upon the degree of contact and the manner in which it is done. Here the contact was no doubt with the fingers and as slight as possible, for fear of detection.

The hemorrhage ceased is expressed in various ways, e.g. ‘her disease sat down’ (Tabasco Chontal), ‘she became well,’ and ‘she no longer suffered.’

Was healed is a passive construction, which may be changed to an active one ‘that Jesus had healed her’ (where active expressions containing agents are required) or which may be shifted to one expressing state of being ‘was well,’ ‘no longer had the disease,’ or ‘the sickness had left her.’

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Translation commentary on Mark 6:25

Exegesis:

meta spoudēs (only here in Mark) ‘with haste,’ ‘in a hurry’; perhaps ‘eagerly’ (Lagrange).

ētēsato legousa ‘she requested, saying’: it is not necessary, however, in English, to translate both verbs (as does Revised Standard Version); simply ‘she requested.’

thelō hina ‘I want that’: as in 5.23 the force of the phrase here is probably imperatival; thelō hina … dōs moi ‘Give me’ (it may be that thelō hina is equivalent, as in later Greek, to ‘please’).

exautēs (only here in Mark) ‘at once,’ ‘immediately’ (the whole phrase is ex autēs tēs hōras ‘this very hour’).

pinaki (6.28) ‘platter,’ ‘dish.’

Iōannou tou baptistou (8.28) ‘of John the Baptist’ (cf. ho baptizōn ‘the Baptizer’ in 1.4).

Translation:

Immediately with haste reflects a double expression in the Greek text. The idea is that the girl not only returned very soon, but she was obviously hurrying to deliver her request.

The closest equivalent of platter is often ‘serving tray,’ whether consisting of earthenware, wood or basketry. It must be a sufficiently large object, so as to hold a human head, but not one in which the head would be hidden from view, as in the case of a basket. Evidently, Herodias was eager that her triumph might be clearly witnessed by all who were present.

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Translation commentary on Mark 7:8

Text:

At the end of the verse Textus Receptus, Soden, Vogels, and Merk (in parentheses) add, baptismous xestōn kai poteriōn, kai alla paromoia toiauta polla poieite ‘washings of pots and cups, and many other such like things you do’: the majority of modern editions of the Greek text omit these words.

Exegesis:

aphentes tēn entolēn tou theou ‘leaving the commandment of God.’

aphiēmi (cf. 2.5) ‘abandon,’ ‘forsake,’ ‘leave.’

entolē (7.9; 10.5, 19; 12.28, 31) ‘commandment’: the singular ‘the commandment of God’ here represents all the commandments, ‘the Law of God.’

krateite tēn paradosin tōn anthrōpōn ‘you hold on to the tradition of men.’

krateō (cf. 1.31) ‘hold to,’ ‘keep,’ ‘observe.’

paradosis (cf. 7.3) ‘tradition.’

Translation:

Without some break at the beginning of this verse, it is quite possible for people to think that these words are likewise from the book of Isaiah. Accordingly, the use of indentation, quotation marks, or special particles or forms to mark such quotations should be employed (e.g. in some languages the limits of quotations are specially marked by some form of the verb, ‘says he,’ e.g.: ‘he says … says he’). Some translations have even introduced ‘Jesus said,’ at the beginning of this verse in order to make the transition clear (e.g. Loma (Liberia)).

Commandment of God may be ‘what God commanded’ or ‘the orders which God spoke.’

Leave the commandment cannot be translated in some instances simply as ‘to abandon,’ but rather ‘to no longer do’ or even ‘to refuse to do.’

Hold fast may be rendered as ‘you are very careful to do’ or ‘you do not fail to do.’

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Translation commentary on Mark 8:6

Exegesis:

Most of the words in this verse have already been dealt with: paraggellei ‘he commands,’ 6.8; anapesein ‘to recline,’ ‘to sit down,’ 6.40; labōn ‘taking,’ 6.41; paratithōsin ‘they may place,’ ‘they may set before,’ 6.41.

eucharistēsas (14.23; cf. eulogeō 6.41) ‘giving thanks (to God).’

eklasen (8.19; 14.22; cf. kataklaō 6.41) ‘he broke.’

Translation:

Commanded the crowd to sit … may be shifted to the direct form as ‘commanded the crowd, Sit down….’

In a number of languages ‘to give thanks’ requires an object. Accordingly, one may translate ‘he gave thanks to God’ or ‘he said to God, Thanks’ (Chicahuaxtla Triqui, Tzeltal).

For broke and gave to the disciples to set before see 6.41.

As in all instances of intra-Gospel parallels, one should attempt to reproduce the identical wording of the Greek text with substantially similar renderings in receptor languages. This may not always be completely possible, for certain minor shifts in wording in the Greek text may call for accompanying adaptations in receptor languages, and hence there cannot be any one-to-one system of exact correspondence. Nevertheless, the degree to which parallelism can be reproduced, whether within a single book or between books, should be a constant concern of the translator. On the other hand, it is not wise to refer to a portion already translated and to take over the wording without examination, for such arbitrary lifting of material out of context may result in very artificial transitions and syntactic relationships, especially in matters of tense sequence, conjunctions, pronominal reference, and aspects of the verb.

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Translation commentary on Mark 9:1

Exegesis:

amēn (cf. 3.28) ‘truly,’ ‘solemnly.’

hoti ‘that’ is recitative, introducing direct speech.

eisin tines hōde tōn hestēkotōn ‘there are some of those standing here,’ ‘some of those here present.’

hōde (cf. 8.4) ‘here.’

hoi hestēkotes ‘those who are standing’: the verb histēmi ‘stand’ is used here in the sense of ‘being’ or ‘existing’ rather than the strictly physical sense of ‘standing’ (Lagrange ‘some of those present’; O Novo Testamento de Nosso Senhor Jesus Cristo. Revisdo Autorizada ‘some of those who are here’).

hoitines ou mē geusōntai thanatou ‘who certainly will not taste death,’ ‘who will by no means die’: the double negative is emphatic, and the statement is a forceful way of saying ‘who certainly will be alive.’

ou mē (9.41; 10.15; 13.2, 19, 30; 14.25, 31; 16.18) ‘not’: an emphatic way of making a negative statement.

geuomai (only here in Mark) ‘taste’: in a figurative sense, as here, ‘experience,’ ‘come to know.’

heōs an idōsin ‘until they see’: the meaning is not that they will die as soon as they see the Kingdom of God come with power; the emphasis is on the fact that during their lifetime they will see the Kingdom come with power.

heōs an (cf. 6.10) ‘until.’

eidein ‘see’: the word should be translated literally, rather than in a figurative manner, e.g. ‘perceive,’ ‘become aware of,’ ‘experience.’ The aorist subjunctive should be simply rendered ‘see’ rather than ‘have seen,’ as some translations have it.

tēn basileian tou theou elēluthuian en dunamei ‘the Kingdom of God having come with power’: the perfect passive participle elēluthuian ‘having come’ functions as an adjective (in the predicate position) which makes an additional statement concerning the Kingdom. It is not, simply, that in their lifetime they will see the Kingdom of God: it is that they will see the Kingdom present (‘having come’) in power. This ‘having come,’ therefore, lies in the future just as much as heōs an idōsin ‘until they see’: it is said that they will see (in the future, within their lifetime) the Kingdom having arrived – which ‘arrival’ is also future in relation to the time of the prediction. A translation should attempt accurately to convey the meaning of the Greek, which is reasonably clear and precise.

(On the interpretation of the passage, see the commentaries in loc.).

hē basileia tou theou (cf. 1.15) ‘the Reign of God’: here spoken of as an ‘event’ (however interpreted), visible in its coming.

elēluthuia ‘having come’: regardless of the interpretation of the verse, the force of the perfect participle should be observed. In Revised Standard Version ‘before they see the kingdom of God come,’ the ‘come’ is ambiguous: it may mean ‘having come,’ but may also mean ‘coming.’

Translation:

Them should refer to the same group as is identified in 8.34, ‘the crowd as well as the disciples.’

For this use of truly, with double type of attribution, see 8.12.

Some standing here, as an expression equivalent to ‘now living,’ may actually be translated in certain languages as ‘some sitting here,’ for ‘sitting’ is in a number of languages of Africa, for example, the verb which by extension also means ‘to live’ or ‘to exist.’

A literal translation of taste death has been understood in some languages to mean ‘partake of a cannibalistic meal.’ The meaning is, of course, ‘to die,’ though in some languages the negative is shifted to the subject constituent rather than to the verb, e.g. ‘not all those here are going to die until they see…’ (Copainalá Zoque). This shift is designed to avoid the tendency to interpret the ‘until’ clause as designating the point at which such persons are to die. In some languages, one can preserve something of the force of the idiom ‘taste death’ by using a parallel ‘feel death’ (Tabasco Chontal), ‘see death’ (Navajo; cf. also Toraja-Sa’dan), and ‘suffer death’ (Highland Puebla Nahuatl).

In some languages the expression ‘see the kingdom’ is impossible, because ‘kingdom’ actually identifies a process of ‘rule’ or ‘ruling’ (see kingdom, 1.15 and 4.11). However, one can often speak of ‘see God ruling,’ which would be the closest equivalent to see the kingdom of God. In other instances one may be able to translate as ‘see that God has now begun to rule with power,’ though this is not a very close approximate.

Power is generally rendered in this context as ‘great authority’ (Tzeltal), or ‘strength to command,’ rather than merely ‘power’ or ‘might,’ if these terms refer primarily to physical prowess or dominance.

It must be recognized that part of the difficulty of translating this verse is the fact that scholars are so divided as to what it actually means. In all fairness to the Scriptures it is best to avoid taking any overly decisive position, or the results may do violence, either to the prediction of Jesus or to the subsequent events of history.

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Translation commentary on Mark 9:33

Text:

Instead of ēlthon ‘they came’ of the majority of modern editions of the Greek text, Textus Receptus and Soden have ēlthen ‘he came.’

Before dielogizesthe ‘you were discussing’ Textus Receptus adds pros heautous ‘among yourselves’; Kilpatrick adds pros heautous after dielogizesthe; all other modern editions of the Greek text omit the two words.

Exegesis:

en tē oikia ‘in the house’: perhaps Peter’s house, which, it would seem, had become Jesus’ “home” in Galilee.

dielogizesthe (cf. 2.6) ‘you were discussing,’ ‘debating (with one another).’

Translation:

Came must often be changed to ‘arrived at,’ because of the problem of narrative perspective. However, in some languages, e.g. Yatzachi Zapotec, there are two words for ‘arriving’; one is used when one arrives at a destination other than one’s home and another when the point of arrival is at home (although in Yatzachi Zapotec there is an additional complication in that in this particular passage the point of arrival must also be related to the home of the narrator). In this passage Jesus was evidently arriving at his “home.”

On the way must be rendered in some languages by an expression containing a verb, ‘as you walked along the path’ (or ‘along the road’), since on the way implies a process of journeying, not simply a position.

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .