Exegesis:
elegen de tautēn tēn parabolēn ‘and he told this (i.e. the following) parable.’ The parable states that, unless the repentance to which vv. 3 and 5 call comes shortly, it will be too late. For parabolē cf. on 4.23.
sukēn eichen tis pephuteumenēn lit. ‘a certain man had a fig tree planted,’ or “had a fig tree growing” (An American Translation). sukēn (also 21.29) is emphatic by position. The past participle pephuteumenēn going with sukēn refers to a prevailing situation, not to an act or event of the past.
en tō ampelōni autou ‘in his vineyard.’
ampelōn ‘vineyard,’ in Palestine not exclusively a plantation of grape vines, but including also other kinds of fruit-trees, cf. Strack-Billerbeck I, 873.
kai ēlthen zētōn karpon en autē ‘and he came seeking fruit on it,’ i.e. ‘he came and sought,’ rather than ‘he came to seek.’ The participle zētōn denotes the main act and the verb ēlthen leads up to the main act.
kai ouch heuren ‘and he found none,’ lit. ‘and he did not find (any).’
Translation:
Parable, see 8.4.
A man had a fig tree planted in his vineyard, or, to show that the tree is in focus, ‘there was a fig tree, which stood planted (or, was growing) in someone’s vineyard, or, which someone had growing in his vineyard’; in some cases it is better to render the relative clause as a co-ordinate sentence. With a further shift one may say, ‘there was a fig tree that stood planted in a vineyard. Once its owner came….’ In some languages the reference to being planted is better omitted; hence, ‘there-was(-standing)’ (Malay, similarly in Shona 1966, Toraja-Sa’dan). For fig tree see 6.44. The term chosen should refer to a tree with edible fruits, which is taken care of in some manner or other. For vineyard see 20.9. In this context, however, it is acceptable to use a more generic term, e.g. ‘garden,’ ‘field,’ since the specific concept ‘vine(yard)’ plays no role in what follows.
He came seeking fruit on it, or, ‘for its fruit,’ ‘for fruit(s) on the/his tree’; or, ‘he came and looked whether there was fruit on it, or, whether it had (or, had borne) fruit.’ For the generic fruit one may substitute the specific, i.e. the name of the fruit of the tree in question.
Found none. For the verb see 2.12.
Quoted with permission from Reiling, J. and Swellengrebel, J.L. A Handbook on the Gospel of Luke. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1971. For this and other handbooks for translators see here . Make sure to also consult the Handbook on the Gospel of Mark for parallel or similar verses.

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.