This miracle is literally “sign,” the same word used frequently throughout John’s Gospel; its first occurrence is in 2.11. Some ancient manuscripts have the plural “signs” in this verse, but apparently no modern translator follows this text. The plural seems to have come in under the influence of 2.23 and 6.2.
Rather than a participial clause seeing this miracle that Jesus had performed, one may prefer a clause expressing cause, for example, “Because the people saw this miracle that Jesus had performed, they said.” It may also indicate a temporal relation, for example, “after the people had seen this miracle that Jesus performed they said.”
People translates the same Greek word translated people in verse 10. It means “men” in the generic sense, that is, it is not restricted to male persons.
The Prophet has already been mentioned as one of the expected messianic figures (1.21). Here he is further referred to as the one who was to come into the world, the prophet spoken of by Moses (Deut 18.15, 18).
It is not easy to render accurately the Prophet who was to come into the world. The past tense of the verb (was) suggests a prior event, while the infinitive to come suggests a coming event. It may be necessary to make specific the relation between these two events by saying “the Prophet who Moses said would come into the world” or “the Prophet about whom it says in the Scriptures, ‘He will come into the world’ ” or “the Prophet who, the Scriptures said, will come into the world.”
Quoted with permission from Newman, Barclay M. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of John. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1980. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.