It was customary to remove the clothing from a condemned man before he was crucified, and according to Roman law his clothes became the property of the executioners. The word translated clothes is the same word used in 13.4 (Good News Translation outer garment). Here the reference is clearly to all clothes that Jesus was wearing.
Although we cannot be sure that the four parts consisted of four individual items of clothing, it may be necessary in some languages to translate as though this were the case, for example, “they took his clothes and divided them, each soldier taking one piece of clothing.”
The four soldiers probably formed a military unit; note Acts 12.4, which speaks of four groups of four soldiers each.
In Greek the clause they also took the robe is literally “also the robe,” and is part of the first sentence. Most translators render these words as a separate sentence or connect them with the following sentence, as Good News Translation does. The robe (many translations “tunic”) was a long garment worn next to the skin. That it was made of one piece of woven cloth, without any seams in it precluded the possibility that it was made of more than one material (note the law of Deut 22.11). This type of garment could be made by an ordinary weaver, so it need not have been expensive. To translate “tunic” as robe may give the impression that it was an outer garment. On the other hand, to use such an expression as “inner garment” may give the impression that it was underwear.
Quoted with permission from Newman, Barclay M. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of John. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1980. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.