This verse, which defines eternal life, is a kind of parenthetical explanation, and so New American Bible places it in parenthesis.
To know you is more literally “that they may know you.” The belief that knowledge is essential to salvation is common in both Jewish and Greek thought. In particular, the Gnostic religions emphasized that knowledge (that is, an intuitive understanding of the nature of God) was essential to salvation. The Old Testament also indicates that the knowledge of God is essential to salvation, but with a different focus. In Judaism the knowledge of God is primarily the revelation of God contained in his Law, and obedience to this Law means life. That is, true knowledge of God was tied to a particular historical revelation, and this knowledge demanded faith and obedience. The same belief is reflected in the Gospel of John. The knowledge of God referred to here is the knowledge which comes through a specific revelation in Jesus Christ, and it demands a response of love and obedience on the part of those who follow. Knowledge, then, for both Old Testament and New Testament writers is not a beatific vision or an intuitive feeling about God; rather it is based on an objective revelation and demands a positive response in obedience and love.
In 5.44 God is spoken of as “the only God,” while 1 John 5.20 refers to him as, “the true (God).” These two attributes are basic affirmations of monotheism. They distinguish the God of the Old Testament (and of the New Testament) from the many false gods of polytheism.
The only true God may be rendered in some languages “the only one who is really God.” This appositional definition of God must be closely combined in some languages with the preceding you, for example, “to know you, you are the only God that really exists” or “… you are the only God there is.”
The only other place where the title Jesus Christ occurs in the Fourth Gospel is in 1.17. It is rather surprising to find it in this particular context, where one would normally expect “the Son.” However, since one of the strong emphases here is on the historical revelation, it may be that the historical name Jesus Christ was chosen specifically for this purpose.
The thought that God sent Jesus is frequent in the Fourth Gospel (note 3.17). The same thought occurs in verses 8,18,21,23, and 25.
The principal difficulty for a translator in rendering verse 3 is to know precisely the relation between the initial statement this is eternal life and what follows. One could interpret the relation as one of purpose, for example, “this is the purpose of eternal life, namely, for people to know the only true God and Jesus Christ.” Another possibility is that of means or cause; that is, through knowing the only true God and Jesus Christ, one acquires eternal life, or, Knowing the only true God and Jesus Christ causes one to live eternally. In view of the manner in which John emphasizes the importance of knowing God as a means of eternal life, it may be possible in some languages to restructure verse 3 to read as follows: “By knowing you, the only true God, and Jesus Christ whom you sent, people are caused to live forever”; or even, “If people know you, the only true God, and if they know me, the one whom you sent, then they will live without ceasing.” Note that in the second restructuring the first person pronoun is used to refer to “Jesus Christ,” and that under these circumstances, the name “Jesus Christ” would normally be omitted. It is possible to indicate in a footnote that, in the Greek text, a third person reference is employed and the full name “Jesus Christ” occurs. It would be awkward in almost any language to have an apposition with the first person pronoun, for example, “to know me, Jesus Christ.” The relation of means may be expressed somewhat differently, for example, “This is how people live forever; they know you, the only true God, and they know Jesus Christ, whom you have sent.”
Quoted with permission from Newman, Barclay M. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of John. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1980. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.