making implicit plural form explicit (Exodus 37:1)

In many, if not most of the languages in the Philippines, proper nouns, such as personal names, are tagged with a marker that signals their grammatical role within a sentence. For Tagalog and the Visayan languages , this typically includes si to mark the proper noun as the actor or subject (nominative case), ni to mark the proper noun as an owner (genitive case), and kay to mark the proper noun as as an indirect object, i.e. the one to or toward whom an action is directed (dative case). All of these also have plural forms — sina, nina and kina respectively — and unlike in the biblical languages or in English, the plural form has to be used when only a single proper name is mentioned but implicitly that proper name includes more than just one.

In this verse, where English translates “Bezalel (made the ark),” the Tagalog translation translates “nina Bezalel” because the context of the text makes clear that Bezalel did not work on the ark by himself (see Exodus 36:2). (Source: Kermit Titrud and Steve Quakenbush)

making implicit plural form explicit (2 Samuel 11:17)

In many, if not most of the languages in the Philippines, proper nouns, such as personal names, are tagged with a marker that signals their grammatical role within a sentence. For Tagalog and the Visayan languages , this typically includes si to mark the proper noun as the actor or subject (nominative case), ni to mark the proper noun as an owner (genitive case), and kay to mark the proper noun as as an indirect object, i.e. the one to or toward whom an action is directed (dative case). All of these also have plural forms — sina, nina and kina respectively — and unlike in the biblical languages or in English, the plural form has to be used when only a single proper name is mentioned but implicitly that proper name includes more than just one.

In this verse, where English translates “(fought with) Joab,” the Tagalog translation translates “sina Joab” because the context of the text makes clear that Joab was with his troops. (Source: Kermit Titrud and Steve Quakenbush)

making implicit plural form explicit (Genesis 19:23)

In many, if not most of the languages in the Philippines, proper nouns, such as personal names, are tagged with a marker that determines their grammatical role within a sentence. For Tagalog and the Visayan languages , this includes si to mark the proper noun as the actor or subject (nominative case), ni to mark the proper noun as an owner (genitive case), and kay to mark the proper noun as the object, i.e. the one that is acted upon (dative case). All of these also have plural forms — sina, nina and kina respectively — and unlike in the biblical languages or in English, the plural form has to be used when only a single proper name is mentioned but implicitly that proper name includes more than just one.

In this verse, where English translates “Lot (arrived in Zoar),” the Tagalog translation translates “sina Lot” because the context of the text makes clear that Lot was not alone. (Source: Kermit Titrud)

making implicit plural form explicit (Mark 9:28)

In many, if not most of the languages in the Philippines, proper nouns, such as personal names, are tagged with a marker that signals their grammatical role within a sentence. For Tagalog and the Visayan languages , this typically includes si to mark the proper noun as the actor or subject (nominative case), ni to mark the proper noun as an owner (genitive case), and kay to mark the proper noun as as an indirect object, i.e. the one to or toward whom an action is directed (dative case). All of these also have plural forms — sina, nina and kina respectively — and unlike in the biblical languages or in English, the plural form has to be used when only a single proper name is mentioned but implicitly that proper name includes more than just one.

In this verse, where English translates “he (had entered),” the Tagalog translation translates “sina Jesus” because the context of the text makes clear that Jesus entered with his disciples. (Source: Kermit Titrud and Steve Quakenbush)

making implicit plural form explicit (Judges 8:8)

In many, if not most of the languages in the Philippines, proper nouns, such as personal names, are tagged with a marker that signals their grammatical role within a sentence. For Tagalog and the Visayan languages , this typically includes si to mark the proper noun as the actor or subject (nominative case), ni to mark the proper noun as an owner (genitive case), and kay to mark the proper noun as as an indirect object, i.e. the one to or toward whom an action is directed (dative case). All of these also have plural forms — sina, nina and kina respectively — and unlike in the biblical languages or in English, the plural form has to be used when only a single proper name is mentioned but implicitly that proper name includes more than just one.

In this verse, where English translates “he (went up),” the Tagalog translation translates “sina Gideon” because the context of the text makes clear that Gideon was with 300 men. (Source: Kermit Titrud and Steve Quakenbush)

making implicit plural form explicit (1 Samuel 15:7)

In many, if not most of the languages in the Philippines, proper nouns, such as personal names, are tagged with a marker that signals their grammatical role within a sentence. For Tagalog and the Visayan languages , this typically includes si to mark the proper noun as the actor or subject (nominative case), ni to mark the proper noun as an owner (genitive case), and kay to mark the proper noun as as an indirect object, i.e. the one to or toward whom an action is directed (dative case). All of these also have plural forms — sina, nina and kina respectively — and unlike in the biblical languages or in English, the plural form has to be used when only a single proper name is mentioned but implicitly that proper name includes more than just one.

In this verse, where English translates “Saul (defeated),” the Tagalog translation translates “nina Saul” because the context of the text makes clear that Saul and his army men defeated the Amalekites. (Source: Kermit Titrud and Steve Quakenbush)

making implicit plural form explicit (2 Samuel 12:26)

In many, if not most of the languages in the Philippines, proper nouns, such as personal names, are tagged with a marker that signals their grammatical role within a sentence. For Tagalog and the Visayan languages , this typically includes si to mark the proper noun as the actor or subject (nominative case), ni to mark the proper noun as an owner (genitive case), and kay to mark the proper noun as as an indirect object, i.e. the one to or toward whom an action is directed (dative case). All of these also have plural forms — sina, nina and kina respectively — and unlike in the biblical languages or in English, the plural form has to be used when only a single proper name is mentioned but implicitly that proper name includes more than just one.

In this verse, where English translates “Joab (fought against),” the Tagalog translation translates “sina Joab” because the context of the text makes clear that Joab was with his troops. (Source: Kermit Titrud and Steve Quakenbush)

making implicit plural form explicit (Genesis 20:1)

In many, if not most of the languages in the Philippines, proper nouns, such as personal names, are tagged with a marker that signals their grammatical role within a sentence. For Tagalog and the Visayan languages , this typically includes si to mark the proper noun as the actor or subject (nominative case), ni to mark the proper noun as an owner (genitive case), and kay to mark the proper noun as as an indirect object, i.e. the one to or toward whom an action is directed (dative case). All of these also have plural forms — sina, nina and kina respectively — and unlike in the biblical languages or in English, the plural form has to be used when only a single proper name is mentioned but implicitly that proper name includes more than just one.

In this verse, where English translates “Abraham (journeyed),” the Tagalog translation translates “sina Abraham” because the context of the text makes clear that Abraham was not traveling alone. (Source: Kermit Titrud and Steve Quakenbush)