Lloyd Peckham explains the Mairasi translation: “In secret stories, not knowable to women nor children, there was a magical fruit of life. If referred to vaguely, without specifying the specific ‘fruit,’ it can be an expression for eternity.”
In many, if not most of the languages in the Philippines, proper nouns, such as personal names, are tagged with a marker that signals their grammatical role within a sentence. For Tagalog and the Visayan languages , this typically includes si to mark the proper noun as the actor or subject (nominative case), ni to mark the proper noun as an owner (genitive case), and kay to mark the proper noun as as an indirect object, i.e. the one to or toward whom an action is directed (dative case). All of these also have plural forms — sina, nina and kina respectively — and unlike in the biblical languages or in English, the plural form has to be used when only a single proper name is mentioned but implicitly that proper name includes more than just one.
In this verse, where English translates “Bezalel (made the ark),” the Tagalog translation translates “nina Bezalel” because the context of the text makes clear that Bezalel did not work on the ark by himself (see Exodus 36:2). (Source: Kermit Titrud and Steve Quakenbush)
Samson’s riddle in Judges 14:14 in the form of a Hebrew poem is translated in the TagalogMagandang Balita Biblia (rev. 2005) into a form of a traditional Tagalog riddle of two lines with internal rhymes (-kain and –kain; –kas and –bas) and an (almost) identical number of syllables (6+7, 7+7):
Mula sa kumakain ay lumabas ang pagkain;
at mula sa malakas, matamis ay lumabas.
It back-translates as:
“From the eater came out the food;
and from the strong, sweet came out”
The Greek that is translated as “engaged” or “betrothed” in English is translated in Pampanga as “having-been-given-approval” and Tagalog as “having-been-brought-before-the authorities” (both implying a couple which has already applied to the local civil registrar or priest for a license to marry). Tboli uses “braceleted” (a figurative expression for the giving of property for the dowry, an act that finalizes the marriage contract) and Uab Meto has “publicly pledged to marry (lit. “reciprocally-bound”)” (a term indicating that an interchange of gifts as a pledge for marriage has taken place).
The Hebrew in Acts 17:16 that is translated as “deeply distressed” or similar in English is translated in Tagalog as “his inner being got hot” (Common Language Translation) (source: Daniel Arichea in The Bible Translator 1983, p. 209ff. )
The phrase in 1 Peter 3:4 that is translated in some English versions with “gentle and quiet in spirit” was translated into Kahua with the idiom that verbatim says “be beautiful in your belly.” (Source: Daniel Clark)
In many, if not most of the languages in the Philippines, proper nouns, such as personal names, are tagged with a marker that signals their grammatical role within a sentence. For Tagalog and the Visayan languages , this typically includes si to mark the proper noun as the actor or subject (nominative case), ni to mark the proper noun as an owner (genitive case), and kay to mark the proper noun as as an indirect object, i.e. the one to or toward whom an action is directed (dative case). All of these also have plural forms — sina, nina and kina respectively — and unlike in the biblical languages or in English, the plural form has to be used when only a single proper name is mentioned but implicitly that proper name includes more than just one.
In this verse, where English translates “Jesus (went through),” the Tagalog translation translates “sina Jesus” because the context of the text makes clear that Jesus was accompanied by his disciples. (Source: Kermit Titrud and Steve Quakenbush)
(The Catholic Christian Community Bible [first English edition 1997, other translations into Indonesian, Chinese, Cebuano, Chavacano, French, Ilonggo, Korean, Quechuan, Spanish, and Tagalog] “for the Christian Communities of the Third World” uses the following introduction.)
The books of Samuel are two parts of the same work. What has been said in the introduction to the first book holds true for the second.
In this second part, the deeds of King David are narrated. No history as sincere as this was ever written in ancient times –- a story written by a man of God who could unearth David’s real greatness. Thus, what is exceptional about King David can be noted in a series of small things that perhaps seemed insignificant or even stupid to his contemporaries (see how different David is from Joab, the “achiever” and “effective” man). But these things did not pass unnoticed by the one who narrated the story. Then, Israel understood that if they had had several outstanding kings, only David provided them with an anticipated image of the true King, Christ.
To better understand the events that follow, let us bear in mind that even before David, the tribe of Judah which settled in southern Palestine felt different from the tribes of Israel situated more to the north. Saul had more allies in the north; while David was a Bethlehemite from the tribe of Judah and found his support there.
Down below are the introductions in the Mandarin Chinese, Tagalog, Cebuano, and Spanish editions.
Dalawang bahagi ng iisang libro ang mga aklat ni Samuel, kayat para rin sa ikalawang aklat ang sinabi sa Introduksyon sa una.
Isinasalaysay sa atin sa ikalawang bahaging ito ang mga gawa ni Haring David. Walang kasaysayang nasulat na kasintapat nito noong mga unang panahon. Kasaysayang sinulat ng isang tao ng Diyos, at alam niya kung paano madidiskubre ang tunay na kadakilaan ni David. Kaya ang katangi-tangi kay Haring David ay mapapansin sa isang serye ng maliliit na bagay na para sigurong walang halaga o kaya’y kahangalan pa nga para sa kanyang mga kapanahon (tingnan ang tungkol sa pagkakaiba nina David at Yoab, ang may nagagawa at ang “mabisa”). Ngunit hindi nakalampas ang mga ito sa nagsalaysay ng kanyang buhay. Kayat naintindihan ng Israel na kung nagkaroon nga sila ng ibang magagaling na mga hari, si David lamang ang nakapaglahad sa kanila ng isang larawan bilang pagpapauna sa tunay na Hari, si Kristo.
Para madaling maintindihan ang sumusunod na mga pangyayari, alalahanin nating bago pa man dumating si David ay itinuring na ng tribu ng Juda na nanirahan sa timog ng Palestina, na sila’y iba sa mga tribu ng Israel na nasa mas hilagang bahagi. Mas maraming kakampi si Saul sa hilaga samantalang taga-Betlehem naman si David, sa tribu ng Juda.
Translation: Cebuano
Gibahig duha sa mao rang tagsulat ang Samuel. Ang napadayag na sa Pasiuna sa 1 Samuel, mohaom sab dinhi.
Gisaysay ang dinhi binuhatan ni David. Ang 2 Samuel maoy lalbing matinud-anong kasaysayan sa kakaraanan – sinulat sa tawo sa Diyos, nga nakasuhid sa tinuod nga kabantog ni David. Ang nakatalagsaon ni Hari David makita sa nagsunodsunod nga gagmayng butang nga daw walay bili o gani binuang alang sa katawhan sa iyang panahon. (Basaha ang kalainan tali ni David ug ni Joab, ang “makab-oton” ug “malamposon”.) Apan wala palabya kining mga butanga sa tagsulat ining istoryaha. Human ini, natino sa Israel nga bisag may pipila sila ka masinabotong mga hari, si David lang ang nakahatag nila sa inisyal nga hulagway ni Cristo, ang matuod nga hari.
Alang sa mas maayong pagsabot sa mosunod nga mga hitabo, angayng timan-an nga bisan sa wala pa si David, ang tribu ni Juda nga nagpuyo sa habagatan sa Palestina mibati nang daan og kalahi sa mga tribu ni Israel sa amihanang Palestina. Daghan ang katawhan nga nagpaluyo ni Saul gikan sa Amihanan diin gisuportahan si David nga taga Betlehem sa tribu ni Juda.
Translation: Spanish
Los libros de Samuel son las dos partes de una misma obra, y vale para el segundo lo que se dijo en la Introducción al primero.
En esta segunda parte se nos cuentan los hechos de David, rey. Historia tan sincera como no se escribió ninguna otra en la antigüedad. Historia escrita por un hombre de Dios que supo descubrir la verdadera grandeza de David. Lo inimitable del rey David se nota en una serie de cosas pequeñas que a sus contemporáneos les parecieron insignificantes o incluso tonterías (ver al respecto las divergencias entre David y Joab, el hombre cumplidor y «eficaz»). Pero no pasaron inadvertidas al que contó su vida y, después de él, Israel comprendió que si bien habían tenido algunos reyes excelentes, sólo David les había presentado alguna figura anticipada del Rey verdadero, Cristo.
Para facilitar la comprensión de los acontecimientos que vienen a continuación, recordemos que, ya antes de David, la tribu de Judá instalada en el sur de Palestina se oponía frecuentemente a las tribus de Israel ubicadas más al norte. Saúl había tenido más partidarios en el norte, mientras que David era el hombre de Belén, en la tribu de Judá.
