Translation commentary on Mark 8:27

Exegesis:

eis tas kōmas Kaisareias tēs Philippou ‘to the villages of Caesarea Philippi’: i.e. villages surrounding Caesarea, the most important city of the region.

en tē hodō (cf. 8.3) ‘on the way,’ ‘as they went.’

tina me legousin hoi anthrōpoi einai literally ‘whom do men say me to be,’ an indirect form with the infinite of the verb, rather than the direct form, with the present indicative, tis legousin hoi anthrōpoi hoti egō eimi ‘Who do men say that I am’: it is this indirect form, with the infinitive, which determines the accusative case of ‘John the Baptist’ and ‘Elijah’ in the next verse.

Translation:

Caesarea Philippi should be treated as a unit proper name, referring to a region, e.g. ‘the region called Caesarea Philippi,’ rather than attempting to translate as ‘the Caesarea of Philip.’

On the way may be best treated in some languages as a description of a process, e.g. ‘as they were walking along’ or ‘while they were journeying.’

Who do men say that I am is essentially a complex expression, for the predicate complement of the verb am is the object of the verb say. In some languages such a construction is impossible, but an equivalent may be found in ‘Men talk about me. What do they say?,’ ‘When men speak about me, what do they say?,’ or ‘When men talk about me, what person do they say I am?’ (this last expression comes closest to the force of the Greek). Cf. Indonesian ‘Who am I according to the saying of the people?’

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Translation commentary on Mark 9:21

Exegesis:

posos (cf. 6.38) ‘how long.’

chronos (cf. 2.19) ‘time.’

hōs ‘as,’ ‘when’: here it is a temporal conjunction meaning ‘since.’ The question asked by Jesus, literally translated, is: ‘How long a time is it since this (first) happened to him?’ (cf. Translator’s New Testament).

paidiothen (only here in the N.T.) ‘from childhood.’

Translation:

His father is ‘the father of the boy.’

The expression has … had this, though quite intelligible to us as English speaking persons, is not translatable literally into many other languages. These may require such renderings as ‘has he suffered this way,’ ‘has he been afflicted,’ or ‘has he had the demon in his heart.’

From childhood is an elliptical expression which may require different degrees of expansion in various languages, ‘he has suffered since he was a child’ or ‘even when a little child he suffered and still does.’

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Translation commentary on Mark 10:3

Exegesis:

eneteilato (13.34) ‘he commanded,’ ‘ordered.’ Freely translated, the meaning of the question is: “What commandment (entolē) did Moses give you?”

Translation:

Answered may be easily mistranslated in languages which require certain types of verbs introducing direct discourse. What follows is of course a question, even though it is given in response to another question. Accordingly, in some languages this must be adapted as ‘he asked them in turn.’

Command may be rendered as ‘tell you to do’ or ‘order you to do.’ Often some complimentary verb must be added, for Moses was not actually commanding the people but enjoining a particular order upon them.

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Translation commentary on Mark 10:36

Text:

After thelete ‘you want’ Westcott and Hort, Lagrange, Kilpatrick, and Taylor omit me ‘me,’ which is included by the majority of modern editions of the Greek text.

Exegesis:

The construction of the Greek is rather uncommon (with the omission of me ‘me’ the construction is more nearly normal), but the sense is clear enough: Revised Standard Version ‘What do you want me to do for you?’ accurately translates the Greek.

Translation:

In some instances said must be rendered as ‘asked’ because of the following question.

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Translation commentary on Mark 11:17

Text:

autois ‘to them’ is omitted by Westcott and Hort, and Taylor, but retained by all other editions of the Greek text.

Exegesis:

gegraptai (cf. 1.2) ‘it is written,’ ‘Scripture says’: the quotation, from Isa. 56.7, represents Yahweh speaking, so that ‘My house’ of the quotation is ‘God’s house’ (not as though Jesus were claiming the Temple was his own house).

proseuchēs (cf. 9.29) ‘of prayer.’

klēthēsetai ‘shall be called’: a Hebraism for ‘shall be.’

pasin tois ethnesin (cf. 10.33) ‘for all peoples,’ ‘for all nations.’

spēlaion lēstōn ‘a den of robbers,’ ‘a cave of bandits’: the phrase is a reference to another O.T. passage, Jer. 7.11.

spēlaion (only here in Mark) ‘cave,’ ‘den.’

lēstēs (14.48; 15.27) ‘robber,’ ‘highwayman,’ ‘bandit.’

Translation:

Taught may require an object, as it does in so many languages, in which case one may have ‘taught the people.’

Is it not written anticipates a positive answer, but the form may be quite varied, e.g. (1) ‘Is it written…; it surely is so written’; (2) ‘it is written, is it not, of course, …’ and (3) ‘is it not written, no…’ or ‘is it not written, yes….’ It should be noted that in some languages agreement with a sentence introduced by a negative must also be a negative, while in other languages agreement is introduced by a positive – forms which are anticipated in some languages in the very form of the question.

Is it … written involves an awkward passive which because of the anticipatory it, referring to the following direct discourse, must be altered in many languages, e.g. ‘the writings contain, do they not, My house shall….’

House of prayer may be rendered as ‘house where they talk to God’ (Copainalá Zoque, Guerrero Amuzgo). In some instances, however, ‘all the nations’ must be made the subject of the praying, for the prayers are not to be uttered on behalf of all the nations, but the temple is a place where all people may pray, e.g. ‘a house in which people of all the nations may pray.’

Den is a cave, but one with a special purpose, namely, to hide in. In order for the full meaning to be conveyed, in Shipibo-Conibo this added feature must be introduced, e.g. ‘cave … to hide in,’ otherwise one might assume that this was only a providential provision for travelers caught in a rainstorm.

Robbers are not thieves, but those who take away possessions by force.

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Translation commentary on Mark 12:17

Exegesis:

ta Kaisaros ‘the things that are Caesar’s’; ‘what belongs to the emperor.’

apodote (only here in Mark) ‘give back,’ ‘return,’ ‘pay,’ ‘render.’

exethaumazon ep’ autō ‘they marvelled greatly at him.’

ekthaumazō (only here in N.T.: cf. thaumazō 5.20) ‘to wonder greatly,’ ‘to marvel much.’

epi ‘at’: for this use the preposition cf. 1.22.

Translation:

Render to is equivalent in many languages to ‘pay to’ or ‘give back to,’ in the sense that the coin had been minted by Caesar’s government. Accordingly, one can translate this passage as ‘pay back to Caesar the things that belong to Caesar and pay back to God the things that belong to God.’

For amazed see 1.22, 27. However, at him may require adaptation in the form of a causal statement, e.g. ‘because of him’ or ‘because of what he said,’ in instances in which one cannot say ‘amazed at a person,’ but only ‘amazed at what a person does’ or ‘because of a person.’

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Translation commentary on Mark 13:5

Exegesis:

blepete (cf. 8.15) ‘beware!’ ‘caution!’ ‘watch out!’ Moulton & Milligan give examples from the papyri showing that this use of the verb blepō ‘see’ was not purely Semitic, but was Greek as well.

mē tis humas planēsē ‘lest any one deceive you,’ ‘that no one lead you astray.’

planaō (cf. 12.24) in the active, as here, ‘cause to err,’ ‘lead astray,’ ‘deceive.’

Translation:

Leads you astray is equivalent to ‘deceive,’ or as in some languages ‘cause you to believe a lie.’

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

Translation commentary on Mark 13:37

Exegesis:

grēgoreite (cf. v. 34) ‘you must watch.’

Translation:

Say is used in this verse in two different meanings: (1) addressing particular persons and (2) uttering something which is universally applicable. This may require two different verbs in another language, e.g. ‘what I am saying to you I mean for everyone,’ ‘what I am now talking to you about includes everyone’ or ‘what I am telling you I am also saying for the benefit of everyone.’

For watch see verse 33.

Quoted with permission from Bratcher, Robert G. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of Mark. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1961. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .