angry

The Hebrew, Greek and Latin that is translated as “(was or became) angry” in English is translated in Kwere as “saw anger.” In Kwere, emotions are always paired with sensory verbs (seeing or smelling or hearing). (Source: Pioneer Bible Translators, project-specific translation notes in Paratext)

In Bariai it is “to have grumbling interiors” (source: Bariai Back Translation).

See also anger and feel (terror, pain, suffering, anxiety).

very angry

The Hebrew that is translated as “became very angry” or “burned with anger” in English is translated in Irarutu as “his stomach was boiling.”

See also anger, fury / furious, and Seat of the Mind for traditional views of “ways of knowing, thinking, and feeling.”

Jonah

Drawing by Ismar David from H. L. Ginsberg 1969. For other images of Ismar David drawings, see here.

Following is an image of the Jonah Sarcophagus or the 3rd quarter of the 3rd century, housed in the Museo Pio Cristiano (photographed by Richard Stracke , shared under Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike license):

Peppard (2024, p. 119ff.) analyzes the sarcophagus (click or tap here to see the analysis):

The textual version of the short story begins with God calling Jonah as a prophet to go east and preach repentance to the Gentiles of the great city of Nineveh (ancient Assyria; modern Mosul, Iraq). On the left the men load a boat, which Jonah has disobediently boarded to sail westward, away from Israel and away from God’s prophetic commandment (Jonah 1). Moving to the right, the men throw Jonah into the sea, in an attempt to quell the raging storm, which they (rightly) interpret has been caused by Jonah’s disobedience to his god. In this artistic version, he dives straight into the mouth of the great fish—portrayed here, as elsewhere, like a sea monster—and prays to God for salvation over three days and three nights (Jonah 2). He is then spit out onto shore and commanded again by God to preach repentance to Nineveh (Jonah 3). He does so but then becomes disgruntled when the Ninevites do repent and God does not enact his planned punishment. Despite having been saved himself, Jonah doesn’t think these others are deserving of God’s mercy. So God teaches him a final lesson (Jonah 4). While Jonah pouts alone outside of the city, God provides a large new plant to grow over Jonah, to protect him from the desert sun. This scene dominates the upper-right register, with Jonah reclining nude under bountiful shade, as if in a blessed afterlife. But as quickly as the plant grew, God sends a worm to destroy it, so that Jonah is again near death—first from a tempest-tossed ocean, and now from a sun-scorched desert. The story concludes with God delivering a prophetic sermon to his reluctant prophet: if Jonah is concerned over the life and death of just one plant that emerged and vanished so quickly, how much more should God be concerned with the fate of the thousands of lives in Nineveh, at that time the largest city in the known world?

The textual version of the story ends, like many prophetic oracles of the Old Testament, with a question. The question hangs in the air for ancient listeners and modern readers, opening up to reflection and discussion about the tension between justice and mercy, about God’s commitment to a chosen people while offering salvation to others, and about the persistent self-centered ways of even God’s chosen messengers. The earliest Christian textual interpreters seized on two aspects of the story. First, as represented by the Gospel of Luke, Jesus interprets “the sign of Jonah” for his generation to be a call toward repentance (Luke 11:29-32). Just as he began his ministry with, “Repent, for the Kingdom of God is at hand,” along with John’s baptismal ritual to enact such repentance, so, too, does he connect his preaching to the universalism of Jonah’s mission. Luke thus emphasizes chapters 3 and 4 of Jonah, but Matthew’s version of Jesus’ teaching draws from the action of chapter 2. Just as Jonah was in the belly of the great fish for three days, “so will the Son of Man be in the heart of the earth three days and three nights” (Matt 12:40). Matthew includes the same teaching of repentance as Luke but also adds the unique interpretation of Jonah’s “death” and “resurrection” as a foreshadowing of Jesus’ own. This second idea comes to dominate the subsequent reception history. Then, when the apostle Paul describes immersion baptism as a ritualized participation in death and resurrection (Rom 6:3-4), the resources are all present to close the loop on the Jonah cycle. The story of Jonah therefore portrays (for Christians) the necessity of repentance, the salvific role of immersion in water as a death and resurrection, and the universal message of the God of Israel for all people, whether Jews or Gentiles. No matter how wayward a son of Israel has been, no matter how wicked a king of the Gentiles has been, God’s mercy is available and boundless.

The artist of the sarcophagus surrounds the Jonah cycle with other stories to reinforce these meanings for the viewer. Looking closely at the water, between the sea monster and the reclining Jonah, one can see an inset Noah. Depicted in the “Jack-in-the-box” style typical of this era, Noah emerges from the ark to find the dove messenger returning with an olive branch (Gen 8:11), signifying the end of the flood and the salvation of those in the ark.- Early Christian artists often juxtapose various stories of salvation near or through water. One might even read the fisherman on the lower right, whose line casts near to where Jonah comes on shore, as a symbol of Jesus’ first metaphor for preaching and discipleship: “Come, follow me,” Jesus said to Simon Peter and Andrew while they were fishing, “and I will make you fishers of men” (Matt 5:19).

The upper left features Jesus’ raising of Lazarus, a “sign” performed in the Gospel of John that bears obvious connection to the “sign of Jonah” in the Gospel of Matthew. The center of the upper register shows two scenes that are open to multiple interpretations. One possibility is from the Old Testament: here depicts Moses drawing “water from the rock” to satisfy the thirst of the Israelites wandering the wilderness during the exodus (Exod 17 / Num 20); to its right might then be the rebellion of Israelites against Moses (perhaps Num 16).

Another possibility involves a different “water from the rock” miracle, that of Peter summoning a spring of water with which to baptize his repentant jailers. This is a non-canonical story about Peter’s life, but one apparently in very wide circulation, as there are at least 225 examples of it preserved from early Christian art. The scene to its right would thus be the arrest of Peter, another non-canonical but widely depicted story. Either option signifies God’s miraculous provision for salvation through water, whether through thirst-quenching or a new covenant with God. The upper right shows a shepherd guiding sheep out of a mausoleum-like structure, and this calls to mind various biblical images of a shepherd and flock as salvation from death: the “Lord is my shepherd” (Psalm 23), the parables of the lost sheep (Luke 15 / Matt 18), and the “good shepherd” and “gate” for the sheep (John 10), among others. Whoever “enters the gate” of death through Jesus will be saved, say the Gospel of John and the Jonah sarcophagus in unison. Both Jews and Gentiles will be “one flock” with “one shepherd” (John 10:16).

With these details in mind, we can zoom back out to see the big picture one final time. If you allow your eyes to be guided by the overall flow of the shapes and lines, you will see a curved arc of descent and ascent. Begin above the sail of the boat, where there stands in the sky what looks like a person peering through a circular portal in the heavens. In fact, this is the Roman sky god Caelus, who is often pictured this way during the Roman imperial era, with a billowing garment over his head. This personification of the sky or heaven (hence the word “celestial”) was adopted frequently in early Christian art as a way to communicate heavenly realms to the viewer (see also Figure 5.6 below). Some Roman writers even identified the God of Israel (as a sky god) with the Roman god Caelus, so we might imagine him here as a symbol of divine command over the drama below U His gaze looks down along the line of the sail and follows the halyard directly into the snout of the beast. The arc flattens at the center of the sarcophagus and then bends upward through the right-facing snout, upward along the reclining Jonah’s left arm, then his right arm, and above to the plant of his blessed afterlife. From its tiny details to its overall form, this artistic masterwork conjures a treasury of biblical stories and frames the hoped-for arc of salvation from death.

Following is a contemporary Coptic Orthodox icon of Jonah.

 

Orthodox Icons are not drawings or creations of imagination. They are in fact writings of things not of this world. Icons can represent our Lord Jesus Christ, the Virgin Mary, and the Saints. They can also represent the Holy Trinity, Angels, the Heavenly hosts, and even events. Orthodox icons, unlike Western pictures, change the perspective and form of the image so that it is not naturalistic. This is done so that we can look beyond appearances of the world, and instead look to the spiritual truth of the holy person or event. (Source )

In Spanish Sign Language it is translated with a sign that depicts “swallow (by a large fish).” (Source: Steve Parkhurst)


“Jonah” in Spanish Sign Language, source: Sociedad Bíblica de España

In Swiss-German Sign Language it is translated with the sign for “stubbornness.”


“Jonah” in Swiss-German Sign Language, source: DSGS-Lexikon biblischer Begriffe , © CGG Schweiz

For more information on translations of proper names with sign language see Sign Language Bible Translations Have Something to Say to Hearing Christians .

complete verse (Jonah 4:1)

Following are a number of back-translations as well as a sample translation for translators of Jonah 4:1:

  • Kupsabiny: “When/After God (had) changed his thoughts, Jonah felt pain and became very angry/annoyed.” (Source: Kupsabiny Back Translation)
  • Newari: “This displeased Jonah greatly. And he became very angry.” (Source: Newari Back Translation)
  • Hiligaynon: “Jonas did- not -like the LORD’s forgiving Nineve, and he (was) very angry.” (Source: Hiligaynon Back Translation)
  • Kankanaey: “Jonas was extremely offended/annoyed at that which had happened and he got-angry.” (Source: Kankanaey Back Translation)
  • English: “But Jonah was very distressed that God had not destroyed Nineveh. He became very angry. The people of Nineveh were non-Jews, and Jonah did not think that God should act mercifully toward anyone who was not a Jew.” (Source: Translation for Translators)

SIL Translator’s Notes on Jonah 4:1

Section 4:1–11

The LORD showed Jonah his mercy and compassion

Jonah was upset that the LORD had not destroyed the people of Nineveh, and he argued with the LORD about it. The LORD taught Jonah that Jonah, too, should have compassion on the people of Nineveh. The LORD caused a plant to grow to shelter Jonah from the sun and then sent a worm to destroy it. When Jonah was upset about the plant being destroyed, the LORD told him that if he could be concerned about a mere plant, it was more fitting that the LORD should be concerned about people—as people are more important to him than plants. This was to show Jonah how much the LORD cared about people—even the enemies of the Israelites.

4:1

Jonah, however, was greatly displeased, and he became angry: When Jonah saw that the LORD had not destroyed Nineveh, he was not pleased. In fact, he was very angry about it.

Jonah, however, was greatly displeased: This expression is literally “it was evil to Jonah with great evil.” This is a strong expression in Hebrew. If you must translate in a way that says that Jonah was unhappy, make it clear in your statement that Jonah was extremely (very) upset. One translation is “this was absolutely disgusting to Jonah” (Stuart, p. 498). Here is another translation:

This made Jonah very indignant (New Jerusalem Bible)

© 2020 by SIL International®
Made available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA) creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.
All Scripture quotations in this publication, unless otherwise indicated, are from The Holy Bible, Berean Standard Bible.
BSB is produced in cooperation with Bible Hub, Discovery Bible, OpenBible.com, and the Berean Bible Translation Committee.

Commentaire sur la traduction de Jonas 4.1

4.1-11

Cette section constitue la conclusion de cet épisode et la fin du livre.

Parallèle à la prière en Jonas 2.3, il s’agit ici d’un échange entre Jonas et le Seigneur à la suite de la repentance de Ninive. Au lieu de se réjouir de ce qui s’est passé à Ninive et de son succès en tant que « prophète », Jonas se fâche contre Dieu. Au lieu de célébrer le salut de Yahweh (Jonas 2.10), Jonas se montre très fâché (Jonas 4.1) et il est tellement contrarié qu’il demande à mourir (Jonas 4.8, Jonas 4.9).

À l’inverse de ce qui se passe lorsque Jonas est dans le ventre du poisson, où Jonas s’adresse pendant un long moment à Dieu sans qu’il lui réponde (Jonas 2.3), ici Dieu répond assez rapidement. Là Dieu ne prononce pas de paroles, mais agit (Jonas 2.11). Ici Dieu prend tout son temps pour échanger avec Jonas (Jonas 4.5). Par des actes spécifiques et des paroles assez claires, le Seigneur essaie de le convaincre qu’il est souverain. Il insiste sur son droit d’avoir pitié de qui il veut. Il y a des liens subtils tissés entre la situation ces deux derniers chapitres. La plante que Jonas aime peut représenter les Ninivites dont Dieu a pitié, mais Jonas ne veut pas voir ce lien. Ainsi malgré la repentance et l’obéissance de ce peuple, Jonas ne supporte pas la compassion de Dieu pour ces « non-méritants ». Malheureusement, dans ce récit Jonas finit comme un prophète « manqué ». Pour Jonas, la question qui termine le livre (Jonas 4.11) reste sans réponse.

La majorité des versions y insèrent un sous-titre comme la Traduction œcuménique de la Bible : « Jonas se fâche, le Seigneur s’explique ».

Ce verset reflète les étapes de certaines expériences humaines. D’abord Jonas a mal, puis il se fâche. Le récit fait presque rire, tellement le lecteur est étonné de voir l’attitude de Jonas. Des mots et thèmes clés reviennent ici : « mal », « grand », « colère », (Jonas 3.9, Jonas 3.10, etc.). Notons que la raison de la colère du prophète n’est pas tout de suite dévoilée.

L’hébreu dit littéralement « et cela faisait mal à Jonas un grand mal ». La présence du nom propre Jonas, associée à une construction double (composé d’un verbe et d’un nom complément d’objet de la même racine) aide à signaler un nouveau paragraphe, voir un nouvel épisode. Voir Jonas 1.16 ; Néh 2.10. Il ne faut pas sous-estimer la force de cette affirmation. Parler de « déplaisir » (La Bible Pléiade, Bible du Rabbinat Français) ne rend pas la force de ces propos. En français, on dirait qu’il le « prend très mal » ou que « cela l’a beaucoup contrarié ». La Traduction œcuménique de la Bible exprime bien l’idée : Jonas le prit mal, très mal. Les traducteurs pourraient trouver des expressions idiomatiques dans leur langue pour exprimer cette idée très forte. Si possible, il vaudrait mieux retenir le mot clé mal.

et il se fâcha est littéralement « et cela a chauffé à lui », une expression idiomatique en hébreu qui exprime la colère. L’idée de colère pourrait être exprimée de manière idiomatique dans la langue cible.

Source: Péter-Contesse, René & Zogbo, Lynell. Jonas – Manuel de traduction – Commentaire linguistique et exégétique de la Bible. Alliance biblique universelle, 2021.