
Painting by Lino Pontebon, “an artist from the Negros island of the Philippines. The area in which he lives has been the scene of considerable military action and this has added to the already hard life of the peasants. His painting of the angry Christ captures a mood in the Philippines and reflects the prevailing anger of the people at being manipulated by forces beyond their control.
The painting became popular in many parts of the world, especially among the young. It counteracts the image of ‘gentle Jesus meek and mild’ with the reminder that Jesus also became angry at injustice.”
(Source for this and the image: The Bible Through Asian Eyes by Masao Takenaka and Ron O’Grady 1991)
In the English Good News Bible (2nd edition of 1992), this occurrence of the Greek hoi Ioudaioi, traditionally “the Jews” in English, is translated with a term that refers to the Jewish people or is not translated at all if it implicitly refers to the Jewish people (for example “Passover” instead of “Passover of the Jews”). For an explanation of the differentiated translation in English as well as translation choices in a number of languages, see the Jews.
In the Yatzachi Zapotec translation of the Gospel of John, any reference to the evangelist and presumed narrator is done in the first person.
The translator Inez Butler explains (in: Notes on Translation, September 1967, pp. 10ff.):
“In revising the Gospel of John in Yatzachi Zapotec we realized from the start that the third person references of Jesus to himself as Son of Man had to be converted into first person references, but only more recently have we decided that similar change is necessary in John’s references to himself as ‘the disciple whom Jesus loved.’ As I worked on those changes and questioned the informant about his understanding of other passages in the Gospel, I discovered that the reader misses the whole focus of the book as an eyewitness account unless every reference to the disciples indicates the writer’s membership in the group. In view of that we went back through the entire book looking for ways to cue in the reader to the fact that John was an eyewitness and a participant in a many of the events, as well as the historian.
“When the disciples were participants in events along with Jesus, it was necessary to make explicit the fact that they accompanied him, although in the source language that is left implicit, since otherwise our rendering would imply that they were not present.”
In this verse, the Yatzachi Zapotec says: “It was about time for the Passover of us Israelites when we went with Jesus to Jerusalem.”
In the Yatzachi Zapotec translation of the Gospel of John, any reference to the evangelist and presumed narrator is done in the first person.
The translator Inez Butler explains (in: Notes on Translation, September 1967, pp. 10ff.):
“In revising the Gospel of John in Yatzachi Zapotec we realized from the start that the third person references of Jesus to himself as Son of Man had to be converted into first person references, but only more recently have we decided that similar change is necessary in John’s references to himself as ‘the disciple whom Jesus loved.’ As I worked on those changes and questioned the informant about his understanding of other passages in the Gospel, I discovered that the reader misses the whole focus of the book as an eyewitness account unless every reference to the disciples indicates the writer’s membership in the group. In view of that we went back through the entire book looking for ways to cue in the reader to the fact that John was an eyewitness and a participant in a many of the events, as well as the historian.
“When the disciples were participants in events along with Jesus, it was necessary to make explicit the fact that they accompanied him, although in the source language that is left implicit, since otherwise our rendering would imply that they were not present.”
In this verse, the Yatzachi Zapotec says: “Simon Peter said to us . . . And we said to him, ‘We also will go along.’ Then we went along to the shore and we got into a boat. But that night we did not catch anything.”
Following are a number of back-translations of John 2:13:
- Uma: “The time had almost arrived for the big day in the Yahudi religion called Paskah Day. So, Yesus went to Yerusalem to attend that big day.” (Source: Uma Back Translation)
- Yakan: “The festival of the Isra’il tribe was close which they call For-Remembering. Therefore Isa and his disciples went up to Awrusalam, the place of the festival.” (Source: Yakan Back Translation)
- Western Bukidnon Manobo: “Soon at that time the Jews would carry out in Jerusalem the feast where they celebrated the passing by long ago of the angel of God. Therefore Jesus and company went to Jerusalem,” (Source: Western Bukidnon Manobo Back Translation)
- Kankanaey: “When the fiesta of the Jews called Passed-By was near-in-time, plural Jesus went to Jerusalem.” (Source: Kankanaey Back Translation)
- Tagbanwa: “When the time was close when the Judio celebrate their fiesta called Passed-by, Jesus went to Jerusalem.” (Source: Tagbanwa Back Translation)
- Tenango Otomi: “It was near to the time the Jews had a celebration called the Passover. Jesus went to Jerusalem.” (Source: Tenango Otomi Back Translation)
Leave a Reply
You must be logged in to post a comment.