figures of speech

The Greek that is translated as “figures of speech” or similar in English is translated in Ojitlán Chinantec as “telling words a little bit covered,” in Tenango Otomi as “comparisons,” in Navajo (Dinė): “stories that teach,” and in Mezquital Otomi as “like a story” (source: M. Larson / B. Moore in Notes on Translation February 1970, p. 1-125.).

In the German New Testament translation by Berger / Nord (publ. 1999) it is translated as vieldeutige Worte or “ambiguous word (or: “words with many meanings”)” and in the translation by Fridolin Stier (1989) as “hidden (or: shrouded) speech” (Hüllrede).

See also parable and image.

formal pronoun: Jesus addressing his disciples and common people

Like many languages (but unlike Greek or Hebrew or English), Tuvan uses a formal vs. informal 2nd person pronoun (a familiar vs. a respectful “you”). Unlike other languages that have this feature, however, the translators of the Tuvan Bible have attempted to be very consistent in using the different forms of address in every case a 2nd person pronoun has to be used in the translation of the biblical text.

As Voinov shows in Pronominal Theology in Translating the Gospels (in: The Bible Translator 2002, p. 210ff. ), the choice to use either of the pronouns many times involved theological judgment. While the formal pronoun can signal personal distance or a social/power distance between the speaker and addressee, the informal pronoun can indicate familiarity or social/power equality between speaker and addressee.

Here, Jesus is addressing his disciples, individuals and/or crowds with the formal pronoun, showing respect.

In Nepali translations, Jesus addresses his disciples and other people with the medium honorific pronoun timīlē (तिमीले) or timīlēharū (तिमीलेहरू). His disciples respond with a high honorific pronoun. (Source: Chitra Chhetri in The Bible Translator 2009, p. 73ff. )

In most Dutch translations, Jesus addresses his disciples and common people with the informal pronoun, whereas they address him with the formal form.

See also formal 2nd person plural pronoun (Japanese).

complete verse (John 16:25)

Following are a number of back-translations of John 16:25:

  • Uma: “‘All this I say to you with figures-of-speech. But the time will come when I will no longer use-figures-of-speech. I will speak to you with clearness/plainness speaking-about my Father.” (Source: Uma Back Translation)
  • Yakan: “Isa said to them, ‘This teaching of mine to you is in parables/figures of speech but the day is coming when I will no longer speak in parables/figures of speech to you and I will speak to you about my Father straight.” (Source: Yakan Back Translation)
  • Western Bukidnon Manobo: “I used parables to teach you, but the day is coming soon when I will no longer use parables because then you will understand clearly what I say to you about my Father God.” (Source: Western Bukidnon Manobo Back Translation)
  • Kankanaey: “‘I have been telling you this by-illustration. In a future day however, I won’t relate any other illustrations, but rather I will speak-directly to tell you concerning my Father.” (Source: Kankanaey Back Translation)
  • Tagbanwa: “As for these things, I have said them to you only in illustrations. But the time will come when my conversation with you will no longer be like this. I will say plainly what I will tell you concerning the Father.” (Source: Tagbanwa Back Translation)
  • Tenango Otomi: “In these words I have spoken to you I have searched how to make comparisons. But the time is coming when what I tell you will not be with comparisons. Rather I speak to you straightly about how it is you will know the Father.” (Source: Tenango Otomi Back Translation)

Father (address for God)

The Greek that is translated with the capitalized “Father” in English when referring to God is translated in Highland Totonac with the regular word for (biological) father to which a suffix is added to indicate respect. The same also is used for “Lord” when referring to Jesus. (Source: Hermann Aschmann in The Bible Translator 1950, p. 171ff. )

Like a number of other East Asian languages, Japanese uses a complex system of honorifics, i.e. a system where a number of different levels of politeness are expressed in language via words, word forms or grammatical constructs. These can range from addressing someone or referring to someone with contempt (very informal) to expressing the highest level of reference (as used in addressing or referring to God) or any number of levels in-between. In the widely-used Japanese Shinkaiyaku (新改訳) Bible of 2017, God the Father is addressed with mi-chichi (御父). This form has the “divine” honorific prefix mi– preceding the archaic honorific form chichi for “father.”

If, however, Jesus addresses his Father, he is using chichi-o (父を) which is also highly respectful but does not have the “divine” honorific. (Source: S. E. Doi, see also S. E. Doi in Journal of Translation, 18/2022, p. 37ff. )

See also Lord and my / our Father.

1st person pronoun referring to God (Japanese)

Click or tap here to see the rest of this insight.

Like a number of other East Asian languages, Japanese uses a complex system of honorifics, i.e. a system where a number of different levels of politeness are expressed in language via words, word forms or grammatical constructs. These can range from addressing someone or referring to someone with contempt (very informal) to expressing the highest level of reference (as used in addressing or referring to God) or any number of levels in-between.

One way Japanese shows different degree of politeness is through the choice of a first person singular and plural pronoun (“I” and “we” and its various forms) as shown here in the widely-used Japanese Shinkaiyaku (新改訳) Bible of 2017. The most commonly used watashi/watakushi (私) is typically used when the speaker is humble and asking for help. In these verses, where God / Jesus is referring to himself, watashi is also used but instead of the kanji writing system (私) the syllabary hiragana (わたし) is used to distinguish God from others.

(Source: S. E. Doi, see also S. E. Doi in Journal of Translation, 18/2022, p. 37ff. )

See also pronoun for “God”.

formal 2nd person plural pronoun (Japanese)

Click or tap here to see the rest of this insight.

Like a number of other East Asian languages, Japanese uses a complex system of honorifics, i.e. a system where a number of different levels of politeness are expressed in language via words, word forms or grammatical constructs. These can range from addressing someone or referring to someone with contempt (very informal) to expressing the highest level of reference (as used in addressing or referring to God) or any number of levels in-between.

One way Japanese shows different degree of politeness is through the choice of a formal plural suffix to the second person pronoun (“you” and its various forms) as shown here in the widely-used Japanese Shinkaiyaku (新改訳) Bible of 2017. In these verses, anata-gata (あなたがた) is used, combining the second person pronoun anata and the plural suffix -gata to create a formal plural pronoun (“you” [plural] in English).

(Source: S. E. Doi, see also S. E. Doi in Journal of Translation, 18/2022, p. 37ff. )

Translation commentary on John 16:25

These things is emphatic in the Greek sentence structure; and the word translated figures of speech is the same word translated parable in 10.6 (see there). The reference to Jesus’ use of figures of speech in teaching must not be limited to the analogy of the woman in childbirth. It may include as well the symbolism involved in washing the disciples’ feet (13.8-11) and the parable of the vine and the branches (15.1-17); and it may even be enlarged to include such discourses as that of the shepherd (10.1-18). In fact, the reference may be to everything that Jesus has thus far taught his disciples, including this last discourse, but not limited to it.

In many languages, figures of speech is rendered “likeness words” or “words which show likenesses.” In some, one may even use such a phrase as “picture words.” In others, such a descriptive phrase may be employed as “calling something by another name” or “using other words to speak of the same thing.” In general, however, the equivalent of “parables” is “stories” or “stories which teach.” A variety of expressions may be used in interpreting figurative language. Fortunately, figurative language is a universal phenomenon of speech, and its existence in any and all languages is readily recognized, though it may be described or spoken of in different ways.

The Greek word translated plainly (so also New English Bible, Jerusalem Bible) is used in 7.4 in the phrase to be well known (see there). This word (Greek parrēsia) may mean “openly,” “in boldness,” or “plainly.” New American Bible translates “in plain speech,” while the whole phrase is translated “let you know plainly” by Moffatt; “tell you plainly” by Goodspeed and Phillips, and “tell you … absolutely clearly” by Barclay. In some languages a qualifier, such as plainly, must refer to the manner in which people comprehend, not the way a person speaks. Hence, one may render the last part of verse 25 “I will speak to you about the Father in such a way that you will clearly understand.”

Quoted with permission from Newman, Barclay M. and Nida, Eugene A. A Handbook on the Gospel of John. (UBS Handbook Series). New York: UBS, 1980. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .

SIL Translator’s Notes on John 16:25

Section 16:25–33 Jesus had defeated the world

Jesus explained to the disciples that he would return to his Father in heaven. The disciples declared their belief that Jesus was from God, but Jesus questioned the strength of their belief. He told them that they would scatter, but he would still have the Father with him. He told them these things so that they would have peace. He said that even though they would face persecution in the world, he had defeated the world (system).

Here are some other possible section headings:

Jesus promised the disciples peace when they would be persecuted
-or-
The disciples can have courage when others will persecute them

Paragraph 16:25–28

Jesus continued to prepare his disciples for his return to his Father in heaven.

16:25a

I have spoken these things to you in figures of speech: This clause indicates that Jesus had been talking to his disciples using figurative language. He had not used plain or direct language. He had taught using examples, illustrations, and parables. For example, he used the illustration of the woman in labor (16:21), and the illustration of the vine and the branches (15:1–6). Here are other ways to translate this clause:

These things I have spoken to you in figurative language (New American Standard Bible)
-or-
I have been speaking figuratively (New International Version)
-or-
I have used examples to explain to you what I have been talking about. (Contemporary English Version)

these things: This phrase refers in a general way to what Jesus had told the disciples before. The Greek text emphasizes this phrase, probably to indicate a change in the subject.

in figures of speech: The Greek text emphasizes this phrase to contrast it with “plainly” in 16:25c. The Greek word the Berean Standard Bible has translated as figures of speech refers to nonliteral forms of speech. That is language that illustrates and compares, such as parables and illustrations. These forms of speech may be hard to understand, and Jesus’ listeners had to think about them before understanding them. See how you translated this word in 10:6. For example:

in parables
-or-
indirectly in stories (New Century Version)
-or-
by using illustrations

16:25b

An hour is coming: This clause means “in the future” and it refers to the time after Jesus’ resurrection. It includes the time after the Holy Spirit would come. Here are other ways to translate this clause:

a time is coming (NET Bible)
-or-
the time will come (New Century Version)
-or-
Soon

when I will no longer speak to you this way: This clause means that Jesus will talk in a way that is literal and easier to understand. He will not use language that is figurative and difficult to understand. The Greek word that the Berean Standard Bible translates as this way is the same word that it translates as “figures of speech” in 16:25a. The Greek text emphasizes this phrase as it did the similar phrase in 16:25a.Translate this word in a way that makes the connection clear. For example:

when I will no longer speak to you in figures of speech (English Standard Version)
-or-
when I will speak to you plainly about the Father and will no longer use examples like these (Contemporary English Version)
-or-
when I will not use stories like that to tell you things (New Century Version)
-or-
when I will no longer use this kind of language (New International Version)

16:25c

but: The Greek conjunction that the Berean Standard Bible translates as but here connects a negative statement (16:25b) to a positive statement (16:25c). This kind of sentence emphasizes the positive statement. Languages have different ways to indicate this type of emphasis. Here are some ways to show the emphasis:

• Use the conjunction but as in the Berean Standard Bible.

a time is coming when I shall no longer use figures, but tell you of the Father in plain words (Revised English Bible)

• Use a conjunction other than but. This is a common way in English to show this type of emphasis. For example:

The time is coming when I won’t use examples to speak to you. Rather, I will speak to you about the Father in plain words. (God’s Word)

• Do not use a conjunction. For example:

the time will come when I will not use stories like that to tell you things; I will speak to you in plain words about the Father (New Century Version)

• Change the order of the clauses. For example:

the time will come when I will speak to you plainly about the Father and will no longer use examples like these (Contemporary English Version)

You should translate this emphasis in the way that is most natural in your language.

will tell you plainly about the Father: This clause means “I will use language that is easy to understand to tell you about my Father.” The Greek text emphasizes the word plainly to contrast it with “in figures (of speech)” in the previous clauses. Avoid implying that earlier Jesus did not speak clearly but whispered or mumbled so the disciples could not understand what words he said. His language was difficult to understand but the sounds were perfectly clear. Now he would avoid difficult language and speak in a plain or literal way. For example:

tell you about the Father in plain words (New Jerusalem Bible)
-or-
will tell you about ⌊my⌋ Father in a way that you can understand

© 2020 by SIL International®
Made available under the terms of a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 License (CC BY-SA) creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0.
All Scripture quotations in this publication, unless otherwise indicated, are from The Holy Bible, Berean Standard Bible.
BSB is produced in cooperation with Bible Hub, Discovery Bible, OpenBible.com, and the Berean Bible Translation Committee.