Nkumbi / Mbangala / Songo: “bread that has gone no yeast” — “this is an application of a common construction in Angolan Bantu languages for speaking about the ingredients in some foods: ‘there is salt in the soup’ is rendered literally, ‘the soup has gone salt.’ (Source: Riikka Halme-Berneking in The Bible Translator 2014, p. 353ff. )
And he came to him, and lo, he was standing beside his burnt offering, and the princes of Moab with him: This sentence is very similar to verse 6 (see the comments there). The only major difference is the use of the Hebrew verb meaning came instead of the verb meaning “returned.” In spite of this difference, Good News Bible uses the verb “went back” both here and in verse 6.
And Balak said to him, “What has the LORD spoken?”: Balak’s question shows how anxious he is to know what the LORD said. He is now portrayed as being more anxious than in verse 6, where he does not ask anything. In many languages only direct speech will bring out this anxiety in an effective manner. This is why we do not recommend the indirect speech in Good News Bible here (“Balak asked what the LORD had said”). There is another reason why Balak’s question should really stand out in translation: it has no parallel in the context of the other prophecies. (Before the third prophecy in chapter 24 Balak does not ask this question either.) Balak explicitly mentions the LORD: this shows his resignation to the fact that it is the LORD, the God of the people whom he is trying to curse, who ultimately decides about who will be blessed or cursed.
Quoted with permission from de Regt, Lénart J. and Wendland, Ernst R. A Handbook on Numbers. (UBS Helps for Translators). Miami: UBS, 2016. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .
On the day that the tabernacle was set up: See 7.1, which has the same time setting, but in a longer form. The narrative is still directly connected to the date of Exo 40.17. Many Bantu languages have a demonstrative form that makes reference to such a past event quite specific. In Hebrew this verse begins with the conjunction “And.” Revised Standard Version and Good News Bible omit it for naturalness in English, which other languages may find helpful. For tabernacle, which renders the Hebrew word mishkan (literally “dwelling-place”), see 1.50.
The cloud covered the tabernacle, the tent of the testimony: Revised Standard Version follows the Hebrew text literally by saying the cloud, which indicates that this cloud is already known to the reader. Much of this clause corresponds with Exo 40.34, where it says for the first time that the cloud covered the Tent of Meeting. Good News Bible says “a cloud came and covered it,” which gives the wrong impression that this cloud appears in the narrative for the first time. Although it occurs here in Numbers for the first time, it was already mentioned in Exodus (starting in 13.21). Only a translation such as the cloud or “the cloud-mass” will keep the link with Exo 40.34. For the tabernacle, the tent of the testimony, see the comments on 1.50, even though the wording is a little different there. Good News Bible says simply “the Tent of the LORD’s presence,” but translators should be more precise here as in the Hebrew text. A consistent rendering in the translation is needed, especially in the case of such important thematic expressions.
And at evening it was over the tabernacle like the appearance of fire until morning: New Revised Standard Version reorders this clause without changing its meaning, saying “and from evening until morning it was over the tabernacle, having the appearance of fire.” New International Version makes explicit that the pronoun it refers to the cloud by saying “From evening till morning the cloud above the tabernacle looked like fire.” “Looked like fire” (also Good News Bible) does not render the Hebrew word marʾeh, which means appearance or “brightness” in this context. The Hebrew shows that the comparison with fire is not so directly and easily made. A translation such as “as it were, like fire” expresses better the comparative idea here in Hebrew. Possible models for this whole clause are “and from evening until morning the cloud rested over the Tabernacle in the likeness of fire” (similarly New Jewish Publication Society’s Tanakh), and “and the cloud, appearing like [a] fire, covered the Tabernacle from evening until morning.”
So it was continually: Good News Bible and Contemporary English Version omit this clause. But with it the Hebrew marks explicitly that what is described here happened continually, time and time again. (Good News Bible expresses this idea very briefly in verse 17 by using the word “Whenever.”) There is no reason to omit this clause, especially in such a rhythmically fashioned text. Possible models here are “This was always the case” and “This happened every time [or, continually].”
The cloud covered it by day, and the appearance of fire by night: As Revised Standard Version‘s footnote indicates, the phrase by day is not based on the Hebrew text but follows the Septuagint, the Vulgate, and the Peshitta. Revised Standard Version‘s rendering suggests that the cloud and the appearance of fire are really two different things. Although a separate cloud and appearance of fire seem to be in agreement with Exo 13.21 and 40.38, it does not agree with (Revised Standard Version‘s own rendering of) the preceding verse 15, just discussed above, where the appearance of fire is only the nightly manifestation of the cloud. Translators should follow the Hebrew text here by saying “the cloud covered it, appearing as fire by/at night” (New Jewish Publication Society’s Tanakh, Levine) or “the cloud covered it; at night, it [the cloud] had the appearance of a fire” (Nouvelle Bible Segond). These renderings are not only in line with verse 15 but with verse 21 as well.
Quoted with permission from de Regt, Lénart J. and Wendland, Ernst R. A Handbook on Numbers. (UBS Helps for Translators). Miami: UBS, 2016. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .
The Hebrew and Greek that is translated as “front of the tent” in English is translated in Chichewa as “eye of the tent” (source: de Regt / Wendland 2016).
And Balak said to him: Some languages may have an introductory word or phrase to indicate that a new episode begins here, for example, “Then” (Good News Bible) or “After that” (Chewa). The pronoun him refers to Balaam, which Good News Bible makes explicit.
Come with me to another place: The Hebrew text includes the word naʾ here, thus making Balak’s request more urgent and compelling. Models that express it are “Please come with me…” (New American Bible) or “Do come with me….” To another place may be rendered “to a different place.” By changing location Balak hopes to achieve his desired outcome.
From which you may see them: The pronoun them (literally “him/it”) occurs four times in this verse. Each time it refers to the Israelites. The first time it may be necessary to render this pronoun as “the people of Israel” for clarity.
You shall see only the nearest of them, and shall not see them all: As in 22.41 (see the comments there), the Hebrew phrase for the nearest of them (literally “the end/outskirts of him/it”) is ambiguous. With this phrase the text aims to dramatize again the great number of Israelites, this time through the mouth of King Balak, who is speaking. Good News Bible combines these two clauses with the previous one for natural English, saying “from which you can see only some of the Israelites.” PV attempts to make these words of Balak sound more logical in their context by saying “There, you will see all the Israelites. From here, you only saw part of them” (similarly Bible en français courant), and so does Die Bibel im heutigen Deutsch with “from where you can see the whole people. From here you only see the end of their camp.” These renderings imply that Balak wants Balaam to have a better view from the new place. However, these renderings are quite speculative when compared with the Hebrew text. Contemporary English Version expresses a somewhat different implication by rendering these clauses and the final one as “Maybe if you see a smaller part of the Israelites, you will be able to curse them for me.” The chiastic structure of this verse seems to support this interpretation. Balak fears that seeing all the Israelites will overwhelm Balaam and make him pronounce another blessing, which he does not want to happen.
Then curse them for me from there: Curse renders the same Hebrew verb as in verse 8 (see the comments there).
Quoted with permission from de Regt, Lénart J. and Wendland, Ernst R. A Handbook on Numbers. (UBS Helps for Translators). Miami: UBS, 2016. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .
The Hebrew in Numbers 23:23 that is translated as “enchantment” and “divination” in English are translated in Chichewa as “the instruments for practicing sorcery” and “the instruments for doing divination” respectively (source: de Regt / Wendland 2016).
Verses 32-34 function as a summary that brings the tribal census and location reports of chapters 1–2 to a close (compare 1.44-47, 54). They are no longer part of the LORD’s direct speech. Many languages will have a way of indicating this shift from direct speech to a summary at this point. Helpful models that do this for verse 32 are “These are the Israelites, counted according to their families. All those in the camps, by their divisions, number 603,550” (New International Version), “Those are the enrollments of the Israelites by ancestral houses. The total enrolled in the divisions, for all troops: 603,550” (New Jewish Publication Society’s Tanakh), and “Now [discourse shift marker] these ones [just mentioned] they are the [people of] Israel as [he/they] counted them…” (Chewa). In spite of what Revised Standard Version and Good News Translation suggest, the Hebrew of this verse shows no indication of any past tense at all. (This is different from 1.46, where a past tense form occurs in the Hebrew.) In some languages the use of a present tense in the context of what is expected to be a summary of a historical narrative (and thus set in the past) would be taken literally as switching to something that is actually happening currently. In these languages a past tense may be unavoidable.
These are the people of Israel as numbered by their fathers’ houses …: The Hebrew verb rendered numbered twice in this verse is the same one translated “number” in 1.3 (see the comments there). It is better rendered “enrolled” (New Jewish Publication Society’s Tanakh), “registered,” or “recorded.” For fathers’ houses, see 1.2.
All in the camps who were numbered by their companies were six hundred and three thousand five hundred and fifty: The camps are the tribal campsites of the Israelites (see 1.52). For by their companies (literally “by their troops”), see 1.3; for six hundred and three thousand five hundred and fifty, see the comments on 1.20-46.
Quoted with permission from de Regt, Lénart J. and Wendland, Ernst R. A Handbook on Numbers. (UBS Helps for Translators). Miami: UBS, 2016. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .
And the LORD said to Moses: See the comments on verse 11 and 1.1. This verse introduces the LORD’s instructions to Moses in verses 45-48. God says the male Levites belong to him in place of the firstborn Israelite sons. There were 273 more firstborn Israelite sons than male Levites, so God tells Moses to redeem these extra Israelites by paying for them and giving the money to the priests.
Quoted with permission from de Regt, Lénart J. and Wendland, Ernst R. A Handbook on Numbers. (UBS Helps for Translators). Miami: UBS, 2016. For this and other handbooks for translators see here .
